I cannot better close these observations than by citing some forcible

and eloquent remarks of the late Judge Story, addressed to the

American youth.--"Let the American youth," says he, "never forget that

they possess a noble inheritance, bought by the toils, and sufferings,

and blood of our ancestors; and capable, if wisely improved, and

safely guarded, of transmitting to their latest posterity all the

substantial blessings of life--the peaceful enjoyment of liberty, of

property, of religion, and of independence. The structure has been

erected by architects of consummate skill and fidelity; its

foundations are solid; its compartments are beautiful, as well as

useful; its arrangements are full of wisdom and order; and its

defences are impregnable from without. It has been reared for

immortality, if the work of man may justly aspire to such a title. It

may, nevertheless, perish in an hour, by the folly, or corruption, or

negligence of its only keepers, THE PEOPLE. Republics are created by

the virtue, public spirit, and intelligence of the citizens. They fall

when the wise are banished from the public councils because they dare

to be honest, and the profligate are rewarded because they flatter the

people, in order to betray them."

[Illustration]

FOOTNOTES:

[54] For a more particular account of this plan of union, the reader

is referred to Pitkin's History of the United States, vol. i. p. 142,

or Holmes' Annals, vol. ii. p. 55.

[55] Holmes' Annals.

[56] Madison Papers, vol. ii. p. 687-9.

[57] Hinton.

[58] "The nomination came with particular grace from Pennsylvania, as

Dr. Franklin alone could have been thought of as a competitor. The

doctor was himself to have made the nomination of General Washington,

but the state of the weather and of his health confined him to his

house."--_Madison Papers._

[59] "This plan had been concerted among the deputation, or members

thereof, from Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, and perhaps

Mr. Martin, from Maryland, who made with them a common cause, though

on different principles. Connecticut and New York were against a

departure from the principles of the confederation, wishing rather to

add a few new powers to congress, than to substitute a national

government. The states of New Jersey and Delaware were opposed to a

national government, because its patrons considered a proportional

representation of the states as the basis of it. The eagerness

displayed by the members opposed to a national government, from these

different motives, began now to produce serious anxiety for the result

of the convention. Mr. Dickinson said to Mr. Madison: 'You see the

consequence of pushing things too far. Some of the members from the

small states wish for two branches in the general legislature, and are

friends to a good national government; but we would sooner submit to

foreign power, than submit to be deprived, in both branches of the

legislature, of an equality of suffrage, and thereby be thrown under

the dominion of the larger states.'"--_Madison Papers._

[60] Madison Papers.

[61] This committee consisted of Mr. Gerry, Mr. Ellsworth, Mr. Yates,

Mr. Patterson, Dr. Franklin, Mr. Bedford, Mr. Martin, Mr. Mason, Mr.

Davy, Mr. Rutledge, and Mr. Baldwin.

VI. GEORGE WASHINGTON, PRESIDENT.

[Illustration]

INAUGURATED AT NEW YORK, APRIL 30, 1789.

JOHN ADAMS, VICE-PRESIDENT.

HEADS OF THE DEPARTMENTS.

Thomas Jefferson, Virginia, September 26, 1789,} Secretaries

Edmund Randolph, Virginia, January 2, 1794, } of State.

Timothy Pickering, Pennsylvania, December 10, 1795 }

Alexander Hamilton, New York, September 11, 1789,} Secretaries

Oliver Wolcott, Connecticut, February 3, 1795 } of Treasury.

Henry Knox, Massachusetts, September 12, 1789,} Secretaries

Timothy Pickering, Pennsylvania, January 2, 1795, } of War.

James M'Henry, Maryland, January 27, 1796 }

Samuel Osgood, Massachusetts, September 26, 1789,} Postmasters

Timothy Pickering, Pennsylvania, November 7, 1791, } General.

Joseph Habersham, Georgia, February 25, 1795, }

Edmund Randolph, Virginia, September 26, 1789,} Attorneys

William Bradford, Pennsylvania, January 27, 1794, } General.

Charles Lee, Virginia, December 10, 1795 }

SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

Frederick A. Muhlenberg, Pennsylvania, First Congress, 1789.

Jonathan Trumbull, Connecticut, Second do. 1791.

Frederick A. Muhlenberg, Pennsylvania, Third do. 1793.

Jonathan Dayton, New Jersey, Fourth do. 1795.

To the traveller whose lot has led him to traverse inhospitable

deserts--encounter fierce storms, and stem angry floods--it is

delightful, at length, to enter a region where such obstacles no

longer impede his progress--where he breathes with freedom--where he

pauses to repose and refresh himself, without the anticipation of

similar immediate toil and fatigue. It may not, indeed, be the end of

his journey--and he may not know with certainty the future issue of

that journey; but the aspect is less forbidding--the prospect is even

inviting--and he passes on, animated with the hope of still better

things to come.

Some such change we realize at the point at which we have arrived, in

following down the great events of American history. Casting an eye

upon the scenes of the past, little besides toil, agitation, and

conflict, are to be seen.

The Pilgrim Fathers land on these western shores. Immediately, a

wide-spread wilderness is before them, and the task of clearing it is

begun; savage foes--subtle, secret, and sanguinary--prowl about their

habitations, and for years agitate and distress them. The mother-country

becomes involved in continental wars--America is the theatre of the

contest, and American soldiers must fight her battles. But, like the

palm-tree, the colonists rise under the burdens imposed on them. As they

prosper and expand, England becomes jealous, and bears herself lordly

towards them, in measures of oppression--in prohibitions and exactions.

War ensues--a long and exhausting war; their fields lie neglected; their

cities are captured; their families are impoverished, and their sons are

slain; but they conquer, and are free. But, as a nation, they have no

sufficient bond of union--no efficient government to guide their future

destiny in safety. National and state debts rest as an incubus upon

their efforts, and no adequate power exists by which to provide for

their liquidation. A convention meets: different plans are

proposed--different constitutions are discussed. Obstacles to the

adoption of any arise, which appear insurmountable, and the convention

is on the eve of dissolving--leaving the problem still unsolved, whether

human wisdom is adequate to devise a constitution which shall harmonize

the conflicting interests of thirteen free and independent states.

Once more Providence rallies to our aid--moving upon untractable

spirits, as in days of yore the spirit had moved upon the troubled

waters, and now, as then, there "is a calm." Deliberations are

resumed--asperities wear away--harmony succeeds--the final vote is

taken--a constitution is adopted, and sent abroad among the people of

the states.

But again the waters become tumultuous--angry conflict is waged in

almost every state-house in the land--hundreds and thousands lift up

their voices against this constitution, and refuse to sanction

it--ill-boding doubts swell up like clouds gathering from the sea, and

for a time exclude all hope of a constitutional ratification.

But another becalming influence from on high moves upon the mental

mass; jarring strifes are suspended--angry discord ceases--harmonious

action succeeds--the constitution is ratified, _and George Washington

is elected president of the United States_!

On the ratification of the constitution, the attention of the people

was at once directed to General Washington, as the first president of

the United States. Communications, expressive of this general desire,

were made to him. "We cannot," said Mr. Johnson, of Maryland, "do

without you, and I and thousands more can explain to any body but

yourself, why we cannot do without you." "I have ever thought," said

Governeur Morris, "and have said, that you must be president; no other

man can fill that office." In a letter on the subject, addressed to

Washington by Colonel Hamilton, the latter said, "You will permit me

to say, that it is indispensable you should lend yourself to its [the

government's] first operations."

Washington had serious objections to becoming a candidate. He

sincerely wished for retirement. "It is my great and sole desire"--so

he expressed himself to a friend, who had written him--"to live and

die in peace and retirement on my own farm."

But the voice of the nation demanded a further sacrifice from the

noble and disinterested patriot. He alone was believed to fill so

prëeminent a station in public opinion, that he might be placed at the

head of the nation without exciting envy. He alone possessed the

requisite confidence of the nation.

By the constitution, the new government was to commence its operations

on the 4th of March, 1789; but a quorum of representatives did not

appear till the 1st, nor of senators till Monday, the 6th day of April.

On this latter day, the president of the senate, elected for the

purpose of counting the votes, declared to the senate, that the senate

and house of representatives had met, and that he, in their presence,

had opened and counted the votes for the electors for president and

vice-president of the United States; whereby it appeared that GEORGE

WASHINGTON was unanimously elected president. The following table

exhibits the votes of the several electoral colleges:

ELECTORAL VOTES FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE-PRESIDENT.

ELECTION FOR THE FIRST TERM,

COMMENCING MARCH 4, 1789, AND TERMINATING MARCH 3, 1793.

Key: A. George Washington, of Virginia.

B. John Adams, of Massachusetts.

C. Samuel Huntington, of Connecticut.

D. John Jay, of New York.

E. John Hancock, of Massachusetts.

F. R. H. Harrison, of Maryland.

G. George Clinton, of New York.

H. John Rutledge, of South Carolina.

I. John Milton, of Georgia.

J. James Armstrong, of Georgia.

K. Edward Telfair, of Georgia.

L. Benjamin Lincoln, of Massachusetts.

----------+----------------+---+---+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Number of | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Electors | STATES. | | | | | | | | | | | | |

from each | | A.| B.|C.|D.|E.|F.|G.|H.|I.|J.|K.|L.|

State. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

----------+----------------+---+---+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

5 |New Hampshire, | 5| 5| | | | | | | | | | |

10 |Massachusetts, | 10| 10| | | | | | | | | | |

7 |Connecticut, | 7| 5| 2| | | | | | | | | |

6 |New Jersey, | 6| 1| 5| | | | | | | | | |

10 |Pennsylvania, | 10| 8| 2| | | | | | | | | |

3 |Delaware, | 3| 3| | | | | | | | | | |

6 |Maryland, | 6| 6| | | | | | | | | | |

10 |Virginia, | 10| 5| 1| 1| 3| | | | | | | |

7 |South Carolina, | 7| 1| 6| | | | | | | | | |

5 |Georgia, | 5| 2| 1| 1| 1| | | | | | | |

----------+----------------+---+---+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

69 |Whole No. | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|of electors, | 69| 34| 2| 9| 4| 6| 3| 6| 2| 1| 1| 1|

|Majority, 35 | | | | | | | | | | | | |

----------+----------------+---+---+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Whereupon, a certificate and letter--the one prepared by a committee

of the senate, the other by its president--were communicated to

General Washington, setting forth his election, and expressing the

cordial wish, that so auspicious a mark of public confidence would

meet his approbation.

This certificate and letter were received by Washington, at Mount

Vernon, on the 4th of April. He doubtless appreciated the honor done

him, and was grateful to the people for the confidence reposed in him;

but he would have declined the office, had the convictions of duty

allowed. That, however, was not permitted; and, yielding to the wishes

of the nation, he took leave of Mount Vernon on the second day after

receiving notice of his appointment, and proceeded to New York, at that

time the seat of government--"bidding adieu," as he wrote in his diary,

"to private life and domestic felicity; and, with a mind oppressed with

more anxious and painful sensations than I have words to express."

The state of the public business required his immediate presence at

the seat of government; but the desire to see the first president of

the United States--the zeal and enthusiasm which were kindled up along

the whole route he was to take, rendered it impossible to proceed with

haste. Crowds flocked around him, wherever he stopped; and corps of

militia, and companies of the most respectable citizens, escorted him

through their respective streets.

On reaching New York, April 23d, he was received with due ceremony by

the governor of that state, and conducted with military honors through

an immense concourse of people, to the apartments provided for him.

Here he received the salutations of foreign ministers, public bodies,

political characters, and private citizens of distinction, who pressed

around him to offer their congratulations, and to express their joy at

seeing the man, who had the confidence of all, at the head of the

American republic.

[Illustration: INAUGURATION OF WASHINGTON.]

On Thursday, the 30th of April, the new president was inaugurated. The

oath of office was administered by the chancellor of the state of New

York, in the presence of the senate and house of representatives, and an

immense concourse of people, who attested their joy by loud and

repeated acclamations. From the open gallery adjoining the

senate-chamber, which had been the scene of this new but imposing scene,

the assembly returned to the senate-chamber, where the president

delivered an inaugural address; in which, after alluding to the

"anxieties" occasioned by his election to the chief magistracy, and the

fond hope he had indulged of spending the remainder of his days in the

"retreat" to which he had retired, after years of military toil and

strife, he proceeded in terms alike honorable to himself as a Christian

and a patriot: "It would be peculiarly improper to omit, in this first

official act, my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who rules

over the universe--who presides in the councils of nations--and whose

providential aids can supply every human defect, that his benediction

may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the people of the

United States, a government instituted by themselves for these essential

purposes: and may enable every instrument employed in its administration

to execute, with success, the functions allotted to his charge. In

tendering this homage to the Great Author of every public and private

good, I assure myself that it expresses your sentiments not less than my

own; nor those of my fellow-citizens at large, less than either. No

people can be bound to acknowledge and adore the invisible hand which

conducts the affairs of men, more than the people of the United States.

Every step by which they have advanced to the character of an

independent nation, seems to have been distinguished by some token of

providential agency; and in the important revolution just accomplished

in the system of their united government, the tranquil deliberations,

and voluntary consent of so many distinct communities, from which the

event has resulted, cannot be compared with the means by which most

governments have been established, without some return of pious

gratitude, along with an humble anticipation of the future blessings

which the past seem to presage. These reflections, arising out of the

present crisis, have forced themselves too strongly on my mind to be

suppressed. You will join with me, I trust, in thinking that there are

none, under the influence of which the proceedings of a new and free

government can more auspiciously commence."

Such were the sentiments of the patriot--the sage--the Christian

statesman, as he was about to enter upon the duties of an office, upon

the faithful or unfaithful discharge of which, was to depend the

perpetuity or speedy annihilation of a constitution of government,

which had cost thousands of lives and millions of revenue--besides

involving the happiness of unborn millions. Washington had surveyed

the wide field of responsibility. He came to the high and sacred

office reluctantly indeed, but in reliance upon that Divine arm which

had been his stay in the dark and stormy days of the Revolution.

Having put his hand to the plough, he was not the man to look back.

Having passed the Rubicon, his march was forward. Immediately

following the delivery of the above address, the president, with the

members of both houses, attended divine service at St. Paul's chapel.

Thus did Washington, and thus did the national assembly, commence the

government with a _devout recognition of its dependence upon Divine

Providence for success_. Happy for the country, if the same spirit of

piety, and the same acknowledgments to the Divine Author of all good,

had descended to after years.

The acts and events which signalized the administration of Washington

relate to--

A System of Revenue. Indian War.

Regulation of Departments. Rëelection of Washington.

Amendments of the Constitution. Difficulties with France.

Establishment of a Judiciary. Insurrection in Pennsylvania.

Assumption of Debts. Jay's Treaty.

Removal of the Seat of Government. Election of Mr. Adams.

National Bank. Farewell Address.

_System of Revenue._--The first duty, under the federal constitution,

to which congress was called, was to provide a revenue for the support

of the government. For this purpose duties were laid on imported

merchandize and on the tonnage of vessels; thus drawing into the

national treasury funds, which had before been collected and

appropriated by the individual states. To counteract the commercial

regulations of foreign nations, and encourage American shipping,

higher tonnage duties were imposed on foreign than on American

vessels, and ten per cent. less duty on goods imported in vessels

belonging to the citizens of the United States than the same goods

brought in those owned by foreigners.

_Regulation of Departments._--Three executive departments were

created, designed to aid the president in the management of the

government. These were styled departments of _war_, of _foreign

affairs_, and of the _treasury_. The heads of these departments were

to be called _secretaries_, and to receive a salary of three thousand

five hundred dollars. They were intended to constitute a council, to

be consulted by the president at his pleasure; and their opinions, on

all important questions, he was authorized to require in writing.

In framing the acts establishing these departments, a question arose

of serious magnitude, viz: "In what manner, and by whom, these

important officers could be _removed from office_?" The constitution

was explicit in regard to their appointment, giving the power of

nominating to the president, and that of confirming or rejecting the

nomination to the senate; but it was silent as to removal. Some few

maintained that they could be removed only by impeachment; but the

principal question was, "whether they were removable by the president

alone, or by the president with the concurrence of the senate?"

The debate on this question was long and animated. It was claimed, by

one portion of the members, that as the senate had a voice in the

appointment of these officers, they should have a voice in case of

their removal; that such power entrusted to one man might be

abused--if not by Washington, by some of his successors.

On the other hand, it was contended that, as it was made the duty of

the president to see the laws faithfully executed, he ought to have

the power of dismissing those agents who were unfaithful; otherwise,

how, in many supposable cases, could he secure a faithful execution of

the laws? It was further urged, that the mal-conduct of an officer

might require his immediate dismission, before the senate--a body

scattered over the states--could be convened. True, the power might be

abused, and, in the hands of an ambitious man, perhaps would be; but

such abuse would, in due time, be rebuked by the people, and the

abuser of this delegated power, be displaced with dishonor. "The

danger," said Mr. Madison, "consists in this: the president can

displace from office a man whose merits require that he should be

continued in it. What will be the motives which the president can feel

for such abuse of his power, and the restraints to operate to prevent

it? In the first place, he will be impeachable by this house, before

the senate, for such an act of mal-administration; for I contend, that

the wanton removal of meritorious officers, would subject him to

impeachment, and removal from his own high trust."

The difference of opinion on this great question, gave rise to warm

and protracted debates. A majority of both houses, however, at length

decided, that _the power of removal is in the president alone_.

Several who had been members of the convention which framed the

constitution, were, at this time, members of the house of

representatives. They were equally divided on the question--Mr.

Madison and Mr. Baldwin, supporting the construction finally adopted

by congress: Mr. Hamilton and Mr. Gerry, opposing it.

_Amendments of the Constitution._--The states of New York and

Virginia, although they ratified the constitution, were solicitous to

have certain amendments adopted, which, in separate memorials, they

presented to congress, and urged that body to call another convention

for their adoption. Congress, however, had no authority to call a

convention. Mr. Madison submitted to the house several amendments,

which, together with those presented by several of the states, were

referred to a committee, consisting of one member from each state.

This committee, at length, reported several amendments; twelve of

which, after various alterations, were agreed to by both branches of

congress, and sent to the states. These amendments related to

religion--keeping or bearing arms in time of war--quartering soldiers,

citizens, &c., &c. Ten of these articles were at length ratified by

the state legislatures, and became a part of the constitution.

_Establishment of a Judiciary._--"A national judiciary was also

established during this session, consisting of a supreme court,

circuit, and district courts. The bill for carrying this part of the

constitution into effect, originated in the senate, and was drawn up

by a committee, of which Mr. Ellsworth was chairman. The district

courts were to consist of one judge in each state. The states were

divided into circuits, in each of which, one of the judges of the

supreme court, and the district judge of the state in which the court

was held, constituted the circuit courts. In certain cases, this court

had original jurisdiction, and also took cognizance of appeals from

the district courts. The supreme court was composed of a chief justice

and five associate judges, and was to hold two sessions annually, at

the seat of government. This court had exclusive jurisdiction in

certain cases, and appellative jurisdiction from the circuit courts,

and also from the state courts, in cases where the validity of

treaties, and the laws of the United States were drawn in question.

This organization of the federal judiciary, has remained nearly the

same to the present time, except for a short period, when a different

system, relative to the circuit courts, was established, but which was

soon abolished, and the old system restored."[62] John Jay was

appointed chief justice; John Rutledge, James Wilson, William

Cushing, Robert H. Harrison, and John Blair, associate judges of the

supreme court, and Edmund Randolph, attorney general.[63]

Great Events in the History of North and South America · 第 40 / 69 段