CHAPTER VIII.

THE ORGANS OF CIRCULATION AND RESPIRATION.

_SPECIAL REFERENCES._

VERLOREN. Mém. sur la Circulation dans les Insectes. Mém. cour,

par l’Acad. Roy. de Belgique, Tom. XIX. (1847). [Structure of

Circulatory Organs in a number of different Insects.]

GRABER. Ueb. den Propulsatorischen Apparat der Insekten. Arch. f.

mikr. Anat., Bd. IX. (1872). [Heart and Pericardium.]

LEYDIG. Larve von _Corethra plumicornis_. Zeits. f. wiss. Zool.,

Bd. III. (1852). [Valves in Heart.]

LANDOIS, H. Beob. üb. das Blut der Insekten. Zeits. f. wiss. Zool.,

Bd. XIV. (1864). [Blood of Insects.]

JAWOROWSKI. Entw. des Rückengefässes, &c., bei _Chironomus_. Sitzb.

der k. Akad. der Wiss. Wien., Bd. LXXX. (1879). [Minute Structure

and Development of Heart.]

LANDOIS, H., and THELEN. Der Tracheenverschluss bei den Insekten.

Zeits. f. wiss. Zool., Bd. XVII. (1867). [Stigmata.]

PALMEN. Zur Morphologie des Tracheensystems (1877). [Morphology of

Stigmata and Tracheal Gills.]

MACLEOD. La Structure des Trachées et la Circulation

Péritrachéenne. (Brussels, 1880.)

LUBBOCK. Distribution of Tracheæ in Insects. Trans. Linn. Soc.,

Vol. XXIII. (1860).

RATHKE. Untersuch. üb. den Athmungsprozess der Insekten. Schr. d.

Phys. Oek. Gesellsch. zu Königsberg. Jahrg. I. (1861). [Experiments

and Observations on Insect-respiration.]

PLATEAU. Rech. Expérimentales sur les Mouvements Respiratoires

des Insectes. Mém. de l’Acad. Roy. de Belgique, Tom. XLV. (1884).

Preliminary notice in Bull. Acad. Roy. de Belgique, 1882.

LANGENDORFF. Studien üb. die Innervation der Athembewegungen.--Das

Athmungscentrum der Insekten. Arch. f. Anat. u. Phys. (1883).

[Respiratory Centres of Insects.]

_Circulation of Insects._

A very long chapter might be written upon the views advanced by

different writers as to the circulation of Insects. Malpighi first

discovered the heart or dorsal vessel in the young Silkworm. His

account is tolerably full and remarkably free from mistakes. The heart

of the Silkworm, he tells us, extends the whole length of the body,

and its pulsations are externally visible in young larvæ. He supposed

that contraction is effected by muscular fibres, but these he could

not distinctly see. The tube, he says, has no single large chamber, but

is formed of many little hearts (_corcula_) leading one into another.

The number of these he could not certainly make out, but believed

that there was one to each segment of the body. During contraction

each chamber became more rounded, and when contraction was specially

energetic, the sides of the tube appeared to meet at the constrictions.

The flow of blood, he ascertained, was forward, the rhythm not

constant. No arteries were seen to be given off from the heart.[135]

Swammerdam thought that his injections ascertained the existence of

vessels branching out from the heart,[136] but this proved to be a

mistake. Lyonnet added many details of interest to what was previously

known. He came to the conclusion that there was no system of vessels

connected with the heart, and even doubted whether the organ so named

was in effect a heart at all. Marcel de Serres maintained that it was

merely the secreting organ of the fat-body. Cuvier and Dufour doubted

whether any circulation, except of air, existed in Insects. This was

the extreme point of scepticism, and naturalists were drawn back from

it by Herold,[137] who repeated and confirmed the views held by the

seventeenth-century anatomists, and insisted upon the demonstrable fact

that the dorsal vessel of an Insect does actually pulsate and impel a

current of fluid. Carus, in 1826, saw the blood flowing in definite

channels in the wings, antennæ, and legs. Straus-Durckheim followed up

this discovery by demonstrating the contractile and valvular structures

of the dorsal vessel. Blanchard affirmed that a complex system of

vessels accompanied the air tubes throughout the body, occupying

peritracheal spaces supposed to exist between the inner and outer

walls of the tracheæ. This peritracheal circulation has not withstood

critical inquiry,[138] and it might be pronounced wholly imaginary,

except for the fact that air tubes and nerves are found here and there

within the veins of the wings of Insects.

[135] Dissert. de Bombyce, pp. 15, 16 (1669).

[136] Biblia Naturæ, p. 410.

[137] Schrift. d. Marburg. Naturf. Gesellschaft, 1823.

[138] See, for a full account of this discussion, MacLeod sur la

Structure des Trachées, et la Circulation Péritrachéenne (1880). The

peritracheal circulation was refuted by Joly (Ann. Sci. Nat., 1849).

[Illustration: Fig. 73.--Heart, Alary Muscles, and Tracheal Arches,

seen from below; to the left is a side view of the heart. _T^2_, _T^3_,

_A^1_, alary muscles attached to the second thoracic, third thoracic,

and first abdominal terga. × 6. Fig. 35 (p. 74) is not quite correct as

to the details of the heart. The thoracic portion should be chambered,

and additional chambers and alary muscles represented at the end of the

abdomen. These omissions are rectified in the present figure.]

_Heart of the Cockroach._

[Illustration: Fig. 74.--Diagram to show the interventricular valves

and lateral inlets of the Heart. _ML_, median lobe; _V_, valve; _I_,

lateral inlet.]

The heart of the Cockroach is a long, narrow tube, lying immediately

beneath the middle line of the thorax and abdomen. It consists of

thirteen segments (fig. 73), which correspond to three thoracic and

ten abdominal somites. Each segment, as a rule, ends behind in a

conspicuous fold which projects backwards from the dorsal surface;

immediately in front of this are two lateral lobes. The median lobe

passes into the angle between two adjacent terga, and is continuous

with the dorsal wall of the segment next behind, from which it is

separated only by a deep constriction, while the lateral folds conceal

paired lateral inlets,[139] which lead from the pericardial space to

the hinder end of each chamber of the heart. Immediately in front of

each constriction is the interventricular valve, a pear-shaped mass of

nucleated cells, hanging down from the upper wall of the heart, and

inclining forward below. The position of this valve indicates that

during systole it closes upon the constricted boundary between two

chambers, thus shutting off at once the inlets and the passage into the

chambers behind. In this way the progressive and rhythmical contraction

of the chambers impels a steady forward current of blood, allowing an

intermittent stream to enter from the pericardial space, but preventing

regurgitation.

[139] It may be observed that Graber, who has paid close attention to

the heart of Insects, describes the inlets (_e. g._, in _Dytiscus_)

as situated, not at the hinder end, but in the middle of each

segment. We have not been able to discover such an arrangement in the

heart of the Cockroach.

[Illustration: Fig. 75.--Junction of two chambers of the Heart, seen

from above. _ML_, median lobe; _I_, lateral inlet.]

The wall of the heart includes several distinct layers. There are (1) a

transparent, structureless intima, only visible when thrown into folds;

(2) a partial endocardium, of scattered, nucleated cells, which passes

into the interventricular valves; (3) a muscular layer, consisting of

close-set annular, and distant longitudinal fibres. The annular muscles

are slightly interrupted at regular and frequent intervals, and are

imperfectly joined along the middle line above and below, so as to

indicate (what has been independently proved) that the heart arises

as two half-tubes, which afterwards join along the middle. Elongate

nuclei are to be seen here and there among the muscles. The adventitia

(4), or connective tissue layer, is but slightly developed in the adult

Cockroach.

Within the muscular layer is a structure which we have failed to make

out to our own satisfaction. It presents the appearance of regular but

imperfect rings, which do not extend over the upper third of the heart.

They probably meet in a ventral suture, but this and other details are

hard to make out, owing to the transparency of the parts. The rings

stain with difficulty, and we have not observed nuclei belonging to

them. Each extends over more than one bundle of annular muscles.

The difficulty of investigating a structure so minute and delicate

as the heart of an Insect may explain a good deal of the discrepancy

noted on comparing various published descriptions. Perhaps the most

obvious peculiarity which distinguishes the heart of the Cockroach, is

the subdivision of the thoracic portions into three chambers, which,

though less prominent in side-view than the abdominal chambers, are,

nevertheless, perfectly distinct. The number of abdominal chambers is

also unusually high; but it is so easy to overlook the small chambers

at the posterior end of the abdomen, that the number given in some of

the species may have been under-estimated.

_Pericardial Diaphragm and Space._

The heart lies in a pericardial chamber, which is bounded above by

the terga and the longitudinal tergal muscles; below by a fenestrated

membrane, the pericardial diaphragm. The intermediate space, which is

of inconsiderable depth, is nearly filled by a cellular mass laden with

fat, and resembling the fat-body.

The pericardial diaphragm, or floor of the pericardium, is continuous,

except for small oval openings scattered over its surface. It

consists of loosely interwoven fibres, interspersed with elongate

nuclei (connective-tissue corpuscles) and connected by a transparent

membrane. Into the diaphragm are inserted pairs of muscles, which, from

their shape and supposed continuity with the heart, have been named

_alæ cordis_, or alary muscles.[140] These are bundles of striated

muscle, about ·003 in. wide, which arise from the anterior margin of

each tergum. In the middle of the abdomen every alary muscle passes

inwards for about ·04 in., without breaking-up or widening, and then

spreads out fanwise upon the diaphragm. The fibres unite below the

heart with those of the fellow-muscle, and also join, close to the

heart, those of the muscles in front and behind. The alary muscles

are often said to distend the heart rhythmically by drawing its walls

apart, but this cannot be true. They do not pass into the heart at

all. Even if they did, a pull from opposite sides upon a flexible,

cylindrical tube, would narrow and not expand its cavity. Moreover,

direct observation[141] shows that the heart continues to beat after

all the alary muscles have been divided, and even after it has been cut

in pieces. These facts suggest that the heart of Insects is innervated

by ganglia upon or within it, and indeed transparent larvæ, such as

_Corethra_ or _Chironomus_, exhibit paired cells, very like simple

ganglia, along the sides of the heart.

[140] Lyonnet.

[141] Brandt, Ueb. d. Herz der Insekten u. Muscheln. Mél. Biol. Bull.

Acad. St. Petersb. Tom. VI. (1866).

[Illustration: Fig. 76.--Heart and Pericardial Diaphragm. On the

right, as seen from above; on the left, as seen from below; the bottom

figure represents a transverse section. _Ht_, heart; _PD_, pericardial

diaphragm; _AM_, alary muscle; _Tr_, tracheal tube; _PC_, pericardial

fat-cells; _PC_′, multinucleate fat-cells.]

Scattered over the upper surface of the pericardial diaphragm are

groups of cells, similar to the fat-masses of the perivisceral space.

Over the fan-like expansions of the alary muscles are different

fat-cells, which form branched and multinucleate lobes, and radiate in

the same direction as the underlying muscles.

Tracheal trunks, arising close to the stigmata, ascend upon the tergal

wall towards the heart. They overlie the alary muscles, and end near

the heart by bifurcation, sending one branch forward and another

backward to meet corresponding branches of adjacent trunks. A series of

arches is thus formed by the dorsal tracheæ on each side of the heart.

Occasionally an arch is subdivided into two smaller parallel tubes.

A few branches of distribution are given off to the fat-cells of the

pericardium.

Graber has explained the action of the pericardial diaphragm and

chamber in the following way.[142] When the alary muscles contract,

they depress the diaphragm, which is arched upwards when at rest.

A rush of blood towards the heart is thereby set up, and the blood

streams through the perforated diaphragm into the pericardial chamber.

Here it bathes a spongy or cavernous tissue (the fat-cells), which

is largely supplied with air tubes, and having been thus aerated,

passes immediately forwards to the heart, entering it at the moment of

diastole, which is simultaneous with the sinking of the diaphragm.

[142] Arch. f. mikr. Anat., Bd. IX. (1872); Insekten, ch. x.

In the Cockroach the facts of structure do not altogether justify this

explanation. The fenestræ of the diaphragm are mere openings without

valves. The descent of a perforated non-valvular plate can bring no

pressure to bear upon the blood, for it is not contended that the alary

muscles are powerful enough to change the figure of the abdominal

rings. Moreover, we find comparatively few tracheal tubes in the

pericardial chamber, and can discover no proof that in the Cockroach

the fat-cells adjacent to the heart have any special respiratory

character. The diaphragm appears to give mechanical support to the

heart, resisting pressure from a distended alimentary canal, while the

sheets of fat-cells, in addition to their proper physiological office,

may equalise small local pressures, and prevent displacement. The

movement of the blood towards the heart must (we think) depend, not

upon the alary muscles, but upon the far more powerful muscles of the

abdominal wall, and upon the pumping action of the heart itself.

_Circulation of the Cockroach._

The pulsations of the heart are rhythmical and usually frequent, the

number of beats in a given time varying with the species, the age, and

especially with the degree of activity or excitement of the Insect

observed.[143]

[143] Newport, in Todd’s Cyclopædia of Anatomy and Physiology, Art.

Insecta, pp. 981–2.

Cornelius[144] watched the pulsations in a white Cockroach immediately

after its change of skin, and reckoned them at eighty per minute;

but he remarks that the Insect was restless, and that the beats were

probably accelerated in consequence.

[144] Beitr. zur näheren Kenntniss von Periplaneta orientalis, p. 19.

In the living Insect a wave of contraction passes rapidly along

the heart from behind forwards; and the blood may under favourable

circumstances be seen to flow in a steady, backward stream along the

pericardial sinus, to enter the lateral aperture of the heart. The

peristaltic movement of the dorsal vessel may often be observed to set

in at the hinder end of the tube before the preceding wave has reached

the aorta.

From the heart a slender tube (the aorta) passes forward to the head.

It lies upon the dorsal surface of the œsophagus, which it accompanies

as far as the supra-œsophageal ganglia. In many Insects the thoracic

portion of the dorsal vessel is greatly narrowed and non-valvular,

forming the aorta of most writers on Insect Anatomy. The aorta often

dips downward near its origin, but in the Cockroach the thoracic

portion of the vessel keeps nearly the same level as the abdominal.

It gives off no lateral branches, but suddenly ends immediately in

front of the œsophageal ring in a trumpet-shaped orifice,[145] by

which the blood passes at once into a lacunar system which occupies

the perivisceral space. Here the blood bathes the digestive and

reproductive organs, receives the products of digestion, which are

not transmitted by lacteals, but discharged at once into the blood;

here, too, it gives up its urates to the excretory tubules, and its

superfluous fats to the finely-divided lobules of the fat-body. The

form of the various appendages of the alimentary canal (salivary

glands, cæcal tubes, and Malpighian tubules), as well as of the testes,

ovaries, and fat-body, is immediately connected with the passive

behaviour of the fluid upon which their nutrition depends. Instead

of being compact organs injected at every pulsation by blood under

pressure, they are diffuse, tubular, or branched, so as to expose as

large a surface as possible to the sluggish stream in which they float.

[145] The termination of the aorta has been described by Newport, in

_Sphinx_ (Phil. Trans., 1832, Pt. I., p. 385) _Vanessa, Meloe, Blaps

and Timarcha_. (Todd’s Cycl., Art. “Insecta,” p. 978.)

From the perivisceral space the blood enters the pericardial sinus by

the apertures in its floor, and returns thence by the lateral inlets

into the heart.

No satisfactory injections of the circulatory channels can be made in

Insects, on account of the large lacunæ, or cavities without proper

wall, which are interposed between the heart and the extremities of the

body. In the wings and other transparent organs the blood has been seen

to flow along definite channels, which form a network, and resemble

true blood vessels in their arrangement. Whether they possess a proper

wall has not been ascertained. It is observed that in such cases the

course of the blood is generally forwards along the anterior, and

backwards along the posterior, side of the appendage. The direction of

the current is not, however, quite constant, and the same cross branch

may at different times transmit blood in different directions.[146]

[146] Moseley, Q. J. Micr. Sci. (1871).

_Blood of the Cockroach._

The blood of the Cockroach may be collected for examination by cutting

off one of the legs, and wiping the cut end with a cover-slip. It

abounds in large corpuscles, each of which consists of a rounded

nucleus invested by protoplasm. Amœboid movements may often be

observed, and dividing corpuscles are occasionally seen. Crystals

may be obtained by evaporating a drop of the blood without pressure;

they form radiating clusters of pointed needles. The fresh-drawn

blood is slightly alkaline; it is colourless in the Cockroach, but

milky, greenish, or reddish in some other Insects. The quantity varies

greatly, according to the nutrition of the individual: after a few

days’ starvation, nearly all the blood is absorbed. Larvæ contain much

more blood, in proportion to their weight, than other Insects.

_Respiratory Organs of Insects._

The respiratory organs of Insects consist of ramified tracheal tubes,

which communicate with the external air by stigmata or spiracles. Of

these spiracles the Cockroach has ten pairs--eight in the abdomen and

two in the thorax. The first thoracic spiracle lies in front of the

mesothorax, beneath the edge of the tergum; the second is similarly

placed in front of the metathorax. The eight abdominal spiracles belong

to the first eight somites; each lies in the fore part of its segment,

and hence, apparently, in the interspace between two terga and two

sterna. The first abdominal spiracle is distinctly dorsal in position.

The disposition of the spiracles observed in the Cockroach is common in

Insects, and, of all the recorded arrangements, this approaches nearest

to the plan of the primitive respiratory system of Tracheata, in which

there may be supposed to be as many spiracles as somites.[147] The head

never carries spiracles except in _Smynthurus_, one of the Collembola

(Lubbock). Many larvæ possess only the first of the three possible

thoracic spiracles; in perfect Insects this is rarely or never met with

(_Pulicidæ?_), but either the second, or both the second and third, are

commonly developed. Of the abdominal somites, only the first eight ever

bear spiracles, and these may be reduced in burrowing or aquatic larvæ

to one pair (the eighth), while all disappear in the aquatic larva of

_Ephemera_.

[147] The oldest Tracheate actually known to bear spiracles is the

Silurian Scorpion of Gothland and Scotland (Scudder, in Zittel’s

Palæontologie, p. 738). We need not say that this is very far removed

from the primitive Tracheate which morphological theory requires. The

existing _Peripatus_ makes a nearer approach to the ideal ancestor

of all Tracheates, if we suppose that all Tracheates had a common

ancestor of any kind, which is not as yet beyond doubt.

From the spiracles, short, wide air-tubes pass inwards, and break up

into branches, which supply the walls of the body and all the viscera.

Dorsal branches ascend towards the heart on the upper side of the alary

muscles; each bifurcates above, and its divisions join those of the

preceding and succeeding segments, thus forming loops or arches. The

principal ventral branches take a transverse direction, and are usually

connected by large longitudinal trunks, which pass along the sides

of the body; the Cockroach, in addition to these, possesses smaller

longitudinal vessels, which lie close to the middle line, on either

side of the nerve-cord.[148] The ultimate branches form an intricate

network of extremely delicate tubes, which penetrates or overlies every

tissue.

[148] The longitudinal air-tubes are characteristic of the more

specialised Tracheata. In Araneidæ, many Julidæ, and Peripatus each

spiracle has a separate tracheal system of its own.

[Illustration: Fig. 77.--Tracheal System of Cockroach. Side view of

head seen from without, introducing the chief branches of the left

half. × 15.]

[Illustration: Fig. 78.--Tracheal System of Cockroach. Top and front of

head seen from without. × 15.]

[Illustration: Fig. 79.--Tracheal System of Cockroach. Back of head,

seen from the front, the fore half being removed. × 15. The letters A–J

indicate corresponding branches in figs. 77, 78, and 79.]

[Illustration: Fig. 80.--Tracheal System of Cockroach. The dorsal

integument removed and the viscera in place. × 5.]

[Illustration: Fig. 81.--Tracheal System of Cockroach. The viscera

removed to show the ventral tracheal communications. × 5.]

[Illustration: Fig. 82.--Tracheal System of Cockroach. The ventral

integument and viscera removed to show the dorsal tracheal

communications. × 5.]

_Tracheal Tubes._

The accompanying figures sufficiently explain the chief features of

the tracheal system of the Cockroach, so far as it can be explored by

simple dissection. Leaving them to tell their own tale, we shall pass

on to the minute structure of the air-tubes, the spiracles, and the

physiology of Insect respiration.

The tracheal wall is a folding-in of the integument, and agrees with

it in general structure. Its inner lining, the intima, is chitinous,

and continuous with the outer cuticle. It is secreted by an epithelium

of nucleated, chitinogenous cells, and outside this is a thin and

homogeneous basement membrane. The integument, the tracheal wall, and

the inner layers of nearly the whole alimentary canal are continuous

and equivalent structures. The lining of the larger tracheal tubes at

least is shed at every moult, like that of the stomodæum and proctodæum.

[Illustration: Fig. 83.--Tracheal tube with its epithelium and spiral

thread. Slightly altered from a figure given by Chun (Rectal-drüsen bei

den Insekten, pl. iv., fig. 1).]

_Tracheal Thread._

In the finest tracheal tubes (·0001 in. and under) the intima is to

all appearance homogeneous. In wider tubes it is strengthened by a

spiral thread, which is denser, more refractive, and more flexible

than the intervening membrane. The thread projects slightly into the

lumen of the tube, and is often branched. It is interrupted frequently,

each length making but a few turns round the tube, and ending in a

point. The thread of a branch is never continued into a main trunk.

Both the thread and the intervening membrane become invisible or faint

when the tissue is soaked with a transparent fluid, so as to expel

the air. Both, but especially the thread, absorb colouring matter

with difficulty. The thread, from its greater thickness, offers a

longer resistance to solvents, such as caustic alkalies, and also to

mechanical force; it can therefore be readily unrolled, and often

projects as a loose spiral from the end of a torn tube, while the

membrane breaks up or crumbles away.[149]

[149] Investigators are not yet agreed as to the minute structure

of the tracheal thread. Chun (Abh. d. Senkenberg. Naturf. Gesells.,

Bd. X., 1876) considers it an independent chitinous formation, not a

mere thickening of the intima. He describes the thread as solid. The

intima itself is, he believes, divisible in the larger tubes into

an inner and an outer layer, into both of which the thread is sunk.

Macloskie (Amer. Nat., June, 1884) describes the spiral as a fine

tubule, opening by a fissure along its length. He regards it as a

hollow crenulation of the intima, and continuous therewith. Packard

(Amer. Nat. Mag., May, 1886) endeavours to show that the thread is

not spiral, but consists of parallel thickenings of the intima. He

is unable to find proof of the tubular structure, or of the external

fissure. We have specially examined the trachea of the Cockroach, and

find that the thread can readily be unwound for several turns. It is

truly spiral.

[Illustration: Fig. 84.--Intima (chitinous lining) of a large tracheal

tube. The spiral thread divides here and there. Copied from MacLeod,

loc. cit., fig. 9.]

The large tracheal tubes close to the spiracles are without spiral

thread, and the intima is here subdivided into polygonal areas, each

of which is occupied by a reticulation of very fine threads. This

structure may be traced for a short distance between the turns of the

spiral thread.

The chitinogenous layer of the tracheal tubes is single, and consists

of polygonal, nucleated cells, forming a mosaic pattern, but becoming

irregular and even branched in the finest branches. The cell walls are

hardly to be made out without staining. Externally, the chitinogenous

cells rest upon a delicate basement membrane.

Where a number of branches are given off together, the tracheal tube

may be dilated. Fine branches, such as accompany nerves, are often

sinuous. In the very finest branches the tube loses its thread, the

chitinogenous cells become irregular, and the intima is lost in the

nucleated protoplasmic mass which replaces the regular epithelium of

the wider tubes.[150]

[150] It has been supposed that these irregular cells of the tracheal

endings pass into those of the fat-body, but the latter can always be

distinguished by their larger and more spherical nuclei.

_The Spiracles._

The spiracles of the Cockroach are by no means of complicated

structure, but their small size, and the differences between one

spiracle and another, are difficulties which cost some pains to

overcome.

The first thoracic spiracle (fig. 85) is the largest in the body. It

lies in front of the mesothorax, between the bases of the first and

second legs. It is placed obliquely, the slit being inclined downwards

and backwards, and is closed externally by a large, slightly two-lobed

valve, attached by its lower border. The aperture immediately within

the valve divides into two nearly equal cavities, each of which leads

to a separate tracheal trunk; and between these cavities is a septum,

thickened on its free edge, against which the margin of the valve

appears to close. A special occlusor muscle arises from the integument

below the spiracle, and is inserted into a chitinous process which

projects inwardly from the centre of the valve. A second muscle,

whose connections and mode of action we have not been able to make

out satisfactorily, lies beneath the first, and is inserted into the

thickened edge of the septum.

The second thoracic spiracle (fig. 86) lies in front of the metathorax,

between the bases of the second and third legs. It is much smaller and

simpler than the first. Its valve is nearly semi-circular, and the free

border is strengthened on its deep surface by a chitinous rim, which

terminates beyond the end of the hinge of the valve in a process which

gives insertion to the occlusor muscle.

[Illustration: Fig. 85.--First Thoracic Spiracle (left side), seen from

the outside. × 70. _V_, valve; _I_, setose lining of valve (mouth of

tracheal tube) × 230. The occlusor muscle is shown. The arrow indicates

the direction of air entering the spiracle. In the natural position

this spiracle is set obliquely, the slit being inclined downwards and

backwards. (_P. americana._)]

The abdominal spiracles present quite a different plan of structure.

The external orifice is permanently open, owing to the absence of

valves, but communication with the tracheal trunk may be cut off at

pleasure by an internal occluding apparatus. The external orifice leads

into a shallow oval cup, which communicates with the tracheal trunk

by a narrow slit, or internal aperture of the spiracle. The chitinous

cuticle, surrounding this internal aperture, is richly provided with

setæ, which are turned towards the opening.[151] Fig. 87_C_ represents

a spiracle seen from within, and shows that the slit divides the cup

into two unequal lips, the smaller of which inclines away from the

middle line of the body, is movable, and is strengthened on its deep

surface by a curved chitinous rod, the “bow” of Landois. From the

opposite lip, a pouch is thrown out, which serves for the attachment of

the occlusor muscle. The muscle is inserted into the extremity of the

bow, and when it contracts, the bow is pulled over into the position

shown in fig. 87_D_, and the opening is closed. The antagonist muscle,

which exists in all the abdominal spiracles, is shown in fig. 88; it

arises from the supporting plate of the spiracle, and is inserted

opposite to the occlusor, into the extremity of the bow.

[151] In the first abdominal spiracle the setæ are developed only on

that lip which carries the bow.

[Illustration: Fig. 86.--Second Thoracic Spiracle (left side), seen

from the outside. × 70. _V_, lower (movable) valve. The occlusor

muscle is shown. The arrow indicates the direction of air entering the

spiracle. (_P. americana._)]

[Illustration: Fig. 87.--Four views of the First Abdominal Spiracle

(left side). × 70. The bow is shaded in all the figures. (_P.

americana._)

_A_--The spiracle, seen from the outside; _p_, lateral pouch; _I_,

internal aperture.

_B_-- Do., side view.

_C_-- Do., seen from the inside, the aperture open. The occlusor muscle

is shown.

_D_--The spiracle, seen from the inside, the aperture shut.]

Each of the eight abdominal spiracles is constructed on this plan; the

first merely differs from the others in its larger size and dorsal

position, being carried upon the lateral margin of the first abdominal

tergum, whereas the others are placed on the side of the body, each

occupying an interspace between two terga and two sterna. The bow is of

about the same length in all; hence the apparent disproportion in the

figures of different spiracles. The external aperture of the abdominal

spiracles is oval or elliptical, placed vertically and directed

backwards.

[Illustration: Fig. 88.--Abdominal Spiracle (left side) in side view,

showing the bow: × 70; _p_, lateral pouch of spiracle, seen from

within. The tesselated structure of the spiracle and trachea is shown

at _A_ (× 230), and the margin of the external aperture at _B_ (× 230).

(_P. americana._)]

We have already pointed out that the wall of the air-tube, for a

short distance from the spiracular orifice, has a tesselated instead

of a spiral marking. In the thoracic spiracles the tesselated cells

are grouped round regularly placed setæ (fig. 85 _I_). The chitinous

cuticle within the opening is crowded with fine setæ, which are often

arranged so as to form a fringe on one or both sides of the internal

aperture. (_Supra_, p. 152.)

_Mechanism of Respiration._

In animals with a complete circulation, aërated blood is diffused

throughout the body by means of arteries and capillaries, which deliver

it under pressure at all points. Such animals usually possess a special

aërating chamber (lung or gill), where oxygen is made to combine with

the hæmoglobin of the blood. It is otherwise with Insects. Their blood

escapes into great lacunæ, where it stagnates, or flows and ebbs

sluggishly, and a diffuse form of the internal organs becomes necessary

for their free exposure to the nutritive fluid. The blood is not

injected into the tissues, but they are bathed by it, and the compact

kidney or salivary gland is represented in Insects by tubules, or a

thin sheet of finely divided lobules. By a separate mechanism, air is

carried along ramified passages to all the tissues. Every organ is its

own lung.

We must now consider in more detail how air is made to enter and leave

the body of an Insect. The spiracles and the air-tubes have been

described, but these are not furnished with any means of creating

suction or pressure; and the tubes themselves, though highly elastic,

are non-contractile, and must be distended or emptied by some external

force. Many Insects, especially such as fly rapidly, exhibit rhythmical

movements of the abdomen. There is an alternate contraction and

dilatation, which may be supposed to be as capable of setting up

expirations and inspirations as the rise and fall of the diaphragm of

a Mammal. In many Insects, two sets of muscles serve to contract the

abdomen--viz., muscles which compress or flatten, and muscles which

approximate or telescope the segments.[152] In the Cockroach the

second set is feebly developed, but the first is more powerful, and

causes the terga and sterna alternately to approach and separate with

a slow, rhythmical movement; in a Dragon-fly or Humble-bee the action

is much more conspicuous, and it is easy to see that the abdomen is

bent as well as depressed at each contraction. No special muscles exist

for dilating the abdomen, and this seems to depend entirely upon the

elasticity of the parts. It was long supposed that, when the abdomen

contracted, air was expelled from the body, and the air passages

emptied; that when the abdomen expanded again by its own elasticity,

the air passages were refilled, and that no other mechanism was needed.

Landois pointed out, however, that this was not enough. Air must be

forced into the furthest recesses of the tracheal system, where the

exchange of oxygen and carbonic acid is effected more readily than in

tubes lined by a dense intima. But in these fine and intricate passages

the resistance to the passage of air is considerable, and the renewal

of the air could, to all appearance, hardly be effected at all if the

inlets remained open. Landois accordingly searched for some means

of closing the outlets, and found an elastic ring or spiral, which

surrounds the tracheal tube within the spiracle. By means of a special

muscle, this can be made to compress the tube, like a spring clip upon

a flexible gas pipe. When the muscle contracts, the passage is closed,

and the abdominal muscles can then, it is supposed, bring any needful

pressure to bear upon the tracheal tubes, much in the same way as with

ourselves, when we close the mouth and nostrils, and then, by forcible

contraction of the diaphragm and abdominal walls, distend the cheeks

or pharynx. Landois describes the occluding apparatus of the Cockroach

as completely united with the spiracle. It consists, according to

him, of two curved rods, the “bow” and the “band,” one of which forms

each lip of the orifice. From the middle of the band projects a blunt

process for the attachment of the occlusor muscle, which passes thence

to the extremity of the bow. The concave side of each rod is fringed

with setæ, and turned towards the opening, which lies between the

two. Upon this description of the spiracles of the Cockroach we have

to remark that there is no occluding apparatus at all in the thoracic

spiracles, which are provided with external valves. In the abdominal

spiracles the bow is perfectly distinct, but the “band” of Landois

has no separate existence. Though the actual mechanism in this Insect

does not altogether agree with Landois’ description, it is capable of

performing the physiological office upon which he justly lays so much

stress--viz., the closing of the outlets of the tracheal system, in

order that pressure may be brought upon the contained air.

[152] This subject is treated at greater length in Prof. Plateau’s

contribution on Respiratory Movements of Insects. (_Infra_, p. 159.)

The injection of air by muscular pressure into a system of very fine

tubes may, however, appear to the reader, as it formerly did to

ourselves, extremely difficult or even impossible. Can any pressure

be applied to tubes within the body of an Insect which will force air

along the passages of (say) ·0001 in. diameter? It may well seem that

no pressure would suffice to distend these minute tubules, in which the

actual replacement of carbonic acid by oxygen takes place, but that the

air would either contract to a smaller volume or burst the tissues.

If we question the physical possibility of Landois’ explanation, an

alternative is still open to us. The late Prof. Graham has applied the

principle of Diffusion to the respiration of animals, and has shown

how by a diffusion-process the carbonic acid produced in the remote

cavities would be moved along the smaller tubes, and emptied into wider

tubes, from which it could be expelled by muscular action. The carbonic

acid is not merely exchanged for oxygen, but for a larger volume of

oxygen (O 95 : CO_{2} 81); and there is consequently a tendency to

accumulation within the tubes, which is counteracted by the elasticity

of the air vessels, as well as by special muscular contractions.[153]

[153] Phil. Mag., 1833. Reprinted in “Researches,” p. 44. Graham

expressly applies the law of diffusion of gases to explain the

respiration of Insects. Sir John Lubbock quotes and comments upon the

passage in his paper on the Distribution of the Tracheæ in Insects.

(Linn. Trans. Vol. XXIII.)

Whether diffusion or injection by muscular pressure is the chief means

of effecting the interchange of gases between the outer air and the

inner tissues of the Insect, is a question to be dealt with by physical

enquiry.

If we suppose two reservoirs of different gases at slightly different

pressures to be connected by a capillary tube of moderate dimensions,

such as one of the larger tracheæ of the Cockroach, transference by

the molecular movements of diffusion would be small compared with that

effected by the flow of the gas in mass. But if the single tube were

replaced by a number of others, of the same total area, but of the

fineness (say) of the pores in graphite, the flow of the gas would be

stopped, and the transference would be effected by diffusion only.

We may next consider tubes of intermediate fineness, say a tracheal

tubule of the Cockroach at the point where the spiral thread ceases,

and where the exchange of gases through the wall of the tubule becomes

comparatively unobstructed. Such a tubule is about ·0001 in. diameter.

If we may extend to such tubules the laws which hold good for the flow

of gases in capillary tubes of much greater diameter, the quantity of

air which might be transmitted in a given time by muscular pressure of

known amount can be determined. Suppose the difference of pressure at

the two ends of the tubule to be one-hundredth of an atmosphere, and

further, that the tubule is a quarter of an inch long and ·0001 in.

diameter. The tubule would then be cleared out every four seconds. Such

a flow of air along innumerable tubules might well suffice for the

respiratory needs of the Cockroach. Without laying too much stress upon

this calculation, for which exact data are wanting, we may be satisfied

that an appreciable quantity of air may be made by muscular pressure to

flow along even the finer air passages of an Insect.[154]

[154] For an explanation of the physical principles involved in this

discussion, and for the calculation (based upon our own assumptions),

we are indebted to Mr. A. W. Rücker, F.R.S.

_Respiratory Movements of Insects._

By FÉLIX PLATEAU, Professor in the University of Ghent.

The respiratory movements of large Insects are in general very

apparent, and many observers have said something about what they

have seen in various species. It is only since the publication of

Rathke’s memoir, however, that precise views have been gained as to the

mechanism of these movements. This remarkable work, treating of the

respiratory movements in Insects, the movable skeletal plates, and the

respiratory muscles characteristic of all the principal groups, filled

an important blank in our knowledge. But, notwithstanding the skill

displayed in this research, many questions still remained unanswered,

which required more exact methods than mere observation with the naked

eye or the simple lens.

The writer, who was followed a year later by Langendorff, conceived

the idea of studying, by such graphic methods as are now familiar, the

respiratory movements of perfect Insects. He has made use of two modes

of investigation. The first, or graphic method, in the strict sense of

the term, consisted in recording upon a revolving cylinder of smoked

paper the respiratory movements, transmitted by means of very light

levers of Bristol board, attached to any selected part of the Insect’s

exoskeleton. Unfortunately, this plan is only applicable to insects of

more than average size. A second method, that of projection, consisted

in introducing the Insect, carried upon a small support, into a large

magic lantern fitted with a good petroleum lamp. When the amplification

does not exceed 12 diameters, a sharp profile may be obtained, upon

which the actual displacements may be measured, true to the fraction of

a millimetre. Placing a sheet of white paper upon the lantern screen,

the outlines of the profile are carefully traced in pencil so as to

give two superposed figures, representing the phases of inspiration and

expiration respectively. By altering the position of the Insect, so as

to obtain profiles of transverse section, or of the different parts of

the body, and, further, by gluing very small paper slips to parts whose

movements are hard to observe, the successive positions of the slips

being then drawn, complete information is at last obtained of every

detail of the respiratory movements: nothing is lost.

This method, similar to that employed by the English physiologist,

Hutchinson,[155] is valuable, because it enables us, with a little

practice, to investigate readily the respiratory movements of very

small Arthropods, such as Flies or Lady-birds. It has this advantage

over all others, that it leaves no room for errors of interpretation.

[155] J. Hutchinson, Art. Thorax, Todd’s Cycl. of Anat. and Phys.

Not satisfied with mere observation by such means as these, of the

respiratory movements of Insects, the writer has also studied the

muscles concerned, and, in common with other physiologists (Faivre,

Barlow, Luchsinger, Dönhoff, and Langendorff), has examined the action

of the various nervous centres upon the respiratory organs. The results

at which he has arrived may be summarised as follows:--

1. There is no close relation between the character of the respiratory

movements of an Insect and its position in the zoological system.

Respiratory movements are similar only when the arrangement of the

abdominal segments, and especially when the disposition of the attached

muscles are almost identical. Thus, for example, the respiratory

movements of a Cockroach are different from those of other Orthoptera,

but resemble those of Hemiptera Heteroptera.

2. The respiratory activity of resting Insects is localised in the

abdomen. V. Graber has expressed this fact in a picturesque form, by

saying that in Insects the chest is placed at the hinder end of the

body.

3. In most cases the thoracic segments do not share in the respiratory

movements of an Insect at rest. Among the singular exceptions to this

rule is the Cockroach (_P. orientalis_), in which the terga of the

meso- and meta-thoracic segments perform movements exactly opposite in

direction to those of the abdomen. (See fig. 89, _Ms. th._, _Mt. th._)

[Illustration: Fig. 89.--Profile of Cockroach (_P. orientalis_). The

black surface represents the expiratory contour, while the inspiratory

is indicated by a thin line. The arrows show the direction of the

expiratory movement. _Ms. th._, mesothorax; _Mt. th._, metathorax.

Reduced from a magic-lantern projection.]

4. Leaving out of account all details and all exceptions, the

respiratory movements of Insects may be said to consist of alternate

contraction and recovery of the figure of the abdomen in two

dimensions--viz., vertical and transverse. During expiration the

diameters in question are reduced, while during respiration they revert

to their previous amounts. The transverse expiratory contraction is

often slight, and may be imperceptible. On the other hand, the vertical

expiratory contraction is never absent, and usually marked. In the

Cockroach (_P. orientalis_) it amounts to one-eighth of the depth of

the abdomen (between segments 2 and 3).

5. Three principal types of respiratory mechanism occur in Insects, and

these admit of further subdivision:--

(_a_) Sterna usually stout and very convex, yielding but little.

Terga mobile, rising and sinking appreciably. To this class belong

all Coleoptera, Hemiptera Heteroptera, and Blattina (Orthoptera).

[Illustration: Fig. 90.--Transverse section of Abdomen, Lamellicorn

Beetle. The position of the terga and sterna after an inspiration, is

indicated by the thick line; the dotted line shows their position after

an expiration, and the arrow marks the direction of the expiratory

movement.]

In the Cockroach (_Periplaneta_) the sterna are slightly raised during

expiration. (See figs. 89 and 91.)

[Illustration: Fig. 91.--Transverse section of Abdomen, Cockroach (_P.

orientalis_).]

(_b_) Terga well developed, overlapping the sterna on the sides of

the body, and usually concealing the pleural membrane, which forms

a sunk fold. The terga and sterna approach and recede alternately,

the sterna being almost always the more mobile. To this type belong

Odonata, Diptera, aculeate Hymenoptera, and Acridian Orthoptera.

(Fig. 92.)

(_c_) The pleural membrane, connecting the terga with the sterna,

is well developed and exposed on the sides of the body. The terga

and sterna approach and recede alternately, while the pleural zone

simultaneously becomes depressed or returns to its original figure.

To this type the writer assigns the Locustidæ, the Lepidoptera and

the true Neuroptera (excluding Phryganidæ). (Fig. 93.)

[Illustration: Fig. 92.--Transverse section of Abdomen, Bee (_Bombus_).]

6. Contrary to the opinion once general, changes in length of

the abdomen, involving protrusion of the segments and subsequent

retraction, are rare in the normal respiration of Insects. Such

longitudinal movements extend throughout one entire group only--viz.,

the aculeate Hymenoptera. Isolated examples occur, however, in other

zoological divisions.

[Illustration: Fig. 93.--Transverse section of Abdomen, Hawk Moth

(_Sphingina_).]

7. Among Insects sufficiently powerful to give good graphic tracings,

it can be shown that the inspiratory movement is slower than the

expiratory, and that the latter is often sudden.

8. In most Insects, contrary to what obtains in Mammals, only the

expiratory movement is active; inspiration is passive, and effected by

the elasticity of the body-wall.

9. Most Insects possess expiratory muscles only. Certain Diptera

(_Calliphora vomitoria_ and _Eristalis tenax_) afford the simplest

arrangement of the expiratory muscles. In these types they form a

muscular sheet of vertical fibres, connecting the terga with the

sterna, and underlying the soft elastic membrane which unites the

hard parts of the somites. One of the most frequent complications

arises by the differentiation of this sheet of vertical fibres into

distinct muscles, repeated in every segment, and becoming more and more

separated as the sterna increase in length. (See the tergo-sternal

muscles of the Cockroach, fig. 36, p. 76.) Special inspiratory muscles

occur in Hymenoptera, Acridiidæ, and Phryganidæ.

10. The abdominal respiratory movements of Insects are wholly

reflex. Like other physiologists who have examined this side of the

question, the writer finds that the respiratory movements persist in a

decapitated Insect, as also after destruction of the cerebral ganglia

or œsophageal connectives; further, that in Insects whose nervous

system is not highly concentrated (_e.g._, Acridiidæ and Dragon-flies),

the respiratory movements persist in the completely-detached abdomen;

while all external influences which promote an increased respiratory

activity in the uninjured animal, have precisely the same action upon

Insects in which the anterior nervous centres have been removed, upon

the detached abdomen, and even upon isolated sections of the abdomen.

The view formerly advocated by Faivre, that the metathoracic ganglia

play the part of special respiratory centres, must be entirely

abandoned. All carefully performed experiments on the nervous system

of Arthropoda have shown that each ganglion of the ventral chain is a

motor centre, and in Insects a respiratory centre, for the somite to

which it belongs. This is what Barlow calls the “self-sufficiency” of

the ganglia.

* * * * *

The writer has made similar observations upon the respiration of

Spiders and Scorpions;[156] but to his great surprise he has been

unable either by direct observation, or by the graphic method, or by

projection, to discover the slightest respiratory movement of the

exterior of the body. This can only be explained by supposing that

inspiration and expiration in Pulmonate Arachnida are intra-pulmonary,

and affect only the proper respiratory organs. The fact is less

surprising because of the wide zoological separation between Arachnida

and Insects.

[156] De l’absence de mouvements respiratoires perceptibles chez les

Arachnides (Archives de Biologie de Van Beneden et Van Bambeke, 1885.)

_Respiratory Activity of Insects._

The respiratory activity of Insects varies greatly. Warmth, feeding,

and movement are found to increase the frequency of their respirations,

and also the quantity of carbonic acid exhaled. In Liebe’s[157]

experiments a Carabus produced ·24 mgr. of carbonic acid per hour

in September, but only ·09 mgr. per hour in December. A rise of

temperature raised the product temporarily to twice its previous

amount; but when the same insect was kept under experiment for several

days without food, the amount fell in spite of its increased warmth.

Treviranus[158] gives the carbonic acid exhaled by a Humble-bee as

varying from 22 to 174, according as the temperature varied from 56° to

74° F.

[157] Ueb. d. Respiration der Tracheaten. Chemnitz (1872).

[158] See table in Burmeister’s “Manual,” Eng. trans. p. 398.

Larvæ often breathe little, especially such as lie buried in wood,

earth, or the bodies of other animals. The respiration of pupæ is also

sluggish, and not a few are buried beneath the ground or shrouded in

a dense cocoon or pupa-case. Muscular activity originates the chief

demand for oxygen, and accordingly Insects of powerful flight are most

energetic in respiration.

A rise of temperature proportionate to respiratory activity has

been observed in many insects. Newport[159] tells us how the female

Humble-bee places herself on the cells of pupæ ready to emerge, and

accelerates her inspirations to 120 or 130 per minute. During these

observations he found in some instances that the temperature of a

single Bee was more than 20° above that of the outer air.

[159] Art. “Insecta,” Cyc. Anat. and Phys., p. 989.

Some Insects can remain long without breathing. They survive for many

hours when placed in an exhausted receiver, or in certain irrespirable

gases. Cockroaches in carbonic acid speedily become insensible,

but after twelve hours’ exposure to the pure gas they revive, and

appear none the worse. H. Müller[160] says that an Insect, placed in

a small, confined space, absorbs _all_ the oxygen. In Sir Humphry

Davy’s “Consolations in Travel”[161] is a description of the Lago dei

Tartari, near Tivoli, a small lake whose waters are warm and saturated

with carbonic acid. Insects abound on its floating islands; though

water birds, attracted by the abundance of food, are obliged to confine

themselves to the banks, as the carbonic acid disengaged from the

surface would be fatal to them, if they ventured to swim upon it when

tranquil.

[160] Pogg. Ann. 1872, Hft. 3.

[161] Works, Vol. IX., p. 287. This passage has been cited by Rathke.

_Origin of Tracheal Respiration._

Kowalewsky, Bütschli, and Hatschek have described the first stages

of development of the tracheal system. Lateral pouches form in the

integument; these send out anterior and posterior extensions, which

anastomose and form the longitudinal trunks. The tracheal ramifications

are not formed by a process of direct invagination, but by the

separation of chitinogenous cells, which cohere into strings, and then

form irregular tubules. The cells secrete a chitinous lining, and

afterwards lose their distinct contours, fusing to a continuous tissue,

in which the individual cells are indicated only by their nuclei,

though by appropriate re-agents the cell boundaries can be defined.

The ingenious hypothesis propounded by Gegenbaur, that the tracheal

tubes of Insects were originally adapted to aquatic respiration, and

that the stigmata arose as the scars of disused tracheal gills, has

been discussed in chap. iv. Semper has suggested[162] that tracheæ

may be modified segmental organs, but the most probable view of

their origin is that put forth by Moseley,[163] that they arose as

ramified cutaneous glands. In _Peripatus_ the openings are distributed

irregularly over the body; the external orifices lead to pits, from

which simple tubes, with but slight spiral markings, extend into the

deeper tissues.

[162] Arbeiten a. d. Zool. Zoot. Inst. Würzburg. Bd. II., 1874.

[163] Phil. Trans., 1874, p. 757.

The Structure and Life-history of the Cockroach (Periplaneta orientalis) An Introduction to the Study of Insects · 第 8 / 11 章