Mirabeau deserves the praise of keeping at this season far above all

petty traffic of his influence and pen. He saw the safety and glory of

France, and the rise of a national constitution, in the opposition of

the parliament to the court, and in the consequent necessity of

assembling the states-general. He represented these convictions to the

minister Montmorin, but without avail; on the contrary, Montmorin

earnestly requested him to undertake his defence, and to attack the

parliament. Mirabeau, in reply, set before the minister the errors of

his views, and refused, with dignity, the task offered him. "Do not," he

concludes, "compromise a zealous servant, who will despise danger when

called upon to devote himself for his country, but who would not, even

for the price of all earthly crowns, prostitute himself in an equivocal

cause, the aim of which is uncertain, the principle doubtful, and the

progress fearful and dark. Should I not lose all the little talent of

which you exaggerate the influence, if I renounced that inflexible

independence which alone gains me success, and which only can render me

useful to my country and my king? When the day arrives, when, animated

by my conscience, and strong in my conviction, an honourable citizen, a

faithful subject, an honest writer, I cast myself into the _melée_, I

shall be able to say, 'Listen to a man who has never varied in his

principles, nor deserted the public cause.'"

And it must be remarked, in honour of Mirabeau, when doubts are cast

upon his subsequent career, that, at the moment that he refused the aid

of his pen to a powerful minister, he was suffering the extreme of

penury, aggravated by its being shared by a dear friend. When,

therefore, he afterwards accepted the pay of the court, we may believe,

unworthy as was the act, that he compromised no principle; but, though a

reformer, not being a republican, the support he engaged to give to the

king had the suffrage of his conscience.

[Sidenote: 1788.

Ætat.

39.]

The reputation of Mirabeau was now at its height; but, though his genius

was acknowledged, he was not esteemed a good member of society. It is

strange on what reputation depends: it may seem a paradox to say, that

it often depends on modesty. Notoriety, and even success, may follow the

unblushing man; but the good word of our fellow-creatures clings rather

to him whose worth is crowned by the graceful and conciliating virtue of

modesty. Mirabeau had been oppressed--he had suffered much; his

ostensible errors were venial, and such as many a man might have

committed without entire condemnation; but the publicity that attended

them, and the readiness with which he exposed his faults, and his family

persecution, to public view, displeased and offended. He was feared as a

false friend, as well as a dangerous enemy. Yet, wherever he appeared,

he gained the hearts of those whom he addressed. He had the art of

rendering himself agreeable and fascinating to all. The truth is that,

though in theory and absence, we may approve the unblameable, the

torpid, and the coldly good, our nature forces us to prefer what is

vivacious, exhilarating, and original. This is the secret of the

influence exercised by men, whose biographers labour to excuse and to

account for the spontaneous ebullitions of sympathy and affection that

follow their steps. Mirabeau was easy, complaisant, gay, and full of

animation and variety in his conversation; he had, in a supreme degree,

what his father named the dangerous gift of familiarity. It was his

delight to cast aside all etiquette, and to reduce his intercourse to

the interchange of the real emotions of the heart and expression of

ideas, unaccompanied by any disguise or conventional refinements;--for

this, he did not scruple to appear at times rude and even vulgar; but

also by this he inspired confidence, as being frank and true.

At length, the hour long expected, long desired, came, when the

states-general were convoked by a royal decree of the 27th December,

1788. Mirabeau passionately desired to belong to the assembly; and,

relying on the popularity which he enjoyed in his native province,

departed for Aix early in the following month.

[Sidenote: 1789.

Ætat.

40.]

The nobles and high clergy of Provence were vehemently opposed to the

changes they apprehended in government, and were zealously wedded to the

privileges of their order. They entered a protest against certain

portions of the royal decree which threw power into the hands of the

people. When Mirabeau arrived among them as the partisan of the dawning

liberty of his country, he was received as an enemy. He raised his voice

against the protest, and naturally took his place at the head of the

liberal party. The nobles commenced their attack against him by

excluding him from among them, on the pretext that he did not (as an

elder son merely) possess any fief. Mirabeau protested against this

exclusion, as well in his own name as in those of every other in a

similar situation with himself; but in vain. On the 8th of the following

February, in an assembly of the nobles, on the proposition of the

marquis de Fare, his exclusion was pronounced, as not possessing either

estate or fief in Provence. Mirabeau spared neither pamphlets nor

speeches on the occasion; though, occupied by the calls made on him by

his party during the day, he could only give the hours of night to

composing and publishing. "I do not write a line," he says, in one of

his letters, of the date of the 8th February, "that I am not interrupted

thirty times, and to such a degree, that I can only labour at public

affairs by night. You know what cardinal de Retz said:--'_The chief

hinderance of the head of a party is his party._' A thousand minor

annoyances, a thousand important arrangements, a thousand inevitable

interruptions, deprive me, during the day, of all presence of mind to

compose, and of all coherence of ideas and style."

Besides these labours, he had the more difficult task of keeping clear

of brawls and duels among a class of men whose dearest wish was to

provoke him to the committal of an outrage. Proud and arrogant

themselves, they hoped to taunt one yet prouder into some deed of

violence that would give them the advantage over him. But haughty as

Mirabeau was, he was yet wiser; the peculiarity of his genius was a

quick perception of the proper line of conduct, and he preserved his

dignity, while he showed himself forbearing.

He had to meet yet another difficulty. He published his correspondence

from Berlin at this moment, for the purpose of acquiring the funds

necessary for his election: this work was condemned to be burnt, by the

parliament. It had been published anonymously; but, as the name of the

author was well known, Mirabeau saw himself forced to make a journey to

Paris, for the purpose of silencing his enemies, and giving courage to

his friends, who quailed under the attacks made against him. This

journey and short absence served but to raise to enthusiasm the favour

with which he was regarded by the population of Provence. Deputations of

the _bourgeoisie_ of Marseilles and Aix met him on his return, with all

the manifestations of affection and joy which the people of the south

render so cordial and demonstrative. The road he traversed was strewn

with flowers; fireworks were let off; a crowd of 50,000 persons

assembled round his carriage, while cries of "Vive Mirabeau!" rent the

air. No noble dared show himself in the streets. "If you hate oppression

as much as you love your friends," Mirabeau said to the assembled

citizens, "you will never be oppressed." He was, within a few days

after, received with similar demonstrations at Marseilles: 120,000

inhabitants filled the streets to welcome him; two louis were paid for a

window to look on him--his carriage was covered with laurels--the people

kissed the wheels--the women brought their children to him. Mirabeau,

who saw, in his elevation in the public favour, the stepping stone to

success, beheld these demonstrations with proud delight; they were the

signals of his triumph over the party who trampled on him--over that

series of adversity which, from his cradle to that hour, had never

ceased to crush him. The report, carefully spread, that this triumph had

been got up by his friends, vanished before the fact that the whole

population were his friends, and that the getting up was merely his

assent to receive the marks of their enthusiastic favour. That he had

done his best to curry favour with the people is true: that fault abides

with him, if it be one.

Among other manœuvres he had, it is said, opened a clothier's shop at

Marseilles. There is no foundation for this story, although Marat, and

other partisans of equality of his own day, asserted it. He had been

obliged, indeed, to make himself free of the town, when candidate for

the deputyship. His only chance was to make friends with the people. He

was treated with contumely by the nobles; and even now his triumph was

not devoid of drawback, occasioned by the indignities cast on him by the

class to which he properly belonged: their insults did not fail to sting

his pride, and rouse him to revenge, even while he successfully

preserved himself from open quarrelling.

The popularity he acquired he was soon called upon to exert. M. Caraman,

military commander in Provence, applied to him to allay the disturbances

occasioned by a scarcity. The nobles regarded the pending famine as a

means of taming the people; and the same marquis de Fare, who had

originated the exclusion of Mirabeau from the assembly, insolently

exclaimed,--"Do the people hunger?--let them eat the dung of my horses."

Such a speech, and such a spirit, manifested by the wealthy, naturally

exasperated the poor. The weakness of the magistrates, who decreed so

great a reduction in the price of food that the traders could no longer

afford to sell it, only augmented the public peril: the granaries were

pillaged,--blood was spilt in the streets. At the request of M. de

Caraman, Mirabeau stept forward,--he persuaded the governor to withdraw

the soldiery,--he induced the bourgeois youth to take arms to keep the

peace. His eloquence, the credit given to his sincerity and good

intentions, pacified the people, and first at Marseilles, and afterwards

at Aix, he restored peace and security. At this period, while he

fulfilled the noble part of pacificator and of a citizen, powerful only

through the influence of his genius and patriotism, he was elected, both

by Marseilles and Aix, deputy of the _tiers état_ in the approaching

assembly of the states-general. He gave the preference to the latter, as

circumstances rendered it doubtful whether his election for Marseilles

would be admitted by his colleagues.

We now arrive at the epoch when he developed the whole force of his

genius, and acquired immortality, as the great leader of a revolution

which, at its first outbreak, commanded the sympathy and respect of the

world which looked on; beholding with gladness and hope the overthrow of

feudal abuses, and the restoration of the oppressed majority of the

French nation to the rights of men and citizens.

The first steps that Mirabeau trod towards greatness were taken on

slippery ground. The eyes of the crowd sought for him with avidity,

during the procession of the king and states-general to the church of

St. Louis, on the 4th May. He appeared, with his dark shaggy hair, his

beetling brows, and luminous eyes, stepping proudly on. A murmur of

disapprobation was raised;--he looked round, and all was silent; yet in

that moment he felt the struggle, the combat that would ensue: his fiery

nature made him also, perhaps, rely on victory. When the names of the

deputies were called over, and those of other popular men were

applauded, hisses of disapprobation followed his. They did not daunt

him: he walked across the chamber to his place with an air of resolution

and haughtiness that spoke of perseverance and vigour in the coming

struggle.

To give himself notoriety and weight, he commenced by publishing a

journal of the proceedings of the chambers. This publication was seized

by government, and he then changed its title to that of letters to his

constituents. He excited animosity by this publication in the chamber

itself, but it added to his weight and influence.

The first combat of the _tiers état_ with the two other chambers is

well known. They demanded that their consultations should be held in

common, while the noblesse and clergy desired each their chamber, secure

that the lower one would be crushed by the union of the two higher with

the king. Mirabeau, at first, recommended that system of passive

resistance which is all powerful when resorted to resolutely by numbers.

During the interval that succeeded, Mirabeau had an interview with

Necker, by the desire of his friend Duroverai; but it availed nothing.

Mirabeau regarded Necker as a weak man, though he acknowledged his

unimpeachable honesty; and he was soon after carried far beyond any

necessity of recurring to his patronage for advancement, when, by

echoing the voices of many men, and giving expression and direction to

their passions, his eloquence filled France with the cry of liberty, and

gave power and authority to the hesitating deputies.

He met with a check, when the name he wished the assembly of _tiers

état_ to assume (deputies of the people) was rejected, with ill-founded

indignation. The term people was regarded as disgraceful and

humiliating. "The nation," he wrote on this occasion, "is not ripe; the

folly and frightful disorder of the government have forced the

revolution as in a hotbed; it has outgrown our aptitude and knowledge.

When I defended the word people, I had nearly been torn to pieces. It

was circulated that I had gone over to the government:--truly I am said

to have sold myself to so many, that I wonder I have not acquired a

universal monarchy with the money paid for me."

The resolution of the _tiers état_, now naming themselves the national

assembly, excited mingled contempt and alarm. The nobility protested

against their assumption, and the king was counselled to oppose their

resolves by a royal decree; the hall of the deputies was closed, under

pretence of preparing for the royal visit; the deputies adjourned to a

neighbouring tennis court, and took a solemn oath to stand by each other

to the last. On the following day, the 23d of June, the _seance royale_

had place, and the decree promulgated that the three orders should vote

separately. Satisfied that this exertion of royal power would tame at

once the rebellious deputies, the royal cortege--the ministers, the

nobles, and the clergy--left the chamber; the _tiers état_, the

self-constituted national assembly, remained. A gloomy silence ensued,

broken by Mirabeau, who rose, and, warning them of the danger to be

apprehended, added, "I demand of you to seek shelter in your dignity and

legislative powers, and that you take refuge in the faith of your oath,

which does not allow you to separate till you have formed a

constitution." The grand master of ceremonies, de Brézé, now entered,

for the purpose of dispersing the deputies, saying, that they had heard

the orders of the king. The president, Bailly, replied that he would

take those of the assembly. At that moment, on which the public cause

hung,--for on the boldness and perseverance of the deputies depended

their success,--at that moment of hesitation, Mirabeau rose, and with a

manner full of majesty, and a calm voice, he replied, "The commons of

France intend to deliberate. We have heard what your king has been

advised to say, but you, sir, cannot be his interpreter to the national

assembly; you have neither place, nor voice, nor right to speak here.

But, to prevent delay, go tell your master, that we are here by the

power of the people; and that the power of the bayonet alone shall drive

us out."

Victor Hugo, in his essay on the character of Mirabeau, remarks, that

these words sealed the fate of the monarchy of France. "They drew a line

between the throne and the people; it was the cry of the revolution. No

one before Mirabeau dared give it voice. Great men only pronounce the

words that decide an epoch. Louis XVI. was afterwards more cruelly

insulted, but no expression was used so fatal and so fearful as that of

Mirabeau. When he was called Louis Capet, royalty received a disgraceful

blow; but, when Mirabeau spoke, it was struck to the heart."[13]

The immediate effect of this outburst was, first, that de Brézé,

losing all presence of mind, backed out of the chamber, and the

deputies, electrified by the audacity of their self-constituted leader,

arose with acclamations, and passed a decree to confirm his words.

The national assembly, which by law was attached to the person of the

king, sat at Versailles; the distance from Paris was short, and the

capital regarded with growing interest the actions of the deputies.

Crowds assembled in the streets, and various tumults ensued: these have

been variously attributed to different factions, which excited the

people for the purpose of carrying on their own designs. There does not

seem much foundation for that opinion; the public cause, the natural

turbulence of the Parisians, which had been manifested during every

reign of past times; the heat and agitation of the crisis, easily

account for the alarming tumults in the metropolis. The chief suspicion

at the time rested on the party of the duke of Orléans. Mirabeau did not

belong to this; he had no connection with the leaders of the mob; his

impracticable and vehement character kept him aloof from coalition with

others. He was not sufficiently trusted to be selected as chief, he

disdained any other post; feeling that, without descending to manœuvre

and consultations, his energy, eloquence, and presence of mind, would

place him in the van of war. He remained, therefore, independent; uneasy

when others obtained influence in the assembly, visiting Paris as a

looker on, and waiting his time, which soon came. For it must be

remembered, that, at this period, notwithstanding the distinguished part

he had acted, Mirabeau's supremacy was by no means acknowledged. There

was a large party against him, and Barnave was held up by it as the more

eloquent and greater man. The errors of his youth were remembered, and a

thousand calumnies spread abroad against him; the people were even

influenced by them, and though, at one time they were ready to carry him

in triumph, a moment after the hawkers cried about _the great treason of

count de Mirabeau._ When his private conduct was attacked, Mirabeau was

silent; "Because," he says, with graceful dignity, "a strict silence is

the expiation of faults purely personal, however excusable they may be;

and because I waited till time, and my services, should win for me the

esteem of the worthy; because, also, the rod of censure has always

seemed respectable to me, even in the hands of my enemies; and, above

all, because I have never seen any thing but narrow egotism and

ridiculous impropriety in occupying one's fellow citizens in affairs not

belonging to them." But when his public conduct was attacked, he

defended it with an energy and truth that bore down all attack, and

raised him higher than ever in the general esteem.

To return to the epoch at which we are arrived. To quell the capital and

subdue the deputies, the king and his counsellors summoned troops to

surround Paris. Fifteen regiments, composed chiefly of foreigners,

advanced. It became evident that the design was formed of using the

bayonet, to which Mirabeau had referred, as the only power to which they

would submit. He now again came forward to stop the progress of the

evil. He proposed an address to the king, demanding that the march of

the troops should be countermanded. He still preserved a respectful

style towards the monarch, but he did not spare the measures of

government, and exposed in open day the direct approach of war and

massacre. His speech was covered with applause, and he was commissioned

to draw up an address to the king. It was short and forcible: it

prophesied, with sagacity, the dangers that must ensue from the presence

of the military; it protested with dignity against the force about to be

exercised against the assembly, and declared the resolution of the

deputies, in spite of snares, difficulties, and terror, to prosecute

their task and regenerate the kingdom. "For the first time," says madame

de Staël, "France heard that popular eloquence whose natural power is

augmented by the importance of events." "It was by Mirabeau," Brougham

observes, "that the people were first made to feel the force of the

orator, first taught what it was to hear spoken reason and spoken

passion; and the silence of ages in those halls was first broken by the

thunder of his voice, echoing through the lofty vaults now covering

multitudes of excited men."

Dumont, in his "Souvenirs de Mirabeau," asserts that he drew up this

address. On several other occasions, he assumes the merit either of

writing for Mirabeau or suggesting his speeches. He speaks of him as a

great plagiarist, putting all his associates to use in collecting

materials for him, and contenting himself with giving them form, or

sometimes only voice. This sort of accusation is exceedingly futile. The

capacity of gathering materials, lying barren but for the life he puts

into them, is the great attribute of genius: it hews an Apollo out of

the marble block; places the colours of Raphael on the bare canvass;

collects, in one focus, the thoughts of many men inspired by passion and

nature: it, as with Mirabeau, takes the spirit of the times, the

thoughts and words excited during a crisis; and, by giving to them a

voice of command or persuasion, rules the minds of all. In this manner,

Mirabeau was a plagiarist, but none but he could use, to govern and

subdue, the weapons fabricated, it might be, by other hands. To quote

the apt metaphor of Carlisle, he might gather the fuel from others, but

the fire was his own. He was not a man formed of shreds and patches

taken from other men, nor was Dumont endowed with creative powers to

call such a being into life. Mirabeau was a man of God's own making,

full of wild passion and remorseful error, but true to the touch of

nature; fraught with genius and power; a natural king among those whom

he used as his subjects to pay tribute to, and extend the sphere of, his

greatness.

[Sidenote: 1789.

July

11.]

The death of the marquis de Mirabeau, at the age of seventy-three, took

place at this period. From the time that his son figured in the

assembly, he became deeply interested in his career; declaring that his

success was "glory, true glory." He was suffering by a chronic pulmonary

catarrh, and evidently declining. Mirabeau frequently visited him, and

was well received, though they never discussed politics during these

short visits. But the marquis caused the speeches of his son to be read

to him, as well as the papers that recounted the sittings of the

assembly in which he figured. On the 11th of July, while he was

listening to his grand-daughter reading, he closed his eyes--his

breathing failed--and when she looked up he was dead, with a smile on

his face.

Mirabeau, who venerated his father, in spite of the injuries he had

sustained from him, was deeply affected by this loss: perhaps pride

added to his demonstrations of affliction. He wrote to his constituents,

that all the citizens in the world ought to mourn; he scarcely appeared

in the assembly, and for a few days gave himself up to sorrow.

It was not a period when a great political character could withdraw

himself for more than a few days. The crisis was at hand.

[Sidenote: July

14.]

The king had returned a cold answer to the address drawn up by Mirabeau,

and presented by the most distinguished deputies; the court still

pursued the plan of assembling troops; Necker was dismissed from the

ministry; the investment of the capital by the military became

imminent,--when the people, animated by mixed fear and indignation,

rose: they seized on all the arms they could obtain; the bastille was

demolished; for the first time the Parisians felt their power, and

tasted of the triumph of shedding the blood of those who resisted them.

The terror of these acts spread to Versailles. The assembly sent

deputation after deputation to the king, imploring him to pacify Paris

by countermanding the troops. When the destruction of the bastille was

known, a fifth deputation was prepared to be presented to the monarch.

It was composed of twenty-four members: they were about to leave the

chamber on this errand, when Mirabeau stopped them, and with increased

vehemence exclaimed,--"Tell the king, that the hordes of foreigners that

surround us were yesterday visited by the princes, the princesses, and

their favourites, who caressed and exhorted them, and covered them with

presents. Tell him that, during the night, these foreign satellites,

gorged with gold and wine, predicted, in their impious songs, the

servitude of France, and brutally invoked the destruction of the

national assembly. Tell him that, in his own palace, his courtiers

mingled in the dance to the sound of such music, and that similar to

these were the preparations of Saint Bartholomew. Tell him, that

Henry IV., whose memory the whole world blesses, he, who ought to be his

model among his ancestors, sent provisions to Paris when it revolted,

and he was besieging it in person; while, on the contrary, his ferocious

advisers keep the corn, brought by trade, from his starving and faithful

capital." The deputation was about to carry his words to the king, when

the arrival of Louis, without guards or escort, was announced. A murmur

of glad welcome ran through the assembly. "Wait," said Mirabeau gravely,

"till the king has announced his good intentions. Let a serious respect

receive the monarch in this moment of sorrow. The silence of the people

is the lesson of kings."

Thus did this wonderful man, by means of the fire and impetuosity of his

character, enter at once into the spirit of the hour, while his genius

suggested the expressions and the tone that gave it direction and voice.

It is impossible to enter into the detail of all Mirabeau's speeches and

acts. A rapid glance at his votes and declarations during this period

must suffice. Mirabeau detested despotism, whose iron hand had fallen so

heavily on himself. The aid given by the government of his country to

his father's tyranny,--the ban placed on him by the nobility who were

his equals,--the burning desire for distinction that consumed him,--his

contempt for his inferiors in talent,--his faith in the

revolution,--such were the passions that gave force to his genius. But

his genius showed itself omnipotent nowhere except in the tribune. When

he wrote, he but half expressed his thoughts; his passions were but half

excited; and Mirabeau's power lay in the union of his passions and his

genius. Apart, the former degenerated into vice, and the latter showed

itself either exaggerated, sophistical, or inert. In the tribune, their

union was complete. When he began to speak he was at first

confused,--his breast heaved,--his words were broken,--but the sight of

his opponents,--the knowledge of the sympathy he should find in the

galleries,--the inspiration of the moment,--suddenly dispersed all

mistiness; his eloquence became clear, fervid, sublime,--the truth

conjured up images at once striking and appalling. When he was farther

excited by the difficulties of a crisis, his courage rose to meet

it,--he stept forward with grandeur; a word or a look, which his talent

and ugliness at once combined to render imposing, shone out on the

assembly,--electrified and commanded it.

This power of seizing on the spirit of the question, clearing the view

of the assembly, and leading it onward in the right road, he exerted

memorably on the 24th September, when Necker, to remedy the disastrous

state of the finances, proposed a patriotic contribution of a fourth of

the incomes. A committee, after three days spent in examination,

approved the plan. Mirabeau, the known enemy of Necker, spoke, to engage

the assembly to adopt it at once, on the recommendation of the minister,

without taking any responsibility on itself. The friends of Necker saw

the snare, and accused him of injuring the plan of the minister, while

he pretended to support it. Mirabeau replied, that he was not the

partisan, but, were he the dearest friend of the minister, he should not

hesitate to compromise him rather than the assembly. Necker might

deceive himself, and the kingdom receive no detriment; but that the

public weal were compromised, if the assembly lost its credit. These

words had some effect, but still the discussion went on, and still the

deputies hesitated to adopt Necker's proposition, till Mirabeau, again

ascending the tribune, burst forth with a torrent of overwhelming

eloquence in its favour: he painted the horrors of a national

bankruptcy, and the consequent guilt of incurring it; he expatiated on

the wide-spread misery that must ensue. He continued,--"Two centuries of

robbery and depredation have opened a gulf in which the kingdom is

nearly swallowed; this gulf must be filled up. Here is a list of French

proprietors; select among the richest, so to lessen the number of

victims; but still select--for must not a few perish to save the many?

Two thousand notables possess enough to fill up the deficit, to bring

back order into your finances, and peace and prosperity to the kingdom.

Strike! immolate without pity these hapless victims--precipitate them

into the abyss;--it will close! Ha! you draw back with horror.

Inconsistent pusillanimous men! Do you not see that when you decree

bankruptcy, or, what is still more odious, when you render it inevitable

without decreeing it, you stain yourselves with a still greater and yet

a gratuitous crime? for this sacrifice will at least fill up the

deficit. But do you think, because you do not pay, you will no longer be

in debt? Do you believe that the thousands, the millions of men, who in

one moment will lose by the explosion, or by its reaction, all that made

the comfort of their lives, and, perhaps, their only means of support,

will allow you to reap the fruits of your crime in peace? Stoical

contemplators of the incalculable ills which this catastrophe will bring

on France! Insensible egotists! who think that the convulsions of

despair and misery will pass away like every other, and the more quickly

as they are more violent;--are you sure that so many men, without bread,

will tranquilly permit you to taste the viands whose quantity and

delicacy you will not suffer to be diminished? No!--you will perish in

the universal conflagration that you do not tremble to set a-light, and

the loss of your honour will not preserve one of your detestable

enjoyments.

* * * * *

Vote, then, for this extraordinary subsidy;--may it suffice! Vote it;

because, if you have any doubts with regard to the means (vague and

uncertain doubts), you have none on its necessity, and our want of power

to replace this proposition by any other--at least for the present. Vote

it; for public affairs will not endure procrastination, and we are

accountable for all delay. Beware of asking for time. Ruin never gives

that. Some days ago, gentlemen, in reference to a ridiculous tumult in

the Palais Royal--a laughable insurrection which had no importance

except in feeble minds--you heard the violent cry uttered, 'Cataline is

at the gates of Rome, and you deliberate!' and then certainly we had

near us neither Cataline, nor danger, nor faction, nor Rome. But now

bankruptcy, hideous bankruptcy is before us; she menaces to consume

you,--your possessions and your honour,--and you deliberate!"

These words raised a tumult of enthusiasm in the assembly. A deputy rose

to reply, but the cries overbore him; and, frightened by his task, he

remained motionless and mute. "I was near Mirabeau," writes madame de

Staël, "when he thus delivered himself. Nothing could be more

impressive than his voice; his gestures and words were pregnant with an

animation, the power of which was prodigious. The assembly at once

received the report of the committee, and adopted the plan of the

minister." "This," remarks Thiers, "is the triumph of eloquence; but he

alone could obtain it who was animated by the passions and just views of

Mirabeau."

Mirabeau hated the assumptions of the aristocracy, but he looked upon

royalty as a necessary defence between the lower and the higher orders;

at the same time he believed that the welfare of his country demanded

that the people should have a voice in the state.

[Sidenote: Oct.

25.]

He expressed his opinion on this subject in a letter to his uncle the

bailli. He says,--"I have always thought, and now more than ever think,

that royalty is the only anchor of safety which can preserve us from

shipwreck. And how many efforts I have made, and make each day, to

support the executive power, and combat the distrust which induces the

national assembly to go beyond the mark! For the rest, we must judge of

the revolution by the good and evil of its result, not by the license

which prevails at present, which forms a state too violent to be

durable. I am reassured with regard to the future, by the consideration,

that the revolution, be it injurious or beneficial, is, in fact,

consummated. The most enlightened men feel that they must assist the

change, to lessen its violence; that resistance is as useless as it must

be disastrous; and that every citizen, whether zealous or indifferent,

must tend to the same end,--facilitate the consolidation of the empire,

and give the machine that movement which will allow us to judge of its

excellence or its defects. You recommend me to support the executive

power; but you will easily discern that the obstinate resistance of one

order of the state, by exciting fresh causes of revenge, and producing

new commotions, would destroy that power round which the supreme law of

the state commands us now to rally."

It was in this spirit that he spoke for the veto, though fear, perhaps,

of compromising his popularity made him abstain from voting. The veto

had become a sort of bugbear. When Mirabeau visited Paris, the mob

thronged round his carriage, imploring him to prevent the king from

having the veto. They were slaves, they said, if the king had the

veto;--the national assembly was useless. "Mirabeau," says Dumont,

"carried it off very well: he appeased the people; and, using only vague

expressions, dismissed the mob with patrician affability."

At the period of the revolution, when the passions of men were excited

to bandy calumny with eager voices and pens dipt in gall, Mirabeau was

accused of being an Orleanist. It is difficult to say what an Orleanist

was. The duke himself, weak but ambitious, never made one step forward

but he made two back; so that it became a saying that the duke of

Orléans did not belong to the Orleanists. His name, meanwhile, and money

were employed to form a party rather inimical to Louis XIV. than

favourable to himself. It added to the tumult and tempest of the times,

but was of no real influence in the direction of events. Dumont declares

that, living intimately with Mirabeau, the most indiscreet and confiding

of men, he saw no trace of his complicity in any plot against the court:

but that, familiar with the duke as with every one, his manner gave

colour to a report which had no other foundation. That he was at this

time the enemy of the court is, however, undoubted. When the fatal feast

of the _gardes du corps_, at Versailles, was denounced in the assembly,

and the cry of calumny was raised by the royalists, Mirabeau burst out

with impetuosity, and declared that he was ready to accuse by name the

principal actors in this sacrilegious orgie, on condition that it were

first decreed that the person of the king only was inviolable. This

expression, pointing at and criminating the queen, silenced the

discussion.

During the days of the 5th and 6th October, Mirabeau sought to

tranquillise, without any attempt at leading, the multitude. When he

first heard of the approach of the rabble rout of _poissardes_ and their

followers from the capital, for the purpose of forcing the acceptance of

the constitution on the king, Mirabeau addressed the president Mounier,

saying, "Paris is marching on us: make an excuse; and go to the castle

and tell the king to accept the constitution purely and simply." "Paris

marches," replied Mounier; "so much the better: let them kill us

all--all, without exception--the nation will be the gainer." When the

crowd had invaded Versailles, Mirabeau was not seen. Dumont found him in

bed before eleven o'clock in the evening. He rose, and they went

together to the national assembly, where he displayed his accustomed

dignity by calling on the president to cause the assembly to be

respected, and to order the chamber to be cleared of the strangers who

filled it. It required all his popularity to succeed. The _poissardes_

in the gallery, with their usual familiarity, cried out, "Mother

Mirabeau must speak--we must hear mother Mirabeau!" but he was not a man

to make a show on these occasions.

The king humiliated--the court, driven to extremities, yet still

struggling, looked round for agents and supporters. The talents and

influence of Mirabeau would render his accession to their party

invaluable; Necker had named him "Tribun par calcul, et aristocrate par

goût;" and this character, joined to his debts, his bad reputation, his

known vices, and the very report that he acted for the duke of Orléans,

inspired the notion that he was venal.

[Sidenote: Nov.]

There can be no doubt that, at this period, a thousand different schemes

and hopes agitated this strange and powerful man. He detested the

aristocracy and despotism; but he was attached to royalty and the image

of the English constitution; and various advances made him by the court

led him to believe that a conscientious support of royalty might be

combined with his personal interests. Dumont mentions a conversation he

had with him, in which he showed him a plan for the retreat of the king

to Metz--the necessity the assembly would find itself under of following

him there, and the consequent quelling of the anarchical power in

France. Dumont, foreseeing that civil war and massacre would follow such

attempts, argued strongly against it. Mirabeau replied that the court

was resolved, and that he thought it right to combine to ensure its

success, and cause them to act so as to preserve the liberty of the

country. His purpose was, however, shaken by the arguments of Dumont,

and the whole plan was subsequently given up. Thiers gives a somewhat

different account. He narrates that in an interview with a friend, in

the park of Versailles, that lasted the whole night, Mirabeau declared

that he was resolved for the sake of his glory, for the good of his

country, and the advancement of his own fortune, to remain immovable

between the throne and the disorganisers, and to consolidate the

monarchy while he participated in its power. His pride, however, stood

in the way of any debasing steps. When the court made him offers, it was

informed that he would make no sacrifice of principles; but that, if the

king would be faithful to the constitution, he was ready to become his

staunch supporter. His conditions were, that his debts should be paid,

and that he should have a place in the ministry. According to law, the

ministers could neither speak nor vote in the assembly--before accepting

place, Mirabeau endeavoured to get this law repealed. He failed; and

during the discussion Lanjuinais proposed that the actual deputies

should be forbidden to accept place. Mirabeau angrily replied, that so

baneful a decree ought not to be passed for the sake of one man; but

that he would vote for it with the amendment, that a place in the

ministry should not be forbidden all the deputies, but only to M. de

Mirabeau, deputy for Aix. This outburst of frank audacity had no effect;

Lanjuinais' motion passed; and Mirabeau felt exceedingly indignant

towards the assembly, and often spoke of the members with bitter

contempt; yet his letters bear the impress of generous forbearance,

inspired by enlarged views of the duties of a citizen. "I do not say,"

he writes, "that the assembly is not somewhat severe towards me; with

all that, nothing can prevent, when the occasion presents, this

struggling, tumultuous, and, above all, ostracising assembly, from

returning under my influence: that results from the firmness of my

principles, and the support given by my talent. It was from the bottom

of my heart that I once wrote, 'Malheur aux peuples reconnaissants!' One

is never quit towards one's country. One gains glory, at least, by

serving it in whatever state. No element of public servitude ought to

exist--and gratitude is a very active one."

There is generosity, but not absolute wisdom in this dictum. In

republics, more evil arises from want of accord and stability of purpose

than from leaning on one man, especially among the French, who, vain by

nature, are more apt each to believe in his own capacity than rely on

that of another. Unfortunately, this distrust of public servants took

firm root during the revolution. First, no deputy was allowed to be

minister, so that no man of business could be deputy. Afterwards, the

members of one assembly were not allowed to be elected in the succeeding

one, so that inexperience, crude views, and want of mutual reliance,

became the characteristic of the French legislators.

[Sidenote: 1790.

Ætat.

41.]

Mirabeau's negotiations with the court meanwhile went on; he even

received for a short time a pension from Monsieur, the king's eldest

brother; the queen treated him with winning condescension--and she was

won also by the charm of his superiority and frankness. Thus he did not

sell his principles, which remained unchanged, yet he made a mart of

them; and, in the eye of history, falls from the high position of a man

above the reach of gold. His want of docility, meanwhile, often

displeased the court--he refused to compromise his popularity at its

beck, and despised the men who wished at once to make use of him and yet

to render him useless.

His position, though it seem dubious, was plain enough. He wished to

lead a moderately royal party, and give stability to the monarchy. He

desired to oppose the jacobins and disorganisers; but his views did not

meet the sanguine and senseless hopes and wishes of the court--which

aimed at nothing less than a return to the _ancien régime._ He stood

therefore companionless--seizing at times on and thundering from the

tribune--making his power felt whenever he was roused, but walking in

darkness, uncertain of the means which yet he grappled at, whereby to

confirm his greatness.

In the assembly he continued to extend his influence by means of his

enthusiasm, and his power of expressing it. Various methods had been

made use of to get rid of the constituent assembly, and elect

another--under the pretence that, the work of forming a constitution

being accomplished, their task was at an end, and that the continuation

of their power was illegal and a usurpation over the throne. In the

midst of the cries which these words called forth, Mirabeau rose. "We

are asked," he said "when the deputies of the people, became a national

convention? I reply, on that day when, finding the entrance to their

chamber surrounded by soldiers, they hastened to assemble in the first

place they could find, and swore to perish rather than to betray or

abandon the rights of the nation. Our powers on that day changed their

nature. Whatever these powers may be which we have exerted, our efforts

and our labours have legitimated them, and the adhesion of the whole

nation has sanctified them. Do you remember the heroic words of the

great man of antiquity, who had neglected the legal forms in saving his

country? Summoned by a factious tribune to swear whether he had observed

the laws, he replied, f I swear that I have saved my country!'

Gentlemen, I swear that you have saved France!" At this grand oath, the

whole assembly, carried away by a sudden impulse, closed the discussion

and dismissed the question.

The same power gave him the victory, when he was accused of conspiring

with the duke of Orléans to produce the commotions of the 5th and 6th of

October, and caused the accusation to be cast aside as devoid of

credit.[14]

[Sidenote: 1791.

Ætat.

42.]

We have an interesting picture of his position at the commencement of

the year 1791 from Dumont--who though his friend, and at times his

secretary, or rather, as he affirms, the composer of some of his most

successful speeches, gives no signs of partiality. "I dined several

times at the house of Mirabeau, who told me that he was on terms with

the court, and directed its counsels; and that his hopes were well

founded--as the royal personages had begun to see the necessity of

attaching him to their cause, and of no longer listening to the advice

of the emigrants and princes. He now lived in good style, and his house

was handsomely fitted up: he was better off than he had ever been, and

showed no discretion in the use of his money. I was surprised to see him

show off, after dinner, a case in which were several jewels. This was

proclaiming his being on the civil list, and I wondered that his

popularity did not suffer by it. His table was splendid, and his company

numerous. His house was filled early in the morning, and it was a

perpetual _levée_ from seven o'clock till the hour of his repairing to

the assembly; and a great crowd frequently assembled at that time to

enjoy the felicity of seeing him pass. Although titles were abolished,

he was still the comte de Mirabeau, not only with his servants and

visiters, but also the people, who love to decorate their idols. I could

have learnt from him the secret of his intercourse with the court, his

views, means, and intrigues, for he was well disposed to open himself to

me; but I neither wished to be censor nor flatterer. He insinuated

twenty times that his only object was to save the monarchy, if it were

possible. That means were necessary to accomplish this end; that trivial

morality was hostile to that on a large scale; that disinterested

services were rare; and that hitherto the court had wasted its money on

traitors.[15]

"During the last week of my stay in Paris, I saw him in a new

situation, which he had often pretended to despise, but more from

mortification than indifference. He was president of the

assembly,--never was the place so well filled. He displayed new talents.

He put an order and clearness into the work, of which no idea had

hitherto been formed. By a word, he threw light on a question; by a

word, he appeased a tumult. His deference to all parties, the respect he

always testified for the assembly, the conciseness of his speeches, his

answers to the various deputations that came to the bar,--which, whether

spontaneous or prepared, were always delivered with dignity and grace,

and gave satisfaction even in refusals,--in a word, his activity,

impartiality, and presence of mind added to his reputation and success

in a place which had been a stumbling block to his predecessors. He had

the art of putting himself foremost, and drawing the general attention

on himself, even when, not being allowed to speak from the tribune, he

appeared to have fallen from his best prerogative. Several of his

enemies and rivals, who had chosen him for the sake of putting him in

eclipse, had the chagrin of finding that they had added to his glory.

"He was far from being in good health, and told me that he felt himself

perishing away. I observed that his style of life would long ago have

killed a man less robust than himself. He had no repose from seven in

the morning till ten or eleven at night. He was in continual

conversation and agitation both of thought and feeling. When we parted,

he embraced me with an emotion he had never before displayed.--'I shall

die at the oar,' he said, 'and we probably shall never meet again. When

I am gone my worth will be acknowledged. The evils that I have arrested

will burst over France, and the criminal faction that trembles before me

will no longer be bridled. I have only prophecies of evil before my

eyes. Ah! my friend, how right we were when we desired at the beginning

to prevent the commons from declaring themselves a national

assembly,--that was the origin of our evils. Since they were victorious,

they have not ceased to show themselves unworthy; they have desired to

govern the king, instead of governing through him. Now neither they nor

he will have authority; a vile faction will domineer over them, and fill

France with terror."

He lived for three months after saying these words, and lived still to

triumph, and to add to his glory. The last scene of moment in which he

displayed his mighty influence was during the discussion of the law

against emigration. Mirabeau opposed it as tyrannical and unjust: the

popular voice went the other way, and cries were uttered against him.

His thunder silenced their more feeble demonstrations. "The popularity,"

he exclaimed, "which I desired is but a feeble reed; but I will force it

into the earth, and it shall take root in the soil of reason and

justice!" Applause followed this burst. "I swear," he continued, "if a

law of emigration passes, I swear to disobey you." He descended from the

tribune, having silenced his enemies, and astonished the assembly. The

discussion went on, and the adjournment was moved, to give time to

prepare a law different from the one under discussion, and so to calm

the people. The tumult continued, and cries of applause or

disapprobation drowned every other sound, till Mirabeau demanded

attention. A deputy, M. Goupil, who some time ago had attacked Mirabeau

with the cry that Cataline was at their doors, now exclaimed,--"By what

right does M. de Mirabeau exercise a dictatorship?" At these words the

orator threw himself into the tribune. The president remarked,--"I have

not accorded the right to speak; let the assembly decide." The assembly

listened.--"I beg my interruptors," said Mirabeau, "to remember that

through life I have combated against tyranny, and I will combat it

wherever it is to be found." Speaking thus, he turned his eyes from

right to left, while applause followed his words;--he continued:--"I beg

M. Goupil to remember that not long ago he was mistaken as to the

Cataline whose dictatorship he now resists. I beg the assembly to remark

that the question of adjournment, simple in appearance, comprehends

others, since it supposes that there is a law to form." Murmurs rose

from the left; the orator fixed his eyes on the inimical party, and its

leaders, Barnave and Lameth. "Silence those thirty voices," he cried: "I

am content also to vote for the adjournment, but on condition that no

sedition follows."

This was the greatest, and it was the last struggle that Mirabeau had

with the jacobins,--his last attempt to stop the progress of that

revolution to which he had given form and dignity during its primal

struggles. "I would not," he wrote, in a letter meant for the eye of the

king,--"I would not have laboured only at a vast destruction." Thus

pledged by his principles and his promises to the court to prop the

monarchy, his task was becoming one that demanded more force than, even

giant as he was, he possessed. The shades of death cover the

probabilities of the future; but it can scarcely be doubted that he must

have modified his views, animated the king to a more resolute and

popular course, or been swept away in the torrent of blood so soon about

to flow.

For some time, incessant labour and excitement undermined his life. The

ophthalmias, which had first attacked him in his prison, in Vincennes,

were renewed, and he Was often obliged to apply leeches to his eyes

during the intervals of one day's sitting of the assembly. The sense of

disease at work within seemed to him to resemble the effects of poison;

and the medicines he took added to, instead of diminishing, his

conviction that he was perishing. His last and fatal seizure was

accompanied by intense pain and agonising spasms; and the only physician

he admitted, who was his friend, began to lose hope. As soon as his

illness became publicly known, his house was surrounded by an anxious

and mute multitude. In the hour of danger they remembered him as their

leader, their preserver, their hope. The bulletins of his progress were

seized on with avidity. Louis XVI. sent ostensibly twice a day, and much

oftener in secret, to hear how he went on. For a moment, the king and

the people appeared united by a common interest, and had a desire of

currying favour with the revolutionary party animated the monarch, and

induced him to visit the dying man, he had acquired a popularity never

to be forgotten. The demagogues feared that he might have been led to

such an act; but it was out of character with Louis, who clung longer to

the etiquettes than to the reality of royalty.

The last days of Mirabeau were divided between agonising pain and calm

and affectionate conversation with his friends. While he hoped to

recover, he gave up all his thoughts to his cure; and even refused to

receive his friends, that the remedies might have a fairer chance. But,

when he felt the sure approach of death, he was eager to have them

around, and talking with them, holding their hands, and looking

affectionately on them, found deep enjoyment in the consciousness of

their sympathy and love. Already he spoke of himself as dead--with great

reluctance he allowed another medical man to be called in, whose

remedies proving ineffectual, Mirabeau said, "You are a great physician,

but there is one greater than you; he who created the wind that destroys

all--the water that penetrates and produces all--the fire that vivifies

or decomposes all." He heard with emotion of the demonstrations of

affection made by the people. His last hours were marked by mingled

philosophy and gaiety: he called his friends about him, and discoursed

of himself and public affairs, with a view to futurity after he was

gone; he made his will--the legacies of which the count de Lamark, who

had been his means of communication with the court, promised should be

paid. The visit of his enemy, Barnave, who came in the name of the

jacobins to inquire concerning him, afforded him pleasure. He gave M. de

Talleyrand a discourse he had prepared for the tribune; and, speaking of

Pitt, he said "he is a minister of preparations, and governs by threats:

I should have given him some trouble had I lived." He felt the approach

of his last hour. "I shall die to-day, my friend," he said, to Cabanis;

"no more remains than to crown one's self with flowers, and surround

one's self with music, so to pass peacefully into eternal sleep."

Hearing the report of cannon, fired for some ceremony, he exclaimed,

"Hark! the funeral rites of Achilles are begun!" As he lost his speech,

he yet smiled softly and serenely on his friends. The spasms returned

with renewed violence. Unable to speak, he wrote, asking, that opium

might be given him to appease them; but, before he could take it, he was

no more. His death took place on the 20th of April, 1791, at the age of

forty-two. The news quickly spread through the court, the town, the

assembly. Every party had placed their hopes in him, and he was mourned

by all except such as might envy his fame. On hearing the fatal

intelligence, the assembly interrupted its sitting; a general mourning

was ordered, and a public funeral.

He was buried in the Pantheon (formerly church of Sainte Geneviève),

which had been dedicated "Aux grands hommes la patrie reconnoissante;"

and Mirabeau was the first buried there. His funeral took place on the

morrow of his death. The ministers and magistrates, the assembly, the

army, the municipalities, in short, the members of every public

institution, accompanied the procession. He was more numerously and

honourably attended, and he was more sincerely mourned, than kings and

princes had been, or than any other great man of his own times. During

the reign of terror his remains were torn from the tomb, and scattered

to the winds, as those of a traitor to the nation.

The peculiarity of Mirabeau, as we before remarked, was the union of

great genius with impetuous passions. The last, manifesting themselves

in boyhood, in a family which, while the members were remarkable for

vehemence in themselves, exacted the most entire filial obedience from

their offspring, caused him to be opposed, persecuted, and oppressed.

Seventeen _lettres de cachet_ had been issued against him, while he felt

that his crimes were rather errors in which the public or the state had

no concern. Shut up in a narrow fortress or narrower cell, his hatred of

tyranny was strongly excited, and he sought in his writings to express

it; and, when the occasion offered, he combated it with impetuous

eloquence and determined resistance. At that time, aware how much his

influence was lessened by the errors of his youth, he had been known,

when he felt his progress checked by the disrepute in which his private

character was held, to weep, and to exclaim, "I cruelly expiate the

errors of my youth!"

With all his errors he was a warm and kind-hearted man, and gifted with

undaunted courage. During his political career, his enemies were

perpetually endeavouring to embroil him in duels, which he avoided

without the most distant suspicion of cowardice being attached to him.

He was a man of wit, and many of his sayings are recorded. They are

often bitter epigrams on his enemies, and inspired by hatred rather than

truth. He called the virtuous La Fayette Grandison-Cromwell; and said of

him that he had _bien sauté pour reculer_, as his latter conduct did

not come up to his first entrance on life when he went to America. He

was the implacable enemy of Necker, who, he says, was "a clock always

too slow." While speaking in the national assembly, he pointed to a

picture, emblemising Time, with his scythe and his hour-glass always

full, exclaiming, "We have taken his scythe, but we have forgotten his

time-piece." Of the national assembly he said, "It has Hannibals in

plenty, and needs a Fabius." It was the fashion to call

Clermont-Tonnerre the Pitt of France: "As you please," said Mirabeau;

"but how would Pitt like to be called the Clermont-Tonnerre of England?"

His faculty of wit rose sometimes into grandeur. When he spoke of the

convulsions that would ensue on the entire overthrow of the monarchy, he

cried, "You will have assassinations and massacres; but you will never

rise to the execrable height of a civil war." Talleyrand said that he

dramatised his death. It is a strange moment for vanity to become

paramount; and the chief trait of his death-bed was his gentleness and

serenity, and the affection he showed to his friends. Politics occupied

him at times; and he said to those about him, "Après ma mort, les

factieux se partageront les lambeaux de la monarchie."

The great quality of his mind was the power of seizing on any word or

idea presented to him, and reproducing it at the right moment, with such

vigour and fire as made it omnipotent. It was the eagle eye that enabled

him on the instant to discern the right path, or the commanding idea,

and to express it with force and majesty. With a lion heart, untiring

perseverance, and the strength of a giant, he swept away opposition,

inspired confidence, and fixed his standard far within the ranks of the

enemy, where none dared touch it.

So well could he adapt his very ugliness, his flashing eyes, abundant

hair, and marks of physical power, to the sentiments which he expressed,

that an actor on hearing him speak in the tribune exclaimed, "Ah! what a

pity he was born a gentleman; he has missed his vocation!" He was

greater as an orator than a leader. But each day he lived he advanced in

the science of party strife. At the last, when he contemplated an

organised opposition to the jacobins, he became expert; but it may be

believed that he would have found an insuperable obstacle to success in

the passions of the people.

In early life his misfortunes arose from not having embarked in a

fitting career. As a military man, a century before, as a marshal under

Louis XIV., he had replaced Turenne; a few years later, he might have

emulated Napoleon. As it was, had he been allowed to seek active service

in the army, his turbulence had found vent in the midst of hardship and

danger--a general would have been given to his country. Another school

was needed to form the leader of the revolution: the exasperation

engendered by tyranny, the resolution born in the solitude of a dungeon,

the ambition nurtured by contempt of inferior men--all that had quelled

a feebler man--gave force and direction to his passions, perception and

enthusiasm to his genius, and made that Mirabeau, whom his countrymen

regard as one of the greatest of their leaders, and whose name is a

light that burns inextinguishably amidst the glory that illustrated the

commencement of the French revolution.

[Footnote 10: These extracts form the best part of the "Memoirs of

Mirabeau," by M. Lucas Montigny, his adopted, or, rather, his natural

son,--a work of zeal and labour, but undigested, diffuse, and

ill-judged. Had the author published a selection from these letters,

which were placed in his hands by the family, we should have an

invaluable work. As it is, we are often as much tantalised by what is

omitted, as edified by what is given, of the correspondence. When the

extracts from it cease, the pages of the memoirs lose all their charm

and value: they degenerate into little else than extracts from

newspapers, and vapid discussions by the author.]

[Footnote 11: The subsequent history of this hapless victim of a

depraved state of society which set the seal of guilt on her attachment,

may be briefly stated. After the birth of her child, Sophie was taken

from the asylum in which she was first placed, and confined in the

convent of Saintes-Claires, at Gien. By degrees many indulgences were

allowed her, and she received visits. Mirabeau became jealous, and

angrily expressed his jealousy, both in letters, and in a single

interview which they had after his liberation from Vincennes. Had

Mirabeau come to this interview with a candid mind and a constant heart,

he had at once have acknowledged Sophie's innocence. But his attachment

had waned, and he was intent on completing his reconciliation with his

father, and contriving one with his wife. He played the part of the wolf

with the lamb in the fable; and, to the utter destruction of the nobler

portion of his nature, the ties of love and affection, the knitting of

which had occasioned misery and ruin to both, were broken for ever. Soon

after, the death of her husband restored Sophie to her liberty, but she

chose to continue to reside within the precincts of the convent, though

she used her liberty to make visits and excursions. She was greatly

loved by all who knew her. Her sweetness and gentleness attached many

friends: her charity and kind sympathy caused her to be beloved by the

poor, by whom her memory was long gratefully preserved. She formed a

second attachment for a gentleman to whom she was about to be married,

but his death prevented their union. Sophie resolved not to survive him.

Immediately on receiving his last sigh, she prepared to die. She shut

herself up with two braziers of burning charcoal; and was found on the

morrow dead. She died on the 8th September, 1789, in the 37th year of

her age.]

[Footnote 12: The subsequent life of Madame de Mirabeau was singular.

For some years she continued under her father's guidance, and, at his

wish, to live a life of pleasure; theatricals and every sort of

dissipation being the order of the day. A reconciliation was set on

foot, and had nearly been accomplished between her and her husband at

the period of his death. She emigrated with her father during the

revolution, and suffered a good deal of poverty. She subsequently

married a count de Rocca, and visited Paris, to endeavour to recover

some portion of her property. Her husband died soon after, and she

resumed the name of Mirabeau, of which she became proud, reviving the

recollections of past times, surrounding herself with every object that

could remind her of the husband of her youth. She lived in intimacy with

his sister, madame du Saillant, and extended her kindness to the young

man whom Mirabeau had adopted. Though frivolous, she had never been ill

conducted, and her faults, being those of timidity, are chiefly to be

attributed to her father, who, loving ease and pleasure, and glad to

have his daughter with him, prevented her by every means in his power

from fulfilling her duties towards her husband. She passed her last

years in the hotel de Mirabeau, and died in the year 1800, in the same

room where her husband had expired.]

[Footnote 13: There is a fragment preserved of Mirabeau, remarkable for

its know, ledge of human motives, which shows the stress he laid on a

resolute line of conduct. It deserves to be quoted:--

"If I wrote a book on the military art, the chapter on enthusiasm should

not be the shortest. If I wrote a treatise on politics, I would treat

largely of the _art of daring_, which is not less necessary for the

success of civil enterprises than of military operations; and also to

try the strength of the man who leads; for it is the further or nearer

boundary-line of the possible that marks the difference of men.

"In reading history, I find that almost all the faults committed by the

chiefs, of whatever party, arise from indecision in their principles,

and obliquity of conduct. They revolt by halves; they are faithful by

halves: they dare not entirely cast aside duty, nor entirely sacrifice

their passions. The first steps, which ought to be full of confidence,

are vacillating and ill-assumed: they arrange a retreat, and take

several roads to reach the goal. Artifices, that favourite resource of

ordinary politicians, are the effect of this timidity of the

understanding or the heart. They negotiate to disguise themselves, to

attract partisans, while they ought to walk straight to the object in

view by the shortest line. What is the invariable result? He who wishes

to deceive is deceived; they have failed in seizing the decisive moment,

and have persuaded no one. As much as extremes are unwise in the course

of daily life, so much are half measures insufficient in critical

events; and the most dangerous, as well as the most inconsistent

conduct, is to get half rid of prejudices. But there are nearly as few

resolute bad men as decided honest ones; and most men want character."]

[Footnote 14: The compiler of the memoirs and correspondence of La

Fayette makes no doubt that Mirabeau belonged to the Orleanist faction

till after the 6th of October, when he began to treat with the court.

This was evidently La Fayette's own conviction, apparently founded on

the evidence laid before the assembly, August 7th, 1790, which Mirabeau

refuted, as mentioned in the text.]

[Footnote 15: Copy of a treaty with M. de Mirabeau.--"First, The king

gives M. de Mirabeau the promise of an embassy: this promise shall be

announced by Monsieur himself to M. de Mirabeau. Second, The king will

immediately, until that promise be fulfilled, grant a private

appointment to M. de Mirabeau of 50,000 livres a month, which

appointment will continue at least for the space of four months. M. de

Mirabeau pledges himself to aid the king with his knowledge, influence,

and eloquence, in all that he may judge useful to the welfare of the

state and the interest of the king--two things that all good citizens

undoubtedly look upon as inseparable; and, in case M. de Mirabeau should

not be convinced of the solidity of the reasons that may be given him,

he will abstain from speaking on the subject.

(Approved) LOUIS.

(Signed) LE COMTE DE MIRABEAU."

"_Note._--The original of this article is in the handwriting of

Monsieur, at present Louis XVIII."

This paper is published in vol. II. appendix, no. V. of the memoirs of

Lafayette. It was found in the iron closet, discovered in the Tuileries

on the 10th of August, 1792, containing secret papers. In the same

receptacle is an autograph letter from Louis XVI. to La Fayette, begging

him to concert with Mirabeau respecting the subjects most important to

the welfare of the state and the king's service and person. This letter

La Fayette suspects to have been dictated by Mirabeau himself, and was

never received by him. It is dated June 29th, 1790. The treaty first

quoted is printed without a date. This alliance of the court with

Mirabeau was first brought about by Monsieur, the king's eldest brother.

Afterwards, it would seem that some other was entered into, negotiated

by the count de la Mark, afterwards prince d'Aremberg, which was

mentioned to Bouille, Feb. 6th, 1791. The prince d'Aremberg lived in

Brussels till 1833, and said to La Fayette, that Mirabeau only made

himself be paid to be of his own opinion; yet the stipulation of

silence, when not convinced by the court, in the above treaty, looks

like a still more entire sale of his influence.]

Lives of the most eminent literary and scientific men of France, Vol. 2 (of 2) · 第 56 / 173 题