I could have cried, so vexed was I at first. Then I felt thankful that

no bad news had actually reached me; for, during the brief moment

occupied in opening the letter, you can scarcely imagine the many

terrible things that passed through my head. Mother had had a fit,

fallen down and broken her leg, though brother Sam had promised me

faithfully not to leave her alone while I was gone; or that stupid

Dutch boy, who takes care of the cow and the fires, had left live coals

in the ash-box, and the house was burned to the ground. Or Sam himself

had got one of those severe attacks of inflammatory rheumatism, and

nobody there but mother to take care of him, and take his fretting

into the bargain, and she almost eighty years old. When I recovered

myself a little, I took that wretched sheet of paper, and was on the

point of penning a dignified expression of my sentiments below the

odious words, and handing it in silent scorn to my nephew-in-law at the

breakfast-table. But better feelings prevailed; I smoothed it nicely

in my portfolio, and am now scratching this hasty epistle upon its

surface, intending in the morning to write it more legibly on some of

my own fair sheets of Bath.

A few among the follies of this tiresome day have, I must acknowledge,

given me a certain sort of satisfaction. Holton Sparks has been come

up with himself; not by any means of mine, I earnestly assure you,

for, besides heartily despising it, I cannot in any shape perpetrate

"April fooling." Sam often says that this is because I am so

matter-of-fact; but, matter-of-fact or not, I trust that there is not

enough matter-of-folly in my composition to attempt such performances.

I always did abominate practical jokes, and Sam knows _that;_ yet the

jokes which that boy still puts upon me, though I am three years older

than himself, would be deemed improbable.

Well, when the breakfast-bell rang this morning, I went down stairs

with an air as erect and dignified as a woman of fif----no matter--with

such a demeanor as one who has outlived the fooleries of early

youth should make habitual. Holton Sparks is very fond of eggs, and

invariably takes the biggest on the dish. I observed that our landlady

directed the servant to hand them first to Mr. Sparks, who was too

intent on securing his egg to notice her action. Indeed, he never

hesitates to help himself first, quite regardless of the ladies who sit

near, and even of Ann Sophia. Holton is a tremendous eater, seeming to

think of nothing at table but disposing of his food as rapidly and in

as large quantities as possible. The manner of this gentleman is to

place a large piece of nicely buttered toast on his plate, pour the

egg over it, pepper the whole thoroughly, and swallow it as if the

preparation were some unpleasant dose that it is his duty to dispatch.

Mrs. Mashum, who is altogether too much given to laughing, and too

volatile for her station, sat behind the coffee urn shaking violently

with suppressed mirth. He broke the shell of his egg as usual, when,

behold, his plate was flooded with a dingy-looking liquid, which proved

to be warm dish-water. On comprehending the joke, he sent it away with

an offended air, and made his breakfast on beefsteak, without deigning

to join in the universal laugh. It seems that last evening he laid a

wager with Mrs. Mashum that she could not succeed in playing him a

trick, he should be so constantly upon his guard during All Fools'

Day. The affair of the egg has put him out of humor to such an extent

that we have been saved the infliction of any more jokes at his hands.

He has worn his dignity all day, not even Ann Sophia succeeding in

laughing or coaxing him into laying it aside. I rather think that he

grudges the dollar which he will have to lay out for the gloves, as

Mrs. Mashum has won the bet, and Ann Sophia assures him that a pair of

her own will not do by any means. He proposed that expedient to settle

the matter. Holton _is_ stingy. But his wife declared that such a good

joke deserved a pair of Alexander's best. It is not because I approve

of betting that I mention this, for I hold the practice in great

abhorrence. It was only of a piece with the other follies of the day,

and shows up Holton Sparks a little.

A small fire of fooling was kept up throughout the morning. If the

door-bell has been rung once, it has forty times, by Mrs. Mashum's cub

of a boy, who would jerk the handle or toss up his ball at the wire,

and then run out of sight. In going from my own room to my niece's, I

saw a sixpence on the floor, and, stooping down to pick it up, found it

fast. Congratulating myself on not having been observed, I was passing

on, when that disagreeable urchin shouted, from behind a door--

"April fool, old lady!"

He deserves to be sent to the House of Refuge.

Ann Sophia herself has put me out of all manner of patience by saying,

as I sat sewing at the front window in her parlor, "Pray, Aunt Abigail,

whose carriage do you suppose that is?" when no vehicle was in view but

the milkman's. Or, suddenly, she would exclaim, "What ladies are those

crossing the street?" when none were anywhere to be seen.

But the meanest of all was a very rude thing, which she repeated

several times upon different persons, apparently delighted with its

efficacy. This was to rush up suddenly, and screaming out, "See there!"

throw her arm directly across one's nose with so much force as to

oblige that organ to follow the direction of her outstretched finger,

whether or no. Such a sort of fooling by compulsion struck me as

particularly reprehensible.

"I'd try it on you, aunty," said the volatile child, "if I were not

afraid of scoring my arm."

Such an insinuation against my nose! Had it been any one besides Sophy,

I could not have forgiven the speech. She is such a highty-tighty.

But one trick which she played was really good, especially as

its object was a man to whom I have taken a huge dislike. He is

an Irish gentleman connected with some legal firm in town, most

desperately polite, with a very long round nose and fiery red hair.

He is continually poking dishes at me across the table, and is

fairly oppressive with his attentions. Moreover, he calls me "Mrs."

perpetually. "Mrs.," indeed! Intimating that I am old enough to be a

"Mrs.," if not one in fact. As he rises very late, he never appears

at breakfast with ourselves; but at dinner we have the misery of his

presence. To-day, when we were almost through with the first course, he

entered with an air much flushed and uncomfortable.

"Are you ill, Mr. O'Killigan?" asked Mrs. Mashum.

"No, thank you, madam," said he, with one of his customary efforts at

politeness. "But I have been trying for a long while to shave, till

forced in despair to give up the attempt. The deuce has got into my

soap."

"You have forgotten that it is the first of April. The day may have had

some influence upon your dressing-case," remarked one of the ladies

present.

"I declare, I have not thought of that," said he, and, springing from

the table, he ran to his room, returning with something which he begged

the ladies to examine. It proved to be a thick, fair slice of a raw

potato, in size and color so much like his own soap, which had been

removed, that he had detected no difference, except that it refused to

form a lather. This was the work of my mischievous niece, who looked at

it very gravely, and remarked, with much demureness--

"I always knew that you Irish were fond of potatoes, but was not aware

that you carried it to such an excess as to shave with that vegetable."

It would have better pleased me had O'Killigan been angry; but the

Irishman took the joke, and all the speeches made at his expense, with

entire good-humor, laughingly assuring the ladies that he would be

revenged before night. And, as he knew not whom to suspect, he adopted

a course which involved most of us in its consequences. When we retire

for the night, those who are not better provided equip themselves

with a candle, of which a supply stands ready in the lower hall. Such

a fuss as I had with my light this evening! It went out as soon as I

reached my own door; and, after relighting it several times by means of

matches, the tallow was exhausted, and I discovered that the blackened

remnant of wick was stuck into a carrot. That miserable Irishman

had enlisted Biddy Flyn, the chambermaid, in his service, and this

afternoon they spent two whole hours in the basement at their nefarious

work, trimming off carrots and giving them a very thin coating of

grease. Mrs. Mashum herself did not escape, for, just as she began

taking her usual rounds to see that all was safe for the night, her

treacherous light went out, leaving her in total darkness--in the lower

regions, too, for she was on the point of inspecting a keg of mackerel

in the cellar.

At this identical moment, having used up all my matches in vain

endeavors to light a candle, which, like its manufacturer's locks, I

had found to be carroty, I was on my way to the kitchen in pursuit of

a more reliable means of illumination, when I heard Mrs. Mashum scream

out--

"Bring a light, Biddy, for goodness sake! I shall step into this

rat-trap that you've set, if I stir an inch in the dark."

And all the while the shameful Biddy stood holding her sides, and

laughing in a most unreasonable way. Several persons were running along

the upper hall calling for lights, the ladies in a sort of demi-toilet,

and one of the young men, a dry-goods clerk, who dresses his hair with

a curling-tongs, having on a black silk night-cap. But the real culprit

did not suffer, after all, for Ann Sophia has her own solar lamp.

While these distressing events were transpiring, that mean Irishman,

with his big nose and red head, sat in the parlor, as cool as possible,

reading the "London News" by the light of a brilliant camphene lamp. I

wonder his hair did not ignite and cause an explosion. It would have

served him quite right.

Strange to say, Mrs. Mashum is not at all offended either at O'Killigan

or his accomplice, but has enjoyed their mischief in a way to me

utterly unaccountable. I suppose Sam would say that she knows how

to take a joke; for my part, they are things which I do not wish to

know how to take myself; I wash my hands of all participation in such

knowledge.

I have obtained a lamp that shall last till I have finished this

narrative of to-day's outrageous proceedings. On passing the

parlor-door, I heard that disagreeable O'Killigan say to his landlady,

in reply to some of her pretended threats of punishment--

"At any rate, my good Mrs. Mashum, you cannot arrest me for incendiary

attempts; I have made such laudable exertions to put out the flames in

the house."

Impudent fellow! I had a mind to say something about the blaze on his

own head; but I forbore, passing on in offended silence.

Now, my dear Mr. Godey, set a good example, and lead the way in a

reform of these abuses, as you have in so many other praiseworthy

undertakings. Frown upon these April fooleries, especially as levelled

at the peace and quiet of respectable single women. If my letter is

too late to take effect this present season, please give it due notice

before a twelvemonth hence. You will thus oblige and gratify your

friend and constant reader,

ABIGAIL SNIPE.

_Postscript._ I shall go home to-morrow, and finish Holton Sparks's

last new shirt in the pleasant seclusion afforded by my own

hearthstone. I cannot endure the thought of sitting at the table in

this house any longer, opposite that dreadful O'Killigan, hearing

him crack his dry jokes while he rubs his chin with his thumb and

forefinger. To be obliged to listen when he comments on the mishaps of

this evening would surely set me into a nervous fit. It strikes me that

I have read in one of Sam's old books--"Sal" somebody's writings--of

an elderly lady who "died of a Frenchman." If I were to stay here much

longer, I should assuredly die of this middle-aged Irishman.

Depend upon it, I shall not breathe a word to Sam of my trials at

Sophy's boarding-house, in consequence of the inmates all making fools

of themselves and me on the FIRST OF APRIL.

INTELLECTUAL ENDOWMENTS OF CHILDREN.

AN extremely intelligent boy, of about twelve years of age,

was once brought to the late Dr. Deville, an English phrenologist,

for examination, by a parent who was very proud of the intellectual

endowments of his child. Dr. Deville gave his opinion of the boy's

character, at the same time cautioning the father of the dangerous

course he was pursuing. But the father's reply was, "All that other

boys considered labor and hard study were merely child's play to him;

and that his studies could not be hurtful to him--he enjoyed them so

much." Again Dr. Deville endeavored to save the child, but the father

would not attend to the warning. Two years from that time he again

called on Dr. Deville, and, in reply to his inquiries about the child,

burst into tears, and stated that the boy was an idiot.

GODEY'S COURSE OF LESSONS IN DRAWING.

LESSON V.

The outline of the stem and the curve of the scroll of Fig. 54 must

first be drawn, the distances and proportions of the various parts

being carefully observed. In sketching the scroll in Fig. 55, the eye

alone will be the guide, the directions and distances of the various

parts being marked off before filling in the details.

[Illustration: Fig. 54.]

[Illustration: Fig. 55.]

[Illustration: Fig. 56.]

[Illustration: Fig. 57.]

The method of drawing the rosette forming part of the scroll shown in

Fig. 57 is displayed in Fig. 56, the circle being drawn first.

In sketching Fig. 58, the direction of the curve must first be

ascertained, its due proportions noted, thereafter filling in the

details.

The stem, leaves, flower, and buds of the wall-flower in Fig. 59 will

afford an interesting example for practice at this stage of progress;

the stem, its length and direction, should first be drawn, the position

of the leaves, &c. marked thereon, and the details thereafter filled in.

[Illustration: Fig. 58.]

[Illustration: Fig. 59.]

[Illustration: Fig. 60.]

[Illustration: Fig. 61.]

The sketch in Fig. 60, which represents the stem, leaves, and flower of

the yellow crowfoot, will be drawn in the same way as above.

The flower of the honeysuckle in Fig. 61 affords a good example for

free pencil-sketching. The stem should be drawn first, then an outline

made which will touch all the exterior parts of the sketch, as in Figs.

44 and 52; the distances of the leaves should next be drawn on this,

and the details put in. The pupil should endeavor to copy this example

correctly; it may appear very difficult, but, by a careful attention

to the rules we have given, and a little determination to "try again,"

if perchance she should once or twice fail, the difficulty will soon

vanish.

[Illustration: Fig. 62.]

[Illustration: Fig. 63.]

[Illustration: Fig. 64.]

[Illustration: Fig. 65.]

The sketch in Fig. 62, representing a human foot, may be put in by

first drawing the general outline, thereafter finishing the details.

Figs. 63, 64, and 65 will be drawn in the same manner.

DRESS--AS A FINE ART.

BY MRS. MERRIFIELD.

CONCLUSION.

WE look forward hopefully to a day when art-education will

be extended to all ranks; when a knowledge of the beautiful will

be added to that of the useful; when good taste, based upon real

knowledge and common sense, will dictate our fashions in dress as in

other things. We have schools of art to reform our taste in pottery,

hardware, and textile fabrics, not to speak of the higher walks of

art, painting, sculpture, and architecture. The handle of a jug, the

stem of a wine-glass, the design for dress silks or lace veils, will

form the subjects of lectures to the students of the various schools

of design; disquisitions are written on the important question whether

the ornamental designs should represent the real form of objects, or

only give a conventional representation of them, while the study of the

human figure, the masterpiece of creation, is totally neglected, except

by painters and sculptors. We hope that the study of form will be more

extended, that it will be universal, that it will, in fact, enter into

the general scheme of education, and that we shall hereafter see as

much pains bestowed in improving by appropriate costume the figure

which nature has given us, as we do now in distorting it by tight

stays, narrow and high-heeled shoes, and all the other deformities and

eccentricities of that many-faced monster, fashion. The economy of the

frame, and the means of preserving it in health and beauty, should form

an integral part of education. There can be no true beauty without

health, and how can we hope to secure health if we are ignorant of the

means of promoting it, or if we violate its precepts by adopting absurd

and pernicious fashions?

Surely it is not too much to hope that dress-makers will hereafter

attend the schools of design, to study the human form, and thence learn

to appreciate its beauties, and to clothe it with appropriate dress,

calculated to display its beauties to the greatest advantage, and to

conceal its defects--the latter with the reservation we have already

noticed. We hope, also, that the shoe-maker will learn to model the

shoe upon the true form of the foot.

Manufacturers are now convinced of the importance and utility of

schools of design, and whether the article hereafter to be produced be

a cup and saucer, a fender, a pattern for a dress or for furniture, for

a service of plate or diamond tiara, it is thought proper that the

pupil, as a preliminary course that cannot be dispensed with, should

commence with the study of the human figure. Yet, is not dress an

art-manufacture as well as a cup and saucer, or a tea-board? Are there

less skill and talent, less taste required to clothe the form which we

are told is made after God's own image, than to furnish an apartment?

Why should not dressmakers and tailors attend the schools of design as

well as those artisans who are intended to be employed in what are now

called art-manufactures? Why should not shoe-makers be taught the shape

and movements of the foot? If this were the case, we are satisfied that

an immediate and permanent improvement would be the consequence in our

style of dress.

We believe that many portrait painters stipulate that they shall be

allowed to dictate the dress, at least as regards the arrangement of

the colors, of their sitters; the reason of this is that the painter's

selection of dress and color is based upon the study of the figure

and complexion of the individual, or the knowledge of the effects of

contrast and harmony of lines, tissues, and colors, while the models

which are presented for his imitation too frequently offer to his view

a style of dress, both as regards form and color, which sets the rules

of harmony at defiance. Now, only suppose that the dress-maker had the

painter's knowledge of form and harmony of lines and colors, what a

revolution would take place in dress? We should no longer see the tall

and the short, the slender and the stout, the brown and the fair, the

old and the young, dressed alike, but the dress would be adapted to the

individual; and we believe that, were the plan of study we recommend

generally adopted, this purpose might always be effected without the

sacrifice of what is now the grand desideratum in dress--novelty.

The reasons why the art of dressmaking has not hitherto received the

attention which it deserves, are to be sought for in the constitution

of society. The branches of manufacture which require a knowledge of

design, such as calico-printing, silk and ribbon-weaving, porcelain and

pottery, and hardware manufactures, are conducted on a large scale by

men of wealth and talent, who, if they would compete successfully with

rival manufactures, find it necessary to study and apply to their own

business all the improvements in science with which their intercourse

with society gives them an opportunity of becoming acquainted. It is

quite otherwise with dressmaking. A woman is at the head of every

establishment of this kind a woman generally of limited education

and attainments, from whom cannot be expected either liberality of

sentiment or enlarged views, but who possibly possesses some tact

and discrimination of character, which enable her to exercise a kind

of dictatorial power in matters of dress over her customers; these

customers are scarcely better informed on the subject than herself.

The early life of the dressmaker is spent in a daily routine of labor

with the needle, and, when she becomes a mistress in her turn, she

exacts from her assistants the same amount of daily labor that was

formerly expected from herself. Work, work, work with the needle

from almost childhood, in the same close room from morning to night,

and not unfrequently from night to morning also, is the everlasting

routine of the monotonous life of the dressmakers. They are working for

bread, and have no leisure to attend to the improvement of the mind,

and the want of this mental cultivation is apparent in the articles

they produce by their labor. When one of the young women who attend

these establishments to learn the trade thinks she has had sufficient

experience, she leaves the large establishment and sets up in business

on her own account. In this new situation, she works equally hard, and

has therefore no time for improving her mind and taste. Of the want

of this, however, she is not sensible, because she can purchase for

a trifle all the newest patterns, and the thought never enters her

poor little head that the same fashion may not suit all her customers.

This defective education of the dressmakers, or rather their want

of knowledge of the human form, is one of the great causes of the

prevalence of the old fashion of tight-lacing. It is so much easier

to make a closely-fitting body suit over a tight stay than it is on

the pliant and yielding natural form, in which, if one part be drawn a

little too tight, or the contrary, the body of the dress is thrown out

of shape. Supposing, on the other hand, the fit to be exact, it is so

difficult to keep such a tight-fitting body in its place on the figure

without securing its form by whalebones, that it is in vain to expect

the stays to become obsolete until the tight-fitting bodice is also

given up.

This will never take place until not only the ladies who are to be

clothed, but the dressmakers shall make the human form their study, and

direct their efforts to set off their natural advantages by attending

to the points which are their characteristic beauties. A long and

delicate throat, falling shoulders, not too wide from point to point,

a flat back, round chest, wide hips; these are the points which should

be developed by the dress. Whence it follows that every article of

dress which shortens the throat, adds height or width to the shoulders,

roundness to the back, or flatness to the chest, must be radically

wrong in principle, and unpleasant and repulsive in effect. In the same

manner, whatever kind of dress adds to the height of a figure already

too tall and thin, or detracts from the apparent height of the short

and stout, must be avoided. These things should form the study of the

dressmaker.

As society is now constituted, however, the dressmaker has not, as we

have already observed, leisure to devote to studies of the necessity

and importance of which she is still ignorant. The reform must be begun

by the ladies themselves. They must acquire a knowledge of form, and

of the principles of beauty and harmony, and so exercise a controlling

influence over the dressmakers. By this means a better taste will be

created, and the dressmakers will at length discover their deficiency

in certain guiding principles, and will be driven at last to resort

to similar studies. But in this case a startling difficulty presents

itself--the poor dressmaker is at present over-worked: how can she

find leisure to attend the schools of design, or even pursue, if she

had the ability, the necessary studies at home? A girl is apprenticed

to the trade at the age of thirteen or fourteen, she works at it

all her life, rising early, and late taking rest, and what is the

remuneration of her daily toil of twelve hours? Eighteenpence, or at

most two shillings a day, with her board! As she reckons the value of

the latter at a shilling, it follows that the earnings of a dressmaker,

in the best period of her life, who goes out to work, could not exceed

15_s._, or at the most 18_s._ a week, if she did not, at the hazard

of her health--which, indeed, is frequently sacrificed--work at home

before she begins, and after she has finished her day's work abroad.

The carpenter or house-painter does not work harder, or bring to bear

on his employment greater knowledge than the poor dressmaker, yet he

has 4_s._ 6_d._ a day without his board, while she has only what is

equivalent to 2_s._ 6_d._ or 3_s.!_ What reason can be assigned why a

woman's work, if equally well done, should not be as well paid as that

of a man? A satisfactory reason has yet to be given; the fact, however,

is indisputable that women are not in general so well paid for their

labor as men.

LETTERS LEFT AT THE PASTRY-COOK'S:

BEING THE CLANDESTINE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN KITTY CLOVER AT SCHOOL,

AND HER "DEAR, DEAR FRIEND" IN TOWN.

EDITED BY HORACE MAYHEW.

THE FIFTH LETTER LEFT.

(_Written on copy-book paper, apparently left by hand._)

Godey's Lady's Book, Vol. 48-49, No. XVIII, May, 1854 · 第 3 / 16 段