Thus, we may find the same word written and pronounced as a dissyllable—

Wó | ren ðáne | don ſóne | a-nón || l. 3591;

and, in another place, written and pronounced as a monosyllable—

In geu | eléngðh | e wórn | it mád || l. 147.

Thus, the _n_ must have been _very slightly_ touched, as is shewn also by

the riming of _e_ and _en_. Examples, ll. 11, 12; 363, 364, etc.

As to the final _-e_, it may be observed that it is most frequently

pronounced just when it is most essential, viz., when it marks a

grammatical inflexion, or an adverbial form, as, _e.g._:—

Til ihé | sus béð | on Ró | dè dón || l. 386;

and,

Wél | he ſeí | den and ſwí | ðè wél || l. 1645.

In the second place, it is very liable to be slurred over before a vowel

following, as in l. 148—

In Ré | ke-fíl | le on ſún | der ſhád ||

~~~~~

and, thirdly, it is frequently added to words without cause, and is

therefore mute, as in l. 60—

ðat éu | ere ſpróng | in wérld | wíd ||

It seems to be sometimes mute after _-ed_, when _-ede_ forms part of a

verb. See ll. 1396, 1433, etc.

Attention to the metre may detect errors in the text. Thus, in l. 75, the

word _dais_ is missing:—

forð glód | ðat fír | me [dá | is] lígt ||

See l. 113, which proves the point.

In l. 1846 the definite form of the adjective is required, and _strong_

should be _stronge_—

ðe stróng | e gód | of ýs | raél ||

It has been noted that the first foot of a line sometimes consists of _one_

syllable only, and that one _accented_. By a bolder license, this is

sometimes the case not only with the _first_ foot, but with _other_ feet,

e.g. with the _third_ foot. Line 2572:—

The Story of Genesis and Exodus: An Early English Song, about 1250 A.D. · 第 66 / 270 题