CHAPTER I.

Produced by Chris Curnow, Margo Romberg and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This

file was produced from images generously made available

by The Internet Archive)

BOOK COLLECTING

A GUIDE FOR AMATEURS

BY

J. H. SLATER

Editor of _Book Prices Current_; formerly Editor of _Book Lore_;

Author of _The Library Manual_; _Engravings and their Value_; _The

Law relating to Copyright and Trade Marks_, etc., etc.

LONDON

SWAN SONNENSCHEIN & CO.

PATERNOSTER SQUARE

1892

[Illustration: AN OLD PRINTING PRESS.

From the _Quintilian of Vascosan_, folio, _Paris_, 1538.]

THE ABERDEEN UNIVERSITY PRESS.

CONTENTS. Page.

CHAPTER I. 1

CHAPTER II. 12

CHAPTER III. 20

CHAPTER IV. 25

CHAPTER V. 34

CHAPTER VI. 44

CHAPTER VII. 51

CHAPTER VIII. 62

CHAPTER IX. 74

CHAPTER X. 100

CHAPTER XI. 112

PRINCIPAL SECOND-HAND BOOKSELLERS IN THE

UNITED KINGDOM WHO PUBLISH CATALOGUES. 121

CHAPTER I.

AN ANCIENT MANUSCRIPT--THE LIBRARY OF THE MEMNONIUM--THE

ALEXANDRIAN LIBRARY--GREECE AND ROME--MONASTIC MANUSCRIPTS--THE

DISCOVERY OF PRINTING--THE BOOK HUNTERS OF THE PAST--THE BOOK

HUNTERS OF TO-DAY--BIBLIOGRAPHICAL AIDS.

The Bibliophile, as he is somewhat pedantically termed, probably dates

his existence from the time when books began to be multiplied in

sufficient quantities to render the acquisition of duplicate copies by

the public a matter of possibility, but his opportunities of amassing a

large number of volumes can hardly be said to have arisen until many

years after the invention of printing.

The most ancient manuscript extant has been identified with the reign of

Amenophis, who ruled in Egypt no less than 1600 years before the

Christian era, and this manuscript, old as it is, shows such superior

execution that there can be little, if any, doubt that caligraphy in its

oldest--that is, its hieroglyphic--form must be referred for its origin

to a period still more remote. Diodorus Siculus relates that Rameses II.

founded a library in one of the chambers of the Memnonium at Thebes, and

deposited therein the 42 sacred books of Thoth, which had they been in

existence now would be nearly 5000 years old. In those days, however,

education was looked upon as the peculiar property of the priesthood;

the library had sealed doors; even the very books themselves must have

been wholly unintelligible to all but the favoured few whose duty it was

to preserve them with religious care. All the early Egyptian manuscripts

extant have served in their day an ecclesiastical rather than a secular

object, and all of them abound with mythological stories more or less

recondite. To use the art of writing for any less sacred purpose would

have been held disrespectful to the educated class and resented

accordingly. Ptolemy Sotor, who reigned over Egypt about the year 280

B.C., appears to have been the first to break through the artificial

barrier which the priestcraft of age upon age had succeeded in building

up; and his magnificent twin library at Alexandria, known as the

Bruchium and Serapeum, which was partly stocked with the confiscated

books of travellers who touched at the port, became in course of time

the most famous in the world, and would most probably have been so at

this day had it not been destroyed by Theodosius and his army, as a

sacrifice at the shrine of ignorance and superstition. With the

destruction of the library at Alexandria, containing, as it did, books

which can never be replaced, the literary importance of the Egyptians

came to an end; thenceforward all that remained was the consciousness of

having instructed others better able to preserve their independence than

they were themselves. Yet after all it is somewhat extraordinary that

Egypt should have been not merely the first to encourage a love of

literature, but also the last; for simultaneously with the destruction

of the Bruchium and Serapeum were ushered in the first centuries of the

dark ages, when the ability to read and write was looked upon as

unworthy the status of a free man, unless indeed he were a priest, and

when fire and sword were brought into requisition for the purpose of

annihilating everything that suggested mental culture.

In the eras which intervened between the reign of Rameses the

Constructor and that of Theodosius the Destroyer, Pisistratus had

founded his public library at Athens, and collected the poems of Homer

which had previously been scattered in detached portions throughout

Greece; and Plato, the prince of ancient book hunters, had given no less

than 100 attic minae--nearly L300 of our money--for three small treatises

of Philolaus the Pythagorean. Aristotle too, unless he has been sadly

maligned, thought 300 minae a fair exchange for a little pile of books

which had formerly belonged to Speusippus, thereby setting an example to

that French king of after ages who pawned his gold and silver plate to

obtain means wherewith to purchase a coveted copy of Lacertius, as

Gabriel Naude calls the great Epicurean biographer. In Rome also

Lucullus had furnished his house with books and thrown open his doors

to all who wished to consult them. Atticus the famous publisher had

turned out a thousand copies of the second book of Martial's _Epigrams_,

with its 540 lines of verse, bound and endorsed in the space of a single

hour, and the booksellers carried on a flourishing trade in their shops

in the Argeletum and the Vicus Sandalarius, exhibiting catalogues on the

side posts of their doors exactly as the second-hand dealers in London

and elsewhere do now. Of all this vast enterprise of Greece and Rome not

a trace remains: only the sepulchral writings of mother Egypt and the

clay tablets of Assyria.

History tells us how the luxurious rich of Athens and Rome regarded

their books as so many pieces of furniture, and engaged learned slaves

to read aloud at their banquets; and if the example of Plato were

followed to any extent, doubtless large sums of money were spent on rare

originals which had passed through the hands of a succession of

dilettanti, and acquired thereby a reputation for genuineness, which

they could not have gained in any other manner. Seneca indeed ridicules

the vulgar emulation which prompted some of his contemporaries to

collect volumes of which, he says, they knew nothing except the

outsides, many of them possibly barely that. It has been ever so: in

England to-day there are many who would have felt the lash of Nero's

tutor across their shoulders.

When the public no longer took pleasure in mental culture, and the whole

world was overrun with hordes of barbarians intent upon destruction,

learning of every kind was banished to the monasteries, and the monks

became the only book lovers, making it their business to transcribe,

generation after generation, the volumes which had been saved from the

general conflagration. It is entirely through their efforts that the old

classics have been preserved to our day; we have to thank them, and them

alone, for the preservation of the Bible itself. Even in the

monasteries, however, the same spirit of emulation which had prompted

Greek to compete with Greek, and Roman with Roman, became apparent in

course of time. Ordinary transcripts, though never numerous, began to be

looked upon as hardly pretentious enough, and the larger houses

established _scriptoria_, where trained monks sat the livelong day,

painfully tracing letter after letter on the purest vellum, while

Bibliolatrists added illuminated borders and miniatures in a style that

would task the skill of our best artists of to-day. This competition

led to the exchange of manuscripts, or to their loan for a brief period,

so that by degrees monastic libraries assumed large proportions,

numbering many hundreds of neatly bound volumes, which, on being opened,

looked as though printed, so accurately and carefully had the copying

been done. This explains how Fust, the inventor, or one of the

inventors, of printing, was enabled to deceive the people of Paris, for

he flooded the market there with printed copies of the Bible which he

sold for 50 crowns each, instead of for 400 or 500 crowns, which would

have been a fair price had they been in manuscript. The book buyers of

Paris _thought they were in manuscript_, until the recurrence of one or

two defective types cast from the same matrix caused an inquiry. Fust

was arrested, not for the fraud but for witchcraft, and to save his life

he explained his process. Thus did the old order give place to the new.

In a very few years after the discovery of Fust's secret the whole of

the western portion of Europe was dotted with printing presses. Before

1499 there were 236 in operation; and six years after Gutenberg had

completed his Bible of 42 lines there were no less than 50 German cities

and towns in which presses had been established. Considering that this

only brings us down to about the year 1462, it is evident with what

rapidity the art of printing was seized upon through the length and

breadth of the country of its probable origin.

In 1475 our own famous printer Caxton was being instructed in the office

of Colard Mansion at Bruges, and in 1477, if not earlier,[1] he settled

as a printer at Westminster, thus laying the foundation of our English

industry and establishing a native press which has continued to grow

year by year until it has assumed its present enormous proportions.

Authorities, however, point out that improvement in the art of printing

did not come by age or experience, for, curiously enough, the

science--for such it really is--was almost perfect from its origin, and,

so far as this country is concerned, has distinctly deteriorated since

the death of Caxton and his pupils Wynkyn de Worde, Faques, and Pynson.

The typefounders of that early period were as expert as many at the

present day and immeasurably superior to most. The greatest care appears

to have been exercised in the casting, and competition did not engender

the slovenly haste which is only too apparent in many of our modern

publications. It is probable that, simultaneously with the introduction

of printing into England, a certain limited few, most likely

ecclesiastics and powerful nobles, would commence to collect works from

the press of Caxton, and subsequently from the foreign presses. In 1545

the Earl of Warwick's library consisted of 40 printed books, in 1691

that of the Rev. Richard Baxter of 1448. It is not until a comparatively

modern period that any single man has been able to mass together

thousands of volumes during the course of a single lifetime, for it is

only recently that printing has been used on every trivial occasion, and

in the manufacture of books which would originally have been deemed

unworthy of the application of the art.

At the present day books constitute one of the necessities of life and

private libraries one of its luxuries. The collector has such ample

scope for the exercise of his favourite pursuit that it has long since

become a question not so much of accumulating a large number of

miscellaneous volumes, as of exercising a rigid discrimination and

confining one's attention to works of a certain class, to the almost

entire exclusion of all others. Thus, some book hunters collect first,

or, at any rate, early, editions of popular modern authors, such, for

example, as Dickens, Thackeray, and Lever; others collect old editions

of the Scriptures, a few, the expensive early printed volumes which are

every year becoming absorbed into the public libraries, and consequently

growing more scarce. A small number attempt to form an extensive

all-round library, but they rarely, if ever, succeed, partly because

life is too short for the purpose, and money too limited in quantity.

Occasionally a large collection comes to the auctioneer's hammer, but in

nearly every instance it will be found that it represents the labours of

several generations of owners, each of whom has contributed the

principal publications of his day or taken advantage of any proffered

bargain which he may have happened to come across during the course of

his lifetime.

The book lover however is not content with mere acquisition, he feels it

his duty to know something of the inner life, so to speak, of each

volume on his shelf--something, that is to say, beyond the outside

lettering. He wishes to know the chief incidents in the history of the

person who wrote it, under what circumstances it was written and why,

how many editions have been published, whether the particular copy is

perfect, how much it is worth from a pecuniary point of view, and

occasionally the nature of the contents. The word "occasionally" may be

considered by some as used in an objectionable sense, implying in fact

that book lovers are not always in the habit of reading what they

possess. Let the collector of Bibles say whether he is in the habit of

reading the various editions which he has been at such pains to collect,

and it will then be time enough to inquire into the practices of other

collectors who, like himself, though in different departments, may not

consider themselves justified in spending the amount of time necessary

for careful and satisfactory study. In truth, if all books were read, it

is only reasonable to suppose that all libraries would be small; and, as

we know the contrary to be the fact, we must acknowledge the truth of

the main proposition to a very large extent. The happiness of the book

lover, as we know him when in the plenitude of his glory, consists by no

means in reading, but in the contemplation of his possessions from afar;

an inane treatise on theology becomes the object of his daily prayers

when bound in morocco and stamped with the Golden Fleece of Longepierre.

In this short dissertation we have but little to do with the contents of

any book. This knowledge can be acquired as circumstances and

opportunity offer; we deal rather with extraneous details which are

necessary to be known by everyone who aspires to form a collection of

books for himself and would know something of the history of each.

Every bibliographer, and also every collector of any eminence, has

within reach certain books of reference which experience has shown to be

absolutely necessary. Chief among these is Lowndes' _Bibliographer's

Manual_ of which two editions have been issued. The first was published

in 1834; the second in seven parts from 1857-61, with an appendix volume

in 1864, having been re-issued from the stereotype plates without a date

in 1871. The latter may frequently be picked up at auction sales for

about 25s., but there is this peculiarity about the work, that it really

would not seem to be very material which edition is purchased. The book

is imperfect and full of errors: it cannot be relied on, and the second

edition, which was edited by the late Mr. H. G. Bohn, the eminent

bookseller, is as untrustworthy as the first edition. The original plan,

which has never been departed from, was to give the names of English

authors in alphabetical order, placing under each the title of the works

he wrote, with the date of each edition, number of volumes, in many

cases the collation, and finally the sums realised at auction. Nothing

fluctuates so greatly as auction values, and it is not surprising,

therefore, to find that not a single entry in Lowndes under this head

can be accepted at the present day. Some of the variations between past

and present prices are ludicrous in the extreme, and there is no doubt

that anyone who attempted to obtain his knowledge of the value of books

from Lowndes' _Manual_ would find himself in possession of a mass of

old-time information which would be rather a hindrance to him than

otherwise. The _Manual_ is useful because it gives a full and tolerably

complete list of English authors, and collates many of their works with

considerable care; it is, moreover, the authority quoted by cataloguers,

and, being a copyright publication, practically bars the way to any

rival work on the same subject. For these and other reasons it is

indispensable.

To ascertain the value of a book is an exceedingly difficult operation;

in fact, there are many who assert that it is impossible to do so.

Booksellers' prices, as disclosed in their catalogues, are not much to

go by, for it is notorious that a West End dealer will often charge more

than one who is established further East. Again, some London booksellers

charge more or less than provincial ones, according to circumstance and

the character of their customers. Until recently there were only two

ways of becoming an adept in this department, the first and best by

practical experience, a method which is not, of course, available to any

but dealers and their assistants; and the second, by indexing retail

catalogues and striking an average. A third method, that of taking the

average of auction sales, was not available until recently, for it is

too troublesome, for any save those whose business it is, to attend

sales by auction all day long for nine months out of the twelve, in

order to obtain the necessary materials.

In 1886, I conceived the idea of fully reporting all sales of any

importance taking place either in London or the provinces, and in

December of that year the necessary arrangements were completed, with

the modification that for the present, at any rate, no notice was to be

taken of any book which did not realise at least 20s. by auction. This

publication, the success of which amply demonstrates the necessity for

its existence, is named _Book Prices Current_, and already five volumes

are published, and a sixth will be ready at the beginning of next year

(1893). As a book of this kind would be useless without a full index,

the greatest possible care has been taken to make it as complete and as

accurate as possible. From _Book Prices Current_ a very good idea of the

average value of almost any book may be obtained. Careful note of the

way in which the particular volume is bound must, of course, be taken,

for this, as might be expected, makes a great difference in the price.

The French are supposed to be much better bibliographers than our own

countrymen, and if the character of the authoritative works published in

either country is a criterion of national merit there cannot be much, if

any, doubt that this is so. Lowndes' _Bibliographer's Manual_ takes no

notice of books published abroad, and, as they are in the majority, it

becomes necessary to seek an additional guide. This is afforded by

Brunet's _Manuel du Libraire et de l'Amateur de Livres_, published at

Paris in 6 vols. from 1860-65, and usually found, with the Appendix on

_Geographie_, 1870, and 2 vol. _Supplement_, 1878-80. In its place it is

a much better book than Lowndes', but it is very expensive, frequently

bringing as much as L10 and L12 by auction. Here again, however, the

values are quite unreliable, and, as in the case of Lowndes', there is

no index of subjects whatever. From the three works mentioned very much

may undoubtedly be learned about almost any book provided the author's

name be known; but as it frequently happened that many authors chose,

for reasons satisfactory to themselves, to conceal their names

altogether, or in the much commoner instance of the name being forgotten

by or unknown to the searcher, an index of subjects becomes a necessity.

This is partly supplied by Watt's _Bibliotheca Britannica_ in 4 vols.

4to, 1824, two volumes being devoted to authors and two to subjects,

there being also cross references from one to the other. This

inestimable work occupied the author the greater portion of his life,

and is a monument of industry and research. The auction value amounts to

L3 within a fraction, this being one of the few books which has a fixed

market price all over the kingdom. Good copies in handsome bindings

frequently occur, and are worth L4 to L5. The _English Catalogue_,

initiated by the late Mr. Sampson Low, is a periodical which makes its

appearance annually, and, unlike all the other works I have mentioned,

is confined entirely to current literature. The title of every work

published during the year is given, with the month in which it was

issued, the price, and publisher's name, the whole being arranged in one

line under the name of the author. At intervals, which do not appear to

be strictly defined, collective editions of these annual catalogues,

arranged in one alphabet, are published, as well as of the indexes of

the _titles_ which are appended to each annual issue.[2]

It is obvious that a work of this kind must be of the greatest utility,

and as the _English Catalogue_ is merely a continuation of the _London

Catalogue_ and the _British Catalogue_, the former of which commenced so

far back as the year 1811, it will be seen that a comprehensive view can

be taken of the whole range of English literature from that date to the

present. The _Catalogue_ has not, however, always been so carefully

prepared as it is now, and consequently in the earlier days many

publications were omitted. When this is the case Lowndes and Watt will

be found of material assistance, the latter especially. A complete set

of these catalogues, unfortunately, is very difficult to obtain, and as

the earlier ones are not indispensable, it may be perhaps advisable to

forego them and to commence in 1814. The volumes to be acquired

therefore would be _London Catalogue_, 1816-51; _English Catalogue_,

1835-63, 1863-71, 1872-80, 1881-89; with the accompanying subject

indexes to the _London Catalogue_, 1814-46; and to the _English

Catalogue_, 1835-55, 1856-75, 1874 (_sic_)-80. It will be noticed that

the dates sometimes overlap each over, but this is an advantage rather

than a drawback. Among the other books frequently consulted by both

dealers and amateurs are Mr. Swan Sonnenschein's _The Best Books_; the

_Reference Catalogue of Current Literature_, and Halkett & Laing's

_Dictionary of Anonymous and Pseudonymous Literature of Great Britain_,

in 4 vols. These are mentioned together because they are essentially

subject indexes and the best of their kind.

Sonnenschein's _The Best Books_, already in a second and vastly improved

edition, is a comparatively recent publication, in which, under subjects

arranged systematically, are placed the best current books, whether

ancient or modern, on each subject, with the prices, sizes, publisher's

name and dates of the first and last editions of each. There are about

50,000 works included, and they together give a very good idea of all

the material in the various departments of research which the specialist

is likely to have occasion to read or refer to. Old books are included

where they are of actual present-day value to the student. The selection

is not, of course, entirely made by the author, as it is impossible for

him to have read a hundredth part of the books recommended; most

probably the list has been compiled from the works of specialists, the

various encyclopaedias, and so forth; but however this may be, it is a

very useful one in the hands of a person capable of discrimination

(towards which the numerous critical and bibliographical notes and the

system of asterisks are a great help), especially if he live near one or

other of the large libraries now springing up in different parts of the

country.

The _Reference Catalogue of Current Literature_, a cumbrous and unwieldy

tome, the last issue of which was out of print within a couple of months

of its publication, consists of a large number of publishers' catalogues

arranged in alphabetical order. Each work mentioned is indexed, and this

has been accomplished so fully and accurately that almost any book to be

bought new in the market makes its appearance here.

Halkett & Laing's _Dictionary_ is, as the title implies, a record of the

anonymous and pseudonymous literature of Great Britain. If an author

wrote under an assumed name or anonymously, his real name will be found

here, together with a short account of his publications. This work can

hardly be said to be indispensable, but it is, notwithstanding,

exceedingly useful, and well worth the three and a half guineas which

will have to be expended upon it.

Among other works which at one time were thought more of than they are

now is Quaritch's _Catalogue of Books_, in one thick volume, 1880, and a

supplement which is back-dated 1875-7. The chief value of this lay not

only in the prices, which were, as in every other bookseller's

catalogue, appended to the items, but in the extraordinary number of the

entries, which cover the whole range of British and foreign literature.

Even now the work is useful, but there is no doubt that it is gradually

decreasing in importance, owing to the high-class works of reference

which have lately made their appearance. As to values, _Book Prices

Current_ gives them much more satisfactorily than any bookseller can

pretend or afford to do, while most of the bibliographical notes and

references are to be found in one or other of the works I have

mentioned.

The collector who, as yet, is not sufficiently advanced to fully realise

the difficulties he will have to surmount before he can bring together a

judicious assortment of books, will at any rate begin to see that the

knowledge requisite to enable him to do so is of no mean order. The

preliminaries will take him a long time to master, and he will find that

the expense is a factor by no means to be despised. Even the books

mentioned are not all that he may have to procure, for if, after

consideration, he should decide to devote his attention exclusively to

one branch of Bibliography, there are other books of reference to be

purchased, and a special course of study must be entered upon and

carefully followed, if he would hope to be successful. Thus, should he

decide to make Dickens or Thackeray his one author, as so many people

are doing now, he will need a guide to direct his course. Memory is so

treacherous that he can take nothing on trust, and time so short that he

cannot afford to journey two sides of the triangle when he might have

taken the third. These special works for special departments are set out

and enlarged upon in the following chapter, but before referring to them

it may not be superfluous to remind the reader that a book of reference

only possesses a relative value. It is quite possible to have a whole

library within reach and yet to be ignorant of the proper method of

using it. Some of our best writers had no library worthy the name, but

the few books they had they knew--knew, that is to say, how to extract

the information they required, which book to consult, how it was

arranged, and what might be expected of it. Though a book collector is

not necessarily a book reader, he will have to be absolute master of his

works of reference, or he will find every volume on his shelf a useless

incumbrance. Where to possess all the absolute facts is of importance,

the newest works are, generally speaking, most likely to be the best;

but this is very far from being applicable to a library in all its

departments. Yet even in the case of works of a general nature a careful

and economic selection may be made, so as to cover, in a small compass,

much valuable ground.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] _The Dictes and Sayinges of the Philosophers_, Caxton's first book

which bears a date, was finished in November, 1477; and it is upon the

strength of this that the Caxton Quarcentenary Festival was held in

1877. There can be little doubt, however, that he printed many books of

which no copies remain, some of which were probably earlier than _The

Dictes_.

[2] In the annual volume for 1891 a new scheme has been started, the

authors and titles entries appearing in _one_ alphabet in "dictionary

form".

Book Collecting: A Guide for Amateurs · 第 1 / 11 章