‘M. Barthelemy, who conducts the affairs of France in the absence

of Comte Dazimer, having sent M. Daragon with a message to Comte de

Cagliostro, in Sloane Street, intimating that he had received orders

from the Court of Versailles to communicate to Comte de Cagliostro

that he now had permission to return to France; yesterday morning, the

Comte, accompanied by Lord George Gordon and M. Bergeret de Frouville,

waited upon M. Barthelemy at the “Hotel of France,” in Piccadilly, for

an eclaireissement upon the subject of this message from the Court of

France, delivered by M. Barthelemy, relative to the permission granted

to the Comte de Cagliostro to return to Paris. M. Barthelemy, the

Comte de Cambise, and M. Daragon seemed much surprised to see Comte de

Cagliostro arrive in Lord George Gordon’s coach, with his Lordship,

and M. Frouville, and, having expressed their desire that the Comte de

Cagliostro _alone_ should speak with M. Barthelemy, they were informed

that Lord Gordon and M. Bergeret de Frouville were there on purpose to

attend their friend, and that Comte de Cagliostro would not dispense

with Lord George Gordon’s absence from the Conference. Will any friend

to liberty blame Comte de Cagliostro, after ten months’ imprisonment

in a dungeon, for having his friends near him, when insidious proposals

are made to him by the faction of Breteuil and the supporters of the

Bastile Men who have already sought his destruction, and, after his

innocence was declared by the judgment of the Parliament of Paris,

embezzled a great part of his fortune, and exiled him from France?

M. Barthelemy (seeing the determination of the Comte’s friends) then

read the letter from M. Breteuil; but, upon the Comte de Cagliostro

desiring a copy, M. Barthelemy refused it. A great deal of conversation

then ensued upon the subject, which in all probability will give rise

to a full representation to the King of France, who is certainly very

much imposed on. The Queen’s party is still violent against Comte

de Cagliostro, the friend of mankind; and De Breteuil--le Sieur De

Launey--Titon--De Brunières--Maître Chesnon--Barthelemy and Dazimer are

mere instruments of that faction. The honour of the King of France, the

justice and judgment of the Parliament of Paris, the good faith of the

Citizens, and the good name of the nation, are all attainted by the

pillage and detention of the property of Comte de Cagliostro.’

And again, in the same paper, 24th of August, 1786, p. 2, col. 3, is

another paragraph respecting him:

‘Comte de Cagliostro has declared he will hold no intercourse with any

of Le Sieur Breteuil’s messengers from France, except in the presence

of Lord George Gordon. The gang of French spies in London, who are

linked in with M. de Morande, and the Sieurs Barthelemy, Dazimer,

Cambise, and the Queen’s Bastile party at Paris, are trying the

most insiduous arts to entrap the Comte and Comtesse, and have the

effrontery and audaciousness to persecute them publicly, and vilify

them even in this free country, where these noble Strangers are come to

seek protection in the arms of a generous people. The friendship and

benevolence of Comte de Cagliostro, in advising the poor Prince Louis

de Rohan to be upon his guard against the Comtesse de Valois, and the

intrigues of the Queen’s faction, (who still seek the destruction of

that noble Prince) has brought upon the Comte and his amiable Comtesse

the hateful revenge of a tyrannical Government. The story of the

Diamonds has never been properly explained to the Public in France. It

would discover too much of the base arts practised to destroy Prince

Louis, and involve in guilt persons not safe to name in an arbitrary

kingdom.’

This airing of private grief in public extorted some strictures in a

letter in the _Morning Post_, of 29th of August, 1786, in which it

was suggested, generally, that foreigners should wash their dirty

linen at home. But Monsieur de Morande, editor of the _Courier de

l’Europe_, published many assertions, be they facts, or fiction,

relative to Cagliostro, and he once more blossomed out into print in

his old champion, the _Public Advertiser_ (vide that newspaper, 5th

of September, 1786, p. 2. col. 1), translated in the number of 7th

September. In this curious letter, he adverts to his adversaries’

slanders, and the following singular passages occur:

‘Of all the very good stories which you relate at my expense, the

best, without comparison, is that of the pig fed with arsenic, which

poisoned the lions, tygers, and leopards of the forests of Medina. I

am going, Mr. Railer, to give you an opportunity of being witty on

a perfect comprehension of the fact. You know that, in physics and

chymistry, reasoning proves but little, ridicule nothing, and that

experiment is all. Permit me, then, to propose a small experiment to

you, of which the issue will divert the public, either at your expense,

or mine. I invite you to breakfast with me on the 9th of November next,

at nine o’clock in the morning. You shall furnish the wine, and the

appendages. For myself, I shall only furnish a single dish, after my

own fashion--it shall be a sucking pig, fattened after my method. Two

hours before breakfast, I shall present you the pig alive, fat and

healthy. You shall order it to be killed as you please, and prepared,

and I shall not approach until it is served at the table. You shall

cut it into four equal parts, you shall chuse that which most flatters

your appetite, and I shall take that which you please. The day after

that of our breakfast, one or more of four things will happen. Either

both of us shall die, or we neither of us shall die, or you shall die

and I survive, or I shall die and you survive. Of these four chances

I give you three, and I bet you 5000 guineas, that, on the day after

our breakfast, you shall die, and I be perfectly well. You must either

accept of this Challenge, or acknowledge that you are an ignorant

fellow, and that you have foolishly ridiculed a thing which is totally

out of your knowledge.

‘If you accept of this Challenge, I shall instantly deposit the 5000

guineas with any banker that you please. You shall do the same in five

days, during which time you shall have leave to make your supporters

Contribute,’ &c.

Monsieur de Morande’s reply was published immediately following the

above letter. It is, like Cagliostro’s, too long for insertion; but its

gist is, that he intends to unmask the pretender, and that he utterly

declines to attend a poisoning match. He writes:

‘I solemnly defy you to contradict them’ (_i.e._, his assertions as

to Cagliostro’s quackeries and adventures); ‘and that I even offer,

without croupiers or supporters, to make you another wager of five

thousand guineas that I shall compleatly unmask you.

‘But, _Monsieur le Comte_, I shall not put my foot in your house, and

shall not breakfast with you myself. I am neither abject enough to keep

you company, nor will let it be suspected for a single moment.

‘You clearly conceive that such an interview ought not, nor can be,

within your doors; you would be liable to be found guilty of criminal

practises, in case of accident. This your _Council_ had not foreseen.

‘As no tavern would permit such infamous scenes to pass under its roof

as those you propose, you must, _Monsieur le Comte_, return once more

to the _booth_; and worthy disciple of LOCUSTA,[113] choose in London a

public place to make an open-air exhibition of your talents.’

And like the scorpion, which carries its sting in its tail, he adds a

foot-note, which refers to the heading of his letter:

‘_M. de Morande’s Answer to Don Joseph Balsamo,_ _self-created Count

of Cagliostro, Colonel in the Service of all the Sovereign Powers in

Europe._’

‘If it was not the case, it would be very singular to have seen, in

the year 1777, M. Cagliostro calling himself in England Colonel of the

Third Regiment of Brandenbourg, and, afterwards, in Russia, Colonel

in the Spanish Service; for which, however, he was reprimanded by

the magistrates of Petersburgh. Having forgot to take his Commission

with him, he could not exhibit proofs, and was obliged to put down

his regimentals. This check on his conduct made him abscond from

Petersburgh. Every Russian nobleman in London knows this anecdote, and,

without presuming to mention names, we trust that this will be found to

be the case upon enquiry.’

To this letter Cagliostro replied with another in the _Public

Advertiser_ (p. 2, col. 1) of September 9, 1786, in which he repeats

his challenge, and declines to sit down to breakfast with a carnivorous

animal.

De Morande, of course, could not be silent, and replied in the _Public

Advertiser_ (p. 2, col. 1) of September 12, 1786. He reiterated the

charges he made against Cagliostro in the _Courier de l’Europe_,

saying, among other things, ‘I have said that you were in England in

the year 1771, under the name of _Balsamo_, and that you were then a

needy, as well as a _very indifferent_ painter; that twenty persons,

at least, are ready to prove it. You take no notice of this second

assertion, which becomes serious, _by the oath you have taken under

that name_, of which I have a legal copy in my possession.

‘I have said that you have made your appearance under another name,

THAT OF CAGLIOSTRO, in the year 1777. I have several _affidavits_,

amongst which there are some of your own, which authenticate very

curious anecdotes concerning you; to this you have replied nothing.

‘I have said that you falsely pretended then to be a _Colonel of the

third regiment_ of Brandenbourg; that you had, at that time, a law-suit

in the Court of Queen’s Bench, _about a certain necklace, and a gold

snuff-box_, which you asserted to have been given MADAME LA COMTESSE,

but which you were obliged to return, and pay all Costs, on the Clear

proofs given by your adverse party, that you obtained them _under false

pretences_. No reply has been made to this.

‘I have added that, were you curious to try the same experiment now,

a new Act of Parliament, which you and your fellow-adventurers have

rendered _very necessary_, would certainly have caused you to be sent

to the Thames.[114] To that direct and very clear observation you have

not replied a single word.

‘I have said that you were ordered by the Police in Russia, not to

presume to take the name of a Colonel in the Spanish service, and to

strip off your Spanish regimentals. I have given you an opportunity

to vindicate yourself, by giving to understand, that there is not

a Russian nobleman in London who would not certify this fact. I

might have added that I have in my possession _the most respectable

authority_ to say so. What have you said in reply to this?

‘I have roundly asserted that I am in possession of proofs, that you

are an impostor under every possible denomination; that you have

not only no pretension to any title, but not even to the rank of a

sergeant. Shall this remain likewise unanswered?

* * * * *

‘I am sorry to be obliged once more to name Mess^{rs.} B. & C. Bankers,

to prove that your pretensions to lay a wager of 5000 guineas, are

as well grounded as your pretensions to the title of a COUNT, or an

_Alchemist_. It is a fact, that you _humbly_ offered to pledge in

their hands the watch, of which the too long, and too much, deluded

Cardinal de Rohan made you a present. It is likewise a fact _that

they disdainfully refused it_. Your proposing, after this, a wager

of 5000 guineas is probably no more than a new pretence to obtain

credit, as you have formerly (in pretending to make great quantities of

gold) obtained small sums, and little diamonds to make larger, which

you afterwards declared had been given to MADAME LA COMTESSE. Those

proofs, I repeat to you, _are in my possession_; they are all fully

authenticated, and I will make good every one of my assertions.’ And he

winds up his letter with expressing ‘the satisfaction I feel in having

furnished the world with sufficient proofs to convince them that you

are THE GREATEST IMPOSTOR OF THIS OR ANY OTHER AGE.’

This ended the correspondence, for the general public were beginning to

meddle in it, and the editor of the _Public Advertiser_ would only open

his pages to the principals in this duel. This finished Cagliostro’s

career in England. He had tried to sell his quack medicines, his

Egyptian pills, but the charm was broken, and he quitted England for

the Continent in May, 1787, leaving his wife behind, with sufficient

means, under the guardianship of the De Loutherbourgs. She afterwards

sold all up, and joined him in June.

By this time his good genius had forsaken him, and for teaching

freemasonry, then even more repugnant to the Roman Catholic hierarchy

than at present, he was arrested, and imprisoned in the Castle of

St. Angelo, November 27, 1789. He never again enjoyed freedom, but

was found dead in his cell at St. Leo. Even the date of his death is

uncertain, most authorities giving 1795; but some say 1794 and 1797.

His wife, too, shared his fate; she was convicted of sorcery and

witchcraft, and was shut up in a convent, where she died in 1794.

His portraits represent him as by no means bad-looking, although the

full eye, the puffed cheeks, and weak mouth betray a sensuality of

feeling.

THE END.

LONDON: PRINTED BY DUNCAN MACDONALD, BLENHEIM HOUSE.

HURST & BLACKETT’S

LIST OF NEW WORKS.

[Illustration]

LONDON:

13, GREAT MARLBOROUGH STREET, W.

13, GREAT MARLBOROUGH STREET, LONDON.

MESSRS. HURST AND BLACKETT’S

LIST OF NEW WORKS.

EIGHTEENTH CENTURY WAIFS. By JOHN ASHTON, Author of ‘Social

Life in the Reign of Queen Anne,’ &c. 1 vol. imperial 8vo. 12s.

CONTENTS: A Forgotten Fanatic--A Fashionable Lady’s

Life--George Barrington--Milton’s Bones--The True Story

of Eugene Aram--Redemptioners--A Trip to Richmond in

Surrey--George Robert Fitzgerald--Eighteenth Century

Amazons--‘The Times’ and its Founder--Imprisonment for

Debt--Jonas Hanway--A Holy Voyage to Ramsgate One Hundred Years

Ago--Quacks of the Century--Cagliostro in London.

SHIKAR SKETCHES: WITH NOTES ON INDIAN FIELD SPORTS. By J. MORAY

BROWN, late 79th Cameron Highlanders. With Eight Illustrations,

by J. C. DOLLMAN, R.I. 1 vol. imperial 8vo. 12s.

CHAPTERS FROM FAMILY CHESTS. By EDWARD WALFORD, M.A., Author of

‘The County Families,’ &c. 2 vols. crown 8vo. 21s.

“There is a mine of wealth in the ‘Family Chests’ which no one has yet

brought to the surface, and from this Mr. Walford has contrived to

excavate a mass of acceptable matter--a treasury of narrative curious

and romantic.”--_Globe._

“The reader will find much curious information in Mr. Walford’s

chapters of agreeable narrative.”--_Scotsman._

REMINISCENCES OF THE COURT AND TIMES OF KING ERNEST OF HANOVER.

By the Rev. C. A. WILKINSON, M.A., His Majesty’s Resident

Domestic Chaplain. 2 vols. With portrait of the King. 21s.

“An interesting book, entitled ‘Reminiscences of the Court and Times

of King Ernest of Hanover,’ has just been published by Messrs. Hurst

and Blackett. The two volumes in which these reminiscences of a

septuagenarian are comprised abound in characteristic stories of the

old king, in anecdotes of many celebrities English and foreign, of the

early part of this century, and, indeed, of all kinds and conditions

of men and women with whom the author was brought in contact by his

courtly or pastorial office.”--_St. James’s Gazette._

THE EGYPTIAN CAMPAIGNS, 1882 TO 1885, AND THE EVENTS WHICH LED

TO THEM. By CHARLES ROYLE, Barrister-at-Law, of ALEXANDRIA. 2

vols. demy 8vo. Illustrated by Maps and Plans. 30s.

“Mr. Royle has done well in the interests of historical completeness

to describe not only the entire military drama, but also the political

events connected with it, and whoever reads the book with care has

gone a considerable way towards mastering the difficult Egyptian

question.”--_Athenæum._

“The Egyptian fiasco has found in Mr. Royle a most painstaking,

accurate, and judicious historian. From a literary point of view his

volumes may be thought to contain too many unimportant incidents, yet

their presence was necessary perhaps, in a complete record, and the

most fastidious reader will unhesitatingly acquit Mr. Royle of filling

his pages with anything that can be called padding.”--_St. James’s

Gazette._

THE PALACE AND THE HOSPITAL; or, CHRONICLES OF GREENWICH. By

the REV. A. G. L’ESTRANGE, Author of ‘The Village of Palaces,’

‘The Friendships of Mary Russell Mitford,’ &c. 2 vols. crown

8vo. With Illustrations. 21s.

“Mr. L’Estrange has provided for those who have a taste for topography,

or rather for the historical and biographical annals of a locality

famous in history, two volumes which are rich in romantic interest,

and his pages abound in curious and interesting glimpses of old

manners.”--_Daily News._

THE REAL SHELLEY: NEW VIEWS OF THE POET’S LIFE. By JOHN CORDY

JEAFFRESON, Author of “The Real Lord Byron,” “A Book about

Doctors,” “A Book about Lawyers,” &c. 2 vols. demy 8vo. 30s.

“Those who have read Mr. Jeaffreson’s account of Byron will be

prepared to find that impartiality is the distinguishing feature of

his endeavour to clear away the fancies and misconceptions which have

been given to the world in some of the biographies of Shelley, and they

will not be disappointed. The author has striven to ascertain, fairly

and fully, the truth concerning a poet whose influence, while it has

been greatly exaggerated by his most enthusiastic admirers, is still a

living factor in the life of many.”--_Morning Post._

THE FRIENDSHIPS OF MARY RUSSELL MITFORD: AS RECORDED IN LETTERS

FROM HER LITERARY CORRESPONDENTS. Edited by the REV. A. G.

L’ESTRANGE, Editor of “The Life of Mary Russell Mitford,” &c. 2

vols. 21s.

“These letters are all written as to one whom the writers love and

revere. Miss Barrett is one of Miss Mitford’s correspondents, all of

whom seem to be inspired with a sense of excellence in the mind they

are invoking. Their letters are extremely interesting, and they strike

out recollections, opinions, criticisms, which will hold the reader’s

delighted and serious attention.”--_Daily Telegraph._

THE BRONTË FAMILY, With Special Reference to PATRICK BRANWELL

BRONTE. By FRANCIS A. LEYLAND. 2 vols. 21s.

“This book is so full of interesting information that as a contribution

to literary biography it may be considered a real success.”--_Academy._

“Mr. Leyland’s book is earnest and accurate, and he has spared no

pains to master his subject and present it with clearness; the book is

valuable, and should be read by all who are familiar with the previous

works on the family.”--_Graphic._

MEMOIRS OF A CAMBRIDGE CHORISTER. By WILLIAM GLOVER. 2 vols.

crown 8vo. 21s.

“In these amusing volumes Mr. Glover provides us with the means of

spending a pleasant hour or two in his company.”--_Times._

“These volumes contain a miscellaneous set of reminiscences, comments,

and anecdotes, written in a light and jocular style. Mr. Glover is

always cheerful and never didactic.”--_Athenæum._

WITHOUT GOD: NEGATIVE SCIENCE AND NATURAL ETHICS. By PERCY

GREG, Author of “The Devil’s Advocate,” “Across the Zodiac,”

&c. 1 vol. demy 8vo. 12s.

“Mr. Greg has condensed much profound thought into his book, and

has fully succeeded in maintaining the interest of the discussion

throughout.”--_Morning Post._

“This work is ably written; there are in it many passages of no

ordinary power and brilliancy. It is eminently suggestive and

stimulating.”--_Scotsman._

FOOTSTEPS OF JEANNE D’ARC. A Pilgrimage. By Mrs. FLORENCE

CADDY. 1 vol. demy 8vo. With Map of Route. 15s.

“The reader, whatever his preconceived notions of the maid may have

been, will soon find himself in sympathy with a writer who, by the

charm of her descriptive style, at once arrests his attention and

sustains the interest of her subject.”--_Morning Post._

THE LIFE AND ADVENTURES OF PEG WOFFINGTON: WITH PICTURES OF THE

PERIOD IN WHICH SHE LIVED. By J. FITZGERALD MOLLOY, Author of

“Court Life Below Stairs,” &c. _Second Edition._ 2 vols. crown

8vo. With Portrait. 21s.

“Peg Woffington makes a most interesting central figure, round which

Mr. Molloy has made to revolve a varied and picturesque panorama of

London life in the middle of the eighteenth century. He sees things in

the past so clearly, grasps them so tenaciously, and reproduces them

so vividly, that they come to us without any of the dust and rust of

time.”--G. A. S. _in Illustrated London News_.

WOMEN OF EUROPE IN THE FIFTEENTH AND SIXTEENTH CENTURIES. By

Mrs. NAPIER HIGGINS. Vols. 1 and 2 demy 8vo. 30s.

“The work is likely to be of permanent value to the students of

history.”--_Morning Post._

ON THE TRACK OF THE CRESCENT: ERRATIC NOTES FROM THE PIRÆUS TO

PESTH. By MAJOR E. C. JOHNSON, M.A.I., F. R. Hist. S., etc.

With Map and Upwards of 50 Illustrations by the Author. 1 vol.

demy 8vo. 15s.

“The author of this bright, pleasant volume possesses keen power

of observation and vivid appreciation of animate and inanimate

beauty. It will brighten hours for many readers who will only

follow the track of the Crescent through its pages and its numerous

illustrations.”--_Morning Post._

MEMOIRS OF MARSHAL BUGEAUD, FROM HIS PRIVATE CORRESPONDENCE

AND ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS, 1784-1849. By the COUNT H. D’IDEVILLE.

Edited, from the French, by CHARLOTTE M. YONGE. 2 vols. demy

8vo. 30s.

“This is a work of great value to the student of French history. A

perusal of the book will convince any reader of Bugeaud’s energy,

his patriotism, his unselfishness, and his philanthropy and

humanity.”--_Athenæum._

GLIMPSES OF GREEK LIFE AND SCENERY. By AGNES SMITH, Author of

“Eastern Pilgrims,” &c. Demy 8vo. With Illustrations and Map of

the Author’s Route. 15s.

“A truthful picture of the country through which the author travelled.

It is naturally and simply told, in an agreeable and animated style.

Miss Smith displays an ample acquaintance and sympathy with all the

scenes of historic interest.”--_St. James’s Gazette._

MONSIEUR GUIZOT IN PRIVATE LIFE (1787-1874). By His Daughter,

Madame DE WITT. Translated by Mrs. SIMPSON. 1 vol. demy 8vo.

15s.

“Madame de Witt has done justice to her father’s memory in an admirable

record of his life. Mrs. Simpson’s translation of this singularly

interesting book is in accuracy and grace worthy of the original and of

the subject.”--_Saturday Review._

PLAIN SPEAKING. By Author of “John Halifax, Gentleman.” 1 vol.

crown 8vo. 10s. 6d.

“We recommend ‘Plain Speaking’ to all who like amusing, wholesome, and

instructive reading. The contents of Mrs. Craik’s volume are of the

most multifarious kind, but all the papers are good and readable, and

one at least of them of real importance.”--_St. James’s Gazette._

WORDS OF HOPE AND COMFORT TO THOSE IN SORROW. Dedicated by

Permission to THE QUEEN. _Fourth Edition._ 1 vol. small 4to. 5s.

Under the Especial Patronage of Her Majesty.

_Published annually, in One Vol., royal 8vo, with the Arms beautifully

engraved, handsomely bound, with gilt edges, price 31s. 6d._

LODGE’S PEERAGE AND BARONETAGE, CORRECTED BY THE NOBILITY.

FIFTY-SIXTH EDITION FOR 1887.

LODGE’S PEERAGE AND BARONETAGE is acknowledged to be the most

complete, as well as the most elegant, work of the kind. As an

established and authentic authority on all questions respecting

the family histories, honours, and connections of the titled

aristocracy, no work has ever stood so high. It is published

under the especial patronage of Her Majesty, and is annually

corrected throughout, from the personal communications of the

Nobility. It is the only work of its class in which, _the type

being kept constantly standing_, every correction is made in

its proper place to the date of publication, an advantage which

gives it supremacy over all its competitors. Independently of

its full and authentic information respecting the existing

Peers and Baronets of the realm, the most sedulous attention is

given in its pages to the collateral branches of the various

noble families, and the names of many thousand individuals

are introduced, which do not appear in other records of the

titled classes. For its authority, correctness, and facility of

arrangement, and the beauty of its typography and binding, the

work is justly entitled to the place it occupies on the tables

of Her Majesty and the Nobility.

LIST OF THE PRINCIPAL CONTENTS.

Historical View of the Peerage.

Parliamentary Roll of the House of Lords.

English, Scotch, and Irish Peers, in their

orders of Precedence.

Alphabetical List of Peers of Great Britain

and the United Kingdom, holding superior

rank in the Scotch or Irish Peerage.

Alphabetical list of Scotch and Irish Peers,

holding superior titles in the Peerage of

Great Britain and the United Kingdom.

A Collective list of Peers, in their order of

Precedence.

Table of Precedency among Men.

Table of Precedency among Women.

The Queen and the Royal Family.

Peers of the Blood Royal.

The Peerage, alphabetically arranged.

Families of such Extinct Peers as have left

Widows or Issue.

Alphabetical List of the Surnames of all the

Peers.

The Archbishops and Bishops of England

and Ireland.

The Baronetage alphabetically arranged.

Alphabetical List of Surnames assumed by

members of Noble Families.

Alphabetical List of the Second Titles of

Peers, usually borne by their Eldest

Sons.

Alphabetical Index to the Daughters of

Dukes, Marquises, and Earls, who, having

married Commoners, retain the title

of Lady before their own Christian and

their Husband’s Surnames.

Alphabetical Index to the Daughters of

Viscounts and Barons, who, having

married Commoners, are styled Honourable

Mrs.; and, in case of the husband

being a Baronet or Knight, Hon. Lady.

A List of the Orders of Knighthood.

Mottoes alphabetically arranged and translated.

“This work is the most perfect and elaborate record of the living and

recently deceased members of the Peerage of the Three Kingdoms as it

stands at this day. It is a most useful publication. We are happy to

bear testimony to the fact that scrupulous accuracy is a distinguishing

feature of this book.”--_Times._

Eighteenth Century Waifs · 第 22 / 26 段