AN ENGLISH PRECEDENT.

The example of Spain is reinforced by an English precedent, where may

be seen in the light of analogy the true rule of conduct. By a statute

of the last century, all soldiers quartered at the place of an election

for members of Parliament were removed, at least one day before the

election, to the distance of two miles or more;[16] and though this

statute has been modified latterly, the principle is preserved. No

soldier within two miles of a place of election is allowed to go out of

the barracks or quarters in which he is stationed, unless to mount or

relieve guard or to vote.[17] This safeguard of elections is vindicated

by the great commentator, Sir William Blackstone, when he says, “It

is essential to the very being of Parliament that elections should be

_absolutely free_; therefore all undue influences upon the electors

are illegal and strongly prohibited.”[18] In accordance with this

principle, as early as 1794, a committee of the other House of Congress

reported against the seat of a Representative partly on the ground that

United States troops were quartered near the place of election and were

marched in a body several times round the court-house.[19] And now that

an election is to occur in Dominica, where National Independence is the

question, nothing is clearer than that it should be, in the language of

Blackstone, “absolutely free,” and to this end all naval force should

be withdrawn at least until the “election” is determined.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 19 (of 20) · 第 23 / 128 题