CHAPTER XVII.

OF THE CAUSES, GENERATION, AND DEFINITION

OF A COMMONWEALTH.

[Sidenote: The end of commonwealth, particular security:]

The final cause, end, or design of men, who naturally love liberty, and

dominion over others, in the introduction of that restraint upon

themselves, in which we see them live in commonwealths, is the foresight

of their own preservation, and of a more contented life thereby; that is

to say, of getting themselves out from that miserable condition of war,

which is necessarily consequent, as hath been shown in chapter XIII, to

the natural passions of men, when there is no visible power to keep them

in awe, and tie them by fear of punishment to the performance of their

covenants, and observation of those laws of nature set down in the

fourteenth and fifteenth chapters.

[Sidenote: Which is not to be had from the law of nature:]

For the laws of nature, as _justice_, _equity_, _modesty_, _mercy_, and,

in sum, _doing to others, as we would be done to_, of themselves,

without the terror of some power, to cause them to be observed, are

contrary to our natural passions, that carry us to partiality, pride,

revenge, and the like. And covenants, without the sword, are but words,

and of no strength to secure a man at all. Therefore notwithstanding the

laws of nature, which every one hath then kept, when he has the will to

keep them, when he can do it safely, if there be no power erected, or

not great enough for our security; every man will, and may lawfully rely

on his own strength and art, for caution against all other men. And in

all places, where men have lived by small families, to rob and spoil one

another, has been a trade, and so far from being reputed against the law

of nature, that the greater spoils they gained, the greater was their

honour; and men observed no other laws therein, but the laws of honour;

that is, to abstain from cruelty, leaving to men their lives, and

instruments of husbandry. And as small families did then; so now do

cities and kingdoms which are but greater families, for their own

security, enlarge their dominions, upon all pretences of danger, and

fear of invasion, or assistance that may be given to invaders, and

endeavour as much as they can, to subdue, or weaken their neighbours, by

open force, and secret arts, for want of other caution, justly; and are

remembered for it in after ages with honour.

[Sidenote: Nor from the conjunction of a few men or families:]

Nor is it the joining together of a small number of men, that gives them

this security; because in small numbers, small additions on the one side

or the other, make the advantage of strength so great, as is sufficient

to carry the victory; and therefore gives encouragement to an invasion.

The multitude sufficient to confide in for our security, is not

determined by any certain number, but by comparison with the enemy we

fear; and is then sufficient, when the odds of the enemy is not of so

visible and conspicuous moment, to determine the event of war, as to

move him to attempt.

[Sidenote: Nor from a great multitude, unless directed by one judgment:]

And be there never so great a multitude; yet if their actions be

directed according to their particular judgments, and particular

appetites, they can expect thereby no defence, nor protection, neither

against a common enemy, nor against the injuries of one another. For

being distracted in opinions concerning the best use and application of

their strength, they do not help but hinder one another; and reduce

their strength by mutual opposition to nothing: whereby they are easily,

not only subdued by a very few that agree together; but also when there

is no common enemy, they make war upon each other, for their particular

interests. For if we could suppose a great multitude of men to consent

in the observation of justice, and other laws of nature, without a

common power to keep them all in awe; we might as well suppose all

mankind to do the same; and then there neither would be, nor need to be

any civil government, or Commonwealth at all; because there would be

peace without subjection.

[Sidenote: And that continually.]

Nor is it enough for the security, which men desire should last all the

time of their life, that they be governed, and directed by one judgment,

for a limited time; as in one battle, or one war. For though they obtain

a victory by their unanimous endeavour against a foreign enemy; yet

afterwards, when either they have no common enemy, or he that by one

part is held for an enemy, is by another part held for a friend, they

must needs by the difference of their interests dissolve, and fall again

into a war amongst themselves.

[Sidenote: Why certain creatures without reason, or speech, do

nevertheless live in society, without any coercive power.]

It is true, that certain living creatures, as bees, and ants, live

sociably one with another, which are therefore by Aristotle numbered

amongst political creatures; and yet have no other direction, than their

particular judgments and appetites; nor speech, whereby one of them can

signify to another, what he thinks expedient for the common benefit: and

therefore some man may perhaps desire to know, why mankind cannot do the

same. To which I answer,

First, that men are continually in competition for honour and dignity,

which these creatures are not; and consequently amongst men there

ariseth on that ground, envy and hatred, and finally war; but amongst

these not so.

Secondly, that amongst these creatures, the common good differeth not

from the private; and being by nature inclined to their private, they

procure thereby the common benefit. But man, whose joy consisteth in

comparing himself with other men, can relish nothing but what is

eminent.

Thirdly, that these creatures, having not, as man, the use of reason, do

not see, nor think they see any fault, in the administration of their

common business; whereas amongst men, there are very many, that think

themselves wiser, and abler to govern the public, better than the rest;

and these strive to reform and innovate, one this way, another that way;

and thereby bring it into distraction and civil war.

Fourthly, that these creatures, though they have some use of voice, in

making known to one another their desires, and other affections; yet

they want that art of words, by which some men can represent to others,

that which is good, in the likeness of evil; and evil, in the likeness

of good; and augment, or diminish the apparent greatness of good and

evil; discontenting men, and troubling their peace at their pleasure.

Fifthly, irrational creatures cannot distinguish between _injury_ and

_damage_; and therefore as long as they be at ease, they are not

offended with their fellows: whereas man is then most troublesome, when

he is most at ease: for then it is that he loves to shew his wisdom, and

control the actions of them that govern the commonwealth.

Lastly, the agreement of these creatures is natural; that of men, is by

covenant only, which is artificial: and therefore it is no wonder if

there be somewhat else required, besides covenant, to make their

agreement constant and lasting; which is a common power, to keep them in

awe, and to direct their actions to the common benefit.

[Sidenote: The generation of a commonwealth.]

The only way to erect such a common power, as may be able to defend them

from the invasion of foreigners, and the injuries of one another, and

thereby to secure them in such sort, as that by their own industry, and

by the fruits of the earth, they may nourish themselves and live

contentedly; is, to confer all their power and strength upon one man, or

upon one assembly of men, that may reduce all their wills, by plurality

of voices, unto one will: which is as much as to say, to appoint one

man, or assembly of men, to bear their person; and every one to own, and

acknowledge himself to be author of whatsoever he that so beareth their

person, shall act, or cause to be acted, in those things which concern

the common peace and safety; and therein to submit their wills, every

one to his will, and their judgments, to his judgment. This is more than

consent, or concord; it is a real unity of them all, in one and the same

person, made by covenant of every man with every man, in such manner, as

if every man should say to every man, _I authorise and give up my right

of governing myself, to this man, or to this assembly of men, on this

condition, that thou give up thy right to him, and authorize all his

actions in like manner_. This done, the multitude so united in one

person, is called a COMMONWEALTH, in Latin CIVITAS. This is the

generation of that great LEVIATHAN, or rather, to speak more reverently,

of that _mortal god_, to which we owe under the _immortal God_, our

peace and defence. For by this authority, given him by every particular

man in the commonwealth, he hath the use of so much power and strength

conferred on him, that by terror thereof, he is enabled to perform the

wills of them all, to peace at home, and mutual aid against their

enemies abroad. [Sidenote: The definition of a commonwealth.] And in him

consisteth the essence of the commonwealth; which, to define it, is _one

person, of whose acts a great multitude, by mutual covenants one with

another, have made themselves every one the author, to the end he may

use the strength and means of them all, as he shall think expedient, for

their peace and common defence_.

[Sidenote: Sovereign, and subject, what.]

And he that carrieth this person, is called SOVEREIGN, and said to have

_sovereign power_; and every one besides, his SUBJECT.

The attaining to this sovereign power, is by two ways. One, by natural

force; as when a man maketh his children, to submit themselves, and

their children to his government, as being able to destroy them if they

refuse; or by war subdueth his enemies to his will, giving them their

lives on that condition. The other, is when men agree amongst

themselves, to submit to some man, or assembly of men, voluntarily, on

confidence to be protected by him against all others. This latter, may

be called a political commonwealth, or commonwealth by _institution_;

and the former, a commonwealth by _acquisition_. And first, I shall

speak of a commonwealth by institution.

-------

The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 03 (of 11) · 第 2 / 21 章