SPIRITS.

"Did you ever see a ghost?" said a gentleman to his friend.

"No, but I once came very nigh seeing one," was the facetious reply.

The writer of this article has had still better luck,--having _twice_

come very nigh seeing a ghost. In other words, two friends, in whose

veracity and healthy clearness of vision I have perfect confidence, have

assured me that they have distinctly seen a disembodied spirit.

If I had permission to do so, I would record the street in Boston, and

the number of the house, where the first of these two apparitions was

seen; but that would be unpleasant to parties concerned. Years ago, the

lady who witnessed it told me the particulars, and I have recently heard

her repeat them. A cousin, with whom her relations were as intimate as

with a brother, was in the last stages of consumption. One morning, when

she carried him her customary offering of fruit or flowers, she found

him unusually bright, his cheeks flushed, his eyes brilliant, and his

state of mind exceedingly cheerful. He talked of his recovery and future

plans in life with hopefulness almost amounting to certainty. This made

her somewhat sad, for she regarded it as a delusion of his flattering

disease, a flaring up of the life-candle before it sank in the socket.

She thus reported the case, when she returned home. In the afternoon she

was sewing as usual, surrounded by her mother and sisters, and listening

to one who was reading aloud. While thus occupied, she chanced to raise

her eyes from her work and glance to the opposite corner of the room.

Her mother, seeing her give a sudden start, exclaimed, "What is the

matter?" She pointed to the corner of the room and replied, "There is

Cousin ------!" They all told her she had been dreaming, and was only

half wakened. She assured them she had not even been drowsy; and she

repeated with great earnestness, "There is Cousin ------, just as I saw

him this morning. Don't you see him?" She could not measure the time

that the vision remained; but it was long enough for several questions

and answers to pass rapidly between herself and other members of the

family. In reply to their persistent incredulity, she said, "It is very

strange that you don't see him; for I see him as plainly as I do any

of you." She was so obviously awake and in her right mind, that the

incident naturally made an impression on those who listened to her. Her

mother looked at her watch, and despatched a messenger to inquire how

Cousin ------ did. Word was soon brought that he died at the same moment

he had appeared in the house of his relatives. The lady who had

this singular experience is too sensible and well-informed to be

superstitious. She was not afflicted with any disorder of the nerves,

and was in good health at the time.

To my other story I can give "a local habitation and a name" well known.

When Harriet Hosmer, the sculptor, visited her native country a few

years ago, I had an interview with her, during which our conversation

happened to turn upon dreams and visions.

"I have had some experience in that way," said she. "Let me tell you a

singular circumstance that happened to me in Rome. An Italian girl named

Rosa was in my employ for a long time, but was finally obliged to return

to her mother, on account of confirmed ill-health. We were mutually

sorry to part, for we liked each other. When I took my customary

exercise on horseback, I frequently called to see her. On one of these

occasions, I found her brighter than I had seen her for some time past.

I had long relinquished hopes of her recovery, but there was nothing in

her appearance that gave me the impression of immediate danger. I left

her with the expectation of calling to see her again many times. During

the remainder of the day I was busy in my studio, and I do not recollect

that Rosa was in my thoughts after I parted from her. I retired to rest

in good health and in a quiet frame of mind. But I woke from a sound

sleep with an oppressive feeling that some one was in the room. I

wondered at the sensation, for it was entirely new to me; but in vain

I tried to dispel it. I peered beyond the curtain of my bed, but could

distinguish no objects in the darkness. Trying to gather up my thoughts,

I soon reflected that the door was locked, and that I had put the key

under my bolster. I felt for it, and found it where I had placed it. I

said to myself that I had probably had some ugly dream, and had waked

with a vague impression of it still on my mind. Reasoning thus, I

arranged myself comfortably for another nap. I am habitually a good

sleeper, and a stranger to fear; but, do what I would, the idea still

haunted me that some one was in the room. Finding it impossible to

sleep, I longed for daylight to dawn, that I might rise and pursue

my customary avocations. It was not long before I was able dimly to

distinguish the furniture in my room, and soon after I heard, in the

apartments below, familiar noises of servants opening windows and doors.

An old clock, with ringing vibrations, proclaimed the hour. I counted

one, two, three, four, five, and resolved to rise immediately. My bed

was partially screened by a long curtain looped up at one side. As I

raised my head from the pillow, Rosa looked inside the curtain, and

smiled at me. The idea of anything supernatural did not occur to me. I

was simply surprised, and exclaimed, 'Why, Rosa! How came you here,

when you are so ill?' In the old familiar tones, to which I was so much

accustomed, a voice replied, 'I am well, now.' With no other thought

than that of greeting her joyfully, I sprang out of bed. There was

no Rosa there! I moved the curtain, thinking she might perhaps have

playfully hidden herself behind its folds. The same feeling induced me

to look into the closet. The sight of her had come so suddenly, that, in

the first moment of surprise and bewilderment, I did not reflect that

the door was locked. When I became convinced there was no one in the

room but myself, I recollected that fact, and thought I must have seen a

vision.

"At the breakfast-table, I said to the old lady with whom I boarded,

'Rosa is dead.' 'What do you mean by that?' she inquired. 'You told me

she seemed better than common when you called to see her yesterday.'

I related the occurrences of the morning, and told her I had a strong

impression Rosa was dead. She laughed, and said I had dreamed it all. I

assured her I was thoroughly awake, and in proof thereof told her I had

heard all the customary household noises, and had counted the clock when

it struck five. She replied, 'All that is very possible, my dear. The

clock struck into your dream. Real sounds often mix with the illusions

of sleep. I am surprised that a dream should make such an impression on

a young lady so free from superstition as you are.' She continued to

jest on the subject, and slightly annoyed me by her persistence in

believing it a dream, when I was perfectly sure of having been wide

awake. To settle the question, I summoned a messenger and sent him to

inquire how Rosa did. He returned with the answer that she died that

morning at five o'clock."

I wrote the story as Miss Hosmer told it to me, and after I had shown

it to her, I asked if she had any objection, to its being published,

without suppression of names. She replied, "You have reported the story

of Rosa correctly. Make what use you please of it. You cannot think it

more interesting, or unaccountable, than I do myself."

A remarkable instance of communication between spirits at the moment of

death is recorded in the Life of the Rev. Joseph S. Buckminster, written

by his sister. When he was dying in Boston, their father was dying in

Vermont, ignorant of his son's illness. Early in the morning, he said to

his wife, "My son Joseph is dead." She told him he had been dreaming.

He calmly replied, "I have not slept, nor dreamed. He is dead." When

letters arrived from Boston, they announced that the spirit of the son

had departed from his body the same night that the father received an

impression of it.

Such incidents suggest curious psychological inquiries, which I think

have attracted less attention than they deserve. It is common to explain

all such phenomena as "optical illusions" produced by "disordered

nerves." But _is_ that any explanation? _How_ do certain states of the

nerves produce visions as distinct as material forms? In the two cases I

have mentioned, there was no disorder of the nerves, no derangement of

health, no disquietude of mind. Similar accounts come to us from all

nations, and from the remotest periods of time; and I doubt whether

there ever was a universal superstition that had not some great,

unchangeable truth for its basis. Some secret laws of our being are

wrapt up in these occasional mysteries, and in the course of the world's

progress we may perhaps become familiar with the explanation, and

find genuine philosophy under the mask of superstition. When any

well-authenticated incidents of this kind are related, it is a very

common inquiry, "What are such visions sent _for_?" The question implies

a supposition of miraculous power, exerted for a temporary and special

purpose. But would it not be more rational to believe that all

appearances, whether spiritual or material, are caused by the operation

of universal laws, manifested under varying circumstances? In the

infancy of the world, it was the general tendency of the human mind to

consider all occasional phenomena as direct interventions of the gods,

for some special purpose at the time. Thus, the rainbow was supposed

to be a celestial road, made to accommodate the swift messenger of the

gods, when she was sent on an errand, and withdrawn as soon as she had

done with it. We now know that the laws of the refraction and reflection

of light produce the radiant iris, and that it will always appear

whenever drops of water in the air present themselves to the sun's rays

in a suitable position. Knowing this, we have ceased to ask what the

rainbow appears _for_.

That a spiritual form is contained within the material body is a very

ancient and almost universal belief. Hindoo books of the remotest

antiquity describe man as a triune being, consisting of the soul, the

spiritual body, and the material body. This form within the outer body

was variously named by Grecian poets and philosophers. They called

it "the soul's image," "the invisible body," "the aërial body," "the

shade." Sometimes they called it "the sensuous soul," and described it

as "_all_ eye and _all_ ear,"--expressions which cannot fail to suggest

the phenomena of clairvoyance. The "shade" of Hercules is described by

poets as dwelling in the Elysian Fields, while his body was converted to

ashes on the earth, and his soul was dwelling on Olympus with the gods.

Swedenborg speaks of himself as having been a visible form to angels in

the spiritual world; and members of his household, observing him at such

times, describe the eyes of his body on earth as having the expression

of one walking in his sleep. He tells us, that, when his thoughts turned

toward earthly things, the angels would say to him, "Now we are losing

sight of you": and he himself felt that he was returning to his material

body. For several years of his life, he was in the habit of seeing and

conversing familiarly with visitors unseen by those around him. The

deceased brother of the Queen of Sweden repeated to him a secret

conversation, known only to himself and his sister. The Queen had asked

for this, as a test of Swedenborg's veracity; and she became pale with

astonishment when every minute particular of her interview with her

brother was reported to her. Swedenborg was a sedate man, apparently

devoid of any wish to excite a sensation, engrossed in scientific

pursuits, and remarkable for the orderly habits of his mind. The

intelligent and enlightened German, Nicolai, in the later years of his

life, was accustomed to find himself in the midst of persons whom he

knew perfectly well, but who were invisible to others. He reasoned very

calmly about it, but arrived at no solution more satisfactory than the

old one of "optical illusion," which is certainly a very inadequate

explanation. Instances are recorded, and some of them apparently well

authenticated, of persons still living in this world, and unconscious of

disease, who have seen _themselves_ in a distinct visible form, without

the aid of a mirror. It would seem as if such experiences had not been

confined to any particular part of the world; for they have given birth

to a general superstition that such apparitions are a forerunner of

death,--or, in other words, of the complete separation of the spiritual

body from the natural body. A friend related to me the particulars of a

fainting-fit, during which her body remained senseless an unusually long

time. When she was restored to consciousness, she told her attendant

friends that she had been standing near the sofa all the time, watching

her own lifeless body, and seeing what they did to resuscitate it. In

proof thereof she correctly repeated to them all they had said and

done while her body remained insensible. Those present at the time

corroborated her statement, so far as her accurate knowledge of all

their words, looks, and proceedings was concerned.

The most numerous class of phenomena concerning the "spiritual body"

relate to its visible appearance to others at the moment of dissolution.

There is so much testimony on this subject, from widely separated

witnesses, that an unprejudiced mind, equally removed from superstition

and skepticism, inclines to believe that they must be manifestations of

some hidden law of our mysterious being. Plato says that everything in

this world is merely the material form of some model previously existing

in a higher world of ethereal spiritual forms; and Swedenborg's

beautiful doctrine of Correspondences is a reappearance of the same

idea. If their theory be true, may not the antecedent type of that

strange force which in the material world we call electricity be a

_spiritual_ magnetism. As yet, we know extremely little of the laws of

electricity, and we know nothing of those laws of _spiritual_ attraction

and repulsion which are perhaps the _cause_ of electricity. There may be

subtile and as yet unexplained causes, connected with the state of the

nervous system, the state of the mind, the accord of two souls under

peculiar circumstances, etc., which may sometimes enable a person who is

in a material body to see another who is in a spiritual body. That such

visions are not of daily occurrence may be owing to the fact that it

requires an unusual combination of many favorable circumstances to

produce them; and when they do occur, they seem to us miraculous

simply because we are ignorant of the laws of which they are transient

manifestations.

Lord Bacon says,--"The relations touching the force of imagination and

the secret instincts of Nature are so uncertain, as they require a great

deal of examination ere we conclude upon them. I would have it first

thoroughly inquired whether there be any secret passages of sympathy

between persons of near blood,--as parents, children, brothers, sisters,

nurse-children, husbands, wives, etc. There be many reports in history,

that, upon the death of persons of such nearness, men have had an inward

feeling of it. I myself remember, that, being in Paris, and my father

dying in London, two or three days before my father's death I had a

dream, which I told to divers English gentlemen, that my father's house

in the country was plastered all over with black mortar. Next to those

that are near in blood, there may be the like passage and instincts of

Nature between great friends and great enemies. Some trial also would be

made whether pact or agreement do anything: as, if two friends should

agree, that, such a day in every week, they, being in far distant

places, should pray one for another, or should put on a ring or tablet

one for another's sake, whether, if one of them should break their vow

and promise, the other should have any feeling of it in absence."

This query of Lord Bacon, whether an agreement between two distant

persons to think of each other at a particular time may not produce an

actual nearness between their spirits, is suggestive. People partially

drowned and resuscitated have often described their last moments of

consciousness as flooded with memories, so that they seemed to be

surrounded by the voices and countenances of those they loved. If this

is common when soul and body are approaching dissolution, may not such

concentration of loving thoughts produce an actual nearness, filling the

person thought of with "a feeling as if somebody were in the room"? And

if the feeling thus induced is very powerful, may not the presence thus

felt become objective, or, in other words, a vision?

The feeling of the nearness of spirits to when the thoughts are busily

occupied with them may have led to the almost universal belief among

ancient nations that the souls of the dead came back on the anniversary

of their death to the places where their bodies were deposited. This

belief invested their tombs with peculiar sacredness, and led the

wealthy to great expense in their construction. Egyptians, Greeks, and

Romans built them with upper apartments, more or less spacious. These

chambers were adorned with vases, sculptures, and paintings on the

walls, varying in costliness and style according to the means or taste

of the builder. The tomb of Cestius in Rome contained a chamber much

ornamented with paintings. Ancient Egyptian tombs abound with sculptures

and paintings, probably representative of the character of the deceased.

Thus, on the walls of one a man is pictured throwing seed into the

ground, followed by a troop of laborers; farther on, the same individual

is represented as gathering in the harvest; then he is seen in

procession with wife, children, friends, and followers, carrying sheaves

to the temple, a thank-offering to the gods. This seems to be a painted

epitaph, signifying that the deceased was industrious, prosperous, and

pious. It was common to deposit in these tombs various articles of

use or ornament, such as the departed ones had been familiar with and

attached to, while on earth. Many things in the ancient sculptures

indicate that Egyptian women were very fond of flowers. It is a curious

fact, that little china boxes with Chinese letters on them, like those

in which the Chinese now sell flower-seeds, have been discovered in some

of these tombs. Probably the ladies buried there were partial to exotics

from China; and perhaps friends placed them there with the tender

thought that the spirit of the deceased would be pleased to see them,

when it came on its annual visit. Sometimes these paintings and

sculptures embodied ideas reaching beyond the earthly existence, and

"the aërial body" was represented floating among stars, escorted by

what we should call angels, but which they named "Spirits of the

Sun." Families and friends visited these consecrated chambers on the

anniversary of the death of those whose bodies were placed in the

room below. They carried with them music and flowers, cakes and wine.

Religious ceremonies were performed, with the idea that the "invisible

body" was present with them and took part in the prayers and offerings.

The visitors talked together of past scenes, and doubtless their

conversation abounded with touching allusions to the character and

habits of the unseen friend supposed to be listening. It was, in fact,

an annual family-gathering, scarcely sadder in its memories than is our

Thanksgiving festival to those who have travelled far on the pilgrimage

of life.

St. Paul teaches that "there is a natural body, and there is a spiritual

body." The early Christians had a very vivid faith, that, when the

soul dropped its outer envelope of flesh, it continued to exist in

a spiritual form. When any of their number died, they observed the

anniversary of his departure by placing on the altar an offering to the

church, in his name. On such occasions, they partook of the sacrament,

with the full belief that his unseen form was present with them, and

shared in the sacred rite, as he had done while in the material body. On

the anniversary of the death of martyrs, there were such commemorations

in all the churches; and that their spirits were believed to be present

is evident from the fact that numerous petitions were addressed to them.

In the Roman Catacombs, where many of the early Christians were buried,

are apartments containing sculptures and paintings of apostles and

martyrs. They are few and rude, because the Christians of that period

were poor, and used such worldly goods as they had more for benevolence

than for show. But these memorials, in such a place, indicate the same

feeling that adorned the magnificent tombs of Egypt, Greece, and Rome.

These subterranean apartments were used for religious meetings in the

first centuries of our era, and it is generally supposed that they were

chosen as safe hiding-places from persecution. Very likely it was so;

but it is not improbable that the spot had peculiar attractions to

worshippers, from the feeling that they were in the midst of an unseen

congregation, whose bodies were buried there. If it was so, it would be

but one of many proofs that the early Christians mixed with their new

religion many of the traditions and ceremonies of their forefathers, who

had been educated in other forms of faith. Even in our own time, threads

of these ancient traditions are more or less visible through the whole

warp and woof of our literature and our customs. Many of the tombs in

the Cemetery of Père la Chaise have pretty upper apartments. On the

anniversary of the death of those buried beneath, friends and relatives

carry thither flowers and garlands. Women often spend the entire day

there, and parties of friends assemble to partake of a picnic repast.

Most of the ancient nations annually observed a day in honor of the

Souls of Ancestors. This naturally grew out of the custom of meeting in

tombs to commemorate the death of relatives. As generations passed away,

it was unavoidable that many of the very old sepulchres should be seldom

or never visited. Still it was believed that the "shades" even of remote

ancestors hovered about their descendants and were cognizant of their

doings. It was impossible to observe separately the anniversaries of

departed millions, and therefore a day was set apart for religious

ceremonies in honor of _all_ ancestors. Hindoo and Chinese families have

from time immemorial consecrated such days; and the Romans observed a

similar anniversary under the name of Parentalia.

Christians retained this ancient custom, but it took a new coloring from

their peculiar circumstances. The ties of the church were substituted

for ties of kindred. Its members were considered _spiritual_ fathers

and brothers, and there was an annual festival in honor of _spiritual_

ancestors. The forms greatly resembled those of the Roman Parentalia.

The gathering-place was usually at the tomb of some celebrated martyr,

or in some chapel consecrated to his memory. Crowds of people came

from all quarters to implore the spirits of the martyrs to send them

favorable seasons, good crops, healthy children, etc., just as the old

Romans had been accustomed to invoke the names of their ancestors for

similar blessings. Prayers were repeated, hymns sung, and offerings

presented to the church, as aforetime to the gods. A great banquet was

prepared, and wine was drunk to the souls of the martyrs so freely that

complete intoxication was common. In view of this and other excesses,

the pious among the bishops exerted their influence to abolish the

custom. But it was so intertwined with the traditional faith of the

populace, and so gratifying to their social propensities, that it was

a long time before it could be suppressed. A vestige of the old

anniversaries in honor of the Souls of Ancestors remains in the Catholic

Church under the name of All-Souls' Day.

In France, the Parentalia of the ancient Romans is annually observed

under the name of "Le Jour des Morts." All Paris flock to the

cemeteries, bearing bouquets, crosses, and garlands to decorate the

tombs of departed ancestors, relatives, and friends. The gay population

is, for that day, sobered by tender and solemn memories. Many a tear

glistens on the wreaths, and the passing traveller notices many a one

whose trembling lips and swollen eyelids indicate that the soul is

immersed in recollections of departed loved ones. The "cities of the

dead" bloom with fresh flowers, in multifarious forms of crosses,

crowns, and hearts. From all the churches prayers ascend for those who

have dropped their earthly garment of flesh, and who live henceforth in

the "spiritual body," which becomes more and more beautiful with the

progress of the soul,--it being, as the ancients called it, "the soul's

image."

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 09, No. 55, May, 1862 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 18 / 38 题