A witty subaltern once described the present war as a period of long

boredom punctuated by moments of intense fear. All men would emphasise

the boredom, and most men would admit the fear. The only soldiers I ever

met who affected to know nothing of the fear were Afridis, and the

Afridi is notoriously a ravisher of truth. But the predominant

feeling--in the winter months at any rate--was the boredom. There was a

time when some units, owing to the lack of reserves, were only relieved

once every three weeks, and time hung heavy on their hands. Under these

circumstances they began to take something more than a professional

interest in their neighbours opposite. The curiosity was reciprocated.

Items of news, more or less mendacious, were exchanged when the trenches

were near enough to permit of vocal intercourse. Curious conventions

grew up, and at certain hours of the day and, less commonly, of the

night, there was a kind of informal armistice. In one section the hour

of 8 to 9 A.M. was regarded as consecrated to "private business," and

certain places indicated by a flag were regarded as out of bounds by the

snipers on both sides. On many occasions working parties toiled with

pick and shovel within talking distance of one another, and, although it

was, of course, never safe to presume upon immunity, they usually

forbore to interfere with one another. The Bedfords and the South

Staffords worked in broad daylight with their bodies half exposed above

the trenches, raising the parapet as the water rose. About 200 yards

away the Germans were doing the same. Neither side interfered with the

navvy-work of the other, and for the simplest of all reasons: both were

engaged in fighting a common foe--the underground springs. When two

parties are both in danger of being drowned they haven't time to fight.

To speak of drowning is no hyperbole; the mud of Flanders in winter is

in some places like a quicksand, and men have been sucked under beyond

redemption. A common misery begat a mutual forbearance.

It was under such circumstances that the following exchange of

pleasantries took place. The men of a certain British regiment heard at

intervals a monologue going on in the trenches opposite, and every time

the speaker stopped his discourse shouts of guttural laughter arose,

accompanied by cries of "Bravo, Müller!" "Sehr komisch!" "Noch einmal,

Müller!" Our men listened intently, and an acquaintance with German, so

imperfect as to be almost negligible, could not long disguise from them

the fact that their Saxon neighbours possessed a funny man whose name

was Müller. Their interest in Müller, always audible but never visible,

grew almost painful. At last they could restrain it no longer. At a

given signal they began chanting, like the gallery in a London theatre,

except that their voices came from the pit:

We--want--Müller! We--want--Müller! We--want--Müller!

The refrain grew more and more insistent. At last a head appeared above

the German parapet. It rose gradually, as though the owner were being

hoisted by unseen hands. He rose, as the principal character in a Punch

and Judy show rises, with jerky articulations of his members from the

ventriloquial depths below. The body followed, until a three-quarter

posture was attained. The owner, with his hand upon his heart, bowed

gracefully three times and then disappeared. It was Müller!

It is some months since I was in the British trenches,[28] and I often

wonder how our men have accommodated themselves to the ever-increasing

multiplication of the apparatus of war. The fire trenches I visited were

about wide enough to allow two men to pass one another--and that was

all. Obviously the wider your trench the greater your exposure to the

effects of shell-fire, and if we go on introducing trench-mortars, and

gas-pumps, and gas-extinguishers, to say nothing of a great store of

bombs, as pleasing in variety and as startling in their effects as

Christmas crackers, our trenches will soon be as full of furniture as a

Welsh miner's parlour. But doubtless the sappers have arranged all that.

Some of these improvements are viewed by company officers without

enthusiasm. The trench-mortar, for example, is distinctly unpopular, for

it draws the enemy's fire, besides being an uncanny thing to handle,

although the handling is done not by the company but by a "battery" of

R.G.A. men, who come down and select a "pitch." I have seen a

trench-mortar in action--it is like a baby howitzer, and makes a

prodigious noise. Our own men deprecate it and the enemy resent it. It

is an invidious thing. The gas-extinguisher is less objectionable, and,

incidentally, less exacting in the matter of accommodation. It is a

large copper vessel resembling nothing so much as the fire-extinguishing

cylinders one sees in public buildings at home. About our gas-pumps I

know nothing except by hearsay. They are in charge of "corporals" in

the chemical corps of the sappers, and your corporal is, in nine cases

out of ten, a man whose position in the scientific world at home is one

of considerable distinction. He is usually a lecturer or

Assistant-Professor in Chemistry at one of our University Colleges who

has left his test-tubes and quantitative analysis for the more exciting

allurements of the trenches. I sometimes wonder what name the fertile

brain of the British soldier has found for him--probably "the squid." He

has three gases in his repertoire, each more deadly than the other. One

of them is comparatively innocuous--it disables without debilitating;

and its effect passes off in about twenty minutes. The truth is that we

do not take very kindly to the use of this kind of thing. Still, our men

know their business, and our gas, whichever variety it was, played a

very effective part in the capture of the Hohenzollern Redoubt.

For the greater part of the winter months the "Front" was, to all

appearances above ground, as deserted as the Sahara and almost as

silent. Everybody who had to be there was, for obvious reasons,

invisible, and the misguided wayfarer who found himself between the

lines was in a wilderness whose intimidating silence was occasionally

interrupted by the sound of projectiles coming he knew not whence and

going he knew not whither. The effect was inexpressibly depressing. But

a mile or two behind our lines all was animation, for here were

Battalion and Brigade Headquarters, all linked up by a network of field

telephones, which in turn communicated with Divisional Headquarters

farther back. Baskets of carrier-pigeons under the care of a pigeon

fancier, who figures in the Army List as a captain in the R.E., are kept

at these places for use in sudden emergency when the wires get destroyed

by shell-fire. The sappers must, I think, belong to the order of

Arachnidae; they appear to be able to spin telephone wires out of their

entrails at the shortest notice. Moreover, they possess an uncanny

adhesiveness, and a Signal Company man will leg up a tree with a coil of

wire on his arm and hang glutinously, suspended by his finger-tips,

while he enjoys the view. These acrobatic performances are sometimes

exchanged for equestrian feats. He has been known to lay cable for two

miles across country at a gallop with the cable-drum paying out lengths

of wire. The sapper is the "handy man" of the Army.

The location of these Headquarters on our side of the line is a constant

object of solicitude to the enemy on the other. Very few officers even

on our side know where they all are. I had confided to me, for the

purpose of my official duties, a complete list of such Headquarters,

and the first thing I did, in pursuance of my instructions, was to

commit it to memory and then burn it. To find out the enemy's H.Q.--with

a view to making them as unhealthy as possible--is almost entirely the

work of aeroplane reconnaissance. To discover the number and composition

of the units whose H.Q. they are is the work of our "Intelligence." Of

our Intelligence work the less said the better--by which I intend no

aspersion but quite the contrary. The work is extraordinarily effective,

but half its effectiveness lies in its secrecy. It is all done by an

elaborate process of induction. I should hesitate to say that the "I"

officers discover the location of the H.Q. of captured Germans by a

geological analysis of the mud on the soles of their boots, in the

classical manner of Sherlock Holmes; but I should be equally indisposed

to deny it. There is nothing too trivial or insignificant to engage the

detective faculties of an "I" man. He has to allow a wide margin for the

probability of error in his calculations; shoulder-straps, for example,

are no longer conclusive data as to the composition of the enemy's

units, for the intelligent Hun has taken of late to forging

shoulder-straps with the same facility as he forges diplomatic

documents. Oral examination of prisoners has to be used with caution.

But there are other resources of which I shall say nothing. It is not

too much to say, however, that we have now a pretty complete

comprehension of the strength, composition, and location of most German

brigades on the Western front. Possibly the Germans have of ours. One

thing is certain. Any one who has seen the way in which an Intelligence

staff builds up its data will not be inclined to criticise our military

authorities for what may seem to an untutored mind a mere affectation of

mystery about small things. In war it is never safe to say _De minimis

non curatur_.

If "I" stands for the Criminal Investigation Department (and the study

of the Hun may be legitimately regarded as a department of criminology)

the Provost-Marshal and his staff may be described as a kind of

Metropolitan Police. The P.M. and his A.P.M.'s are the _Censores Morum_

of the occupied towns, just as the Camp Commandants are the _Aediles_.

It is the duty of an A.P.M. to round up stragglers, visit _estaminets_,

keep a cold eye on brothels, look after prisoners, execute the sentences

of courts-martial, and control street traffic. Which means that he is

more feared than loved. He is never obtrusive but he is always there. I

remarked once when lunching with a certain A.P.M. that although I had

already been three weeks at G.H.Q., and had driven through his

particular district daily, I had never once been stopped or questioned

by his police. "No," he said quietly, "they reported you the first day

two minutes after you arrived in your car, and asked for instructions;

we telephoned to G.H.Q. and found you were attached to the A.G.'s staff,

and they received orders accordingly. Otherwise you might have had quite

a lively time at X----," which was the next stage of my journey. G.H.Q.

itself is patrolled by a number of Scotland Yard men, remarkable for

their self-effacing habits and their modest preference for dark

doorways. Indeed it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a

needle than to get into that town--or out of it. As for the "Society

ladies," of whom one hears so much, I never saw one of them. If they

were there they must have been remarkably disguised, and none of us knew

anything of them. A conversational lesson in French or English may be

had gratuitously by any Englishman or Frenchman who tries to get into

G.H.Q.; as he approaches the town he will find a French sentry on the

left and an English sentry on the right, the one with a bayonet like a

needle, the other with a bayonet like a table-knife, and each of them

takes an immense personal interest in you and is most anxious to assist

you in perfecting your idiom. They are students of phonetics, too, in

their way, and study your gutturals with almost pedantic affection for

traces of Teutonisms. If the sentry thinks you are not getting on with

your education he takes you aside like Joab, and smites you under the

fifth rib--at least I suppose he does. If he is satisfied he brings his

right hand smartly across the butt of his rifle, and by that masonic

sign you know that you will do. But it is a mistake to continue the

conversation.

Still, holders of authorised passes sometimes lose them, and

unauthorised persons sometimes get hold of them and "convert" them to

their own unlawful uses. The career of these adventurers is usually as

brief as it is inglorious; when apprehended they are handed over to the

French authorities, and the place that knew them knows them no more.

They are shot into some mysterious _oubliette_. The rest is silence, or,

as a mediaeval chronicler would say, "Let him have a priest."

We have taught the inhabitants of Flanders and Artois three things: one,

to sing "Tipperary"; two, to control their street traffic; and three, to

flush their drains. The spectacle of the military police on point duty

agitatedly waving little flags like a semaphore in the middle of narrow

and congested street corners was at first a source of great

entertainment to the inhabitants, who appeared to think it was a kind of

performance thoughtfully provided by the Staff for their delectation.

Their applause was quite disconcerting. It all so affected the mind of

one good lady at H---- that she used to rush out into the street every

time she saw a motor-lorry coming and make uncouth gestures with her

arms and legs, to the no small embarrassment of the supply columns, the

confusion of the military police, and the unconcealed delight of our

soldiers, who regard the latter as their natural enemy. Gentle

remonstrances against such gratuitous assistance were of no avail, and

eventually she was handed over to the French authorities for an inquiry

into the state of her mind.

Drains are looked after by the Camp Commandant, assisted by the sanitary

section of the R.A.M.C. It is an unlovely duty. I am not sure that the

men in the trenches are not better off in this respect than the

unfortunate members of the Staff who are supposed to live on the fat of

the land in billets. In the trenches there are easy methods of disposing

of "waste products"; along some portion of the French front, where the

lines are very close together, the favourite method, so I have been

told, is to hurl the buckets at the enemy, accompanied by extremely

uncomplimentary remarks. In the towns where we are billeted public

hygiene is a neglected study, and the unfortunate Camp Commandants have

to get sewage pumps from England and vast quantities of chloride of

lime. Fatigue parties do the rest.

The C.C. has, however, many other things to do.

Finding my office unprovided with a fire shovel, I wrote a "chit" to the

C.C.:

Mr. M. presents his compliments to the Camp Commandant, and would

be greatly obliged if he would kindly direct that a shovel be

issued to his office.

A laconic message came back by my servant:

No. 105671A. The Camp Commandant presents his compliments to

--------- Mr. M., and begs to inform him that he is not an

2 ironmonger. The correct procedure is for Mr. M.

to direct his servant to purchase a shovel and to send in the

account to the C.C., by whom it will be discharged.

The Commandant, quite needlessly, apologised to me afterwards for his

reply, explaining mournfully that the whole staff appeared to be under

the impression that he was a kind of Harrods' Stores. He could supply

desks and tables--the sappers are amazingly efficient at turning them

out at the shortest notice--and he could produce stationery, but he drew

the line at ironmongery. But his principal task is to let lodgings.

The Q.M.G. and his satellites, who are the universal providers of the

Army, have already been described. Their waggons are known as

"transports of delight," and they can supply you with anything from a

field-dressing to a toothbrush, and from an overcoat to a cake of soap.

And as the Q.M.G. is concerned with goods, the A.G. is preoccupied with

men. He makes up drafts as a railway transport officer makes up trains,

and can tell you the location of every unit from a brigade to a

battalion. Also, he and his deputy assistants make up casualty lists. It

is expeditiously done; each night's casualty list contains the names of

all casualties among officers up till noon of the day on which it is

made out. (The lists of the men, which are, of course, a much bigger

affair, are made up at the Base.) The task is no light one--the

transposition of an initial or the attribution of a casualty to a wrong

battalion may mean gratuitous sorrow and anxiety in some distant home in

England. And there is the mournful problem of the "missing," the

agonised letters from those who do not know whether those they love are

alive or dead.

It is only right to say that everything that can possibly be done is

done to trace such cases. More than that, the graves of fallen officers

and men are carefully located and registered by a Graves Registry

Department, with an officer of field rank in charge of it. Those graves

lie everywhere; I have seen them in the flower-bed of a château used as

the H.Q. of an A.D.M.S.; they are to be found by the roadside, in the

curtilage of farms, and on the outskirts of villages. The whole of the

Front is one vast cemetery--a "God's Acre" hallowed by prayers if

unconsecrated by the rites of the Church. The French Government has

shown a noble solicitude for the feelings of the bereaved, and a Bill

has been submitted to the Chamber of Deputies for the expropriation of

every grave with a view to its preservation.

The Deputy Judge-Advocate-General and his representatives with the

Armies are legal advisers to the Staff in the proceedings of

courts-martial. The Judge-Advocate attends every trial and coaches the

Court in everything, from the etiquette of taking off your cap when you

are taking the oath to the duty of rejecting "hearsay." He never

prosecutes--that is always the task of some officer specially assigned

for the purpose--but he may "sum up." Officers are not usually familiar

with the mysteries of the Red Book,[29] however much they may know of

the King's Regulations; and a Court requires careful watching. One

Judge-Advocate whom I knew, who was as zealous as he was conscientious,

instituted a series of Extension lectures for officers on the subject of

Military Law, and used to discourse calmly on the admissibility and

inadmissibility of evidence in the most "unhealthy" places. Speaking

with some knowledge of such matters, I should say that court-martial

proceedings are studiously fair to the accused, and, all things

considered, their sentences do not err on the side of severity. Even the

enemy is given the benefit of the doubt. There was a curious instance of

this. A wounded Highlander, finding himself, on arrival at one of the

hospitals, cheek by jowl with a Prussian, leapt from his bed and "went

for" the latter, declaring his intention to "do him in," as he had, he

alleged, seen him killing a wounded British soldier in the field. There

was a huge commotion, the two were separated, and the Judge-Advocate was

fetched to take the soldier's evidence. The evidence of identification

was, however, not absolutely conclusive--one Prussian guardsman is

strangely like another. The Prussian therefore got the benefit of the

doubt.

The prisoner gets all the assistance he may require from a "prisoner's

friend" if he asks for one, and the prosecutor never presses a

charge--he merely unfolds it. Moreover, officers are pretty good judges

of character, and if the accused meets the charge fairly and squarely,

justice will be tempered with mercy. I remember the case of a young

subaltern at the Base who was charged with drunkenness. His defence was

as straightforward as it was brief:

I had just been ordered up to the Front. So I stood my friends a

dinner; I had a bottle of Burgundy, two liqueurs, and a brandy and

soda, and--I am just nineteen.

This ingenuous plea in confession and avoidance pleased the Court. He

got off with a reprimand.

The _liaison_ officers deserve a chapter to themselves. Their name alone

is so endearing. Their mission is not, as might be supposed, to promote

_mariages de convenance_ between English Staff officers and French

ladies, but to transmit billets-doux between the two Armies and,

generally, to promote the amenities of military intercourse. As a rule

they are charming fellows, chosen with a very proper eye to their

personal qualities as well as their proficiency in the English language.

Among them I met a Count belonging to one of the oldest families in

France, an Oriental scholar of European reputation, and a Professor of

English literature. The younger ones studied our peculiarities with the

most ingratiating zeal, and one of them, in particular, played and sang

"Tipperary" with masterly technique at an uproarious tea-party in a

_pâtisserie_ at Bethune. Also they smoothed over little

misunderstandings about _délits de chasse_, gently forbore to smile at

our French, and assisted in the issue of the _laisser-passer_. Doubtless

they performed many much more weighty and mysterious duties, but I only

speak of what I know. To me they were more than kind; they gave me

introductions to their families when I went on official visits to Paris

and to the French lines; zealously assisted me to hunt down evidence,

and sometimes accompanied me on my tour of investigation. Among the many

agreeable memories I cherish of the _camaraderie_ at G.H.Q. the

recollection of their constant kindness and courtesy is not the least.

One word before I leave the subject of the Staff. There has been of late

a good deal of pestilential gossip by luxurious gentlemen at home about

the Staff and its work. It is, they say, very bad--mostly beer and

skittles. I have already referred to these charges elsewhere; here I

will only add one word. A Staff is known by its chief. He it is who sets

the pace. During the time I was attached to it, the G.H.Q. Staff had two

chiefs in succession. The first was a brilliant soldier of high

intellectual gifts, now chief of the Imperial Staff at home, who,

although embarrassed by indifferent health, worked at great pressure

night and day. His successor at G.H.Q. is a man of stupendous energy,

commanding ability, and great force of character, who has risen from the

ranks to the great position he now holds. By their chiefs ye shall know

them. Under such as these there was and is no room for the "slacker" at

G.H.Q. He got short shrift. There were very few of that undesirable

species at G.H.Q., and as soon as they were discovered they were sent

home. I sometimes wonder whether one could not trace, if it were worth

while (which it isn't), these ignoble slanders to their origin in the

querulous lamentations of these deported gentlemen, whence they have

percolated into Parliamentary channels. But it really isn't worth while.

The public has, I believe, taken the thing at its true valuation. In

plain speech it is "all rot."

NOTE.--The last paragraph was written before the recent changes at

G.H.Q. and at the War Office, but the reader will not need any

assistance in the identification of the two distinguished Chiefs of

Staff here referred to.--J.H.M.

FOOTNOTES:

[28] The writer's experience of the trenches is described in some detail

in Chapter VIII.

[29] _The Manual of Military Law_.

XXX

HOME AGAIN

Sykes had finished packing my kit and had succeeded with some difficulty

in re-establishing the truth of the axiom that a whole is greater than

its parts. When I contemplated my valise and its original constituents,

it seemed to me that the parts would prove greater than the whole, and I

had in despair abandoned the problem to Sykes. He succeeded, as he

always did. One of the first things that an officer's servant learns is

that, as regards the regulation Field Service allowance of luggage,

nothing succeeds like excess.

Sykes had not only stowed away my original impedimenta but had also

managed to find room for various articles of _vertu_ which had enriched

my private collection, to wit:

(1) One Bavarian bayonet of Solingen steel.

(2) Two German time-fuses with fetishistic-looking brass heads.

(3) A clip of German cartridges with the bullets villainously

reversed.

(4) A copper loving-cup--_i.e._, an empty shell-case presented to

me with a florid speech by Major S---- on behalf of the ----th

Battery of the R.F.A.

(5) An autograph copy of _The Green Curve_ bestowed on me by my

friend "Ole Luk-Oie" (to whom long life and princely royalties).

(6) The sodden Field Note-book of a dead Hun given me by Major

C---- of the Intelligence, with a graceful note expressing the hope

that, as a man of letters, I would accept this gift of

_belles-lettres_.

(7) A duplicate of a certain priceless "chit" about the uses of

Ammonal[30] (original very scarce, and believed to be in the

muniment-room of the C.-in-C., who is said to contemplate putting

it up to auction at Sotheby's for the benefit of the Red Cross

Fund).

(8) An autograph copy of a learned Essay on English political

philosophers presented to me by the author, one of the _liaison_

officers, who in the prehistoric times of peace was a University

professor at Avignon.

(9) A cigarette-case (Army pattern), of the finest Britannia metal,

bestowed on me with much ceremony by a Field Ambulance at Bethune,

and prized beyond rubies and fine gold.

(10) A pair of socks knitted by Jeanne.[31]

To these Madame[32] had added her visiting-card--it was nearly as big

as the illuminated address presented to me by the electors of a Scottish

constituency which I once wooed and never won--wherewith she reminded me

that my billet at No. 131 rue Robert le Frisson would always be waiting

for me, the night-light burning as for a prodigal son, and steam up in

the hot-water bottle.

I had said my farewells the night before to the senior officers on the

Staff, in particular that distinguished soldier and gallant gentleman

the A.G., to whose staff I had been attached (in more senses than one),

and who had treated me with a kindness and hospitality I can never

forget. The senior officers had done me the honour of expressing a hope

that I should soon return; their juniors had expressed the same

sentiments less formally and more vociferously by an uproarious song at

their mess overnight.

Leaves from a Field Note-Book · 第 13 / 14 段