For sixteen hundred years prior to the war between Great Britain and the
Colonies, the pages of history bear no record of the Negro as a soldier.
Tracing his separate history in the Revolutionary War, is a task of much
difficulty, for the reason that while individual instances of valor and
patriotism abound there were so few separate bodies of Negro troops,
that no separate record appears to have been made. The simple fact is
that the fathers as a rule enlisted men both for the Army and Navy, just
as now, is only continued by the Navy, that is to say, they were
assigned wherever needed, without regard to race or color. Varner’s
Rhode Island Battalion appears to have been the only large aggregation
of Negroes in this war, though Connecticut, New York, and New Hampshire
each furnished one separate company in addition to individuals scattered
through their other organizations, so that ere the close of the war,
there were very few brigades, regiments, or companies in which the Negro
was not in evidence.
The free Negro appears to have gone in from the beginning without
attracting or calling out special comment. Later, as men grew scarcer
and necessity more pressing, slaves were taken in also, and then the
trouble began. Those who held slaves did not care to lose them in this
way. Others who had not, did not think it just the thing in a war for
avowed freedom to place an actual slave in the ranks to fight. Some did
not want the Negro, bond or free, to take part as a soldier in the
struggle. So that in May, 1775, the Massachusetts Committee of Safety
voted that thereafter only free men should be enlisted. In July, Gen.
Gates issued an order prohibiting further enlistments of Negroes, but
saying nothing of those already in the service.
In October, a council of war, presided over by Gen. Washington,
comprising three Major Generals and six Brigadier Generals, voted
unanimously against the enlistment of slaves, and by a decided majority
against further enlistments of Negroes. Ten days later in a conference
held at Cambridge, Mass., participated in by Gen. Washington, Benj.
Franklin, Benj. Harrison, Thos. Lynch, and the deputy governors of
Connecticut and Rhode Island, the same action was taken.
On the 7th November, 1775, Earl Dundore, commanding the forces of His
Majesty the King, issued a proclamation offering freedom and equal pay
to all slaves who would join his armies as soldiers. It did not take the
colonists long to find out their mistake, although Gen. Washington, in
accordance with the expressed will of his officers and of the Committee
of Safety, did on the 17th Nov., 1775, issue a proclamation forbidding
the further enlistment of Negroes. Less than two months later, that is
to say on the 30th Dec., 1775, he issued a second proclamation again
authorizing the enlistment of free Negroes. He advised Congress of his
action, and stated that he would recall it if so directed. But he was
not. The splendid service rendered by the Negro and the great and
pressing need of men were such, that although the opposition continued
from some sections, it was not thereafter strong enough to get
recognition. So the Negroes went and came much as did other men.
In all the events of the war, from Bunker Hill to Yorktown, they bore an
honorable part. The history of the doings of the armies is their
history, as in everything they took part and did their share. Their
total enlistment was about 3,000 men. A very fair percentage for the
then population. I might instance the killing of Major Pitcairn, at
Bunker Hill, by Peter Salem, and of Major Montgomery at Fort Griswold by
Jordan Freeman. The part they took in the capture of Major-General
Prescott at Newport; their gallant defense of Colonel Greene, their
beloved commander, when he was surprised and murdered at Croton River,
May 13, 1781, when it was only after the last of his faithful guards had
been shot and cut down that he was reached; or at the battle of Rhode
Island, when a battalion of 400 Negroes withstood three separate and
distinct charges from 1,500 Hessians under Count Donop, and beat them
back with such tremendous loss that Count Donop at once applied for an
exchange, fearing that his men would kill him if he went into battle
with them again, for having exposed them to such slaughter; and many
other instances that are of record. The letter following, written Dec.
5, 1775, explains itself;
_To the Honorable General Court of the Massachusetts Bay._
The subscribers beg leave to report to your Honorable House
(which we do in justice to the character of so brave a man),
that under our own observation we declare that a Negro Man named
Salem Poor, of Col. Frye’s Regiment, Cap. Ames’ Company, in the
late battle at Charleston, behaved like an experienced officer
as well as an excellent soldier. To set forth particulars of his
conduct would be tedious. We would only beg to say, in the
person of this Negro centers a brave and gallant soldier. The
reward due to so great and distinguished a character, we submit
to Congress.
JONA. BREWER, Col.
THOMAS NIXON, Lt. Col.
JOSEPH BAKER, Lieut.
JONAS RICHARDSON, Capt.
EBENEZER VARNUM, 2 Lt.
WILLIAM SMITH, Capt.
RICHARD WELSH, Lieut.
WM. PRESCOTT, Col.
EPHM. COREY, Lieut.
JOSHUA ROW, Lieut.
ELIPHALETT BODWELL, Sergt.
WM. HUDSON BALLARD, Capt.
JOHN MORTON, Sergt.
This is a splendid and well attested tribute to a gallant and worthy
Negro. There were many such, but, beyond receiving and reading no action
was taken thereon by Congress. There is no lack of incidents and the
temptation to quote many of them is great, but the time allotted me is
too brief for extended mention and I must bring this branch of my
subject to a close. It is in evidence that while so many Negroes were
offering their lives a willing sacrifice for the country, in some
sections the officers of the Continental Forces received their bounty
and pay in Negroes, “grown” and “small,” instead of “dollars” and
“cents.” Fighting for _Liberty_ and taking pay in _Slaves_!
When the war was over the free men returned to meet their same
difficulties; the slaves were caught when possible and reenslaved by
their former masters. In Boston a few years later we find a party of
black patriots of the Revolution mobbed on Boston Common while
celebrating the anniversary of the abolition of the slave trade.
The captain of a vessel trading along the coast tells of a Negro who had
fought in the war and been distinguished for bravery and soldierly
conduct. He was reclaimed and reenslaved by his master after the war,
and served him faithfully until old age rendered him useless. The master
then brought the poor old slave to this captain and asked him to take
him along on his trip and try to sell him. The captain hated to sell a
man who had fought for his country, but finally agreed, took the poor
old man to Mobile, and sold him for $100 to a man who put him to
attending a chicken coop. His former master continued to draw the old
slave’s pension as a soldier, in the Revolution, until he died.