REPLY TO MR. MORRILL.

MR. PRESIDENT, before this debate closes, it seems to me I shall be

justified in a brief reply to the most extraordinary, almost eccentric,

argument by my excellent friend, the Senator from Maine [Mr. MORRILL].

He argued against the constitutionality of the pending amendment,--you

all remember with how much ingenuity and earnestness. I shall not

follow him in the details of that speech. I shall deal with it somewhat

in the general, and part of the time I shall allow others to speak for

me.

But before I come upon that branch of the case, I feel that in justice

to colored fellow-citizens I ought to see that they have a hearing.

Senators whom they helped elect show no zeal for their rights. Sir,

they have a title to be heard. They are able; they can speak for

themselves; but they are not here to speak. Therefore they can be heard

only through their communications. Here is one from a member of the

Virginia House of Delegates. It came to my hands yesterday, and is

dated “Richmond, January 29, 1872.” I wish the Senate would hear what

this member of the Virginia House says on the pending amendment.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 19 (of 20) · 第 111 / 128 题