II. HISTORICAL TRUTH.

To this I turn with deeper interest, because it has been denied.

Voltaire, for example, describes Palestine as one of the worst countries

of Asia, comparing it to Switzerland, and says it can only be esteemed

fertile “when compared with the desert.” (KEITH, p. 106.) There cannot

be one moment’s doubt that in such statements he exceeded fact. But

others have pointed to the desolate hillsides, and asked the question

whether such a country could ever have supported a population as dense as

that of Norfolk or Suffolk. Now let there be no mistake on this subject;

for we are fully prepared most freely to admit that the hill country, as

we now see it, could not possibly support a large population, and that

there is a dreary, barren desolation about it which is wholly unlike the

descriptions of rich fertility which abound through the Scriptures. One

of these descriptions will be sufficient; viz., Deut. viii. 7–9: “For the

Lord thy God bringeth thee into a good land, a land of brooks of water,

of fountains and depths that spring out of valleys and hills; a land of

wheat, and barley, and vines, and fig trees, and pomegranates; a land of

oil olive, and honey; a land wherein thou shalt eat bread without

scarceness, thou shalt not lack anything in it; a land whose stones are

iron, and out of whose hills thou mayest dig brass.” Now I am not in the

least afraid of saying plainly that such a description as that is not

true of _modern_ Palestine. It is not a good land flowing with milk and

honey; it is not a land of vines and oil olives; it is not a land from

which a large population could eat bread without scarceness. I read that

there is not a vine to be seen between Eschol and Beersheba, and that

there are very few olives to be found anywhere. What then are we to say?

Was the historical description true, or was it not? Were the people

deceived, or was God true to His Word? “Let God be true, but every man a

liar.” On this point let us ask the stones, and let us take the

testimony of the rocks. But in doing this we must not be content with

taking a tourist’s ticket, and hurrying as fast as possible along the

beaten tracks; but we must accompany our scientific men in their

investigations; and if we do so, what shall we find? In the first place

we shall find scattered through the country the ruins of an enormous

number of villages. The Exploration Fund have actually entered on their

map no less than 2,770 names. It is perfectly clear therefore that there

was once a very large and densely-packed population. Then in the next

place the careful observer will perceive that those hills which are now

so barren were once covered with terraces so as to preserve the soil.

Dr. Keith says that on one hill he counted no less than sixty-seven such

terraces one above another. Then if you examine these terraces you find

a countless number of cisterns and water-courses cut in the rocks,

proving clearly that there was once a careful system of irrigation; and

then, in conclusion, near many of the villages there is found an

olive-press, apparently used by the whole village, while up amongst the

terraces there are multitudes of smaller wine-presses, apparently cut in

the rocks by each proprietor for his own use. In confirmation of this

evidence I have been informed by one for many years a resident in

Jerusalem, that the inhabitants are dependent for firewood on the roots

of the vines and the olives still found on the desolate hillsides. The

roots remain, though the trees are gone, and those roots unite in their

testimony with the rocks amongst which they are found. The evidence

therefore of the rocks is irresistible. The people are scattered through

the nations, and the rain has washed down the toil from the broken

terraces; but the rocks remain; and the proof is as clear as any proof

can be of anything, that there was once a teeming population and a high

state of cultivation, that the country was once a land of vines and oil

olives, and that it was a land maintaining a prosperous, thriving, and

painstaking people. Thus the rocks agree with the Book. Those barren

hills themselves supply the evidence of their former fertility, and the

stones cry out that the grand old Pentateuch is historically true.

Witnesses to Truth · 第 10 / 16 题