A War of Dishonor

By David Starr Jordan.

Late President of Leland Stanford Junior University, now its

Chancellor; Chief Director of the World Peace Foundation since

1910.

_To the Editor of The New York Times:_

In this war what of right and what of wrong? Not much of right, perhaps,

and very much of wrong. But there are degrees in wrong, and sometimes,

by comparison, wrong becomes almost right.

The armed peace, the peace of guns and dreadnoughts and sabre rattlers,

has come to its predestined end. Its armaments were made for war. Its

war makers and war traders, the Pan-Germanists in the lead, have done

their worst for the last nine years. They have been foiled time after

time, but they have their way at last. Their last and most fatal weapon

was the ultimatum. If Servia had not given them their chance they would

have found their pretext somewhere else. When a nation or a continent

prepares for war it will get it soon or later. To prepare for war is to

breed a host of men who have no other business, and another host who

find their profits in blood.

When the war began it had very little meaning. It was the third Balkan

war, brought on, as the others were, by intrigues of rival despotisms.

The peoples of Europe do not hate each other. The springs of war come

from a few men impelled by greed and glory. Diplomacy in Europe has been

for years the cover for robbery in Asia or Africa. Of all the nations

concerned not one had any wish to fight, and Belgium alone could fight

with clean hands.

And this fact gave the war its meaning. The invasion of Belgium changed

the whole face of affairs. As by a lightning flash the issue was made

plain: the issue of the sacredness of law; the rule of the soldier or

the rule of the citizen; the rule of fear or the rule of law. Germany

stands for army rule. This was made clear when, a year ago, she passed

under the yoke at Zabern. However devious her diplomacy in the past,

Britain stands today for the rule of law. The British soldier is the

servant of the British people, not their master.

The highest conception of human relations is embodied in the word law.

Law is the framework of civilization. Law is the condition of security,

happiness, and progress. War is the denial of all law. It makes scrap

paper of all the solemn agreements men and nations have established for

their mutual good.

The rape of Belgium made scrap paper of international law. The sowing of

mines in the fairways of commerce made scrap paper of the rights of

neutral nations. The torture of the Belgian people made scrap paper of

the rights of non-combatants.

War may be never righteous, but it is sometimes honorable. In honorable

war armies fight against armies, never against private citizens. If

armies give no needless provocation, they will receive none. The sacking

of Malines, Aerschot, Dinant--these are not acts of honorable war. The

wreck of Louvain, historic Louvain, the venerable centre for 500 years

of Catholic erudition, at the hands of blood-drunk soldiers was an act

of dishonorable war. It marks a stain on the record of Germany which the

ages will not efface.

"A needed example," say the apologists for this crime. The Duke of Alva

gave the same "needed example" to these same people in his day. For

centuries the words "Spanish blood" struck terror into peoples' hearts

throughout the Netherlands. For centuries to come the word Prussian will

take its hated place.

The good people of Germany do not burn universities. Neither do they

make war for war's sake. They are helpless in the hands of a monster of

their own creation. The affair at Zabern a year ago testifies to their

complete subjugation. All the virtues are left to them, save only the

love of freedom. This the mailed fist has taken away.

The Germany of today is an anachronism. Her scientific ideals are of the

twentieth century. Her political ideals hark back to the sixteenth. Her

rulers have made her the most superb fighting machine in a world which

is soul-weary of fighting. For a nation in shining armor the civilized

World has no place. It will not worship them, it will not obey them. It

will not respect those who either worship or obey. It finds no people

good enough to rule other people against their will.

A great nation which its own people do not control is a nation without a

Government. It is a derelict on the international sea. It is a danger to

its neighbors, a greater danger to itself. Of all the many issues, good

or bad, which may come from this war, none is more important than this,

that the German people should take possession of Germany.

The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 What Americans Say to Europe · 第 67 / 146 题