CHAPTER IV

FOREIGN COLONISTS IN ARGENTINA

It is now time to return to the city to get a little better acquainted

with its inhabitants. As a matter of fact, the features upon which I

have touched--the town, port, promenades, palaces, settlers' houses,

agricultural products, manufactures, or commerce--do more or less

reveal the native, and although I have said nothing of his person

beyond that he looks very like a European, my reader has certainly

gathered some light as to his way of living.

To the Argentine _extra muros_, the citizen of Buenos Ayres is the

_porteño_--that is, the man of the port, the townsman kept, by the

sea, in constant contact with Europe, and more readily undertaking a

trip to London or Paris than to Tucuman or Mendoza. On his side, while

professing great esteem for the provincials (for in the Argentine

patriotism amounts to mania), the _porteño_ is inclined to pity those

who pass their lives far from the capital; while the countryman mocks

good-humouredly at his strange compatriot who knows naught of the

_Campo_, whence are brought to his door the corn and cattle which

are the outcome of the highest and mightiest efforts of their common

national energy, and which by his means are to be exchanged for

European produce in an ever-widening and developing trade.

This is, however, but a superficial judgment that we may permit

ourselves to make; but if we look more closely into the national

character, we shall perceive that if the _porteño_ is the nearer to

Europe and hastens thither on the smallest pretext; if he is more

thoroughly steeped in European culture; if he takes more interest in

the doings of the Old World, attaching the greatest importance to its

opinion of his own country; if it is his dearest ambition that the

youthful Argentine Republic shall comport herself nobly among the old

peoples of a weary civilisation; if it is his constant care to obtain

from beyond sea the advantages gained by experience, to be turned to

account by his own nation--we should be greatly mistaken in assuming

that European contact or descent could lead either citizen or farmer,

_porteño_ or _estanciero_, to prefer to his own land that Old Continent

which his forefathers deserted, in the hope, already realised, of

finding on this virgin soil, fertilised by his own labour, a better

chance of success than the Old World could offer him.

While the physiognomy of the streets of Buenos Ayres is wholly European

in symmetry, style, and even in the expression of the faces to be

seen thereon, yet this people is Argentine to the very marrow of the

bones--exclusively and entirely Argentine. New York is nearer to

Europe, and New York is North American in essence as completely as

Buenos Ayres is Argentine. The difference is that in New York, and

even in Boston or Chicago, North Americanism is patent to all eyes

in type, in carriage, and in voice, as much as in feeling and manner

of thinking; whereas the piquancy of Buenos Ayres lies in the fact

that it offers the spectacle of rabid Argentinism under a European

veil. And, strangely enough, this inherent jingoism, which in some

nations that shall be nameless assumes so easily an offensive guise,

is here displayed with an amiable candour that is most disarming, and

instinctively you seek to justify it to yourself. Not satisfied with

being Argentine from top to toe, these people will, if you let them,

Argentinise you in a trice.

To tell the truth, there are some (I have met a few) who speak ill of

the country--and these critics are people who have not even had the

excuse of having been unsuccessful in their business affairs here.

There are systematic grumblers everywhere, who endeavour to give

themselves importance by finding fault with their surroundings. Those

who are not pleased with their stay in a foreign country should remind

themselves that nobody prevents them from returning to their own.

I have already mentioned that many Italians cross the sea for the

harvesting in the Argentine, and then, taking advantage of the

difference in the seasons, return home to cut their home corn. This

backward and forward movement has grown enormously. But in the long run

the attraction of a land that overflows with energy defeats atavistic

proclivities and weakens roots that are centuries old. And as soon as

the settler has become the owner of a few roods of the new soil, he is

irrevocably lost to Europe.

I have not sought to conceal the fact that the largest number of

immigrants make the mistake of stopping at Buenos Ayres, whose

population is thus increased out of all proportion with the development

of Argentine territory. This mass of working people, who necessarily

remain easily accessible to European influences, offers apparently an

excellent field for revolutionary propaganda. Anarchists and socialists

spare no pains to make proselytes here, in order to strengthen their

hands. A violence of speech and action has in this way given to certain

strikes a truly European aspect. Still, in a country in which there

is a constant supply of work, it is hardly possible that disturbances

arising rather from doctrine than from existing social evils can take

any hold on or materially affect any considerable extent of territory.

If I am to believe what I heard in all parts, the Russian anarchists

have a specially redoubtable organisation. To mention only the most

recent of events, it is known that the Chief of Police, who had

directed in person some ruthless repressive measures, was killed in the

street by a bomb thrown by a Russian, who was protected from the full

severity of the law by his tender age.[6]

Last June, a few days before I left Europe, a bomb was thrown by

some unknown person in the Colon Theatre, falling in the middle of

the orchestra and wounding more or less seriously a large number of

persons. The Colon Theatre, in which opera is given, is the largest and

perhaps the handsomest theatre in the world.[7] The open boxes of the

pit tier, like those of the first two tiers and orchestra, present,

when filled with young women in evening dress, the most brilliant

spectacle that I have ever seen in any theatre. In such a setting,

imagine the catastrophe that could be caused by a bomb![8] The injured

were carried out somehow or other, the house was emptied amid loud and

furious outcries, and, the damage having been repaired in the course of

the following day, not a woman in society was absent from her place at

the performance of the evening. This is a very fine trait of character

which does the highest honour to the women of Argentine society. I am

not sure that in Paris, under similar circumstances, there would have

been a full house on the night following such a disaster.

It is easy to understand, however, that the fury of the public found

expression in an Act of Parliament of terrible severity, directed

immediately against any suspicious groups. The criminal in the present

case has not yet been discovered, though during my stay in Buenos

Ayres there occurred a sensational arrest which led the authorities to

believe they had laid hands on the guilty man. A state of siege was in

some sense declared, lasting all the time I was in Buenos Ayres; and

the Government obtained extraordinary powers, to be used only against

organisations believed to be anarchical. The penalty generally imposed

was transportation to Terra del Fuego, under conditions that no one

would or, perhaps, could describe to me. I am without the necessary

returns for establishing the results obtained. Some complaints reached

me from the more populous quarters affirming that the innocent had been

punished; all I could do was to hand them over to the authorities. I

can testify that in my presence, in any of the circles of Buenos Ayres

society that I was able to observe, no anarchist outrages were on any

single occasion the subject of conversation. More than once I led up

to it. The reply invariably was that the question was one for public

authority, that the Government was armed and would take action, and if

further powers should prove necessary they would be granted. Then the

topic was changed.

There is no doubt that the Argentine Government, like that of Great

Britain, is resolved to finish, once for all, with crimes which arouse

only horror in all the civilised world. In the course of a hasty

visit I had occasion to pay to the Police Department, in the company

of the City Superintendent, Señor Guiraldès (at the very moment of

the arrest of the man who was believed to have thrown the bomb in the

Colon Theatre), I could see that not only is the force a very powerful

one, but that it has at its head men of energy and decision who are

determined to repress deeds of violence, of which all or nearly all are

committed by persons not of Argentine nationality.[9]

While on the subject, one may note that the Argentine police have

adopted and perfected the system of identification of criminals by the

marks of the thumb. First the imprint of all ten fingers is taken, so

as to make mistake impossible and arrive at absolute certainty; then,

acting on the principle that it may be as useful to identify an honest

man as a bandit, identification certificates are issued to the public,

for a small fee, containing an enlargement of the thumb imprint.

A crowd of people waiting at the door of the office that makes and

furnishes these documents showed that the public fully appreciated

their usefulness. Young men and old were submitting in silence to have

their ten fingers smeared with a sort of wax not easily removed by

soap and water. Each in turn departed well pleased that the stigma of

"Unknown" would never be attached to his grave. It appears that it has

become the fashion to register one's thumb at the police-station before

starting on any journey. Señor Guiraldès told us that his own son, now

in Europe, had taken this precaution before exposing his person to

the risks of the elements and the unceremonious manners of Parisian

_apaches_.

In the days of the stage-coach Parisians used to be laughed at for

making their wills and taking out passports before starting on a

journey to Étampes. Now behold! By other routes we have returned to the

good old days. And funny as it may appear to those of us who like to

believe that civilisation in South America is more or less rudimentary,

it is precisely this country which thus, in scientific fashion, guards

against the barbarous ways of the capitals and even the country

districts of Europe.

There was recently a story of an Argentine who was drowned on our

coast and whose body was subsequently washed up on shore, with the

head frightfully mutilated. As, however, the telltale thumb had been

preserved he was quickly identified. If this story had been told me

in time I should certainly have allowed as much of my person as was

necessary to be dipped in wax instead of venturing to start on my

homeward journey without the simple proofs of identity which would

suffice to place beyond doubt the status of any Jonah in the depths of

a whale. As it is, in spite of my imprudence, I reached home with my

head still on my shoulders. Pure luck! Never again will I trust myself

at sea without this elementary precaution, which would so radically

have changed the fortunes of Ulysses in rocky Ithaca.

After this digression, which is only excused by the importance of

the subject, I want to finish what I began to say about the rabid

Argentinism of our friends. I had a great surprise one day when

speaking respectfully of the fine qualities of the Spaniards. Some

highly cultured men present interrupted me, and criticised severely the

race from which they had sprung in terms one might have expected from

an Anglo-Saxon, but not from a Latin. Therefore I must ask my readers

not to imagine that the Argentinos are merely Spaniards transplanted to

American soil. No! The real Argentino, though he would never confess

it, seems to me convinced that there is a magic elixir of youth that

springs from his soil and makes of him a new man, descendant of none

but ancestor of endless generations to come.

That there is indeed a regenerating influence in this youthful land

is proved by the power it wields over newcomers of whatever origin.

The Italian in particular is Argentinised before he is _argenté_. In

the provinces, as in Buenos Ayres, I had a hundred thousand examples

of this before my eyes. You ask a child, the son of an immigrant,

whether he speaks Italian or Spanish. He answers haughtily, "At home

we all talk Argentine." Another, unable to deny that he was born in

Genoa, although he claimed Argentine nationality, murmured by way of

excuse, "I was so little." I may add that in the primary schools

where these replies were made to me the teaching was the epitome of

Argentine patriotic spirit, as might be guessed from the pictures and

inscriptions on the walls.[10] But Alsace-Lorraine and Poland are

witness to the fact that unless the heart be wholly won authority may

labour in vain.

As I want to be wholly sincere here, I must admit that the French take

this Argentine contagion with remarkable facility. I should grievously

wrong our own excellent colony, however, if I did less than justice to

its ardent patriotism. It is only when tried that love grows and grows

purer. In absence the fatherland seems the dearer in proportion as it

is connected with the recollection of sufferings that left us stripped

of all but honour.

The public work of the French colony speaks loudly for it. Its most

important achievement is the French Hospital, founded long ago, but,

thanks to its Governor, M. Basset, and its chief physician, Dr. G.

Lauré, it is invaluable. As I was leaving the building after a visit I

shall not soon forget, the Chairman of the Board of Directors showed me

a bust of Pasteur standing among the trees, and asked what I thought

of a suggestion to place near it a figure of Lorraine. Although the

symbolism in the two statues would be entirely different, I warmly

concurred in the plan. There is, after all, a delicate connection

between these two manifestations of the soul of France--the desire for

knowledge and the courage to hold.

These men, who have presented to the city of Buenos Ayres a monument

worthy of France in commemoration of the friendship of the sister

republics, and who, on the occasion of the floods in Paris of last

year, sent a cheque for 400,000 francs to assuage the worst of the

distress, never miss an opportunity of showing their loyalty to the

mother-country. Yet how many sons of France one meets at every step who

have gone over to the Argentine, head and heart, beyond all possibility

of return!

One large manufacturer of the port of Buenos Ayres is a nephew of a

member of our National Assembly of 1871. I noticed, when inspecting his

very remarkable establishment, that he speaks French less fluently than

Spanish, while his two brothers, who pay frequent visits to Paris, have

become thorough Argentinos.

Again, I might take the case of one of our most eminent compatriots

who left France in his twentieth year, but who has remained French to

the very marrow of his bones. His son is an official of high position

in the Argentine. Doubtless his marriage with a woman of the country

laid the foundation for this South American family. The atmosphere of

the home is naturally altered, and his material interests, indissolubly

riveted to the soil that feeds him and his family, attune the settler

insensibly to new ways, and gradually transform his whole habit of mind

to the new pattern.

Can anybody explain why this is not the case with the French who try

their fortune in North America, and why in Canada the two races live

side by side in all harmony but never mix? It must be that "blood is

thicker than water," as says the English proverb, and that the Latin

element blends more readily with a Latin agglomeration than with an

Anglo-Saxon community. Here I have seen, over and over again, that

after two or three generations nothing remains of the original stock

but the name.

I know of but one instance where the Latin organism has been completely

assimilated by a northern race, and that is the French emigration to

Germany in consequence of the revocation of the Edict of Nantes. But in

that case a community of religious fervour, strengthened by an odious

persecution, was the active agent in the blending of the Latin mind and

character with that of Germany. We all remember that the first German

Governor of Alsace-Lorraine was the descendant of a French emigrant.

Some of us may recall the furious address of the learned Dubois-Reymond

to the youth of Prussia in 1870, urging them over the frontier of

the land from which their ancestors were driven by the sabres of the

dragoons of Louis XIV.

To return once more to our Franco-Argentinos, I ought to say that the

severe application of French military law but too often embitters them

against the mother-country. In its haste to increase its population,

the Argentine awards nationalisation to the children of foreigners born

on Argentine soil, and nationalisation carries in its train military

service. It is the same system adopted by ourselves in Algiers toward

Spanish colonists. The consequence is that the son of French parents

duly registered at the French Consulate, in order to preserve for him

his father's nationality, finds himself later called simultaneously to

serve under two flags on opposite sides of the ocean.

What is he to do? In the Argentine, where military service is very

short, are all his future prospects, while in France no place has been

kept open for him. If France were in danger and called to him for help

he would not hesitate, but, failing that, his actual surroundings make

it hard for him to decide. The majority respond to the call to the

Argentine flag, and by so doing fall into the class of _insoumis_ on

French soil, except in cases where the father, with a forethought that

cannot be approved, has omitted to register the birth at the Consulate.

If I remember rightly, ten only out of forty youths called up leave

Buenos Ayres annually to answer to their names at the French

roll-call. One wonders whether the result be sufficient to justify

steps that might easily trouble our relations with the French colony

in this country. For the young _insoumis_ can never set foot on French

soil without finding the _gendarmerie_ after him. Yet his business

will call him inevitably to Europe. Where will he take his orders when

France has shut her doors to him? England, Belgium, Switzerland, and

Germany are open to him. I heard recently a story about a Frenchman

of Buenos Ayres who ventured to Lille, and had only just time, at a

warning from a friend, to escape over the border.

I need not dwell on the matter, but it is easy to see how detrimental

the present state of the law is to French families living in the

Argentine, Brazil, and other American countries, as well as to France

herself. We manage in this way to drive from the national fold a number

of young men who would in time of danger respond heartily to a call

from the motherland.

Wherever I went I heard the same cry. The Consuls and the French

Minister could only reply, "It is the law." But the Frenchman who

follows the Flag in some foreign land demands an alteration in a law

which ought not to be applied with the same rigour to youths living in

Basle, Brussels, Geneva, and to those who have found a field for their

activities across the sea.

To me it seems only justice to establish a distinction in our

legislation between these two categories of French subjects. For

example, I heard of the case of an eminent politician--M. Pellegrini,

the son of an inhabitant of Nice, and therefore French--who, in his

youth, got into difficulties in the way described with the French

recruiting service, and who later, having risen to the position of

President of the Argentine Republic, received the Grand Cordon of the

Legion of Honour. The red ribbon or the Council of War--which seems the

more appropriate reward to citizens of this kind? Of course, we must

all regret that valuable citizens should thus be taken from France at

the moment when she needs every one of her children. At the same time

we must consider that a Frenchman who has become Argentine is by no

means lost to France, as might be the case in the United States, for

instance, where the Latin is rapidly submerged by the irresistible

flood of Anglo-Saxonism.

In the Argentine, on the contrary, the Northern races prove merely

a useful element of methodical intelligence and tenacity, which is

in time engulfed by the great Latin wave. There are important German

colonies in Brazil, and even in the Argentine. Both English and North

Americans have prosperous manufactories there. Yet in a race that

has preserved integrally its Latinity, all this is of but secondary

interest, and the tendency remains to travel steadily in the track of

peoples of Latin stock, among whom it may without presumption be said

that the French exert the most powerful influence.

For this reason any Frenchman of average intellectual and moral

value who becomes incorporated in the Argentine nation must almost

infallibly at the same time--for I doubt if any Frenchman is ever

really un-Frenched--materially aid in permanently strengthening French

prestige.

What are we to think of men like M. Paul Groussac, who holds an eminent

place in Buenos Ayres, but who would equally in his own land have

reached the very front rank? M. Groussac, having gone through our naval

training school, set out to see the world. One day, his pockets empty,

he arrived at Buenos Ayres, where courageously he hired himself as

_gaucho_--that is, keeper of the immense flocks of the Pampas, whose

members run into their thousands--and he undertook to drive a train of

mules to Peru. He accomplished the journey successfully, covering the

same route four times in all, each journey taking four months. Later we

find him acting as schoolmaster. In Tucuman he carried on the work of

the French outlaw, Jacques, who, having escaped to the Argentine after

the _coup d'état_ of December 2d, devoted himself entirely to public

education on lines taken up later and developed by President Sarmiento.

We had the pleasure of seeing in the place of honour at the Training

College of Tucuman the portraits of the two French founders, Jacques

and Paul Groussac. From time to time the latter brother has published

various literary works, notably some short stories in which Argentine

life and character are brilliantly set forth, and the name of their

author has achieved a wide celebrity. Then M. Hilleret, the great

French sugar manufacturer of Santa Ana, placed a large capital at the

disposal of Paul Groussac with which to start a daily paper destined to

reveal, in the person of its editor-in-chief, a writer of remarkable

force.

To-day you may hear that Paul Groussac is the leading Spanish writer

of our times, which by no means prevents him from contributing some

brilliant articles to our own _Journal des Débats_, amply proving his

mastery of his mother-tongue, not to mention a curious study by him of

that literary enigma the _Don Quichotte_ of Avellaneda.

In 1810 a Public Library was founded by decree of the first

Revolutionary Junto, on the initiative of Secretary Moreno. It was

opened March 16, 1812, its nucleus being drawn from the convent

libraries. In 1880, after the proclamation of Buenos Ayres as capital

of the Federation, the Public Library became the National Library, and

in 1885 Paul Groussac was appointed Governor. In an interview with

President Roca, who cannot be accused of any partiality for him,

Groussac obtained a grant of the building intended, alas! for public

lotteries, in which the library might be installed. He set to work

immediately. The National Library of the Argentine, under the control

of M. Groussac, is now without a rival in South America, and can bear

comparison with many similar institutions on the Old Continent.[11]

One of the pet hobbies of M. Groussac is now to open a French _lycée_

in Buenos Ayres, with the support of both Governments. His eldest son,

an Argentino, has just been appointed to the post of Under-Secretary of

State in the Office of Public Instruction by M. Saënz Peña.

Strangely enough all the fine qualities of this illustrious compatriot

of ours have been lost sight of for the reason that through some

defect--I had almost said vice--in his character he has won the

reputation of being the surliest of bears. Having myself also, to some

extent, a reputation for being less than amiable I wondered whether the

two of us might not come to blows if we met. Considering in some sort

my bald head a protection, I ventured into the bear's den, and found

only the most affable and genial of men, whose claws were of velvet

and his tusks of sugar. Thus we made friends at once, and I found that

the much-dreaded beast had nothing terrible about him, unless it was a

strong accent of the Gers.

Since that day I have done my best to dispel so injurious a prejudice

against the man. I can only explain its prevalence by the words of

Tacitus, who remarked of his father-in-law, Agricola, "He chose rather

to offend than to hate." It is a rare enough trait among men this,

which leads them, like Alceste, to declare their real opinion rather

than stoop to the indignity of falsehood. It may very easily happen

that in this way such men may offend the talker who asks only cheap

flattery, though actuated themselves by the kindliest feelings towards

their fellow-men.

If we consider for a moment the sentiment aroused in us by the general

practice of using words to conceal our thoughts, we must recognise

that we are the first to suffer by this universal weakness--not to say

cowardice--in that we only expect from others what we ourselves give,

namely, hypocritical phrases, leading to crooked actions, and causing

that silent but lasting dislike which forms the principal obsession

in the life of many among us. If it is a less offence to inspire than

to harbour dislike, let us absolve the men who fail to win universal

regard, but who are nevertheless wholly incapable of harming a creature.

Unless I am misinformed, we shall soon have the pleasure of seeing Paul

Groussac in Paris. A Chair of History of the Argentine Republic has

been founded at the Sorbonne, and there is talk of offering it to him.

Certainly no one could better perform its duties. Yet it would surprise

me if he could in this way break off his multitudinous engagements in

the Argentine. They say he will in person open the course of lectures.

I can promise an intellectual treat to his hearers.

I did not hear of any Germans or Englishmen who had, to the same

extent as the Italians and the French, undergone transformation into

Argentinos. The German, whose fundamental roughness--to call it by no

stronger name--is frequently masked by good humour, works his way into

all classes of society, but without losing any of his original traits.

M. Mihanowitch, who is at the head of a colossal business of river

and sea transportation, must, notwithstanding his Austrian origin, be

considered as an Argentino, though he is surely of Slav blood.

The English invariably retain their individuality. I am told that in

Patagonia, where they are carrying on sheep breeding on a scale that

leaves Australia in the rear, they have built up cosy dwellings, where

every night they change into their smoking-jackets for the family

repast, and never miss taking a holiday of two or three months in

their native land. They never become Argentinos. This, however, does

not prevent their being at the head of the business world of La Plata,

where they exert a powerful influence on the industrial and commercial

life of the people.

It would have greatly interested me to study the foreign colonies more

closely, but time was lacking. Of the Spanish, the only man I was able

to see anything of was M. Coelho, the distinguished Governor of the

Spanish Bank of La Plata, whose untiring energy reaches out daily in

new directions; he gave me many proofs of kindness, for which I am

sincerely grateful.

It is certain that the recent visit of Field-Marshal von der Goltz to

the Argentine must prove useful to German influence. As we know, it

is the Germans who are responsible for the present organisation of

the Argentine Army. Their Government, wiser than some others, did not

hesitate to send to La Plata some of their most skilled officers, who

were naturally received by Argentine society with the deference that

was their due.

The eminent legal scholar, Professor Enrico Ferri, lately re-elected

Deputy of the group that we should call "Independent Socialists,"

is and has long been the official mouthpiece of the Italian colony.

Gifted with a perfect urbanity, an impartial mind, lofty ideals, and

generous eloquence, he quickly attracted the notice of the public,

and soon vanquished the suspicions of the Extreme Right, who feared

his Socialist views, and the opposition of the Extreme Left, who bore

him malice for having broken away from them. M. Saënz Peña's Cabinet

has been well advised in calling on M. Enrico Ferri to take over the

management of the penitentiary system.

I have mentioned the principal features of the French colony, and

shall hope to be forgiven if lack of space has prevented me from doing

full justice to its members. I have spoken of M. Py, the distinguished

Governor of the Banque Française de la Plata, who is admirably assisted

in his work by the manager, M. Puisoye. It would be unpardonable to

omit the name of Mme. Moreno (of the Comédie Française), who has so

thoroughly mastered the Spanish tongue that she has opened and carried

to success a _conservatoire_, in which she trains pupils for the stage.

It would be the less excusable to forget this lady in that she is

frequently to be met at receptions, where her elocution, both in prose

and in poetry, delights her Parisian-Argentine public. Whilst waiting

for the Académies to confer on women the right to be learned, let us

venture to proclaim their cleverness even when it is but an adjunct to

feminine charm.

FOOTNOTES:

[6] The death penalty, abolished in Uruguay, does still exist in the

Argentine Republic, but executions are rare. The last dates several

years back. The condemned man is shot by the troops.

[7] The Colon Theatre seats no less than 3570 persons. The third tier

is reserved for ladies only; the acoustics are excellent; the most

renowned artists appear on its stage. There is also another opera-house.

[8] Impossible to exaggerate the horror of the scene. A high official

personage told me that he had never beheld such pools of blood.

[9] The Fire Brigade, admirably organised as I had an opportunity of

observing, is armed like the Paris Corps, and can thus be employed to

reinforce the city police if necessary.

[10] It appears that on the day of the National Fête the pupils of the

primary schools have to take an oath of fidelity to the Flag, which is

called the _juro de la Bandera_, and is accompanied by speeches and

patriotic songs that cannot help making an impression on the children.

[11] In 1893 the Library numbered 69,000 volumes; in 1903, 130,000; and

in 1910, 190,000.

South America to-day · 第 4 / 14 章