SECT. XV.

LXVII. We shall conclude this discourse, by pointing out three capital

errors, which are derived from want of proper attention in making

experiments. The first is, that of taking for the effect, what in reality

is the cause, and taking for the cause, what is nothing more than the

effect. The second consists in taking for the cause, something that comes

in by accident, and which has no influence whatever. The third consists,

in between two effects proceeding from one and the same cause, taking one

of them for the cause of the other. I shall give examples of these three

errors, in observations appertaining to medicine, which are said to be

derived from experience, because mistakes in this branch, are generally

attended with worse consequences, than those in other ordinary physical

matters.

LXVIII. It happens, that a man feels an ardent and extraordinary thirst

upon himself, without being able to assign any apparent cause of it;

he drinks water to great excess, and in a few hours is seized with a

fever, or an acrid fluxion. It is common in such cases, to attribute

the indisposition to the excessive drinking of water, and to apprehend,

that was the cause of the disease; but this was so far from being the

case, that the indisposition was rather the cause of his drinking to that

excess. But I would have it observed, that I speak of an instance, in

which the thirst was not brought on by any manifest or apparent cause,

such as the having used any violent exercise, or having been exposed

to some great heat, either of the sun or fire, or having been a long

time without drinking, or having eaten something very salt. I say that

agreeable to this state of the case, it is very clear, that the thirst

must have arisen from some internal cause; but the question is, from what

cause? Why it could be from no other, than a morbific disposition, that

had begun to prevail within his body; or let us express it in another

manner, and say, that it proceeded from an acrid or salt humour, which

had just begun to get in motion, and by vellicating the fibres that

produce the sensation of thirst, had by that means excited it. Every

preternatural and extraordinary effect, demands a preternatural and

extraordinary cause to occasion it; and if we suppose that the thirst was

such an effect, and we cannot assign any external cause to which we can

attribute it; we must conclude that it proceeded from some preternatural

internal cause; which in all probability, must be the morbific

disposition.

LXIX. The want of this reflection, occasions great errors to be committed

in physic, for by running counter to the course of nature, you must

unavoidably mistake the road that leads to the cure. The consequence

of mistaking the effect for the cause, is administering as a medicine,

what in reality is poison; for it is clear, that if the physician

apprehends the humidity and coldness of the water to be the cause of the

distemper, when in truth it was produced by the acrid, salt, peccant, or

inflammatory humour, I say if this should happen to be the case, and he

calculates his prescriptions to correct the humidity and coldness, he by

so doing, will inflame and increase the original disorder.

LXX. This species of error, is not confined to the case we have

instanced, but is capable of being extended to a vast expanse. I am much

inclined to think, that all the extraordinary and vehement emotions, both

of the irascible, and libidinous kind, which precede distempers a small

distance of time before they make their appearance, and for which you can

assign no special external cause, are the effects of those distempers, in

their original stages; I mean, that in the first agitations of such cases

as we are speaking of, a person is apt to fall into violent passions upon

very slight provocations, such as he knows by his own experience, were

never used to agitate or have that effect on him, and either immediately,

or within a few hours afterwards, he is seized with a fever. People are

apt to suppose, that the passion was the cause of the disease; but I say,

that the disease occasioned the anger; for if this man, agreeable to his

natural disposition, was never subject to such violent starts of passion,

upon such, or even greater provocations, it necessarily follows, that

that which he experienced upon this occasion, must have been the effect

of some preternatural internal cause, which lay concealed within him,

most probably the first fermentative movements of the peccant humour,

which soon afterwards produced a fever. In reality, it is easy for any

one to perceive, and I have remarked it many times both with respect

to myself and others, that the irascible passion, is much more apt to

be inflamed upon slight occasions, in those first stages, or almost

insensible beginnings of such indispositions as tend to be somewhat

serious, than at other times.

LXXI. I do not however deny, that the ardour of passion may excite a

fever; for this without doubt, may have a great share in producing such

an effect, and we may reasonably suppose that it has, and especially in

such people as are of a choleric disposition; but when this is not the

case, we should rather suppose, that the passion tended to augment the

indisposition which followed the sudden fit of anger, and which would

have made its appearance without the intervention of that anger, although

it might have been attended with milder symptoms. And the same we say

of anger, is applicable to sadness and fear also, for they conformable

to the language of the philosophers, are passions appertaining to the

irascible.

LXXII. We may reason in the same general way, upon the effects of the

amorous passion. All vehement desires for ordinary objects, which

frequently present themselves to a man’s view, and which are totally

unusual to him, and for which we cannot assign any special external

circumstance that should excite those desires, we should conclude,

that they proceed from some preternatural internal disposition. The

indulgences or gratifications of these extraordinary desires, are always

attended with actions of excess, to which are generally attributed the

indisposition that follows them; but in truth, the indisposition which

laid concealed, irritated the appetite, and was the cause of the excess,

and not the excess of the indisposition.

LXXIII. The following mistake also, is very frequently fallen into. A

person who has always been indifferent about this or that particular

food, we will say lettuces for example, all of a sudden takes a great

fancy for them, and will eat two or three large ones. If he is afterwards

attacked with a pain of the head, and defluxion upon the breast, or a

diarrhœa, the fault is sure to be laid upon the lettuces, which are

accused as the cause of all the mischief; but in reality, the mischief

had before crept into the constitution, and had induced the extraordinary

desire to eat the lettuces.

LXXIV. I would not however, be understood to insinuate, that eating of

any thing to excess, does not frequently occasion or bring on various

diseases; for I only mean that my position should be understood to allude

to a desire that is vehement, and unusual to the person, and for which,

you can assign no visible external cause that should excite it; for under

such circumstances, there is a necessity for concluding it was owing to

some internal cause, that was sufficiently powerful to merit the name

of a morbific disposition; which is an appellation it could not have

deserved, if the appetite although extraordinary, had not been excessive.

LXXV. I am confirmed in the truth of the remark I have just made, by the

reflexion, that a diversity of appetites, must undoubtedly proceed from a

diversity or alteration of temperaments; and it follows of course, that

every alteration in the temperament, must be attended with an alteration

of the appetite. It is easy to discern, that no sick person, preserves

his appetite in the same even state, in which it continues when he is

in health; and this not only with respect to the quantity he eats and

drinks; but with respect to the quality of his nourishment also; nor is

this confined to the objects of his palate only, but extends to those of

all his other feelings and inclinations, both internal and external.

Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) · 第 87 / 100 题