FROM PHOTOGRAPHS, CONGO STATE

“The pictures get sneaked around everywhere.”—_Page 40._

]

“It seems strange to see a king destroying a nation and laying waste

a country for mere sordid money’s sake, and solely and only for

that. Lust of conquest is royal; kings have always exercised that

stately vice; we are used to it, by old habit we condone it,

perceiving a certain dignity in it; but _lust of money—lust of

shillings—lust of nickels—lust of dirty coin_, not for the nation’s

enrichment but for _the king’s alone_—this is new. It distinctly

revolts us, we cannot seem to reconcile ourselves to it, we resent

it, we despise it, we say it is shabby, unkingly, out of character.

Being democrats we ought to jeer and jest, we ought to rejoice to

see the purple dragged in the dirt, but—well, account for it as we

may, we don’t. We see this awful king, this pitiless and

blood-drenched king, this money-crazy king towering toward the sky

in a world-solitude of sordid crime, unfellowed and apart from the

human race, sole butcher for personal gain findable in all his

caste, ancient or modern, pagan or Christian, proper and legitimate

target for the scorn of the lowest and the highest, and the

execrations of all who hold in cold esteem the oppressor and the

coward; and—well, it is a mystery, but _we do not wish to look_; for

he is a king, and it hurts us, it troubles us, by ancient and

inherited instinct it shames us to see a king degraded to this

aspect, and we shrink from hearing the particulars of how it

happened. _We shudder_ and _turn away_ when we come upon them in

print.”

Why, certainly—_that_ is my protection. And you will continue to do it.

I know the human race.

[Illustration:

King Leopold's Soliloquy: A Defense of His Congo Rule · 第 7 / 14 题