XX.

I beseech audience from the churches for these thoughts on our Irish

polity, and would recall to them their early history, how when the

fiery spirit of their Lord first manifested on earth, life, near to It,

reflected It as in a glowing glass, and impulses of true living arose.

Material possessions were held in common. There was no fierce talk of

Thine and Mine. His ancient law counseled poverty to the spirit, lest

the gates of Paradise should grow narrow before it like the eye of a

needle. I believe the fading hold the heavens have over the world is due

to the neglect of the economic basis of spiritual life. What profound

spiritual life can there be when the social order almost forces men to

battle with each other for the means of existence? I know well that no

political mechanics, nothing which is an economic device only, will of

themselves be able to affect the transfiguration of society and bring

it under the dominion of the spirit. For that, a far higher quality of

thought and action than is here indicated is necessary. The economist

can provide the daily bread, but that bread of the coming day which

Christ wished his followers to aspire to must come otherwise. That

should be the labor of the poets, artists, musicians, and of the heroic

and aristocratic characters who provide by their life an image to

which life can be modeled. Therefore I beseech audience not only of the

churches, but of the poets, writers, and thinkers of Ireland for their

aid in this labor. They alone can create in wide commonalty the ideals

which can dominate society. It is the work of the artist to create for

us images of desirable life, to manifest to us the ideal humanity, and

to prefigure that vaster entity which I have called the national being.

I said in an earlier page that part of the failure of Ireland must be

laid to the poets who had dropped out of the divine procession and sang

a solitary song; to the writers who had turned from contemplating

the great to the portrayal of the little in human nature. I know how

difficult it is to constrain the spirit, and how futile it is to ask

artists or poets to create what they are not inspired to create. But

we can ask all men--artists, poets, litterateurs, and scientists--to be

citizens, and if they realize imaginatively the spiritual conception of

the State, we may assume that this imaginative realization of the

State will influence the labors of the mind, and what is done will,

consciously or unconsciously, have reference to that collective being

which must dominate society more and more, which will dominate it as a

tyranny if we fail in our labors, or liberate and make more majestical

the spirit of man if we imagine rightly. All greatness is brought

about by a conspiracy of the imagination and the will. Our literature

certainly manifests beauty, but not greatness or majesty, for majesty

only arises where there is an orchestration of humanity by some mighty

conductor; and as a people we shall never manifest the highest qualities

in literature or life until we are under the dominion of one, at least,

of the great fundamental ideas which have been the inspiration of races.

Our feebleness arises from our economic individualism. We continually

neutralize each other's efforts. Yet there is no less power in humanity

today than there ever was. We see now clearly what untamed elemental

fires lay underneath the seeming placidity of the world. There was a

feeling in society that, just as the earth itself had settled down to

be a habitable globe, and was forgetting its ancient ferocities of

earthquake that opened up gulfs between land and land and rended sea

from sea, so, too, humanity was losing those wilder energies we surmised

in the cave-dweller or the hunters of mastodon, mammoth, and cave-tiger.

But it was all a dream--a dream, we suspect, about the earth as well

as about humanity. While we indulged in these pleasing speculations on

society, the scientists of our generation were placing beyond question

or argument the doctrine of the indestructibility of energy and matter

and we may be sure that while there is immortal life there must be

immortal energies as its companions through time, and they will never be

less powerful than they are today or were in the morning of the world.

There will be no weakening of that mighty God-begotten brotherhood of

elemental powers; and, while we cannot hope that by the wastage of time

these powers will be feebler, we may hope that by an understanding of

them we may get mastery over them. The wild elephant of the woods, with

a greater strength than man's, has yet been trained to be his servant,

and that arcane power we call electricity, which, if it shoots out of

its channel, shrivels up the body of man, is now our servant. So we may

hope, too, that the elemental energies in humanity itself, which break

out in wars and Armageddons, will come under control. We should not hope

that man will ever be a less powerful being. To hope that would be to

wish for his degradation. We should wish him to become ever more

and more powerful by understanding himself, and by the unity of

the spiritual faculties and the elemental energies in him into one

harmonious whole. At present he is feeble because he is, to use the

scriptural illustration, a house divided against itself.

Our feebleness is due to the conflict of powers in us and our conflict

with each other. Get the two mightiest bulls in a herd, put them

opposing each other in a narrow passage, and they, being of equal

strength, will reduce each other to feebleness. Neither will make

headway. Let them unite together in their charge, and what will oppose

them? Men at conflict in their own hearts, opposing each other in the

world, reduce themselves and each other to wretchedness. The race which

could eliminate the factors which promote internal conflict in society

and could organize human energies in harmony, would be powerful beyond

our wildest dreams. Every now and then in world-history we come across

instances of what organized humanity could accomplish. There are

fragments of an architecture so majestic that they awe us as the high

rocks of nature do, and they seem almost like portions of nature itself,

and truly they are so, being portions of nature remade by man, who is

also a nature energy of divine origin. Europe by its conflicts today

is reducing itself to barbarism and powerlessness, and these conflicts

arose out of the internal conflicts in society, for individuals and

nations act outside themselves as they act inside themselves. The

problem for Europe is to create a harmonious life, and it is the problem

for us in Ireland, and we will have to work this out for ourselves. The

creation of a harmonious life among a people must come from within. It

can never come by the imposition of an external law imposed by another

people: Never did master and slave work in true unison, no matter how

benevolent the master or how yielding the slave, for there is in every

man, no matter what his condition, a spark of divine life, and it

will always be ready to stir him out of subjection, as the fires of

earthquake lie below the cultivated plain. Man is a creature who has

free will, and it is by self-devised and self-checked efforts he will

attain his full human stature. So the problem of creating an organic

life in Ireland, a harmony of our people, a union of their efforts for

the common good and for the manifestation of whatever beauty, majesty,

and spirituality is in us, must be one we ourselves must solve for

ourselves.

To be indifferent to the possibilities of human life, to ignore the

problem, is to turn our back on heaven, which fashioned the spirit of

man in its image. If the spirit of man has likeness to Deity, it means

that if it manifests itself fully in the world, the world too becomes

a shadowy likeness of the heavens, and our civilizations will make a

harmony with the diviner spheres. We give still a service of lip belief

to the Scriptures, yet active faith we have not. But they are true,

yesterday, today, and for ever; and we have still the root of the matter

in us, for when any one utters out of profound conviction his faith,

there are always multitudes ready to respond. What really prevents an

organic unity in Ireland is the economic individualism of our lives. The

science of economics deals with the efforts of men to mine out of nature

the food, minerals, and materials necessary to preserve life. There is

nothing more certain than that where men work alone or only with the

aid of their families they are little higher than the animals. When they

tend to unite civilization begins. Then arise the towers, the temples,

the cities, the achievements of the architect and engineer. The earth is

tapped of its arcane energies, the very air yields to us its mysterious

powers. We control the etheric waves and send the message of our deeds

across the ocean. Yet in the midst of these vast external manifestations

of power, multitudes of men and women live in squalor, isolated in their

labors, living in the slums of cities; and this, if we examine it, comes

about because the organization of human energies into a harmonious unity

is not complete. There is really no lack of food, clothing, building

material, land. Nature has provided bountifully for more myriads than we

are likely to see peopling the earth. But people compete with each other

and undersell each other, and those who labor are mulcted of their

due, and instead of turning to the earth--the inexhaustible mother--and

working unitedly for the common weal, they continue that fierce

competition and stultify each other's efforts and reduce each other to

wretchedness. Humanity is a house divided against itself. Those who feel

this to be true must gather round any movement which gives a hope for

the future, which indicates a policy by which the organic unity of

society in Ireland might be attained, and our people work harmoniously

to make beauty and health prevail in our civilization. What each

gives up to society in the making of a civilization he gets back a

thousandfold. Now, the co-operative movement alone of all movements in

Ireland has aspired to make an economic solidarity in Ireland. Whatever

the aims of other movements may be--and many of them have high ideals

and are necessary for the spiritual and intellectual development of our

people--there is none of them which has for aim the unity of economic

life. They all leave untouched this problem--how are we to organize

society so that people will not be in conflict with each other, will not

nullify each other's efforts, but all will conspire together for

unity, so that none shall be forgotten or oppressed or left out of our

brotherhood? The policy I put forward is incomplete and imperfect, and

it must necessarily be so, being mainly the work of one mind, and to

complete it and perfect it there must be many minds and many workers

fired by the ideal. But I have indicated in some completeness how the

rural population could be co-operatively organized, federated together,

and how the urban population could be organized and brought into a

harmony of economic purpose with the folk of the country. Within the

limits of object these suggestions amount to a policy for the nation.

If the tragic condition of the world leaves us unstirred, if we draw

no lessons from it, if there is no fiery stirring of will in Ireland to

make it a better place to live in, then indeed we may lose hope for our

country. Let us remember the most scornful condemnation in Scripture was

not given to the evil but to the indifferent: "Because thou art neither

hot nor cold I will spew thee out of my mouth." Let us not be the

Laodiceans of Europe, listless and indifferent to human needs,

swallowing our whisky and our porter, stupefying our souls, while our

poor are sweated; letting the children of our cities die with more

carelessness about life than the people of any other European country,

with sectarian organization's crawling in secrecy like poisonous

serpents through the undergrowth of swamps and forests. The co-operative

movement is at least open and ideal in its aims and objects. It is

national and not sectional. It seeks the triumph of no section but the

unity of our people, where unity alone is possible. Our intransigents

and extremists of all parties are not hurt or wounded by their adhesion

to the co-operative ideal. We may make up our minds that the stubborn

Irish temperament will never be overcome, but it may be won, and the

movement which invites all parties and creeds into its ranks and gives

them the largest opportunities of working together and understanding

each other, gives also the largest hope of the gradual melting of old

bitterness into a common tolerance where what is best essentially wins;

for all true triumphs are triumphs not of force, but the conquest by a

superior beauty of what is less beautiful. We should aim at a society

where people will be at harmony in their economic life, will readily

listen to different opinions from their own, will not turn sour faces

on those who do not think as they do, but will, by reason and sympathy,

comprehend each other and come at last, through sympathy and affection,

to a balancing of their diversities, as in that multitudinous diversity,

which is the universe, powers and dominions and elements are balanced,

and are guided harmoniously by the Shepherd of the Ages.

The National Being: Some Thoughts on an Irish Polity · 第 25 / 27 题