Religion was reduced to superstition, theology was divorced from

ethics, ritual performances were substituted for moral obligations,

and zeal for God manifested by cruelty to man--conditions which are

invariably concomitant in religious history. The Mephistopheles evoked

by the German Reformation was abroad, and had announced himself to

others besides Dr. Faustus, saying, "I am the Spirit who denies."

Freedom of thought involves a liberty to think wrongly as well as

rightly. Technical learning, in possession of the Jesuits, might

content a religious devotee; but philosophy and the new science opened

paths which led away from traditions and authoritative decretals;

paths which neither priest nor king could close, for they followed the

stars in their courses. The waymarks had been blazed by the genius of

Galileo and Copernicus. Those who dared to venture into this new

territory found institutions and systems of theology arrayed against

them, armed with the power of present persecution, more to be feared

than threats of future damnation. Public life was venal, the Church

simoniacal, and society licentious. In such an age Voltaire was born.

The family of Arouet was ancient and respectable, representing the

middle class of society. Voltaire's grandfather settled in early life

in Paris, and retired on a comfortable fortune made by selling cloth.

His father, Francois Arouet, was a successful notary of Paris, an

honorable profession, which included all that is now done among us by

lawyers, brokers, life-insurers, and administrators of estates. Many

of the characteristics which we discover in his father, and, indeed,

in all the Arouets, survive in Voltaire. They are vivacity, thrift,

irritability, and withal a pleasing and generous disposition.

Francois Marie Arouet was the youngest child of a too prolific mother.

He was born November 21, 1694, a weakly, feeble babe whose life was

despaired of during the first year. The child was abandoned to the

care of a nurse, his mother being an invalid. She died when he reached

the age of seven. By the time the infant was two years old he began to

thrive, and grew into an active, healthy child. Not robust, he was,

nevertheless, wiry, and endowed with nervous energy.

His earliest instruction was from the Abbe de Chateauneuf, who taught

him belles lettres and deism. At a very early age the little lad

exhibited a precocious talent for versification. When ten years old he

was sent to the College Louis-le-Grand. Here he remained until he was

seventeen, receiving an education which, though always depreciated by

him, provided the basis of a wide and varied knowledge. The Jesuits,

who were the instructors at this college, retained the methods of the

schools of the Renaissance, in which plays in Latin and French were

enacted by the scholars. This may explain his life-long devotion to

the drama.

His remarkable poetic talent led to an introduction, when he was but

eleven years old, to Ninon de l'Enclos, who, in her nineteenth year,

was the leader of a brilliant coterie of society. This unaccountable

and marvellous woman was so pleased with the lad that she left him a

legacy of two thousand livres "to buy books with."

When his college days were ended his troubles began. His father had

determined to make him a notary. The youth wanted to follow

literature, which the father regarded as equal to no profession at

all. The father triumphed in so far as securing the young man's

consent to begin the study of law. He began but never proceeded, and

gave himself to everything but the pursuit of legal lore. The Abbe de

Chateauneuf, the godfather of Voltaire, died before the boy's college

days were over, but before his death he introduced his pupil to the

celebrated society of the Epicureans of the Temple. Here the youth

gathered the vast mass of historical gossip which served him so well

in later years. His father was disgusted with his son's pursuits, and,

alarmed at his association with princes and philosophers, he sent him

away to the ancient Norman city of Caen. This did not effect a cure.

The notary sent word to his son that if he would settle down and

finish his studies he would purchase for him a commission as

counsellor to the Parliament of Paris. "Tell my father," he answered,

"that I do not desire any place which can be bought. I shall know how

to make one for myself that will cost nothing."

Voltaire had a brother, named Armand, who was a Jansenist and bigot.

Their father commented on his two sons by saying, "I have a pair of

fools for sons, one in verse and the other in prose."

In the year 1713 the Marquis de Chateauneuf, a brother of the Abbe,

appointed Voltaire to the office of page in his diplomatic corps. The

marquis was Ambassador to The Hague. Here the young man fell

desperately in love with Olympe Dunoyer, a young woman about

twenty-one years of age, and the daughter of a woman who had separated

from her husband, and supported herself by writing disreputable

scandal and gossip. This love affair was violently opposed by the

mother and resulted in the young man's being sent back to Paris. For a

brief time he gladdened the heart of his father by resuming the study

of law, but soon manifested his peculiar facility for getting into

trouble.

Defeated in securing an award from the French Academy for a poem, he

turned his wit against the successful candidate, and also the poet La

Motte, who had decided the competition. A large part of his attack was

harmless fun, but a short and very savage satire aimed at La Motte was

dangerous to its author, so his father was glad of the opportunity to

send his scapegrace to the Chateau de St. Ange, in company with De

Camartin, nephew of the Marquis de Saint Ange. The old marquis was a

just and brilliant magistrate, a man familiar with the history of

France, and who knew the genealogies of the French court, and all the

rare anecdotes of the period included by the reigns of Henry IV. and

Louis XIV. That Voltaire improved these days at St. Ange is undoubted.

He returned to Paris at the time of the death of the king. This time

he was admitted to the famous "court of Sceaux," over which reigned

the brilliant Duchesse du Maine. It is charged that he assisted the

duchess in composing lampoons on the Duke of Orleans, then Prince

Regent. Accused of writing two libels, he was arrested, May 16, 1717,

and sent to the Bastile, in which prison he spent eleven months. While

here he gave himself to serious literary labor. At this time he

changed his name, and was henceforth known as Arouet de Voltaire. The

origin of the new name is one of the disputed problems of biography.

Released from the Bastile, he was, according to custom, ordered into

exile, being permitted to go to a place owned by his father in the

village of Chatenay. In October, 1718, he was permitted formally to

return to Paris. In the spring of the following year he was suspected

of having written the "Philippiques," and was banished informally from

Paris. Most of this period he spent with Marshal Villars, and gathered

more of those reminiscences, which he used with so much skill later in

his career, besides making harmless love to the duchess, the wife of

his host. In 1721 his father died, leaving him an income of about four

thousand livres a year, and this was further increased by a pension of

two thousand livres a year from the Regent in recognition of his

ability as a dramatic writer.

Several years were spent in Paris in literary labors and in acquiring

powerful friends and more powerful enemies; among the latter was the

Chevalier de Rohan, who insulted Voltaire on different occasions,

which led to sharp replies from the caustic youth. The chevalier hired

some roughs to give him a caning. Voltaire could get no one to take

his part, so he challenged the chevalier to a duel. The challenge was

accepted, but on the morning of the day appointed for the meeting the

Government interfered by kindly arresting Voltaire and putting him

again in the Bastile.

After fifteen days of imprisonment he was released on condition that

he would go to England. The chief turnkey of the Bastile was

instructed to go as far as Calais with the troublesome prisoner, in

order to be sure that he was forwarded to his destination. Nothing in

Voltaire's history did more to form his career than his visit to

England. He made a good deal of money there, and it is said, laid the

foundations of his fortune. He formed acquaintances among the foremost

literary men of that nation, such as the Walpoles, Bubb Doddington,

Bolingbroke, Congreve, Sir Everard Falkener, and the poet Pope. The

effect of these associations in the literary career of Voltaire is

marked. They deepened and broadened his mind, and reduced the

flippancy of method, which is the bane of French literature, to its

minimum.

He suffered an exile of three years, a long term for the offence he

had committed. In 1729 he was permitted to return to Paris. That year,

by a lottery speculation, in which he was a sure winner, he secured

enough money, when added to what he already possessed, to render him

independent of all patronage. From this time on he never knew the want

of money, nor permitted an opportunity to pass by which he could

increase his riches.

The next few years were mainly devoted to the production of poems,

plays, and English letters. During these years his pen continually

brought him into difficulty. Some of his productions he denied. At

last, in 1734, when a pirated edition of his English letters appeared,

containing also a criticism upon the fanaticism of the saintly Pascal,

full of heresy, good sense, and keen satire, the fury of the storm

broke upon him again. A warrant was immediately issued for his arrest;

the officer charged with the duty of capturing him found that Voltaire

had left the Chateau at Monjeau, where he had been in attendance at

the wedding of the Duke de Richelieu, so the arrest was not made.

We now find him at the Chateau of Madame du Chatelet. His relations

with this woman will not bear scrutiny. The most charitable

construction which can be put upon the fifteen years during which

Voltaire lived with her is, that she, like himself, was morally the

product of the age. If, however, it is urged against them that there

were pure women and honorable men in France at that time, it may be

asserted that such were men and women who had not been surrounded from

childhood with the influences and social customs in which Voltaire and

Madame du Chatelet lived, moved, and had their being.

When this woman died Voltaire found himself in a very unsettled

condition. During his life at the Chateau de Cirey he had received

letters from Prince Frederick of Prussia. Now the prince is king, and

he asks Voltaire to be his guest, and find with him a refuge and a

home. The "respectable Emily" being dead, Voltaire, after considerable

haggling about money matters with Frederick, who behaved generously,

at last consented.

[Illustration: The Arrest of Voltaire and his Niece by Frederick's

Order.]

In the year 1751 the French author reached Berlin. Frederick treated

him in a right kingly way. From the very first Voltaire behaved like a

marplot, rather than as the guest of a king. Quarrel succeeded

quarrel. Most of his embroilments with the king were of less credit to

Voltaire than to Frederick. The former was as full of tricks as Puck,

and impish in his mischief. Frederick was overbearing and tyrannical.

Having a rude sense of justice, being German, he would grant no

license to the stinging, envious satires of the jealous, envious

Frenchman. They managed to get on with each other for about three

years. Voltaire disgusted Frederick by getting into a lawsuit with a

Jewish banker named Hirsch about a discreditable speculation in

Saxony money. Finally he began a violent controversy with Maupertuis,

president of the Berlin Academy. He libelled this boorish but able

scholar, who held his office by appointment of Frederick. He lied to

the king concerning one of the most cutting satires in literature,

which was aimed at the president. He tricked the king in the shabbiest

manner. He had succeeded in getting into difficulty with his usual

facility.

He asked for permission to leave the court of Frederick, pleading

business at Paris, and also that his health required him to visit

Plombieres, in order to drink of its waters. Frederick gave him leave

to go. On the eve of going, in utter disregard of his promise to the

king, he fired a parting shot at Maupertuis, in the shape of a

supplement to the attack he had already made, then travelled leisurely

on his way. Frederick waited until he reached Frankfort; there he was

detained by order of the king on the charge of having some verses

written by Frederick in his possession. The resident at Frankfort was

as stupid and clumsy as a German official can be, and managed the

affair in a most rude and indelicate manner. Exasperated at the delay,

Voltaire committed the folly of undertaking to steal away. He and his

niece were arrested and imprisoned in an inn, where they were

subjected to very unpleasant treatment. The action of Frederick was

unworthy of a king. Its meanness was intensified by the bungling

stupidity of the resident. The people of Frankfort grew indignant, and

the burgomaster began to show resentment, for Frankfort was a free

city and the King of Prussia had no right to trespass upon its

privileges. It was mean in a monarch to strike this foul blow because

he had been pricked with a sharp pin.

From this time forth Voltaire entered upon a life of complete

independence, free from all incumbrances of mistresses, royal patrons,

or aristocratic friends. He tried residence in Geneva and Lausanne,

but while he found political liberty, he was not accorded by the pious

Swiss the social freedom to which he was accustomed in France. Finally

he purchased a place at Ferney. His home here became the Mecca to

which the literary celebrities of Europe made pilgrimages. At Ferney

he established watch-manufacturing, competing with the Swiss; here

also he built a church, inscribing upon it "_Deo crexit Voltaire_." In

pure mischievousness he entered upon an indecent controversy with the

bishop of the diocese, who was a good though foolish man. He also

managed to quarrel right and left with all sorts of people, while

slowly and imperceptibly old age crept upon him. Much of the noblest

work of his life was done here. It was while at Ferney that he adopted

a young girl of noble but poor family, rescuing her from a convent and

marrying her to the Marquis de Villete. She contributed to making many

of his declining years bright with her presence. His pet name for her

was "Belle et Bonne."

For some of his work done at Ferney he has won the respect and

admiration of mankind. Such were his noble defence of the Calas

family, his successful attack upon the outrages committed upon Sirven

and his family, securing the liberation of Espinasse from the galleys,

the vindication of General Lally, and the brave battle for D'Etalonde

and La Barre, together with many other cases in which his powerful

pen proved its strength in defence of the weak against the oppression

of civil and ecclesiastical tyranny.

This part of his career provides the staple material for his

eulogists, as it is not without genuine value. With the death of Louis

XV., Voltaire evidently expected that he would be invited to return to

Paris, but the government did not give him any encouragement. By the

beginning of 1778 he had finished a tragedy entitled "Irene," and on

February 10th he arrived in Paris after an absence of twenty-eight

years. Though not received very cordially by the ministry, he was

heartily welcomed by the Academy and all the foreign celebrities at

the capital, among them the American minister, Dr. Benjamin Franklin,

to whom he said, "If I were only forty years old I would immediately

go and settle in your happy country." An hour after Franklin left, the

English ambassador called, to whom he made himself equally agreeable.

The prolonged excitement of the continuous attention paid him, at last

brought on a severe illness. In order to secure the right of burial in

consecrated ground he professed conversion. Recovering temporarily, he

scoffed at himself, saying, "It is necessary for a man to die in the

religion of his fathers. If I lived on the banks of the Ganges I

should wish to die with a cow's tail in my hand." Before he died his

secretary, Wagniere, entreated him to state precisely his "way of

thinking" concerning religion. Voltaire asked for paper and ink and

then wrote and signed the following, which is now to be seen in the

National Library at Paris: "I die adoring God, loving my friends, not

hating my enemies, and detesting superstition. Feb. 28th, 1778.

Voltaire."

His play "Irene" was first given on March 16th. By the 30th of the

month he was able to attend, and that night, in the theatre, received

an ovation unequalled in history. Shortly after, his illness returned,

in which he lingered until May 30, 1778, dying at the age of

eighty-three years and six months. There was difficulty in securing a

permit for his burial, and not until 1791 did his body find a

resting-place in the Pantheon.

As a dramatist he ranks next to Racine and Corneille, but as an epic

poet he is a failure. His romances are probably the best evidences of

his versatile and wonderful powers. They embody all the hate and

really noble anger of his soul against the evils which were crushing

the life of the French people. Their wit never fails, and they flash

and sparkle with his matchless brilliancy of satire. As a writer of

history he has never been regarded as possessing very great merit, for

two reasons: First, he was totally lacking in any grasp of the

philosophy of history; second, he was not careful as to accuracy in

stating facts. His philosophical works are largely covert attacks upon

the religious and ecclesiastical systems of his day. These are

interesting reading matter if one does not regard the absurdity of any

permanent claims to physics or metaphysics which they contain.

His criticisms and miscellaneous works reveal all the characteristics

of his other writings--pungent, witty, sharp; indicating, however,

more of the skill of the journalist than of the great author. He has

not left a single line which embodies a great thought. He was a man

of supernatural brilliancy rather than of great genius. Had his work

been less witty and bright, he would be charged with superficiality;

that which saves him from the accusation is the marvellous display of

mental acuteness and a perfect mastery of the French language. The

thought in his productions is as ephemeral as that in a morning

newspaper; but his composition will serve to this day as a model of

the possibilities of the French tongue. In this respect he is

unrivalled.

Popular conceptions of Voltaire are in some respects erroneous. He is

regarded as an arch infidel and bitter foe of religion. On the

contrary, he was always a deist. He never assails "The Sermon on the

Mount," nor can one who reads him carefully believe that there would

not have been a subtle sympathy between him and the best religious

minds of later days. He never mocked men who lived good lives, nor

opposed with any bitterness those who were the friends of liberty of

conscience.

[Signature of the author.]

SAMUEL JOHNSON[5]

[Footnote 5: Extracts reprinted from Harper's Magazine by

permission of Messrs. Harper & Brothers.]

By LORD MACAULAY

(1709-1784)

[Illustration: Samuel Johnson.]

Samuel Johnson, one of the most eminent English writers of the

eighteenth century, was the son of Michael Johnson, who was, at the

beginning of that century, a magistrate of Lichfield, and a bookseller

of great note in the Midland Counties. Michael's abilities and

attainments seem to have been considerable. He was so well acquainted

with the contents of the volumes which he exposed to sale, that the

country rectors of Staffordshire and Worcestershire thought him an

oracle on points of learning. Between him and the clergy, indeed,

there was a strong religious and political sympathy. He was a zealous

churchman, and, though he qualified himself for municipal office by

taking the oaths to the sovereigns in possession, was to the last a

Jacobite in heart. At his house, a house which is still pointed out to

every traveller who visits Lichfield, Samuel was born, on September

18, 1709. In the child the physical, intellectual, and moral

peculiarities which afterward distinguished the man were plainly

discernible: great muscular strength accompanied by much awkwardness

and many infirmities; great quickness of parts, with a morbid

propensity to sloth and procrastination; a kind and generous heart,

with a gloomy and irritable temper.[6] He had inherited from his

ancestors a scrofulous taint, which it was beyond the power of

medicine to remove. His parents were weak enough to believe that the

royal touch was a specific for this malady. In his third year he was

taken up to London, inspected by the court surgeon, prayed over by the

court chaplains, and stroked and presented with a piece of gold by

Queen Anne. One of his earliest recollections was that of a stately

lady in a diamond stomacher and a long black hood. Her hand was

applied in vain. The boy's features, which were originally noble and

not irregular, were distorted by his malady. His cheeks were deeply

scarred. He lost for a time the sight of one eye, and he saw but very

imperfectly with the other. But the force of his mind overcame every

impediment. Indolent as he was, he acquired knowledge with such ease

and rapidity, that at every school to which he was sent he was soon

the best scholar. From sixteen to eighteen he resided at home, and was

left to his own devices. He learned much at this time, though his

studies were without guidance and without plan. He ransacked his

father's shelves, dipped into a multitude of books, read what was

interesting, and passed over what was dull. An ordinary lad would have

acquired little or no useful knowledge in such a way; but much that

was dull to ordinary lads was interesting to Samuel.

[Footnote 6: Johnson himself tells a story strongly

illustrative of the character both of the man and boy. He

says, "Once, indeed, I was disobedient; I refused to attend

my father to Uttoxeter-market. Pride was the source of that

refusal, and the remembrance of it was painful. A few years

ago, I desired to atone for this fault; I went to Uttoxeter

in very bad weather, and stood for a considerable time

bareheaded in the rain, on the spot where my father's stall

used to stand. In contrition I stood, and I hope the penance

was expiatory."--Boswell's "Life of Johnson."]

[Illustration: Dr. Johnson's Penance.]

While he was thus irregularly educating himself, his family was

sinking into hopeless poverty. Old Michael Johnson was much better

qualified to pore upon books, and to talk about them, than to trade in

them. His business declined; his debts increased; it was with

difficulty that the daily expenses of his household were defrayed, it

was out of his power to support his son at either university; but a

wealthy neighbor offered assistance; and, in reliance on promises

which proved to be of very little value, Samuel was entered at

Pembroke College, Oxford. When the young scholar presented himself to

the rulers of that society, they were amazed not more by his ungainly

figure and eccentric manners than by the quantity of extensive and

curious information which he had picked up during many months of

desultory, but not unprofitable study. On the first day of his

residence he surprised his teachers by quoting Macrobius; and one of

the most learned among them declared, that he had never known a

freshman of equal attainments.

Great Men and Famous Women, Vol. 7 A series of pen and pencil sketches of the lives of more than 200 of the most prominent personages in History · 第 12 / 25 段