8 June.

A coquette is like a usurer, giving very little and exacting upon it a

high percentage. To-day, as I am growing more composed and can think

again, I must render Aniela justice; she never encouraged me or

exacted anything. What I mistook for a touch of coquetry at Warsaw

was mere joyfulness of a youthful spirit that had shaken itself

momentarily free from all trouble. All that has happened was brought

on by me. I made mistake after mistake, and it is all my fault.

To know something, and to make it a matter of calculation are two

different things. We account to ourselves for unknown factors which

act upon the soul of a given individual, but in dealing with the same

we generally take ourselves as a point of issue. This happened to me.

I knew, or at least was conscious of the fact, that Aniela and I are

as different from each other as if we were the inhabitants of two

separate planets, but I did not always remember it. Involuntarily I

counted upon her acting in a certain position as I should have acted.

In spite of the consciousness that we two are the most dissimilar

beings under the sun, as opposite as the poles, I note it down with a

certain surprise, and seem not able to get used to the thought. And

yet it is true. I am a thousand times more like Laura Davis than

Aniela.

And now I begin to understand why I failed.

The rock I split against is the want of that which has vanished within

me, thereby freeing my thoughts, but bringing instead of it the mortal

disease that has become my tragedy; it is the catechismal simplicity

of the soul.

Now I can account for it clearly, perhaps not quite satisfactorily,

for I am of so complex a disposition as to have lost the very instinct

of simplicity. "I hear thy voice, but I see thee not." My spiritual

sight suffers from Daltonian disease and cannot distinguish colors.

I cannot even understand how any one can accept a principle, however

hallowed by ages, without looking at it from both sides, pulling it to

pieces, into shreds and atoms, until it crumbles into dust and cannot

be put together any more.

Aniela cannot understand that a principle once considered good,

hallowed by religion, as well as by public opinion, could be

considered otherwise than as a sacred duty.

It does not matter to me whether she is conscious of it, or it is

instinctive impulse reasoned out by her intelligence, or merely

acquired; it is enough that it has entered her very nature.

I had a glimpse of it the other day when I spoke about Pani Korytzka's

divorce suit: "You can prove everything, and yet when one does wrong

conscience tells us: 'It is wrong, it is wrong!'" I did not then

attach the importance to these words that belonged to them. In Aniela

there is no wavering, no doubt whatever. Her soul winnows the chaff

from the grain with such precision that there can be no question about

its purity. She does not try to find her own norma, but takes it

ready-made from religion, general moral principles, and clings to

them so strongly that they become her very own, for they permeate her

system. The simpler the differential quality of good and evil, the

more absolute and merciless it grows. In this ethical code there are

no extenuating circumstances. As according to it the wife belongs to

her husband, she who gives herself to another does wrong. There are no

discussions, no considerations, or reflections,--there is the right

hand for the righteous, the left for the sinners, God's mercy above

all,--but nothing between, no intermediate place.

It is the code of the honest villager, so simple that people like me

do not understand it. It seems to us that human life and human souls

are too complex to find room in it. Unfortunately we have not found

anything to replace it, and consequently we flutter here and there

like stray birds, in loneliness and alarm.

The greater part of our women still hold fast to that code. Even those

who occasionally stray from it do not permit themselves a momentary

doubt as to its truth and sacredness. Where it begins, reasoning

leaves off.

The poets erroneously represent woman as an enigma, a living Sphinx.

Man is a hundred times more of an enigma and a Sphinx. A healthy woman

that is not hysterical may be either good or bad, strong or weak, but

she has more spiritual simplicity than man. Forever and all times the

Ten Commandments are enough for her, whether she live according to

their tenets, or through human frailty set them aside.

The female soul is so dogmatic that I have known a woman whose very

atheism took the form of religion.

It is strange that this code of the honest villager does not exclude

in women either keen intelligence, a subtle mind, or loftiness of

ideas. Their soul seems to have something of the humming-bird which

flits in and out the thickest shrubs, without getting entangled in

their branches, or touching a single leaf.

This may be said especially in regard to Aniela. The greatest

subtility of feeling and thought goes hand in hand with the utmost

simplicity of moral ideas. Her Ten Commandments are the same as the

village girls', with the exception that those of the latter are

wrought on coarse linen, and hers on a web as fine as lace. Why do

I discuss this question? Simply because it is a question of my

happiness, almost my life; for I feel that with all my complex and

intricate philosophy of love, I cannot get over the Ten Commandments.

And how can I conquer them, since I do not even believe in that

philosophy, while Aniela's faith in her principles is calm and

unshaken?

Only the lips that have been drinking at the fountain of doubt opine

that a forbidden kiss is not a sin. A religious woman may be carried

away, as a tree is swept away by a hurricane, by forbidden love, but

she will never acknowledge it.

Shall I ever be able to carry off Aniela? It is possible that my

present state of despondency and discouragement is only a passing one,

and to-morrow I shall feel more hopeful,--to-day all seems impossible.

I wrote once in this same diary that in certain families they

inoculate their children with modesty as they inoculate for small-pox.

The rule which says the wife shall belong to the husband, and in which

Aniela believes so firmly, is strengthened by that modesty, so knitted

into her being, so worked into the system, that I could sooner fancy

Aniela cold and lifeless than baring her bosom in my presence.

And I can still delude myself with the idea that I may expect anything

from her! It is simple idiocy!

What am I to do then? Go away?

No; I shall not go away. I will not, and cannot.

I will remain, and since my love is idiotic, I will do as idiots do.

Enough of systems, calculations, forethought! Let things take their

own way. My former ways did not lead to anything.

Without Dogma: A Novel of Modern Poland · 第 115 / 211 题