THOMAS CARLYLE.

Carlyle is one of the many great men who have suffered severely at the

hands of their biographers, and from the pen clan in general. When the

world knew him alone or chiefly through the lurid splendors of "The

French Revolution,"--that book which, as he himself would have expressed

it, was a truth, though a truth written in hell-fire,--or through the

uncanny labyrinths of "Sartor Resartus," or the subtle analysis of the

"Hero-Worship," or the more pleasing pages of his "Burns," or "Milton,"

or the "Characteristics," it would stand aloof in wonder, in admiration,

almost in awe. But when with his own hand--for he was primarily the

cause of all--he stripped away the privacy which he had guarded so

jealously through life, and through the "Reminiscences" and his wife's

letters, which he prepared for publication, took, as we may say, the

roof off from the house, that all the world might look in, then indeed

he fell from his lofty pedestal and became like one of us. Hero-worship

was no longer possible, but loud abuse and recrimination, or apology and

a cry for charitable construction, became the order of the day. We may

say that he had only himself to thank for it; but who can help

regretting that the man in his old age should so have destroyed the fair

fabric of his own fame? We are not so rich in heroes that we can afford

to lose even the least of the kingly band; and we have felt that we have

sustained an irreparable loss ever since the luckless day when we took

up the first of the intensely interesting but most painful books

relating to this great life.

Let us look a little at this hero's domestic life. What was its

foundation, what its outcome? That there was something wrong at the

foundation seems to be clear. And it was not so much the fact that

neither party married the first choice of the heart,--though it is true

that Jane Welsh loved with all the ardor of her nature Edward Irving

first, and that Carlyle undoubtedly would have married his first love,

the fair and amiable Margaret Gordon, the original of Blumine in "Sartor

Resartus," had not poverty prevented,--but rather was it their

unsuitability to each other. She was a lady, delicately reared, and with

a taste for society and the refinements of life; with a love for

admiration, too, and a wish to shine in her little sphere. He was a

peasant, coarsely bred, and scorning the amenities of life to which he

was unaccustomed,--scorning, too, the chivalric feeling with which

better bred men look upon women and treat their wives. He told her this,

bluntly and brutally, before marriage. They two were to be one, and he

that one. He had the peasant idea of being master, and to the end of his

days held fast to it. They were never, to his mind, equals, but he was

the chief and she the subject. This was what put her down

intellectually. In her youth she had literary tastes and ambitions, and

doubtless much ability; but after marriage we hear no more of that. Even

in the seven years at Craigenputtoch, when one would think that out of

sheer weariness and want of occupation she would have written or

studied, we hear nothing of any such attempts. Her married life seems to

have quenched all this utterly.

Then all the domestic drudgery, which to her seemed such a burden, and

appears to have afflicted her to the end of life, seemed to him to be

the natural and proper thing for a woman. He had all his life been

accustomed to see his mother and sisters at their tasks, naturally and

uncomplainingly, and he could never understand why all women should not

feel in the same way. Then he was fond of solitude, and looked upon a

visitor as an emissary of the devil; and he failed to see that a gay,

pleasure-loving, volatile, sparkling girl could not share his feelings.

So he shut her up remorselessly,--never dreaming that he was cruel. That

she was fond of admiration was nothing to him, though he was fond of it

himself in his own grim way; _he_ was the central figure of this

household, and if she was deprived of a natural enjoyment it seemed a

trifle to him. In short, their whole philosophy of life was different,

their characters unsuited to each other, and their tempers of the order

described as "difficult." It is not necessary to blame one or the other

entirely for what followed. He saw everything in one light, she in

another; what but disappointment and unrest could ensue?

Had she clung to her original determination not to marry him, would it

have been better? Doubtless, yet it is certain that she learned to love

him, even too much for her peace of mind; and it is foolish to picture

her, as some have done, as a loveless wife. Probably at marriage she was

not what is usually styled "in love" with him, but that she did love him

through life is not to be doubted. And that, spite of all his neglect

and harshness and selfishness, he truly loved her and was essentially

loyal to her is as little to be doubted. Whence then came the

unhappiness,--an unhappiness which, we think, has in some places been

greatly exaggerated? As we said before, from their different points of

view. Take, for instance, the hardships of Craigenputtoch. They seemed

nothing to him, brought up as he had been, but much to her, who from her

youth had been the petted darling of a handsome home. This terrible

place, which has been described as worse than a desert island, was a

large and recently renovated old manor-house standing in fields of its

own, only fifteen miles from where her mother lived, and twelve miles

from Dumfries. Everything had been made comfortable for them by her

mother, and in the farm-cottage near were his brother and sister, Jane

and Alexander Carlyle, who had three men and two women; and Mrs.

Carlyle herself always one servant. Much has been written of her

hardships here,--and they were very real hardships to her; but from his

point of view they did not seem so bad. She did some work, but one

cannot help thinking that with so many about her, if she habitually did

such drudgery as is represented, it was her own fault. There will come

domestic crises in all households, when the hands of the mistress must

take hold to save from chaos; but on the whole it would seem that she

was not so very great a martyr in this.

The lack of society was the real evil; and this Carlyle did not feel,

absorbed as he was in his mighty work, his brain burning with the great

thoughts to which he must give utterance. How could he appreciate the

vacuity of her life,--who had always had young and cheerful company

about her, and a mother to pity and cheer her smallest sorrow? It was

very pitiful that he could not see, but not so very strange. Many

another man would have been equally obtuse.

His sisters would not have minded it; he did not mind it, and it was not

given him to see that she minded it as much as she really did. For it is

certain that those seven years left marks upon her which she never

outgrew. They almost seem to have changed her very nature. Yet Carlyle

with his peasant nature did not see it, but wrote cheerfully upon a

time, "Jane is far heartier, now that she has got to work." A mistake,

says Froude: "Mrs. Carlyle had not strength for household work, and

doing it, she permanently broke down her health."

And again Carlyle writes, with a little more appreciation of the

situation:--

"Her life beside me, constantly writing here, is but a dull one;

however, she seems to desire no other. . . . I tell her many times

there is much for her to do, if she were trained for it,--her whole

sex to deliver from the bondage of frivolity, dollhood, and

imbecility, into the freedom of valor and womanhood."

Of the solitude which had nearly killed his wife, he after a time

wearied himself; and then he effected a change. One laughs to think of

the second moving, and wonders if it was as bad as the first, which he

thus described:--

"In this mansion we have had a battle like that of Saint George and

the dragon. Neither are we yet conquerors. Smoke, and wet, and

chaos! May the good Lord keep all Christian men from moving."

If it seemed as bad as this to him, what did it seem to her, delicately

reared and hating the disagreeables of life? Still she did not complain,

but wrote to his mother about this time: "I could wish him a little less

yellow, and a little more peaceable; otherwise he is perfect." And she

soon learned, compelled to it possibly by dire necessity, to take upon

herself all of the practical and prosaic part of the management of their

affairs.

It is painful, although it is also comical, to read of her domestic

battles and defeats. She put infinite wit and talent into her

descriptions of them in her letters to her friends, and the whole world

has read them with smiles and tears; but they were not light troubles to

her, as they would have been to many commonplace women. Probably upon a

majority of wives, even if they have not men of genius for husbands,

fall nearly as great a part of the domestic duties and cares as upon

Mrs. Carlyle; yet few consider this a great hardship, and the sympathies

of the world are not invoked in their behalf. It was not this so much in

Mrs. Carlyle's case as it was the moodiness and fault-finding and

general irascibility of the husband which aggravated everything, and

made little things seem great.

That her spirits were entirely gone and her whole vivacious nature

changed at the end of the Craigenputtoch period is proved by sentences

from her letters, To his mother she writes:--

"It is my husband's worst fault with me that I will not or cannot

speak. Often when he has talked to me for an hour without answer,

he will beg for some sign of life on my part, and all that I can

give him is a little kiss."

And she was a woman who loved to talk, and he the best and most

brilliant talker of his day. Surely, this is pitiful. But after they

went up to London this aspect of things was improved for her, and had it

not been that thereafter she suffered from constant ill-health she would

doubtless have been quite comfortable. But her health was bad, and in

the ignorance of the day the dosing was bad; and when we read of the

medicine which she took as she took her daily bread, we only wonder that

she lived to tell the tale. It speaks a great deal for her Scotch

constitution that she survived her remedies.

Carlyle was soon in the zenith of his fame, and the great men of the day

sat at his feet, figuratively speaking, and would literally have done so

had not his growl been so fierce that it kept them at bay. Of those who

did "beard the lion in his den, the Douglas in his hall," many were

immolated in his diary; and we see them, now that it has been published,

like so many flies with pins stuck through them, fastened to the paper.

Poor Charles Lamb stands there, bloodless, fleshless; but we think

scarcely the less of gentle Elia as we look upon him, but far less of

the cruel perpetrator of the atrocity. Leigh Hunt, too, has a pin quite

through his warm heart; and Stuart Mill, and many others. One wonders

sometimes if Froude himself escaped, or if he were there too, like a

giant bluebottle, desiccated as the rest; and was that the reason why he

did not suppress all the damaging letters and recollections, but

maliciously gave them to the world?

Mrs. Carlyle's pen could be dipped in acid also, as has been proved in

her comments upon the men and women of her time. These, to be sure, are

very brief and fragmentary, and it has been a source of much wonder

that, knowing intimately as she did many of the notable persons of her

time, she has not left behind in any single letter a valuable portrait

or even sketch of any of these great people. What priceless words of

Darwin she might have gathered up, which all the world would have

eagerly read; what characteristic anecdotes she could have told of

Tennyson,--what an insight she might have given into the man behind the

poet; what noble things she must have known of Stuart Mill; what

inimitable _facetiae_ concerning the Hunts; what spirited stories she

could have told of Jeffrey; what a light she could have cast over dark

places in the life of Edward Irving! Why did she not do this, we wonder.

Did the dread of assassination hover over her? For Charles Buller,

Carlyle's friend, had just made his plea for the man who killed his wife

for keeping a diary: "What else could a poor fellow do with a wife who

kept a diary, but murder her?"

We cannot but regret that the sketches were not written. They would have

been immortal; for her power in this line has been unequalled by any one

who has written in these later days. As it is, she has, unconsciously to

herself, left a picture of the greatest of all the men she knew--Carlyle

himself--which can never be blotted out. The portrait is full-length,

full of Rembrandt-like light and shadow, and remorselessly faithful.

Painted not for the public eye, but sketched in a thousand little parts,

in matter-of-fact every-day letters to humble friends, with no remotest

thought that other eyes would ever see them,--it is this by which

Carlyle as a man will be known to all coming time. Not a hero, not a

monster, as some have claimed, but a faulty man, with the defects of his

qualities, described by a woman faulty like himself. A constitutional

growler, with a warm heart withal, and infinite capacities for

tenderness; selfish it may be, but inexorably just; cold to all the

outside world, but warm-hearted and generous and magnificently loyal to

his family, throughout all his distinguished career. No trace of

snobbery or false shame in him. Not liking the reformers of his own day,

but almost deifying the reformers of the past, and himself making it his

mission, from earliest youth to hoary age, to reform the world in his

own particular Carlylean way; fiercely assailing much that passed for

religion, but being always deeply and truly religious at heart. What a

vast contradictory Titan he seems in it all! If a lovely wind-flower,

fresh and fragrant as the breath of morning, was crushed in the arms of

this god of thunder, what shall we say? Shall we reject the god of

thunder, who gave us the "Heroes," and the "Cromwell," and the

"Frederick," and wish that he might have been a gentle poet singing to a

lute; or shall we thank God for him, even as he was, though we give a

tear to the wind-flower?

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

Home Life of Great Authors · 第 88 / 164 题