I seem to remember reading a story in which a scientist devised a

means of reversing the direction of the earth. Perhaps an explosion of

gases backfired against the east. Perhaps he built a monstrous lever

and contrived the moon to be his fulcrum. Anyway, here at last was the

earth spinning backward in its course--the spring preceding

winter--the sun rising in the west--one o'clock going before

twelve--soup trailing after nuts--the seed-time following upon the

harvest. And so it began to appear--so ran the story--that human life,

too, was reversed. Persons came into the world as withered grandames

and as old gentlemen with gold-headed canes, and then receded like

crabs backward into their maturity, then into their adolescence and

babyhood. To return from a protracted voyage was to find your younger

friends sunk into pinafores. But the story was really too ridiculous.

But in these last few years no doubt I do grow younger. The great

camera of the Master rolls its moving pictures backward. Perhaps I am

only thirty-eight now that the direction is reversed.

[Illustration]

I wonder what you thought, my dear X----, when we met recently at

dinner. We had not seen one another very often in these last few

years. Our paths have led apart and we have not been even at shouting

distance across the fields. It is needless to remind you, I hope, that

I once paid you marked attention. It began when we were boy and girl.

Our friends talked, you will recall. You were then less than a year

younger than myself, although no doubt you have since lost distance.

What a long time I spent upon my tie and collar--a stiff high collar

that almost touched my ears! Some other turn of fortune's

wheel--circumstance--a shaft of moonlight (we were young, my dear)--a

white frock--your acquiescence--who knows?

I jilted you once or twice for other girls--nothing formal, of

course--but only when you had jilted me three or four times. We once

rowed upon a river at night. Did I take your hand, my dear? If I

listen now I can hear the water dripping from the oar. There was

darkness--and stars--and youth (yourself, white-armed, the symbol of

its mystery). Yes, perhaps I am older now.

Was it not Byron who wrote?

I am ashes where once I was fire,

And the soul in my bosom is dead;

What I loved I now merely admire,

And my heart is as gray as my head.

I cannot pretend ever to have had so fierce a passion, but at least my

fire still burns and with a cheery blaze. But you will not know this

love of mine--unless, of course, you read this page--and even so, you

can only suspect that I write of you, because, my dear, to be quite

frank, I paid attention to several girls beside yourself.

Yes, they say that I have come to the top of the hill and that

henceforth the view is back across my shoulder. I am counseled that

with a turn of the road I had best sit with my back to the horses, for

the mountains are behind. A little while and the finer purple will be

showing in the west. Yet a little while, they say, and the bewildering

peaks of youth will be gray and cold.

Perhaps some of the greener pleasures are mine no longer. Certainly,

last night I went to the Winter Garden, but left bored after the first

act; and I had left sooner except for climbing across my neighbors. I

suppose there are young popinjays who seriously affirm that Ziegfeld's

Beauty Chorus is equal to the galaxy of loveliness that once pranced

at Weber and Field's when we came down from college on Saturday night.

At old Coster and Bial's there was once a marvelous beauty who swung

from a trapeze above the audience and scandalously undressed herself

down to the fifth encore and her stockings. And, really, are there

plays now as exciting as the _Prisoner of Zenda_, with its great fight

upon the stairs--three men dead and the tables overturned--Red

Rudolph, in the end, bearing off the Princess? Heroes no longer wear

cloak and sword and rescue noble ladies from castle towers.

And Welsh rabbit, that was once a passion and the high symbol of

extravagance, in these days has lost its finest flavor. In vain do we

shake the paprika can. Pop-beer and real beer, its manly cousin, have

neither of them the old foaming tingle when you come off the water.

Yes, already, I am told, I am on the long road that leads down to the

quiet inn at the mountain foot. I am promised, to be sure, many wide

prospects, pleasant sounds of wind and water, and friendly greetings

by the way. There will be a stop here and there for refreshments, a

pause at the turn where the world shows best, a tightening of the

brake. Get up, Dobbin! Go 'long! And then, tired and nodding, at last,

we shall leave the upland and enter the twilight where all roads end.

A pleasant picture, is it not--a grandfather in a cap--yourself, my

dear sir, hugging your cold shins in the chimney corner? Is it not a

brave end to a stirring business? Life, you say, is a journey up and

down a hill--aspirations unattained and a mild regret, castles at

dawn, a brisk wind for the noontide, and at night, at best, the lights

of a little village, the stir of water on the stones, and silence.

Is this true? Or do we not reiterate a lie? I deny old age. It is a

false belief, a bad philosophy dimming the eyes of generations. Men

and women may wear caps, but not because of age. In each one's heart,

if he permit, a child keeps house to the very end. If Welsh rabbit

lose its flavor, is it a sign of decaying power? I have yet to know

that a relish for Shakespeare declines, or the love of one's friends,

or the love of truth and beauty. Youth does not view the loftiest

peaks. It is at sunset that the tallest castles rise.

My dear sir--you of seventy or beyond--if no rim of mountains

stretches up before you, it is not your age that denies you but the

quality of your thought. It has been said of old that as a man thinks

so he is, but who of us has learned the lesson?

The journey has neither a beginning nor an end. Now is eternity. Our

birth is but a signpost on the road--our going hence, another post to

mark transition and our progress. The oldest stars are brief lamps

upon our way. We shall travel wisely if we see peaks and castles all

the day, and hold our childhood in our hearts. Then, when at last the

night has come, we shall plant our second post upon a windy height

where it will be first to catch the dawn.

On the Difference Between Wit and Humor.

I am not sure that I can draw an exact line between wit and humor.

Perhaps the distinction is so subtle that only those persons can

decide who have long white beards. But even an ignorant man, so long

as he is clear of Bedlam, may have an opinion.

I am quite positive that of the two, humor is the more comfortable and

more livable quality. Humorous persons, if their gift is genuine and

not a mere shine upon the surface, are always agreeable companions

and they sit through the evening best. They have pleasant mouths

turned up at the corners. To these corners the great Master of

marionettes has fixed the strings and he holds them in his nimblest

fingers to twitch them at the slightest jest. But the mouth of a

merely witty man is hard and sour until the moment of its discharge.

Nor is the flash from a witty man always comforting, whereas a

humorous man radiates a general pleasure and is like another candle in

the room.

I admire wit, but I have no real liking for it. It has been too often

employed against me, whereas humor is always an ally. It never points

an impertinent finger into my defects. Humorous persons do not sit

like explosives on a fuse. They are safe and easy comrades. But a

wit's tongue is as sharp as a donkey driver's stick. I may gallop the

faster for its prodding, yet the touch behind is too persuasive for

any comfort.

Wit is a lean creature with sharp inquiring nose, whereas humor has a

kindly eye and comfortable girth. Wit, if it be necessary, uses malice

to score a point--like a cat it is quick to jump--but humor keeps the

peace in an easy chair. Wit has a better voice in a solo, but humor

comes into the chorus best. Wit is as sharp as a stroke of lightning,

whereas humor is diffuse like sunlight. Wit keeps the season's

fashions and is precise in the phrases and judgments of the day, but

humor is concerned with homely eternal things. Wit wears silk, but

humor in homespun endures the wind. Wit sets a snare, whereas humor

goes off whistling without a victim in its mind. Wit is sharper

company at table, but humor serves better in mischance and in the

rain. When it tumbles wit is sour, but humor goes uncomplaining

without its dinner. Humor laughs at another's jest and holds its

sides, while wit sits wrapped in study for a lively answer. But it is

a workaday world in which we live, where we get mud upon our boots and

come weary to the twilight--it is a world that grieves and suffers

from many wounds in these years of war: and therefore as I think of my

acquaintance, it is those who are humorous in its best and truest

meaning rather than those who are witty who give the more profitable

companionship.

And then, also, there is wit that is not wit. As someone has written:

Nor ever noise for wit on me could pass,

When thro' the braying I discern'd the ass.

I sat lately at dinner with a notoriously witty person (a really witty

man) whom our hostess had introduced to provide the entertainment. I

had read many of his reviews of books and plays, and while I confess

their wit and brilliancy, I had thought them to be hard and

intellectual and lacking in all that broader base of humor which aims

at truth. His writing--catching the bad habit of the time--is too

ready to proclaim a paradox and to assert the unusual, to throw aside

in contempt the valuable haystack in a fine search for a paltry

needle. His reviews are seldom right--as most of us see the right--but

they sparkle and hold one's interest for their perversity and

unexpected turns.

In conversation I found him much as I had found him in his

writing--although, strictly speaking, it was not a conversation, which

requires an interchange of word and idea and is turn about. A

conversation should not be a market where one sells and another buys.

Rather, it should be a bargaining back and forth, and each person

should be both merchant and buyer. My rubber plant for your victrola,

each offering what he has and seeking his deficiency. It was my friend

B---- who fairly put the case when he said that he liked so much to

talk that he was willing to pay for his audience by listening in his

turn.

But this was a speech and a lecture. He loosed on us from the cold

spigot of his intellect a steady flow of literary allusion--a practice

which he professes to hold in scorn--and wit and epigram. He seemed

torn from the page of Meredith. He talked like ink. I had believed

before that only people in books could talk as he did, and then only

when their author had blotted and scratched their performance for a

seventh time before he sent it to the printer. To me it was an

entirely new experience, for my usual acquaintances are good common

honest daytime woollen folk and they seldom average better than one

bright thing in an evening.

At first I feared that there might be a break in his flow of speech

which I should be obliged to fill. Once, when there was a slight

pause--a truffle was engaging him--I launched a frail remark; but it

was swept off at once in the renewed torrent. And seriously it does

not seem fair. If one speaker insists--to change the figure--on laying

all the cobbles of a conversation, he should at least allow another to

carry the tarpot and fill in the chinks. When the evening was over,

although I recalled two or three clever stories, which I shall botch

in the telling, I came away tired and dissatisfied, my tongue dry with

disuse.

Now I would not seek that kind of man as a companion with whom to be

becalmed in a sailboat, and I would not wish to go to the country with

him, least of all to the North Woods or any place outside of

civilization. I am sure that he would sulk if he were deprived of an

audience. He would be crotchety at breakfast across his bacon.

Certainly for the woods a humorous man is better company, for his

humor in mischance comforts both him and you. A humorous man--and here

lies the heart of the matter--a humorous man has the high gift of

regarding an annoyance in the very stroke of it as another man shall

regard it when the annoyance is long past. If a humorous person falls

out of a canoe he knows the exquisite jest while his head is still

bobbing in the cold water. A witty man, on the contrary, is sour until

he is changed and dry: but in a week's time when company is about, he

will make a comic story of it.

My friend A---- with whom I went once into the Canadian woods has

genuine humor, and no one can be a more satisfactory comrade. I do not

recall that he said many comic things, and at bottom he was serious as

the best humorists are. But in him there was a kind of joy and

exaltation that lasted throughout the day. If the duffle were piled

too high and fell about his ears, if the dinner was burned or the tent

blew down in a driving storm at night, he met these mishaps as though

they were the very things he had come north to get, as though without

them the trip would have lacked its spice. This is an easy philosophy

in retrospect but hard when the wet canvas falls across you and the

rain beats in. A---- laughed at the very moment of disaster as another

man will laugh later in an easy chair. I see him now swinging his axe

for firewood to dry ourselves when we were spilled in a rapids; and

again, while pitching our tent on a sandy beach when another storm had

drowned us. And there is a certain cry of his (dully, _Wow!_ on paper)

expressive to the initiated of all things gay, which could never issue

from the mouth of a merely witty man.

Real humor is primarily human--or divine, to be exact--and after that

the fun may follow naturally in its order. Not long ago I saw Louis

Jouvet of the French Company play Sir Andrew Ague-Cheek. It was a most

humorous performance of the part, and the reason is that the actor

made no primary effort to be funny. It was the humanity of his

playing, making his audience love him first of all, that provoked the

comedy. His long thin legs were comical and so was his drawling talk,

but the very heart and essence was this love he started in his

audience. Poor fellow! How delightfully he smoothed the feathers in

his hat! How he feared to fight the duel! It was easy to love such a

dear silly human fellow. A merely witty player might have drawn as

many laughs, but there would not have been the catching at the heart.

As for books and the wit or humor of their pages, it appears that wit

fades, whereas humor lasts. Humor uses permanent nutgalls. But is

there anything more melancholy than the wit of another generation? In

the first place, this wit is intertwined with forgotten circumstance.

It hangs on a fashion--on the style of a coat. It arose from a

forgotten bit of gossip. In the play of words the sources of the pun

are lost. It is like a local jest in a narrow coterie, barren to an

outsider. Sydney Smith was the most celebrated wit of his day, but he

is dull reading now. Blackwood's at its first issue was a witty daring

sheet, but for us the pages are stagnant. I suppose that no one now

laughs at the witticisms of Thomas Hood. Where are the wits of

yesteryear? Yet the humor of Falstaff and Lamb and Fielding remains

and is a reminder to us that humor, to be real, must be founded on

humanity and on truth.

On Going to a Party.

Although I usually enjoy a party when I have arrived, I seldom

anticipate it with pleasure. I remain sour until I have hung my hat. I

suspect that my disorder is general and that if any group of formal

diners could be caught in preparation midway between their tub and

over-shoes, they would be found a peevish company who might be

expected to snap at one another. Yet look now at their smiling faces!

With what zest they crunch their food! How cheerfully they clatter on

their plates! Who would suspect that yonder smiling fellow who strokes

his silky chin was sullen when he fixed his tie; or that this pleasant

babble comes out of mouths that lately sulked before their mirrors?

I am not sure from what cause my own crustiness proceeds. I am of no

essential unsociability. Nor is it wholly the masquerade of

unaccustomed clothes. I am deft with a bow-knot and patient with my

collar. It may be partly a perversity of sex, inasmuch as we men are

sometimes "taken" by our women folk. But chiefly it comes from an

unwillingness to pledge the future, lest on the very night my own

hearth appear the better choice. Here we are, with legs stretched for

comfort toward the fire--easy and unbuttoned. Let the rain beat on the

glass! Let chimneys topple! Let the wind whistle to its shrill

companions of the North! But although I am led growling and reluctant

to my host's door--with stiffened paws, as it were, against the

sill--I usually enjoy myself when I am once inside. To see me across

the salad smiling at my pretty neighbor, no one would know how

churlish I had been on the coming of the invitation.

I have attended my share of formal dinners. I have dined with the

magnificent H----s and their Roman Senator has announced me at the

door; although, when he asked my name in the hall, I thought at first

in my ignorance that he gave me directions about my rubbers. No one

has faced more forks and knives, or has apportioned his implements

with nicer discrimination among the meats. Not once have I been forced

to stir my after-dinner coffee with a soup spoon. And yet I look back

on these grand occasions with contentment chiefly because they are

past. I am in whole agreement with Cleopatra when she spoke

slightingly of her salad days--surely a fashionable afternoon affair

at a castle on the river Nile--when, as she confessed, she was young

and green in judgment.

It is usually a pleasure to meet distinguished persons who, as a rule,

are friendly folk who sit in peace and comfort. But if they are lugged

in and set up stiffly at a formal dinner they are too much an

exhibition. In this circumstance they cannot be natural and at their

best. And then I wonder how they endure our abject deference and

flabby surrender to their opinions. Would it not destroy all interest

in a game of bowling if the wretched pins fell down before the hit

were made? It was lately at a dinner that our hostess held in

captivity three of these celebrated lions. One of them was a famous

traveler who had taken a tiger by its bristling beard. The second was

a popular lecturer. The third was in distemper and crouched quietly at

her plate. The first two are sharp and bright and they roared to

expectation. But I do not complain when lions take possession of the

cage, for it reduces the general liability of talk, and a common man,

if he be industrious, may pluck his bird down to the bone in peace.

A formal reception is even worse than a dinner. One stands around with

stalled machinery. Good stout legs, that can go at a trot all day,

become now weak and wabbly. One hurdles dispiritedly over trailing

skirts. One tries in conversation to think of the name of a play he

has just seen, but it escapes him. It is, however, so nearly in his

grasp, that it prevents him from turning to another topic. Benson, the

essayist, also disliked formal receptions and he quotes Prince Hal in

their dispraise. "Prithee, Ned," says the Prince--and I fancy that he

has just led a thirsty Duchess to the punchbowl, and was now in the

very act of escaping while her face was buried in the cup--"Prithee,

Ned," he says, "come out of this fat room, and lend me thy hand to

laugh a little!" And we can imagine these two enfranchised rogues,

easy at heart, making off later to their Eastcheap tavern, and the

passing of a friendly cup. But now, alas, today, all of the rooms of

the house are fat and thick with people. There is a confusion of

tongues as when work on the tower of Babel was broken off. There is no

escape. If it were one's good luck to be a waiter, one could at least

console himself that it was his livelihood.

The furniture has been removed from all the rooms in order that more

persons may be more uncomfortable. Or perhaps the chairs and tables,

like rats in a leaky ship, have scuttled off, as it were, now that

fashion has wrecked the home. A friend of mine, J----, resents these

entertainments. No sooner, recently, did he come into such a bare

apartment where, in happier days his favorite chair had stood, than he

hinted to the guests that the furniture had been sold to meet the

expenses of the day. This sorry jest lasted him until, on whispering

to a servant, he learned that the chairs had been stored in an upper

hall. At this he proposed that the party reassemble above, where at

least they might sit down and be comfortable. When I last saw J----

that evening he was sitting at the turn of the stairs behind an exotic

shrubbery, where he had found a vagrant chair that had straggled

behind the upper emigration.

The very envelope that contains a formal invitation bears a forbidding

look. It is massive and costly to the eye. It is much larger than a

letter, unless, perhaps, one carries on a correspondence with a giant

from Brobdingnag. You turn it round and round with sad premonition.

The very writing is coldly impersonal without the pinch of a more

human hand. It practices a chill anonymity as if it contains a warrant

for a hanging. At first you hope it may be merely an announcement from

your tailor, inasmuch as commerce patterns its advertisements on these

social forms. I am told that there was once a famous man--a

distinguished novelist--who so disliked formal parties but was so

timid at their rejection that he took refuge in the cellar whenever

one of these forbidding documents arrived, until he could forge a

plausible excuse; for he believed that these colder and more barren

rooms quickened his invention. The story goes that once when he was in

an unusually timid state he lacked the courage to break the seal and

so spent an uneasy morning upon the tubs, to the inconvenience of the

laundress who thought that he fretted upon the plot. At last, on

tearing off the envelope, he found to his relief that it was only a

notice for a display of haberdashery at a fashionable shop. In his

gratitude at his escape he at once sought his desk and conferred a

blushing heiress on his hero.

But perhaps there are persons of an opposite mind who welcome an

invitation. Even the preliminary rummage delights them when their

clothes are sent for pressing and their choice wavers among their

plumage. For such persons the superscription on the envelope now seems

written in the spacious hand of hospitality.

But of informal dinners and the meeting of friends we can all approve

without reserve. I recall, once upon a time, four old gentlemen who

met every week for whist. Three of them were of marked eccentricity.

One of them, when the game was at its pitch, reached down to the rungs

of his chair and hitched it first to one side and then to the other,

mussing up the rugs. The second had the infirmity of nodding his head

continuously. Even if he played a trivial three spot, he sat on the

decision and wagged his beard up and down like a judge. The third

sucked his teeth and thereby made hissing noises. Later in the evening

there would be served buttermilk or cider, and the sober party would

adjourn at the gate. But there were two young rascals who practiced

these eccentricities and after they had gone to bed, for the

exquisite humor of it, they nodded their heads, too, and sucked their

teeth with loud hissing noises.

No one entertains more pleasantly than the S---- family and no one is

more informal. If you come on the minute for your dinner, it is likely

that none of the family is about. After a search J---- is found in a

flannel shirt in his garden with a watering-can. "Hello!" he says in

surprise. "What time is it? Have you come already for dinner?"

"For God's sake," you reply--for I assume you to be of familiar and

profane manners--"get up and wash yourself! Don't you know that you

are giving a party?"

J---- affects to be indignant. "Who is giving this party, anyway?" he

asks. "If it's yours, you run it!" And then he leads you to the house,

where you abuse each other agreeably as he dresses.

Once a year on Christmas Eve they give a general party. This has been

a custom for a number of years and it is now an institution as fixed

as the night itself. Invitations are not issued. At most a rumor goes

abroad to the elect that nine o'clock is a proper time to come, when

the children, who have peeked for Santa Claus up the chimney, have at

last been put to bed. There is a great wood fire in the sitting-room

and, by way of andirons, two soldiers of the Continental Army keep up

their endless march across the hearth. The fireplace is encircled by a

line of leather cushions that rest upon the floor, like a window-seat

that has undergone amputation of all its legs.

Chimney-Pot Papers · 第 6 / 9 段