SECT. VII.

XXIII. If even in those consequences, which to all human appearance, we

deduce immediately from the truths which nature herself presents to our

senses, we are sometimes liable to be mistaken; what dependance can we

place in those, that are founded on principles, which without consulting

nature, are established by our fancy? What consequence to all appearance

could seem better inferred, than that of the repugnance of nature to a

vacuum, founded on the palpable experiment of the water rising in the

pump? But by the light of innumerable other experiments, the mistake was

discovered; and it was found out, that the true cause of that, and all

such-like phænomena, was the weight of the air.

XXIV. We see with our eyes, whether we explain the cause of it as

proceeding from an intrinsic quality, or from attraction, or from

impulse, that gravity precipitates bodies with a swift movement towards

the earth. It seems most natural to suppose, by reasoning from the

famous axiom, _sicut se habet simpliciter ad simpliciter, ita magis ad

magis_, that to a duplicate gravity, there would correspond a duplicate

acceleration of motion. But the fact differs widely from this proportion.

XXV. It is plain, that air is much more subtle and thin than water. Who

from hence, would not infer as an unavoidable consequence, that air must

penetrate all bodies which water penetrates? Notwithstanding this, we

see that water penetrates paper, which air does not penetrate, or it

penetrates it in so small a degree, or so slowly, that we look upon it as

next to no penetration at all.

XXVI. Who judging by general or common principles, would not conclude,

that wet hay was much less liable to take fire than dry? But experience

teaches us, that by putting together quantities of hay too moist, it will

take fire of itself, which could never have happened, if the hay had been

put together sufficiently dry, or more thoroughly made.

XXVII. What maxim is better established, or more generally assented

to among the naturalists, than that a vivifying heat of the blood, is

indispensably necessary for the preservation of life? But with all this,

Father Plumier, a learned priest of the order of Minimus, in a voyage in

the Pacific ocean, for want of water, found himself under a necessity of

drinking the blood of turtles, and declares, he found it as cold as the

common water in Europe. (Mem. de Trevoux, an. 1704, tom. 1. page 175.)

Who, agreeable to the laws of ratiocination, can say otherwise, than that

the third quality, resulting from the mixing three or four fœtid things

together, must be fœtid also? But experience manifests to us, that this

consequence is not infallible. Mr. Lemeri bought a certain quantity of

the gums galbanum, sagapenum, and opopanax, and also some bitumen of

Judæa, which he put all together into a retort, and found that there

resulted from the mixtures, a strongly scented oil, greatly resembling

musk; now the bitumen in smell, does not in the least resemble musk, and

the other three drugs are absolutely fœtid. (Hist. de l’Academ. Royal,

ann. 1706.)

XXVIII. If a philosopher, destitute of all other information, except that

which he had acquired in the schools, should be told that two liquids,

which to the touch appear cold, should upon being mixed together, not

only heat and boil, but also emit a flame; he would be in a terrible

agitation, and armed with his infallible conclusive principle, _that

nothing can communicate a quality which it does not possess_, would

exclaim against the proposition. But let him exclaim as much as he will,

it is a certain fact, that from mixing a pure acid, with the essential

oil of an aromatic plant, there will result that commotion.

XXIX. We know that water, is much heavier than air; and we also know,

that the vapours which arise from the earth, are nothing else but

particles of water, very minutely divided, and consequently, that they

must be much heavier than particles of air of the same size. We know

also, that a liquid cannot ascend above another, when they are put

together, except when it’s particles of equal size are lighter than those

of the other. From these premises, it should follow as an infallible

consequence, that these vapours cannot rise superior to the air we

breathe. But let this consequence appear ever so infallible, experience

convinces us that the fact is otherwise.

XXX. Nobody is ignorant, that the aromatic species, such as the clove,

the pimienta, and the cinnamon, are hot or heating, and that the regions

nearest the poles are cold, and those nearest the equinoctial hot. From

these premises, what naturalist would not infer, that the use of these

species would be less pernicious to the inhabitants of the cold regions,

than to those of the hot? But experience is ever demonstrating to us the

contrary. For a scruple of clove is more offensive to, and has a greater

effect on the first, than a drachm has on the last.

XXXI. And similar to this, has been the experience of the Hollanders, in

some of their voyages to the East Indies. It happened once, that upon

passing the line, the greatest part of the people belonging to a ship

were taken sick, and that more than half of them died, and that those

only recovered, to whom in their sickness they gave great quantities of

brandy. The medical men found great difficulty in believing, that these

people could owe the preservation of their lives to drinking to excess

of a liquor, which if not taken sparingly and with moderation, is found

to be very pernicious to health. But in the end, they found themselves

obliged to yield to experience; and admit of the liberal use of brandy,

which afterwards delivered with equal success, all the afflicted from

their illness.

XXXII. It is then absolutely necessary to submit to experience, and if we

are not disposed to abandon the real road of truth, to seek for nature in

herself, and not in the deceitful image which our fancy forms of her.

Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) · 第 79 / 100 题