CHAPTER I

TARAS BULBA AND OTHER TALES

By Nikolai Vasilievich Gogol

Introduction by John Cournos

Contents:

Taras Bulba

St. John’s Eve

The Cloak

How the Two Ivans Quarrelled

The Mysterious Portrait

The Calash

INTRODUCTION

Russian literature, so full of enigmas, contains no greater creative

mystery than Nikolai Vasil’evich Gogol (1809-1852), who has done for

the Russian novel and Russian prose what Pushkin has done for Russian

poetry. Before these two men came Russian literature can hardly have

been said to exist. It was pompous and effete with pseudo-classicism;

foreign influences were strong; in the speech of the upper circles there

was an over-fondness for German, French, and English words. Between them

the two friends, by force of their great genius, cleared away the debris

which made for sterility and erected in their stead a new structure out

of living Russian words. The spoken word, born of the people, gave soul

and wing to literature; only by coming to earth, the native earth, was

it enabled to soar. Coming up from Little Russia, the Ukraine, with

Cossack blood in his veins, Gogol injected his own healthy virus into

an effete body, blew his own virile spirit, the spirit of his race, into

its nostrils, and gave the Russian novel its direction to this very day.

More than that. The nomad and romantic in him, troubled and restless

with Ukrainian myth, legend, and song, impressed upon Russian

literature, faced with the realities of modern life, a spirit titanic

and in clash with its material, and produced in the mastery of this

every-day material, commonly called sordid, a phantasmagoria intense

with beauty. A clue to all Russian realism may be found in a Russian

critic’s observation about Gogol: “Seldom has nature created a man so

romantic in bent, yet so masterly in portraying all that is unromantic

in life.” But this statement does not cover the whole ground, for it is

easy to see in almost all of Gogol’s work his “free Cossack soul” trying

to break through the shell of sordid to-day like some ancient demon,

essentially Dionysian. So that his works, true though they are to our

life, are at once a reproach, a protest, and a challenge, ever calling

for joy, ancient joy, that is no more with us. And they have all the joy

and sadness of the Ukrainian songs he loved so much. Ukrainian was to

Gogol “the language of the soul,” and it was in Ukrainian songs rather

than in old chronicles, of which he was not a little contemptuous, that

he read the history of his people. Time and again, in his essays and in

his letters to friends, he expresses his boundless joy in these songs:

“O songs, you are my joy and my life! How I love you. What are the

bloodless chronicles I pore over beside those clear, live chronicles!

I cannot live without songs; they... reveal everything more and more

clearly, oh, how clearly, gone-by life and gone-by men.... The songs

of Little Russia are her everything, her poetry, her history, and her

ancestral grave. He who has not penetrated them deeply knows nothing of

the past of this blooming region of Russia.”

Indeed, so great was his enthusiasm for his own land that after

collecting material for many years, the year 1833 finds him at work on

a history of “poor Ukraine,” a work planned to take up six volumes; and

writing to a friend at this time he promises to say much in it that has

not been said before him. Furthermore, he intended to follow this work

with a universal history in eight volumes with a view to establishing,

as far as may be gathered, Little Russia and the world in proper

relation, connecting the two; a quixotic task, surely. A poet,

passionate, religious, loving the heroic, we find him constantly

impatient and fuming at the lifeless chronicles, which leave him cold as

he seeks in vain for what he cannot find. “Nowhere,” he writes in 1834,

“can I find anything of the time which ought to be richer than any

other in events. Here was a people whose whole existence was passed in

activity, and which, even if nature had made it inactive, was compelled

to go forward to great affairs and deeds because of its neighbours, its

geographic situation, the constant danger to its existence.... If the

Crimeans and the Turks had had a literature I am convinced that no

history of an independent nation in Europe would prove so interesting as

that of the Cossacks.” Again he complains of the “withered chronicles”;

it is only the wealth of his country’s song that encourages him to go on

with its history.

Too much a visionary and a poet to be an impartial historian, it is

hardly astonishing to note the judgment he passes on his own work,

during that same year, 1834: “My history of Little Russia’s past is an

extraordinarily made thing, and it could not be otherwise.” The deeper

he goes into Little Russia’s past the more fanatically he dreams of

Little Russia’s future. St. Petersburg wearies him, Moscow awakens no

emotion in him, he yearns for Kieff, the mother of Russian cities, which

in his vision he sees becoming “the Russian Athens.” Russian history

gives him no pleasure, and he separates it definitely from Ukrainian

history. He is “ready to cast everything aside rather than read Russian

history,” he writes to Pushkin. During his seven-year stay in St.

Petersburg (1829-36) Gogol zealously gathered historical material and,

in the words of Professor Kotlyarevsky, “lived in the dream of becoming

the Thucydides of Little Russia.” How completely he disassociated

Ukrainia from Northern Russia may be judged by the conspectus of his

lectures written in 1832. He says in it, speaking of the conquest of

Southern Russia in the fourteenth century by Prince Guedimin at the head

of his Lithuanian host, still dressed in the skins of wild beasts, still

worshipping the ancient fire and practising pagan rites: “Then Southern

Russia, under the mighty protection of Lithuanian princes, completely

separated itself from the North. Every bond between them was broken;

two kingdoms were established under a single name--Russia--one under the

Tatar yoke, the other under the same rule with Lithuanians. But actually

they had no relation with one another; different laws, different

customs, different aims, different bonds, and different activities gave

them wholly different characters.”

This same Prince Guedimin freed Kieff from the Tatar yoke. This city had

been laid waste by the golden hordes of Ghengis Khan and hidden for a

very long time from the Slavonic chronicler as behind an impenetrable

curtain. A shrewd man, Guedimin appointed a Slavonic prince to rule

over the city and permitted the inhabitants to practise their own

faith, Greek Christianity. Prior to the Mongol invasion, which brought

conflagration and ruin, and subjected Russia to a two-century bondage,

cutting her off from Europe, a state of chaos existed and the separate

tribes fought with one another constantly and for the most petty

reasons. Mutual depredations were possible owing to the absence of

mountain ranges; there were no natural barriers against sudden attack.

The openness of the steppe made the people war-like. But this very

openness made it possible later for Guedimin’s pagan hosts, fresh from

the fir forests of what is now White Russia, to make a clean sweep

of the whole country between Lithuania and Poland, and thus give the

scattered princedoms a much-needed cohesion. In this way Ukrainia was

formed. Except for some forests, infested with bears, the country was

one vast plain, marked by an occasional hillock. Whole herds of wild

horses and deer stampeded the country, overgrown with tall grass, while

flocks of wild goats wandered among the rocks of the Dnieper. Apart from

the Dnieper, and in some measure the Desna, emptying into it, there were

no navigable rivers and so there was little opportunity for a commercial

people. Several tributaries cut across, but made no real boundary line.

Whether you looked to the north towards Russia, to the east towards the

Tatars, to the south towards the Crimean Tatars, to the west towards

Poland, everywhere the country bordered on a field, everywhere on a

plain, which left it open to the invader from every side. Had there been

here, suggests Gogol in his introduction to his never-written history

of Little Russia, if upon one side only, a real frontier of mountain or

sea, the people who settled here might have formed a definite political

body. Without this natural protection it became a land subject to

constant attack and despoliation. “There where three hostile nations

came in contact it was manured with bones, wetted with blood. A single

Tatar invasion destroyed the whole labour of the soil-tiller; the

meadows and the cornfields were trodden down by horses or destroyed

by flame, the lightly-built habitations reduced to the ground, the

inhabitants scattered or driven off into captivity together with cattle.

It was a land of terror, and for this reason there could develop in it

only a warlike people, strong in its unity and desperate, a people whose

whole existence was bound to be trained and confined to war.”

This constant menace, this perpetual pressure of foes on all sides,

acted at last like a fierce hammer shaping and hardening resistance

against itself. The fugitive from Poland, the fugitive from the Tatar

and the Turk, homeless, with nothing to lose, their lives ever exposed

to danger, forsook their peaceful occupations and became transformed

into a warlike people, known as the Cossacks, whose appearance towards

the end of the thirteenth century or at the beginning of the fourteenth

was a remarkable event which possibly alone (suggests Gogol) prevented

any further inroads by the two Mohammedan nations into Europe. The

appearance of the Cossacks was coincident with the appearance in Europe

of brotherhoods and knighthood-orders, and this new race, in spite of

its living the life of marauders, in spite of turnings its foes’ tactics

upon its foes, was not free of the religious spirit of its time; if it

warred for its existence it warred not less for its faith, which was

Greek. Indeed, as the nation grew stronger and became conscious of its

strength, the struggle began to partake something of the nature of a

religious war, not alone defensive but aggressive also, against the

unbeliever. While any man was free to join the brotherhood it was

obligatory to believe in the Greek faith. It was this religious unity,

blazed into activity by the presence across the borders of unbelieving

nations, that alone indicated the germ of a political body in this

gathering of men, who otherwise lived the audacious lives of a band

of highway robbers. “There was, however,” says Gogol, “none of the

austerity of the Catholic knight in them; they bound themselves to no

vows or fasts; they put no self-restraint upon themselves or mortified

their flesh, but were indomitable like the rocks of the Dnieper among

which they lived, and in their furious feasts and revels they forgot

the whole world. That same intimate brotherhood, maintained in robber

communities, bound them together. They had everything in common--wine,

food, dwelling. A perpetual fear, a perpetual danger, inspired them with

a contempt towards life. The Cossack worried more about a good measure

of wine than about his fate. One has to see this denizen of the frontier

in his half-Tatar, half-Polish costume--which so sharply outlined the

spirit of the borderland--galloping in Asiatic fashion on his horse, now

lost in thick grass, now leaping with the speed of a tiger from ambush,

or emerging suddenly from the river or swamp, all clinging with mud, and

appearing an image of terror to the Tatar....”

Little by little the community grew and with its growing it began to

assume a general character. The beginning of the sixteenth century found

whole villages settled with families, enjoying the protection of the

Cossacks, who exacted certain obligations, chiefly military, so that

these settlements bore a military character. The sword and the plough

were friends which fraternised at every settler’s. On the other hand,

Gogol tells us, the gay bachelors began to make depredations across the

border to sweep down on Tatars’ wives and their daughters and to marry

them. “Owing to this co-mingling, their facial features, so different

from one another’s, received a common impress, tending towards the

Asiatic. And so there came into being a nation in faith and place

belonging to Europe; on the other hand, in ways of life, customs, and

dress quite Asiatic. It was a nation in which the world’s two extremes

came in contact; European caution and Asiatic indifference, niavete and

cunning, an intense activity and the greatest laziness and indulgence,

an aspiration to development and perfection, and again a desire to

appear indifferent to perfection.”

All of Ukraine took on its colour from the Cossack, and if I have drawn

largely on Gogol’s own account of the origins of this race, it was

because it seemed to me that Gogol’s emphasis on the heroic rather than

on the historical--Gogol is generally discounted as an historian--would

give the reader a proper approach to the mood in which he created “Taras

Bulba,” the finest epic in Russian literature. Gogol never wrote either

his history of Little Russia or his universal history. Apart from

several brief studies, not always reliable, the net result of his many

years’ application to his scholarly projects was this brief epic

in prose, Homeric in mood. The sense of intense living, “living

dangerously”--to use a phrase of Nietzsche’s, the recognition of courage

as the greatest of all virtues--the God in man, inspired Gogol, living

in an age which tended toward grey tedium, with admiration for his more

fortunate forefathers, who lived in “a poetic time, when everything was

won with the sword, when every one in his turn strove to be an active

being and not a spectator.” Into this short work he poured all his love

of the heroic, all his romanticism, all his poetry, all his joy. Its

abundance of life bears one along like a fast-flowing river. And it

is not without humour, a calm, detached humour, which, as the critic

Bolinsky puts it, is not there merely “because Gogol has a tendency to

see the comic in everything, but because it is true to life.”

Yet “Taras Bulba” was in a sense an accident, just as many other works

of great men are accidents. It often requires a happy combination

of circumstances to produce a masterpiece. I have already told in my

introduction to “Dead Souls” (1) how Gogol created his great realistic

masterpiece, which was to influence Russian literature for generations

to come, under the influence of models so remote in time or place

as “Don Quixote” or “Pickwick Papers”; and how this combination of

influences joined to his own genius produced a work quite new and

original in effect and only remotely reminiscent of the models which

have inspired it. And just as “Dead Souls” might never have been written

if “Don Quixote” had not existed, so there is every reason to believe

that “Taras Bulba” could not have been written without the “Odyssey.”

Once more ancient fire gave life to new beauty. And yet at the time

Gogol could not have had more than a smattering of the “Odyssey.”

The magnificent translation made by his friend Zhukovsky had not yet

appeared and Gogol, in spite of his ambition to become a historian, was

not equipped as a scholar. But it is evident from his dithyrambic letter

on the appearance of Zhukovsky’s version, forming one of the famous

series of letters known as “Correspondence with Friends,” that he was

better acquainted with the spirit of Homer than any mere scholar could

be. That letter, unfortunately unknown to the English reader, would make

every lover of the classics in this day of their disparagement dance

with joy. He describes the “Odyssey” as the forgotten source of all that

is beautiful and harmonious in life, and he greets its appearance in

Russian dress at a time when life is sordid and discordant as a thing

inevitable, “cooling” in effect upon a too hectic world. He sees in its

perfect grace, its calm and almost childlike simplicity, a power for

individual and general good. “It combines all the fascination of a fairy

tale and all the simple truth of human adventure, holding out the

same allurement to every being, whether he is a noble, a commoner, a

merchant, a literate or illiterate person, a private soldier, a lackey,

children of both sexes, beginning at an age when a child begins to love

a fairy tale--all might read it or listen to it, without tedium.” Every

one will draw from it what he most needs. Not less than upon these

he sees its wholesome effect on the creative writer, its refreshing

influence on the critic. But most of all he dwells on its heroic

qualities, inseparable to him from what is religious in the “Odyssey”;

and, says Gogol, this book contains the idea that a human being,

“wherever he might be, whatever pursuit he might follow, is threatened

by many woes, that he must need wrestle with them--for that very purpose

was life given to him--that never for a single instant must he despair,

just as Odysseus did not despair, who in every hard and oppressive

moment turned to his own heart, unaware that with this inner scrutiny

of himself he had already said that hidden prayer uttered in a moment of

distress by every man having no understanding whatever of God.” Then he

goes on to compare the ancient harmony, perfect down to every detail of

dress, to the slightest action, with our slovenliness and confusion and

pettiness, a sad result--considering our knowledge of past experience,

our possession of superior weapons, our religion given to make us holy

and superior beings. And in conclusion he asks: Is not the “Odyssey” in

every sense a deep reproach to our nineteenth century?

(1) Everyman’s Library, No. 726.

An understanding of Gogol’s point of view gives the key to “Taras

Bulba.” For in this panoramic canvas of the Setch, the military

brotherhood of the Cossacks, living under open skies, picturesquely and

heroically, he has drawn a picture of his romantic ideal, which if far

from perfect at any rate seemed to him preferable to the grey tedium of

a city peopled with government officials. Gogol has written in “Taras

Bulba” his own reproach to the nineteenth century. It is sad and joyous

like one of those Ukrainian songs which have helped to inspire him to

write it. And then, as he cut himself off more and more from the world

of the past, life became a sadder and still sadder thing to him; modern

life, with all its gigantic pettiness, closed in around him, he began to

write of petty officials and of petty scoundrels, “commonplace heroes”

he called them. But nothing is ever lost in this world. Gogol’s

romanticism, shut in within himself, finding no outlet, became a flame.

It was a flame of pity. He was like a man walking in hell, pitying. And

that was the miracle, the transfiguration. Out of that flame of pity the

Russian novel was born.

JOHN COURNOS

Evenings on the Farm near the Dikanka, 1829-31; Mirgorod, 1831-33; Taras

Bulba, 1834; Arabesques (includes tales, The Portrait and A Madman’s

Diary), 1831-35; The Cloak, 1835; The Revizor (The Inspector-General),

1836; Dead Souls, 1842; Correspondence with Friends, 1847; Letters,

1847, 1895, 4 vols. 1902.

ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS: Cossack Tales (The Night of Christmas Eve, Tarass

Boolba), trans. by G. Tolstoy, 1860; St. John’s Eve and Other Stories,

trans. by Isabel F. Hapgood, New York, Crowell, 1886; Taras Bulba: Also

St. John’s Eve and Other Stories, London, Vizetelly, 1887; Taras Bulba,

trans. by B. C. Baskerville, London, Scott, 1907; The Inspector: a

Comedy, Calcutta, 1890; The Inspector-General, trans. by A. A. Sykes,

London, Scott, 1892; Revizor, trans. for the Yale Dramatic Association

by Max S. Mandell, New Haven, Conn., 1908; Home Life in Russia

(adaptation of Dead Souls), London, Hurst, 1854; Tchitchikoff’s

Journey’s; or Dead Souls, trans. by Isabel F. Hapgood, New York,

Crowell, 1886; Dead Souls, London, Vizetelly, 1887; Dead Souls, London,

Maxwell 1887; Dead Souls, London, Fisher Unwin, 1915; Dead Souls,

London, Everyman’s Library (Intro. by John Cournos), 1915; Meditations

on the Divine Liturgy, trans. by L. Alexeieff, London, A. R. Mowbray and

Co., 1913.

LIVES, etc.: (Russian) Kotlyarevsky (N. A.), 1903; Shenrok (V. I.),

Materials for a Biography, 1892; (French) Leger (L.), Nicholas Gogol,

1914.

TARAS BULBA

CHAPTER I

“Turn round, my boy! How ridiculous you look! What sort of a priest’s

cassock have you got on? Does everybody at the academy dress like that?”

With such words did old Bulba greet his two sons, who had been absent

for their education at the Royal Seminary of Kief, and had now returned

home to their father.

His sons had but just dismounted from their horses. They were a couple

of stout lads who still looked bashful, as became youths recently

released from the seminary. Their firm healthy faces were covered with

the first down of manhood, down which had, as yet, never known a razor.

They were greatly discomfited by such a reception from their father, and

stood motionless with eyes fixed upon the ground.

“Stand still, stand still! let me have a good look at you,” he

continued, turning them around. “How long your gaberdines are! What

gaberdines! There never were such gaberdines in the world before. Just

run, one of you! I want to see whether you will not get entangled in the

skirts, and fall down.”

“Don’t laugh, don’t laugh, father!” said the eldest lad at length.

“How touchy we are! Why shouldn’t I laugh?”

“Because, although you are my father, if you laugh, by heavens, I will

strike you!”

“What kind of son are you? what, strike your father!” exclaimed Taras

Bulba, retreating several paces in amazement.

“Yes, even my father. I don’t stop to consider persons when an insult is

in question.”

“So you want to fight me? with your fist, eh?”

“Any way.”

“Well, let it be fisticuffs,” said Taras Bulba, turning up his sleeves.

“I’ll see what sort of a man you are with your fists.”

And father and son, in lieu of a pleasant greeting after long

separation, began to deal each other heavy blows on ribs, back, and

chest, now retreating and looking at each other, now attacking afresh.

“Look, good people! the old man has gone mad! he has lost his senses

completely!” screamed their pale, ugly, kindly mother, who was standing

on the threshold, and had not yet succeeded in embracing her darling

children. “The children have come home, we have not seen them for over a

year; and now he has taken some strange freak--he’s pommelling them.”

“Yes, he fights well,” said Bulba, pausing; “well, by heavens!” he

continued, rather as if excusing himself, “although he has never tried

his hand at it before, he will make a good Cossack! Now, welcome, son!

embrace me,” and father and son began to kiss each other. “Good lad! see

that you hit every one as you pommelled me; don’t let any one escape.

Nevertheless your clothes are ridiculous all the same. What rope is this

hanging there?--And you, you lout, why are you standing there with your

hands hanging beside you?” he added, turning to the youngest. “Why don’t

you fight me? you son of a dog!”

“What an idea!” said the mother, who had managed in the meantime to

embrace her youngest. “Who ever heard of children fighting their own

father? That’s enough for the present; the child is young, he has had

a long journey, he is tired.” The child was over twenty, and about six

feet high. “He ought to rest, and eat something; and you set him to

fighting!”

“You are a gabbler!” said Bulba. “Don’t listen to your mother, my lad;

she is a woman, and knows nothing. What sort of petting do you need? A

clear field and a good horse, that’s the kind of petting for you! And do

you see this sword? that’s your mother! All the rest people stuff your

heads with is rubbish; the academy, books, primers, philosophy, and all

that, I spit upon it all!” Here Bulba added a word which is not used in

print. “But I’ll tell you what is best: I’ll take you to Zaporozhe

(1) this very week. That’s where there’s science for you! There’s your

school; there alone will you gain sense.”

(1) The Cossack country beyond (za) the falls (porozhe) of the

Dnieper.

“And are they only to remain home a week?” said the worn old mother

sadly and with tears in her eyes. “The poor boys will have no chance of

looking around, no chance of getting acquainted with the home where they

were born; there will be no chance for me to get a look at them.”

“Enough, you’ve howled quite enough, old woman! A Cossack is not born

to run around after women. You would like to hide them both under your

petticoat, and sit upon them as a hen sits on eggs. Go, go, and let

us have everything there is on the table in a trice. We don’t want any

dumplings, honey-cakes, poppy-cakes, or any other such messes: give us

a whole sheep, a goat, mead forty years old, and as much corn-brandy as

possible, not with raisins and all sorts of stuff, but plain scorching

corn-brandy, which foams and hisses like mad.”

Bulba led his sons into the principal room of the hut; and two pretty

servant girls wearing coin necklaces, who were arranging the apartment,

ran out quickly. They were either frightened at the arrival of the young

men, who did not care to be familiar with anyone; or else they merely

wanted to keep up their feminine custom of screaming and rushing away

headlong at the sight of a man, and then screening their blushes for

some time with their sleeves. The hut was furnished according to the

fashion of that period--a fashion concerning which hints linger only in

the songs and lyrics, no longer sung, alas! in the Ukraine as of yore by

blind old men, to the soft tinkling of the native guitar, to the

people thronging round them--according to the taste of that warlike and

troublous time, of leagues and battles prevailing in the Ukraine after

the union. Everything was cleanly smeared with coloured clay. On the

walls hung sabres, hunting-whips, nets for birds, fishing-nets,

guns, elaborately carved powder-horns, gilded bits for horses, and

tether-ropes with silver plates. The small window had round dull

panes, through which it was impossible to see except by opening the one

moveable one. Around the windows and doors red bands were painted. On

shelves in one corner stood jugs, bottles, and flasks of green and

blue glass, carved silver cups, and gilded drinking vessels of various

makes--Venetian, Turkish, Tscherkessian, which had reached Bulba’s cabin

by various roads, at third and fourth hand, a thing common enough in

those bold days. There were birch-wood benches all around the room,

a huge table under the holy pictures in one corner, and a huge stove

covered with particoloured patterns in relief, with spaces between it

and the wall. All this was quite familiar to the two young men, who

were wont to come home every year during the dog-days, since they had

no horses, and it was not customary to allow students to ride afield on

horseback. The only distinctive things permitted them were long locks of

hair on the temples, which every Cossack who bore weapons was entitled

to pull. It was only at the end of their course of study that Bulba had

sent them a couple of young stallions from his stud.

Bulba, on the occasion of his sons’ arrival, ordered all the sotniks or

captains of hundreds, and all the officers of the band who were of any

consequence, to be summoned; and when two of them arrived with his

old comrade, the Osaul or sub-chief, Dmitro Tovkatch, he immediately

presented the lads, saying, “See what fine young fellows they are! I

shall send them to the Setch (2) shortly.” The guests congratulated

Bulba and the young men, telling them they would do well and that there

was no better knowledge for a young man than a knowledge of that same

Zaporozhian Setch.

(2) The village or, rather, permanent camp of the Zaporozhian

Cossacks.

“Come, brothers, seat yourselves, each where he likes best, at the

table; come, my sons. First of all, let’s take some corn-brandy,” said

Bulba. “God bless you! Welcome, lads; you, Ostap, and you, Andrii. God

grant that you may always be successful in war, that you may beat

the Musselmans and the Turks and the Tatars; and that when the Poles

undertake any expedition against our faith, you may beat the Poles.

Come, clink your glasses. How now? Is the brandy good? What’s

corn-brandy in Latin? The Latins were stupid: they did not know there

was such a thing in the world as corn-brandy. What was the name of the

man who wrote Latin verses? I don’t know much about reading and writing,

so I don’t quite know. Wasn’t it Horace?”

“What a dad!” thought the elder son Ostap. “The old dog knows

everything, but he always pretends the contrary.”

“I don’t believe the archimandrite allowed you so much as a smell of

corn-brandy,” continued Taras. “Confess, my boys, they thrashed you well

with fresh birch-twigs on your backs and all over your Cossack bodies;

and perhaps, when you grew too sharp, they beat you with whips. And not

on Saturday only, I fancy, but on Wednesday and Thursday.”

“What is past, father, need not be recalled; it is done with.”

“Let them try it know,” said Andrii. “Let anybody just touch me, let any

Tatar risk it now, and he’ll soon learn what a Cossack’s sword is like!”

“Good, my son, by heavens, good! And when it comes to that, I’ll go with

you; by heavens, I’ll go too! What should I wait here for? To become a

buckwheat-reaper and housekeeper, to look after the sheep and swine, and

loaf around with my wife? Away with such nonsense! I am a Cossack; I’ll

have none of it! What’s left but war? I’ll go with you to Zaporozhe to

carouse; I’ll go, by heavens!” And old Bulba, growing warm by degrees

and finally quite angry, rose from the table, and, assuming a dignified

attitude, stamped his foot. “We will go to-morrow! Wherefore delay? What

enemy can we besiege here? What is this hut to us? What do we want with

all these things? What are pots and pans to us?” So saying, he began to

knock over the pots and flasks, and to throw them about.

The poor old woman, well used to such freaks on the part of her husband,

looked sadly on from her seat on the wall-bench. She did not dare say a

word; but when she heard the decision which was so terrible for her, she

could not refrain from tears. As she looked at her children, from whom

so speedy a separation was threatened, it is impossible to describe the

full force of her speechless grief, which seemed to quiver in her eyes

and on her lips convulsively pressed together.

Bulba was terribly headstrong. He was one of those characters which

could only exist in that fierce fifteenth century, and in that

half-nomadic corner of Europe, when the whole of Southern Russia,

deserted by its princes, was laid waste and burned to the quick by

pitiless troops of Mongolian robbers; when men deprived of house

and home grew brave there; when, amid conflagrations, threatening

neighbours, and eternal terrors, they settled down, and growing

accustomed to looking these things straight in the face, trained

themselves not to know that there was such a thing as fear in the world;

when the old, peacable Slav spirit was fired with warlike flame, and

the Cossack state was instituted--a free, wild outbreak of Russian

nature--and when all the river-banks, fords, and like suitable places

were peopled by Cossacks, whose number no man knew. Their bold comrades

had a right to reply to the Sultan when he asked how many they were,

“Who knows? We are scattered all over the steppes; wherever there is a

hillock, there is a Cossack.”

It was, in fact, a most remarkable exhibition of Russian strength,

forced by dire necessity from the bosom of the people. In place of the

original provinces with their petty towns, in place of the warring

and bartering petty princes ruling in their cities, there arose great

colonies, kurens (3), and districts, bound together by one common danger

and hatred against the heathen robbers. The story is well known how

their incessant warfare and restless existence saved Europe from the

merciless hordes which threatened to overwhelm her. The Polish kings,

who now found themselves sovereigns, in place of the provincial princes,

over these extensive tracts of territory, fully understood, despite the

weakness and remoteness of their own rule, the value of the Cossacks,

and the advantages of the warlike, untrammelled life led by them. They

encouraged them and flattered this disposition of mind. Under their

distant rule, the hetmans or chiefs, chosen from among the Cossacks

themselves, redistributed the territory into military districts. It

was not a standing army, no one saw it; but in case of war and general

uprising, it required a week, and no more, for every man to appear on

horseback, fully armed, receiving only one ducat from the king; and in

two weeks such a force had assembled as no recruiting officers would

ever have been able to collect. When the expedition was ended, the army

dispersed among the fields and meadows and the fords of the Dnieper;

each man fished, wrought at his trade, brewed his beer, and was once

more a free Cossack. Their foreign contemporaries rightly marvelled at

their wonderful qualities. There was no handicraft which the Cossack was

not expert at: he could distil brandy, build a waggon, make powder,

and do blacksmith’s and gunsmith’s work, in addition to committing wild

excesses, drinking and carousing as only a Russian can--all this he was

equal to. Besides the registered Cossacks, who considered themselves

bound to appear in arms in time of war, it was possible to collect at

any time, in case of dire need, a whole army of volunteers. All that was

required was for the Osaul or sub-chief to traverse the market-places

and squares of the villages and hamlets, and shout at the top of his

voice, as he stood in his waggon, “Hey, you distillers and beer-brewers!

you have brewed enough beer, and lolled on your stoves, and stuffed

your fat carcasses with flour, long enough! Rise, win glory and warlike

honours! You ploughmen, you reapers of buckwheat, you tenders of sheep,

you danglers after women, enough of following the plough, and soiling

your yellow shoes in the earth, and courting women, and wasting your

warlike strength! The hour has come to win glory for the Cossacks!”

These words were like sparks falling on dry wood. The husbandman broke

his plough; the brewers and distillers threw away their casks and

destroyed their barrels; the mechanics and merchants sent their trade

and their shop to the devil, broke pots and everything else in their

homes, and mounted their horses. In short, the Russian character here

received a profound development, and manifested a powerful outwards

expression.

(3) Cossack villages. In the Setch, a large wooden barrack.

Taras was one of the band of old-fashioned leaders; he was born

for warlike emotions, and was distinguished for his uprightness of

character. At that epoch the influence of Poland had already begun to

make itself felt upon the Russian nobility. Many had adopted Polish

customs, and began to display luxury in splendid staffs of servants,

hawks, huntsmen, dinners, and palaces. This was not to Taras’s taste. He

liked the simple life of the Cossacks, and quarrelled with those of his

comrades who were inclined to the Warsaw party, calling them serfs of

the Polish nobles. Ever on the alert, he regarded himself as the legal

protector of the orthodox faith. He entered despotically into any

village where there was a general complaint of oppression by the revenue

farmers and of the addition of fresh taxes on necessaries. He and his

Cossacks executed justice, and made it a rule that in three cases it

was absolutely necessary to resort to the sword. Namely, when the

commissioners did not respect the superior officers and stood before

them covered; when any one made light of the faith and did not observe

the customs of his ancestors; and, finally, when the enemy were

Mussulmans or Turks, against whom he considered it permissible, in every

case, to draw the sword for the glory of Christianity.

Now he rejoiced beforehand at the thought of how he would present

himself with his two sons at the Setch, and say, “See what fine young

fellows I have brought you!” how he would introduce them to all his old

comrades, steeled in warfare; how he would observe their first exploits

in the sciences of war and of drinking, which was also regarded as one

of the principal warlike qualities. At first he had intended to send

them forth alone; but at the sight of their freshness, stature, and

manly personal beauty his martial spirit flamed up and he resolved to go

with them himself the very next day, although there was no necessity for

this except his obstinate self-will. He began at once to hurry about and

give orders; selected horses and trappings for his sons, looked through

the stables and storehouses, and chose servants to accompany them on

the morrow. He delegated his power to Osaul Tovkatch, and gave with it

a strict command to appear with his whole force at the Setch the very

instant he should receive a message from him. Although he was jolly, and

the effects of his drinking bout still lingered in his brain, he forgot

nothing. He even gave orders that the horses should be watered, their

cribs filled, and that they should be fed with the finest corn; and then

he retired, fatigued with all his labours.

“Now, children, we must sleep, but to-morrow we shall do what God wills.

Don’t prepare us a bed: we need no bed; we will sleep in the courtyard.”

Night had but just stole over the heavens, but Bulba always went to

bed early. He lay down on a rug and covered himself with a sheepskin

pelisse, for the night air was quite sharp and he liked to lie warm when

he was at home. He was soon snoring, and the whole household speedily

followed his example. All snored and groaned as they lay in different

corners. The watchman went to sleep the first of all, he had drunk so

much in honour of the young masters’ home-coming.

The mother alone did not sleep. She bent over the pillow of her

beloved sons, as they lay side by side; she smoothed with a comb their

carelessly tangled locks, and moistened them with her tears. She gazed

at them with her whole soul, with every sense; she was wholly merged in

the gaze, and yet she could not gaze enough. She had fed them at her

own breast, she had tended them and brought them up; and now to see them

only for an instant! “My sons, my darling sons! what will become of you!

what fate awaits you?” she said, and tears stood in the wrinkles which

disfigured her once beautiful face. In truth, she was to be pitied, as

was every woman of that period. She had lived only for a moment of love,

only during the first ardour of passion, only during the first flush of

youth; and then her grim betrayer had deserted her for the sword, for

his comrades and his carouses. She saw her husband two or three days in

a year, and then, for several years, heard nothing of him. And when

she did see him, when they did live together, what a life was hers! She

endured insult, even blows; she felt caresses bestowed only in pity;

she was a misplaced object in that community of unmarried warriors, upon

which wandering Zaporozhe cast a colouring of its own. Her pleasureless

youth flitted by; her ripe cheeks and bosom withered away unkissed and

became covered with premature wrinkles. Love, feeling, everything that

is tender and passionate in a woman, was converted in her into maternal

love. She hovered around her children with anxiety, passion, tears, like

the gull of the steppes. They were taking her sons, her darling sons,

from her--taking them from her, so that she should never see them again!

Who knew? Perhaps a Tatar would cut off their heads in the very first

skirmish, and she would never know where their deserted bodies might

lie, torn by birds of prey; and yet for each single drop of their blood

she would have given all hers. Sobbing, she gazed into their eyes, and

thought, “Perhaps Bulba, when he wakes, will put off their departure for

a day or two; perhaps it occurred to him to go so soon because he had

been drinking.”

The moon from the summit of the heavens had long since lit up the whole

courtyard filled with sleepers, the thick clump of willows, and the tall

steppe-grass, which hid the palisade surrounding the court. She still

sat at her sons’ pillow, never removing her eyes from them for a moment,

nor thinking of sleep. Already the horses, divining the approach of

dawn, had ceased eating and lain down upon the grass; the topmost leaves

of the willows began to rustle softly, and little by little the

rippling rustle descended to their bases. She sat there until daylight,

unwearied, and wishing in her heart that the night might prolong itself

indefinitely. From the steppes came the ringing neigh of the horses, and

red streaks shone brightly in the sky. Bulba suddenly awoke, and sprang

to his feet. He remembered quite well what he had ordered the night

before. “Now, my men, you’ve slept enough! ‘tis time, ‘tis time! Water

the horses! And where is the old woman?” He generally called his wife

so. “Be quick, old woman, get us something to eat; the way is long.”

The poor old woman, deprived of her last hope, slipped sadly into the

hut.

Whilst she, with tears, prepared what was needed for breakfast, Bulba

gave his orders, went to the stable, and selected his best trappings for

his children with his own hand.

The scholars were suddenly transformed. Red morocco boots with silver

heels took the place of their dirty old ones; trousers wide as the Black

Sea, with countless folds and plaits, were kept up by golden girdles

from which hung long slender thongs, with tassles and other tinkling

things, for pipes. Their jackets of scarlet cloth were girt by flowered

sashes into which were thrust engraved Turkish pistols; their swords

clanked at their heels. Their faces, already a little sunburnt, seemed

to have grown handsomer and whiter; their slight black moustaches now

cast a more distinct shadow on this pallor and set off their healthy

youthful complexions. They looked very handsome in their black sheepskin

caps, with cloth-of-gold crowns.

When their poor mother saw them, she could not utter a word, and tears

stood in her eyes.

“Now, my lads, all is ready; no delay!” said Bulba at last. “But we must

first all sit down together, in accordance with Christian custom before

a journey.”

All sat down, not excepting the servants, who had been standing

respectfully at the door.

“Now, mother, bless your children,” said Bulba. “Pray God that they may

fight bravely, always defend their warlike honour, always defend the

faith of Christ; and, if not, that they may die, so that their breath

may not be longer in the world.”

“Come to your mother, children; a mother’s prayer protects on land and

sea.”

The mother, weak as mothers are, embraced them, drew out two small

holy pictures, and hung them, sobbing, around their necks. “May God’s

mother--keep you! Children, do not forget your mother--send some little

word of yourselves--” She could say no more.

“Now, children, let us go,” said Bulba.

At the door stood the horses, ready saddled. Bulba sprang upon his

“Devil,” which bounded wildly, on feeling on his back a load of over

thirty stone, for Taras was extremely stout and heavy.

When the mother saw that her sons were also mounted, she rushed towards

the younger, whose features expressed somewhat more gentleness than

those of his brother. She grasped his stirrup, clung to his saddle, and

with despair in her eyes, refused to loose her hold. Two stout Cossacks

seized her carefully, and bore her back into the hut. But before the

cavalcade had passed out of the courtyard, she rushed with the speed of

a wild goat, disproportionate to her years, to the gate, stopped a

horse with irresistible strength, and embraced one of her sons with mad,

unconscious violence. Then they led her away again.

The young Cossacks rode on sadly, repressing their tears out of fear of

their father, who, on his side, was somewhat moved, although he strove

not to show it. The morning was grey, the green sward bright, the birds

twittered rather discordantly. They glanced back as they rode. Their

paternal farm seemed to have sunk into the earth. All that was visible

above the surface were the two chimneys of their modest hut and the tops

of the trees up whose trunks they had been used to climb like squirrels.

Before them still stretched the field by which they could recall the

whole story of their lives, from the years when they rolled in its dewy

grass down to the years when they awaited in it the dark-browed Cossack

maiden, running timidly across it on quick young feet. There is the

pole above the well, with the waggon wheel fastened to its top, rising

solitary against the sky; already the level which they have traversed

appears a hill in the distance, and now all has disappeared. Farewell,

childhood, games, all, all, farewell!

Taras Bulba, and Other Tales · 第 1 / 14 章