CHAPTER XXXIV

Election of Leo X.--His ambitious projects--Birth of Prince

Guidobaldo of Urbino--The Pontiff's designs upon that

state, which he gives to his nephew--The Duke retires to

Mantua.

The Duke's influence, as head of the della Rovere family, was

paramount in the conclave, composed as it was of relations, friends,

and creatures of the late Pope in overwhelming majority. The election

was therefore to a great degree in his hands, and when it fell

upon the Cardinal de' Medici, he rejoiced in the elevation of a

personal friend. He and his brother Giuliano, their nephew Lorenzo,

and their cousin Giulio, afterwards Clement VII., had been welcome

guests at Urbino, during their family's long exile from Florence.

Indeed, we have noticed Giuliano as one of the most brilliant

ornaments of Guidobaldo's court, where he resided so long that the

apartment devoted to his use still bears his name in the palace. The

restoration of the Medici to supremacy in their native city had been

the doing of Julius; the choice of their cardinal as his successor

was the act of his nephew.[*252] Thus was the bond of friendship

confirmed by ties of gratitude. But from such fetters princes are

often prone to assume an exemption, and Francesco Maria was destined

to experience that they are not more binding upon pontiffs.[253]

[Footnote *252: This is rather vague. We are not told what Francesco

Maria did that justifies Dennistoun in saying that the election of

Leo X. was his act. I can find no evidence of Francesco Maria's

personal influence in the conclave. If the election of Leo was an

arrangement, it was Cardinal Riario to whom it was due. The charge of

ingratitude therefore falls to the ground.]

[Footnote 253: To inaugurate the new pontificate, and mark the

contrast of Alexander and Julius with their successor,--its Maecenas,

Agostino Chigi, erected a triumphal arch, inscribed,--

"Olim habuit Cypris sua tempora; tempora Mavors

Olim habuit; sua nunc tempora Pallas habet."

Venus here reigned supreme, by Mars displaced;

Our happier age by Pallas' sway is graced.

To this doggerel there quickly appeared the rejoinder,--

"Mars fuit, est Pallas, Cypria semper ero."

Once Mars, Minerva now, but Venus still.]

Leo X. has been one of the most fortunate of men. His all but

sovereign birth was still more distinguished by the merit of his

family, to which history has done the amplest justice. His natural

talents and tastes were not only of a high order, but were perfectly

adapted to the golden age in which he lived, and to the high career

for which he was destined. His rapid and premature advancement to

the first dignities of the Church stimulated instead of relaxing his

mental discipline. He obtained the triple tiara at the unprecedented

age of thirty-seven, and wore it during the brightest period of the

papacy. Though cut short in the flower of manhood, he lived long

enough to link his name with the most splendid era of modern history,

and although his measures accelerated the crisis of the Reformation,

he died ere their seed had borne that dreaded fruit. In fine, his

eventful life has been celebrated by at least one biographer worthy

of the theme. On the wide field which such a character opens we shall

have little opportunity to expatiate. Our narrative has to do with

its darker shadows, and to hold up this Pontiff as the implacable

foe of a dynasty which had singular claims upon his favour and

consideration.

[Illustration: _Anderson_

LEO X

_After the picture by Raphael in the Pitti Gallery, Florence_]

The general estimate of Julius and of his successor has been shrewdly

conceived and tersely expressed by Sismondi. "The projects of the

former had prospered beyond the ordinary calculations of policy;

his impetuosity, by surprising his enemies and throwing all their

plans into confusion, had often availed him more than prudence

could have done; he had also extended the temporal possessions of

the Church beyond what any of his predecessors had effected. Yet he

had caused so many mischiefs, he had occasioned such vast bloodshed,

he had so swamped Italy with foreign armies, even while he pretended

to rid her of the barbarians, that his death was hailed as a public

blessing, and the cardinals responded to the feeling of Rome, Italy,

and all Christendom in desiring that his successor should in no

respect resemble him. As he had been old, restless, impatient, and

passionate, they sought to replace him with one less aged, and whose

tastes were for literature, pleasure, and epicurean indulgences....

Leo was quite the opposite of his predecessor; his temperament

was far less stern, irascible, or unforgiving. Towards intimate

associates his manners were singularly cheerful and gracious. The

protection he extended to letters and arts, the favours which he

lavished upon savants, poets, and artists, drew from all Europe a

chorus of commendation. But, on the other hand, his character fell

very short of that of Julius in frankness and elevation; all his

negotiations were stained by deceit and perfidy. Whilst he talked

of peace he fanned the flame of war; no pity for the inhabitants of

Italy, crushed by barbarian hosts, ever influenced his conduct. His

ambition, nowise inferior to that of his predecessor, was not veiled,

even to himself, by motives equally respectable. His object was not

the independence of Italy, nor the aggrandisement of the Church, but

the advancement of his own family."

The Cardinal Giovanni de' Medici, second son of Lorenzo the

Magnificent, was elected Pope on the 11th of March, 1513, and

was crowned on the 19th. The Duke of Urbino had repaired to Rome

to offer his congratulations in person, and attended the solemn

installation at the Lateran, with twenty-four mounted gentlemen

and as many footmen; but mingling regard for the dead with respect

for the living, he and all his suite appeared in black velvet and

satin, as mourning for his uncle. The device worn on the Pontiff's

liveries at this pageant, was in harmony with his previous character

and present professions: under a golden "yoke" was inscribed the

word _suave_, meaning something more winning than the scriptural

phrase "easy," from which it was borrowed. When two more years had

gone by, Francesco Maria was an outlaw, crushed under that gentle

yoke, and stripped of his all; whilst the Duke of Ferrara, the next

great feudatory of the Church who followed in the procession, could

scarcely maintain himself by French aid, until the death of his

pontifical oppressor enabled him to parody on his medals another

and more appropriate text, in memory of his escape, "Out of the

LION'S mouth." At this coronation there was witnessed an

unwonted spectacle, the fruit of Alexander's aggressions on the

Campagna barons. The humbled chiefs of Colonna and Orsini walked side

by side, and their reconciliation was commemorated by a rare medal,

on which the crowned column of Colonna is fondly hugged by the Orsini

bear, with the motto, "For their country's safety." Francesco Maria's

reception was as cordial as distinguished, for the promptings of

ambition had not yet transformed Leo's naturally bland and gracious

nature into unrelenting and bitter hate. He was accordingly confirmed

in his dignities, and retained for a year as Captain-General of the

Church, with 13,844 ducats of pay, besides 30,000 of allowances for

his company of two hundred men-at-arms, and a hundred light cavalry;

nor could words exceed the kindness of the letter in which Bembo

intimated this to him on behalf of the Pope.[254]

[Footnote 254: Papal brieves of Aug. 4 and April 17, 1513, in

Archivio Diplomatico at Florence, and Bembo's public despatches, ii.

No. 8. Roscoe has no authority whatever for representing the Duke as

at this period the Pope's "formidable rival."]

When the coronation fêtes were over, he returned home to enjoy one of

those brief intervals of repose which rarely fell to his lot. His

almost continual absence on military service had indeed been greatly

felt in his capital, and most of the distinguished men who frequented

it under Duke Guidobaldo were now dispersed. Some of them, however,

had continued towards his nephew their friendship and services,

either under his own banner or in diplomacy. Among these was

Baldassare Castiglione, to whose good offices the reconciliation of

Francesco Maria with Julius has been partly attributed. In the affair

of the Cardinal of Pavia, the Count warmly espoused his part, and

invented for him, as a deprecatory device, a lion rampant proper on

a field gules, holding a rapier, and a scroll inscribed, _Non deest

generoso in pectore virtus_, "Worth is never wanting in a generous

breast"; but this emblem was seldom used, being odious to the college

of cardinals, as approving a sacrilegious precedent. Castiglione's

elegant endowments were especially qualified to gain him the ear of

a prince whose pride it was to emulate his predecessors, as much

in the grace of their court as in the fame of their arms; and the

preference for so small a state shown by him whom monarchs would

have delighted to honour, was fit subject for gratitude, independent

of the real services which the Duke derived from the friendship of

one so well versed in business. It is stated, although on doubtful

authority, that he went upon a mission from Urbino, to urge on Henry

VIII. a descent upon Calais,[*255] in the hope of such a diversion

recalling Louis from Italy. If so, it was probably in arranging the

treaty of Malines on the 5th of April of this year. In the prospect

of adding Pesaro to his dominions, Francesco Maria had promised to

Castiglione a fief in his dependencies, and in September, 1513, a

charter was granted to him of Novillara, erected into a countship.

The letter of donation specially mentions the faithful, sincere,

and acceptable services of Baldassare; his elegance in the Latin

and Italian languages; his skill in military and civil affairs;

and confers upon him this favour rather in earnest of future and

more ample benefits, than as a reward of the fatigues, perils, and

anxieties which he had already undergone for the Duke.[*256] Of this

grant he received a willing confirmation from Leo X., to whom, on his

elevation, he had borne Francesco Maria's first congratulations. The

brief to this effect dwells on the peculiar satisfaction with which

the Pope thus testified, from long acquaintance, his high merits, his

distinguished birth, his literary acquirements, his military fame,

and his exemplary devotion to the Holy See.

[Footnote *255: Henry landed at Calais August 1st, 1513; it was

then in English hands, as it remained till Mary Tudor lost it

in 1558. From Calais Henry advanced to the siege of Terouenne.

Castiglione was, of course, in London in 1506 to receive the Garter

for Guidobaldo from Henry VII.; a second journey seems apocryphal.

On Castiglione at Urbino and elsewhere, cf. LUZIO e RENIER, _Mantova e

Urbino_ (Torino, 1893), pp. 174, 234, 242 _et seq._]

[Footnote *256: Yet he seems to have suffered in the war. His long

residence at Urbino may well have been due to the Duchess, who loved

him sincerely.]

The estate thus associated with Castiglione is generally said to owe

its name to its "noble air"; and certainly upon the Italian principle

that a healthful atmosphere must be sought in high places, that of

Novillara ought to possess unusual virtues. But the learned Olivieri

has corrected this vulgar error, and has derived its denomination

from the Latin _nubilare_, which he renders as an open shed for the

housing of grain,--a grange, as it might be called. He has traced

it back to the twelfth century, and to the fourteenth ascribes

an imposing tower of three commodious stories built here by the

Malatesta. Hither was conducted, on her first arrival, Camilla of

Aragon, bride of Costanzo Sforza Lord of Pesaro; and its inaccessible

situation did not prevent a splendid manifestation of the general

joy, in fêtes and pageants, commemorated in a volume of excessive

rarity, which seem more proportioned to the affectionate gallantry of

her husband and subjects, than to the resources of their state, or to

the conveniences of this palace. Representations of the community

of Pesaro induced Francesco Maria to obtain from Castiglione a

restitution to them of this Castle, in 1522, under promise of

replacing it by an equivalent, which was never redeemed. Years passed

away, notwithstanding repeated remonstrances on the part of Camillo,

son of the Count, in which he even induced the Emperor to join. At

length, in 1573, Guidobaldo II. conferred a tardy compensation, by

granting to Count Camillo the Castel del Isola del Piano. This Duke

had previously built an addition to the palace of Novillara, with

elaborate decorations never completed. At his son's marriage with

Lucretia d'Este, this fief, then worth 500 scudi a year, was settled

upon her, but rarely occupied. It subsequently caught the young

prince Federigo's fancy, who had planned for its beautiful gardens

and frescoes, when untimely death cut short his schemes, and brought

the nationality of Urbino and Pesaro to a close.

In the present day Novillara consists of about a hundred houses,

huddled together, threaded by narrow alleys, and walled in by

terraces. It overlooks Pesaro and Fano, the valleys of the Isauro

and Metauro, with the hilly land which separates them. Northward the

eye rests on Monte Bartolo, but southward it roams as far as Loreto,

and in clear weather the Dalmatian coast may be discerned. The tower

of the Malatesta, which formed a landmark to the whole surrounding

country, fell in 1723, and the dilapidated fabric of the della Rovere

now harbours a few squalid families, adding another to the melancholy

wrecks of departed grandeur too frequent in this fair land. Yet

Novillara will pass down the stream of Italian literary history as

the title of its courtly lord, and its magnificent panorama may well

repay the traveller who has leisure and strength to scramble to its

summit.

The early policy of Leo was entirely pacific. The leading aim of his

diplomacy was to soothe those irritations which his predecessors had

fomented throughout Europe, and to heal the wounds thence resulting

to Italy. His only aggressive measures during 1513 had been directed

against the French, with the patriotic view of thwarting renewed

attempts upon the Peninsula, in which they were seconded by Spain

and Venice. In this object he was successful, but as the various

and complicated transactions by which it was effected are foreign

to our immediate purpose, we refer the reader for details to the

tenth, twelfth, and thirteenth chapters of Roscoe's delightful work,

although naturally representing them in the lights more favourable to

the Pontiff's motives than we are prepared fully to approve. Power

is, however, a dangerous draught, often exciting the thirst it seeks

to slake. Before the Keys had been many months in Leo's possession,

the establishment of his own family in the two fairest sovereignties

of Italy became the object for which he was to

"Cry havock, and let slip the dogs of war."

Anticipating changes which might occur upon the death of Ferdinand

II. of Spain, he conceived hopes of throwing off foreign domination

in Naples, and providing for it a king of Italian birth, in his own

brother Giuliano the Magnificent. With this ulterior advancement

in fancied perspective, he removed him from the management of

affairs at Florence, and substituted his nephew Lorenzo, intending

ere long to assert for the latter a titular as well as a virtual

sovereignty, and to extend his sway over all Tuscany, Urbino, and

Ferrara. These ambitious and revolutionary projects required powerful

aid, which could be most readily secured by finding a sharer in the

adventure. Such a one readily occurred in Louis XII., whose consent

to copartnery could scarcely be doubted, when his long-cherished

acquisition of the Milanese was offered as his share of its gains.

It was no serious objection to this scheme that it inferred a total

subversion of Leo's anti-gallican policy; and, intent only upon his

new views, he secretly negotiated with the French King to bring once

more into Lombardy those troops which, but the year before, he had

been the chief means of ignominiously chasing beyond the Alps. Should

this move place the great powers in general collision, there was all

the fairer chance for papal ambition in the scramble; and it mattered

little that Italy should again be laid in ashes, and saturated with

blood, so that the Medici became arbiters of her destiny.

With a view to these arrangements, Giuliano was betrothed in the

following year to Filiberta of Savoy, maternal aunt of Francis, heir

to the French crown. But a fatality seems to have attended most

papal diplomacy: based upon nepotism or personal ambition, it was

generally thwarted by its own fickleness or imbecility. Doubtful of

the success of his scheme upon the crown of Naples (which Louis was

little disposed to gratify, although prepared to concede to Giuliano

the principality of Tarento), or impatient perhaps of waiting for

its becoming vacant, the Pontiff turned his views upon Parma and

Piacenza, as a convenient interim state for his brother, to be

aggrandised by the purchase of Modena from the Emperor for 40,000

golden ducats. But here he was met by a difficulty of his own recent

creation, for the establishment of Louis at Milan must have proved

dangerous to the proposed principality of Giuliano; so, once more

shuffling the cards, he prepared some new combinations for preventing

the French expedition into Italy. One of these was an intrigue to

detach the Venetian republic from the party of Louis, for which

purpose he sent thither his adroit secretary Bembo, whose memorial

to the senate has been printed by Roscoe. This attempt, however,

entirely failed, and the King's death, on the 1st of January, alone

prevented the detection of his faithless ally.[257]

[Footnote 257: One of the shrewd agents of the maritime republic

supplied a key to the policy of Leo, by observing that it consisted

in immediately opening a secret understanding with the avowed enemy

of whatever prince he leagued with. His intrigues in behalf of his

brother and nephew are illustrated by some documents in the _Archivio

Storico Italiano_, Appendix I., 306.]

In returning from Venice, Bembo paid one more visit to the Feltrian

court, now at Pesaro, rejoicing in the recent birth of an heir to

the Dukedom. There he found many changes. The gay and accomplished

circle, in whose lighter or more pedantic pastimes he had borne a

willing part, was scattered, many of its members like himself to hold

appointments of trust and dignity. But it was a sincere satisfaction

to him again to meet the Duchess Elisabetta, now recovered from the

deep despondency he has so touchingly described, and enjoying the

society of her accomplished niece and successor, as well as of her

former mistress of the revels, the merry Emilia Pia. In company

of these ladies, the diplomatist forgot during a brief interval

the cares of state, and lingered for two days on the excuse of

indisposition, until he thought it necessary to explain his delay

in a letter to Cardinal Bibbiena of the 1st of January, 1515.[258]

The fatigues of riding post a hundred and forty miles from Chioggia

in two days and a half required this repose, and induced him to

continue his journey in less hot haste. Yet Bembo, with all his

accomplishments, was but a sunshine courtier, as we shall see some

fifteen months later.

[Footnote 258: See below, p. 368.]

It would seem that, at the time of Giuliano's marriage, the idea

of providing for him large additions in Romagna to his Lombard

principality was the leading motive of his brother's policy,

and that the Dukes of Urbino and Ferrara were already viewed as

stepping-stones to his exaltation. The command of the pontifical

troops was accordingly bestowed upon him as Gonfaloniere, on the

24th of June, 1515, at once an injustice and an insult to Francesco

Maria, in whose hands its baton remained unsullied.[*259] The fair

professions with which the Duke was superseded were vague and

unsatisfactory, and he received warning from various quarters of

the sinister designs whereof he was the destined victim. These,

however, being as yet immature, the Pontiff maintained professions

of unwavering favour, and, in a brief dated on the 16th of August,

he assures the Duke that he will readily regard certain services as

entitled to the largest and most liberal remuneration in his power.

[Footnote *259: However, Francesco's record was not a very brilliant

one. He failed to take Mirandola without Julius II., and the affair

of Ravenna would, one might think, have ruined any soldier.]

Yet Giuliano must be acquitted of the ingratitude and perfidy

shown to his former friend by the Pope and his nephew Lorenzo. The

hospitalities of Duke Guidobaldo had in his case fallen upon no

arid soil. His fondest recollections of lettered intercourse and

of youthful love were centred in Urbino. He remembered that it was

Francesco Maria who, six years before, had interposed to screen him

from the jealousies of the late Pontiff, and who had warmly urged the

restoration of his family in Florence. He therefore firmly refused

to acquiesce in any projects which would aggrandise himself at the

Duke's cost; and, in token of good will, while on his way to France,

made a detour to visit him at Gubbio, where he thus addressed him:

"I have heard, my Lord, that it has been represented to you how the

Pope has a mind to take your state from you, in order to give it me;

but this is not true, for, on account of the kindness, favour, and

benefits I ever have received from your Excellency and your house,

I should never consent to it, however much desired by his Holiness,

lest other princes of your rank should resolve, in consequence, never

again to give such refuge at their courts as was granted to me and

mine. Be assured, therefore, that, whilst I live, you not only will

receive no molestation on my account, but will be ever regarded by

me as an elder brother."[260] Upon these assurances, Francesco Maria

not only suspended the defences of his duchy, which he had begun

to put in order, but accepted an engagement for himself, with two

hundred men-at-arms and a hundred light horse, under Giuliano, the

pontifical captain-general. To secure himself, however, against all

contingencies, he applied to the Pontiff for leave to bring into the

field a thousand infantry, in addition to his usual following. The

scruples of Giuliano did not in any way soften his brother, whose

intrigues against Urbino are prominent in the curious despatch of his

secretary Bibbiena, which Roscoe has printed under date the 16th of

February.

[Footnote 260: Dialogo Giraldi, Vat. Ottob. MSS. No. 3153.]

Louis XII. died on the 1st of January, 1515, and was succeeded by

his second and third cousin, Francis I. This event changed not the

projects of Leo in behalf of his brother, whose marriage to the

Princess of Savoy was solemnised in February, and who was received

by the French monarch with kindness and distinction. To render his

position fully worthy of the match, the Pope invested him with Parma,

Piacenza, and Modena, yielding a revenue approaching to 48,000

ducats. He likewise settled a large pension upon the princess, and

provided for the pair a magnificent palace in Rome, to which they

were welcomed with a pomp unusual even in these days of pageantry.

Leo's position with reference to Francis I. was in many respects

embarrassing, and the defence of his policy, elaborately undertaken

by Roscoe, has established the writer's bias rather than the

Pontiff's rectitude. That monarch was steadily pursuing those

schemes upon the Milanese which Leo had the year before suggested

to his predecessor; and the amicable relations established with

the Medici by Giuliano's marriage gave him additional reason to

rely upon the Pontiff's support in the struggle which must follow

his descent upon Italy. But to restrain the French beyond their

Alpine barrier was the favourite, as well as the natural policy of

his Holiness, and it was that which tended most to the security of

his brother's newly-acquired Lombard sovereignty. He therefore,

in July, after some months of anxious vacillation, avowed his

adherence to the league of the Emperor with the Kings of England

and of Spain, to which Florence, Milan, and the Swiss were parties.

Yet he was far from hearty in the cause, and, during the brief

campaign which succeeded the arrival of a French army in Lombardy,

the ecclesiastical contingent limited their efforts to watching the

safety of Parma and Piacenza. Nor did the other allies show much

more zeal, excepting the Swiss, whose impetuous valour brought on

the pitched battle of Marignano on the 13th of September, and lost

them the prestige which had stamped their infantry as invincible. The

costly victory there gained by the French was speedily followed by a

surrender of his claims upon Milan by Duke Maximiliano Sforza, who

was content to enjoy for the remainder of his life a home and pension

provided by his conqueror.[*261]

[Footnote *261: The defeat of the Swiss at Marignano opened the way

for the long fight between Francis I. and Charles V. It decided many

things--the future of monarchy in Europe, for instance, as well as

the fate of the republican army "so long invincible in Italy." Cf.

CREIGHTON, _op. cit._, vol. V., p. 243. "What will become

of us," said Leo to Giorgi, the Venetian Ambassador, who brought him

the news of the defeat--"and of you?" "We will put ourselves in the

hands of the Most Christian King," he added, "and will implore his

mercy." Cf. the _Relazioni Venete_, 2nd series, vol. III., p. 44,

quoted by Creighton, who, as always, takes the view of a statesman,

and not merely that of a scholar. Sforza surrendered Milan on October

4th. The Pope signed terms with Francis October 13th, 1515. The Pope

was then in Viterbo, which he left for Bologna in November, coming to

Florence on the last day of that month. In December he was back in

Bologna to meet Francis. He returned to Florence and left for Rome on

February 19th, 1516.]

The principal object of Francis being thus effected, he was not

indisposed to reconciliation with the Holy See, for which Leo had

sedulously retained an opening by keeping Ludovico Canossa throughout

the contest as an accredited agent at the French head-quarters. But

the Pontiff met the usual reward of trimmers. The tardy accommodation

offered by his envoy came too late to save Parma and Piacenza, for

which alone he had become a party to the war. The French monarch

would not hear of renouncing what he insisted were intrinsic

portions of the Milanese, but offered to meet with the Pontiff and

arrange in person a lasting amity, Bologna being named for the

interview. Upon the diplomatic arrangements which there occupied

these potentates in the end of the year we need not touch, further

than to notice that the intercession of Francis in favour of the

Duke of Urbino, which the latter had hastened, after the battle of

Marignano, to bespeak by means of a special envoy, proved quite

ineffectual. It obviously was dictated less by any interest in the

Duke's welfare than by the wish to thwart a favourite project of his

fickle ally, and it at once was met by reference to an article which

the Pope had adroitly inserted in the treaty, that Francis should in

no way interfere for the protection of any undutiful vassal of the

Holy See. From Bologna Leo proceeded to Florence, where he remained

most of the winter, maturing his schemes for the ruin of Francesco

Maria.

The death of Ferdinand of Spain in January, 1516, soon reawoke the

ambitious hopes of Francis, by reminding him of his predecessor's

dormant claims upon the Neapolitan crown. But a new combination of

circumstances gave another turn to his thoughts. The efforts of the

Venetians to recover Verona and Brescia from Maximilian brought the

latter into Lombardy at the head of fifteen thousand Swiss troops,

by whom Lautrec, the French general, was for a time hard pressed,

and Leo, ever anxious to conciliate a conqueror, hastily sent

Cardinal Bibbiena with reinforcements to the Emperor's camp. Yet the

storm, passing off suddenly and harmlessly, left few traces besides

jealousy, which the prudence of that wily legate scarcely prevented

from arising in the mind of Francis towards his slippery ally.

These vacillations on the part of Leo have been slightly touched

upon, in order to clear the ground for displaying his ambitious

nepotism in its proper field,--the duchy of Urbino. This, his

prevailing weakness, had met with many disappointments. No opening

occurred for its exercise in the direction of Naples. Parma and

Piacenza had passed from his grasp, by reluctant surrender to a

professing ally. But, worst of all, his favourite brother Giuliano,

the object in whom centred most of his schemes, had been removed

by death on the 17th of March, not without surmise of poison from

the jealousy of his nephew Lorenzo.[*262] Although his great

popularity favoured the ambitious views which were thrust upon him

by the Pontiff, his mind lay rather towards elegant pursuits and

splendid tastes, than to such high aspirations. Indeed, the Venetian

ambassador, Capello, represents his dying request to Leo as in favour

of Urbino[*263]; but the Pope waived the discussion of a point upon

which his resolution was taken. Lorenzo, his successor in the papal

favour, was a much more willing, though less conciliatory, instrument

of his Holiness's designs.

[Footnote *262: Giuliano had certainly been ailing for months. His

death did not seem to have been unexpected.]

[Footnote *263: So does Giorgi. Cf. _Relazioni Venete_, 2nd series,

vol. II., p. 51.]

Lorenzo de' Medici was eldest son of Pietro, the first-born of

Lorenzo the Magnificent.[*264] He was born on the 13th of September,

1492, and his youth was passed amid many trials. His father, after

ten years of exile from Florence, had been drowned in the Garigliano,

in 1504, and, four years thereafter, his sister Clarissa's marriage

with Filippo Strozzi involved him in a second banishment. He was of

good person and gallant presence, endowed with a stirring spirit,

but destitute of generous or heroic qualities. Giorgi, another

Venetian envoy, even considered him scarcely inferior in cunning and

capacity to the redoubted Valentino. The government of Florence was

committed to him by Leo, on his uncle Giuliano being called to a

higher destiny, and feeling his advancement restrained by the prior

claims, as well as by the moderation of the latter, he is believed to

have removed him by poison; at all events he was immediately named to

succeed him as gonfaloniere of the Church.

[Footnote *264: Cf. VERDI: _Gli ultimi anni di Lorenzo de'

Medici duca d'Urbino, 1515-1519_ (Pietrogrande, 1905).]

This renewed outrage upon Francesco Maria's military rank,[*265]

and the death of the only individual of the Medici upon whom he had

any reliance, warned him of the approaching crisis in his fate. The

influence of Alfonsina degli Orsini in favour of her son Lorenzo

stimulated the Pontiff's projects, unwarned by a prediction of

Giuliano that, by following the courses of the Borgia, he would

probably suffer their fate. The immediate pretext, adopted for

outpouring the accumulated vials of papal wrath, was the Duke's

declining to march his troops into Lombardy under Lorenzo as

gonfaloniere, in consequence, as Giraldi informs us, of information

that his death was resolved upon should he trust his person within

his rival's power. Accordingly, Leo was no sooner returned to Rome,

than, affecting to consider this refusal, as the act of overt

rebellion by a subject against his sovereign, he issued a severe

monitory against his feudatory, summoning him thither to answer

various vague or irrelevant charges, one of these being the Cardinal

of Pavia's slaughter, of which he had already received no

"Ragged and forestalled remission,"

on a report subscribed by Leo himself. Various diplomatic

functionaries at the papal court vainly interceded that he should

appear by attorney, instead of surrendering in person; and he

meanwhile garrisoned Urbino, Pesaro, and S. Leo. The Duchess Dowager,

whose arms had frequently received and fondled the infant Lorenzo,

while her husband's court sheltered the elder members of his house,

hastened to Rome as a mediatrix; but it was with difficulty she

made her way to the Pope's presence, and she obtained no mercy for

her nephew, nor protection for her own alimentary provisions out

of the duchy, his Holiness refusing to listen to any propositions

until the Duke had obeyed the monitory by appearing at Rome before

the 2nd of April. In consequence of his failure to do so, a bull of

excommunication went forth on the 27th, depriving him of his state,

and all dignities held of the Holy See, and absolving his subjects

from allegiance, on pain of ecclesiastical censures. By a gratuitous

exercise of malevolence, the papal influence was employed with the

King of Spain for confiscation of Sora, and his other patrimonial

holdings in Naples, thus visiting him with instant beggary. On the

18th of August, his dukedom and ecclesiastical baton were conferred

upon the unworthy Lorenzo, who, in the following month, was also

invested with the prefecture of Rome.

[Footnote *265: I do not see how this was an outrage. Francesco had

been already dismissed: see _supra_ 360. Besides, he had certainly

made overtures to the French. Cf. GUICCIARDINI, _Storia

d'Italia_, vol. XII.]

[Illustration: _Alinari_

LORENZO DI PIERO DE' MEDICI, DUKE OF URBINO

_After the picture by Bronzino in the Uffizi Gallery, Florence_]

The value of political gratitude is strikingly illustrated in the

fact, that these outrageous measures were adopted, in a consistory

composed for the most part of creatures of the della Rovere family,

with the single dissentient voice of Cardinal Grimani, of Venice,

Bishop of Urbino, whose independence earned him an exile from Rome.

Nor was this the only painful lesson of the worth of courtier

fidelity now taught to that illustrious house. Even the civilities

of Bembo to the Duchess Dowager sank to a low grade, as he thus

acknowledges in a letter to Bibbiena of the 19th of April:--"The Lady

Duchess of Urbino, whom I visited yesterday (a duty which I, however,

very rarely perform), commends herself to you, as does also the Lady

Emilia. On these dames the Signor Unico [Accolti] dances attendance.

He is more than ever in the heat of his old passion, which he

declares now numbers five lustres and a half; and he has better

hopes than heretofore of at length obtaining the consummation of his

desires, having been asked by the Lady Duchess to _improvisare_, by

which means he trusts to move that stony heart to tears--at the

least. He is to rehearse in two or three days, and as soon as he

does so, I shall report to you: would that you could be here, as he

is sure to do it right well." It can scarcely be doubted that this

innuendo was meant to apply to the more exalted of these ladies.

Whether as a caustic sneer, or a current scandal, it comes ill from

such a quarter, and only adds a new proof of the poet's inordinate

conceit. Nor did it go unpunished, for we find such vain effrontery

thus lashed by Gandolfo Porrino, a contemporary satirist:--

"In such affairs the palm he gives to one beyond all gold,

Urbino's Duchess dowager, your cousin scarce yet old.

Long at that court Lord Unico had paragoned her face,

With words and pen, in wondrous phrase, to angels' matchless grace.

Till, gazing on those saint-like eyes, while tears bedimmed his own,

The secret of his passion thus he breathed to her alone:

'All goddess fair! my love for thee all other loves exceeds,

No Launcelot, no errant knight, its lightning course outspeeds!

Prithee with me participate the boon that cannot cloy,

And share in mutual confidence a bliss without alloy.'

Unlike those artful hypocrites who evil speeches spurn,

But wink at acts, the prudent dame thus answer did return:

'Remember that we hapless wives must each their lord obey,

Tyrant or kind, his dread behests we never may gainsay;

Mine is the Duke, to whom your wish propose, should he assent,

As well I wot, right readily your whim shall I content.'

Confounded by her sarcasm the carpet-knight was left

Poor victim of his vanity, of self-respect bereft."

The now inevitable war was opened by a simultaneous movement upon the

duchy from three several quarters. Renzo, that is, Lorenzo da Ceri,

accompanied by Lorenzo de' Medici and a powerful army, advanced from

Romagna; Vitello Vitelli marched upon Massa Trabaria; and, on the

12th of May, Gianpaolo Baglioni seized on Gubbio.[*266] The force

thus poured upon the state amounted to seventeen thousand foot,

above a thousand men-at-arms, and near two thousand light horse.

That which Francesco Maria could bring into the field numbered about

nine thousand men, and being averse to entail upon his subjects the

miseries of an unavailing struggle, he authorised their surrender,

excepting the citadels of Pesaro, Urbino, S. Leo, and Maiuolo, which

he garrisoned for resistance. His attempts to obtain the mediation

or support of foreign powers entirely failed. Their sympathy and

condolence were freely doled out to him, but none gave hope of

efficient aid, except Maximilian, whose promises, on this as on all

other occasions, proved quite worthless. It only remained to bow, as

his uncle Guidobaldo had done, before the storm, and await happier

times. On the 31st he sent off from Pesaro his consort, in an ailing

state, his infant son, and the dowager Duchess to their relations at

Mantua, with such valuables as they could transport in six or eight

vessels, and, speedily following them, he embarked at midnight and

reached that city in disguise.

[Footnote *266: Cf. PELLEGRINI, _Gubbio sotto i conti e

Duchi d'Urbino_, in _Boll. per l'Umbria_, vol. XI., p. 221. Gianpaolo

Baglioni da Perugia entered the Eugubine territory with 100 knights,

500 horse, and 3000 foot. The Duke wrote that he could not defend

Gubbio. On the 31st May the Consiglio was called together, and it

decided: "redire ad Romanam ecclesiam et sub regimine s. D.N."]

Pesaro, after an eight days' siege, capitulated on honourable terms,

in breach of which Tranquillo Giraldi, the commandant, was hanged

upon a vague accusation of bad faith. Urbino having, by order of its

sovereign, been surrendered without a blow on the 30th of May,[*267]

the community, on the 16th of June, sent deputies to kiss the Pope's

feet on taking possession of the state, in hopes of obtaining

relaxation of the interdict; but his Holiness raised it only for

such as adhered to the existing order of things. He committed the

government of the town to its new bishop, Giulio Vitelli, who

intrigued at all hands to induce the magistracy to follow the example

set them in other places, of petitioning his Holiness to give them

an independent sovereign, in order that the exaltation of his nephew

to the dukedom might seem a popular measure. On the 16th of June

the interdict was removed from all the duchy except S. Leo, which

alone held out; but, faithful to the proverb of hating him whom he

had injured, the Pontiff was deaf to all entreaties for restoration

to church privileges of his victim, who consequently remained in

hiding at Goito near Mantua, apart from his family, that he might

not involve them in excommunication, and giving out that he had fled

across the Alps, in order to baffle those who sought his life.

[Footnote *267: ZACCAGNINI has published an unknown poem

on this taking of Urbino. See _Un poemetto sconosciuto sulla presa

d'Urbino del 1516_, in _Le Marche_ (1906), An. VI., p. 145.]

The example of Guidobaldo kept alive his hopes of regaining his

sovereignty, as that Duke had done, by means of S. Leo. But ere he

could organise measures for a descent, he had the grief of learning

its fall. As there is always something of romantic adventure in

the surprise of a place impregnable by ordinary expedients, we may

dwell for a moment on the third and last successful leaguer of this

fortress. The garrison consisted of a hundred and twenty men, one

tenth of whom had fallen in its defence. After three months spent in

hopeless assaults, a Florentine carpenter, named Antonio, observing

from the opposite heights the absence of sentinels over one of the

most precipitous parts of the rock, attempted to make his way up the

face of it, sometimes aided by plants and bushes in the clefts, but

generally driving iron spikes into their crevices, and fastening

ropes, ladders, or beams, as he advanced. After four nights of this

perilous toil he reached the wall, which he found, as expected,

without defenders. Having reported the way accessible, a number of

light infantry were entrusted to his guidance, whom he ordered to

strip their headgear and shoes, and to strap upon their backs their

shields, swords, and hatchets. On the 30th of September, under cover

of a wet and foggy night, he conducted these safely to the summit,

accompanied by a drummer and four pair of colours. At daybreak,

an alarm was given from the watch-tower of an assault upon the

gate, towards which the besiegers had sent a party; and, whilst the

defenders hurried in that direction, Antonio, with some fifty men,

cleared the walls, displayed their colours, and beat to arms. Ere the

garrison had recovered their presence of mind, the gate was opened by

the escalading party to their comrades, and the place was carried.

The citadel was held for twenty-five days longer by a handful

of desperate men, but they at length surrendered to one Antonio

Riccasoli of Florence, who placed upon the castle a vainglorious

inscription, claiming for himself the genius of another Dedalus. The

fortress had been commanded by Sigismondo Varana, Count of Camerino,

the Duke's young nephew, assisted by an experienced captain of the

Ubaldini; and the good treatment experienced by the garrison gave

rise to a suspicion of treachery on their part, Sigismondo alone

being sent to Volterra as prisoner of war. Much of the Duke's

treasure was taken, and the loss of S. Leo proved a serious blow to

his interests.[268]

[Footnote 268: Vat. Urb. MSS. No. 906, 907, 928; Vat. Ottob. MSS. No.

3153.]

Memoirs of the Dukes of Urbino, Volume 2 (of 3) Illustrating the Arms, Arts, and Literature of Italy, from 1440 To 1630. · 第 16 / 20 章