This great authority says again, quoting a decided case:--

“Innkeepers are liable to an action if they refuse to receive a

guest without just cause. The innkeeper is even indictable for

the refusal, if he has room in his house and the guest behaves

properly.”[191]

And Professor Parsons, in his work on Contracts, so familiar to lawyers

and students, says:--

“He cannot so refuse, unless his house is full and he is

actually unable to receive him. And if on false pretences he

refuses, he is liable to an action.”[192]

The importance of this rule in determining present duty will justify

another statement in the language of a popular Encyclopædia:--

“One of the incidents of an innkeeper is, that _he is bound

to open his house to all travellers, without distinction,

and has no option to refuse such refreshment, shelter, and

accommodation as he possesses_, provided the person who applies

is of the description of a traveller, and able and ready to pay

the customary hire, and is not drunk or disorderly or tainted

with infectious disease.”

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 19 (of 20) · 第 98 / 128 题