CHAPTER III

WATER LANE

I HAD now reached the end of my fourth year at college, and it was time

for me to leave. I was sent down into the eastern counties to a

congregation which had lost its minister, and was there “on probation”

for a month. I was naturally a good speaker, and as the “cause” had got

very low, the attendance at the chapel increased during the month I was

there. The deacons thought they had a prospect of returning prosperity,

and in the end I received a nearly unanimous invitation, which, after

some hesitation, I accepted. One of the deacons, a Mr. Snale, was

against me; he thought I was not “quite sound”; but he was overruled. We

shall hear more of him presently. After a short holiday I entered on my

new duties.

The town was one of those which are not uncommon in that part of the

world. It had a population of about seven or eight thousand, and was a

sort of condensation of the agricultural country round. There was one

main street, consisting principally of very decent, respectable shops.

Generally speaking, there were two shops of each trade; one which was

patronised by the Church and Tories, and another by the Dissenters and

Whigs. The inhabitants were divided into two distinct camps—of the

Church and Tory camp the other camp knew nothing. On the other hand, the

knowledge which each member of the Dissenting camp had of every other

member was most intimate.

The Dissenters were further split up into two or three different sects,

but the main sect was that of the Independents. They, in fact, dominated

every other. There was a small Baptist community, and the Wesleyans had

a new red-brick chapel in the outskirts; but for some reason or other the

Independents were really the Dissenters, and until the “cause” had

dwindled, as before observed, all the Dissenters of any note were to be

found on Sunday in their meeting-house in Water Lane.

My predecessor had died in harness at the age of seventy-five. I never

knew him, but from all I could hear he must have been a man of some

power. As he got older, however, he became feeble; and after a course of

three sermons on a Sunday for fifty years, what he had to say was so

entirely anticipated by his congregation, that although they all

maintained that the gospel, or, in other words, the doctrine of the fall,

the atonement, and so forth, should continually be presented, and their

minister also believed and acted implicitly upon the same theory, they

fell away—some to the Baptists, some to the neighbouring Independents

about two miles off, and some to the Church, while a few “went nowhere.”

When I came I found that the deacons still remained true. They were the

skeleton; but the flesh was so woefully emaciated, that on my first

Sunday there were not above fifty persons in a building which would hold

seven hundred. These deacons were four in number. One was an old farmer

who lived in a village three miles distant. Ever since he was a boy he

had driven over to Water Lane on Sunday. He and his family brought their

dinner with them, and ate it in the vestry; but they never stopped till

the evening, because of the difficulty of getting home on dark nights,

and because they all went to bed in winter-time at eight o’clock.

Morning and afternoon Mr. Catfield—for that was his name—gave out the

hymns. He was a plain, honest man, very kind, very ignorant, never

reading any book except the Bible, and barely a newspaper save _Bell’s

Weekly Messenger_. Even about the Bible he knew little or nothing beyond

a few favourite chapters; and I am bound to say that, so far as my

experience goes, the character so frequently drawn in romances of intense

Bible students in Dissenting congregations is very rare. At the same

time Mr. Catfield believed himself to be very orthodox, and in his way

was very pious. I could never call him a hypocrite. He was as sincere

as he could be, and yet no religious expression of his was ever so

sincere as the most ordinary expression of the most trifling pleasure or

pain.

The second deacon, Mr. Weeley, was, as he described himself, a builder

and undertaker; more properly an undertaker and carpenter. He was a

thin, tall man, with a tenor voice, and he set the tunes. He was

entirely without energy of any kind, and always seemed oppressed by a

world which was too much for him. He had depended a good deal for custom

upon his chapel connection; and when the attendance at the chapel fell

off, his trade fell off likewise, so that he had to compound with his

creditors. He was a mere shadow, a man of whom nothing could be said

either good or evil.

The third deacon was Mr. Snale, the draper. When I first knew him he was

about thirty-five. He was slim, small, and small-faced, closely shaven,

excepting a pair of little curly whiskers, and he was extremely neat. He

had a little voice too, rather squeaky, and the marked peculiarity that

he hardly ever said anything, no matter how disagreeable it might be,

without stretching as if in a smile his thin little lips. He kept the

principal draper’s shop in the town, and even Church people spent their

money with him, because he was so very genteel compared with the other

draper, who was a great red man, and hung things outside his window. Mr.

Snale was married, had children, and was strictly proper. But his way of

talking to women and about them was more odious than the way of a

debauchee. He invariably called them “the ladies,” or more exactly, “the

leedies”; and he hardly ever spoke to a “leedy” without a smirk and some

faint attempt at a joke.

One of the customs of the chapel was what were called Dorcas meetings.

Once a month the wives and daughters drank tea with each other; the

evening being ostensibly devoted to making clothes for the poor. The

husband of the lady who gave the entertainment for the month had to wait

upon the company, and the minister was expected to read to them while

they worked.

It was my lot to be Mr. Snale’s guest two or three times when Mrs. Snale

was the Dorcas hostess. We met in the drawing-room, which was over the

shop, and looked out into the town market-place. There was a round table

in the middle of the room, at which Mrs. Snale sat and made the tea.

Abundance of hot buttered toast and muffins were provided, which Mr.

Snale and a maid handed round to the party.

Four pictures decorated the walls. One hung over the mantelpiece. It

was a portrait in oils of Mr. Snale, and opposite to it, on the other

side, was a portrait of Mrs. Snale. Both were daubs, but curiously

faithful in depicting what was most offensive in the character of both

the originals, Mr. Snale’s simper being preserved; together with the

peculiarly hard, heavy sensuality of the eye in Mrs. Snale, who was large

and full-faced, correct like Mr. Snale, a member of the church, a woman

whom I never saw moved to any generosity, and cruel not with the ferocity

of the tiger, but with the dull insensibility of a cartwheel, which will

roll over a man’s neck as easily as over a flint. The third picture

represented the descent of the Holy Ghost; a number of persons sitting in

a chamber, and each one with the flame of a candle on his head. The

fourth represented the last day. The Son of God was in a chair

surrounded by clouds, and beside Him was a flying figure blowing a long

mail-coach horn. The dead were coming up out of their graves; some were

half out of the earth, others three-parts out—the whole of the bottom

part of the picture being filled with bodies emerging from the ground, a

few looking happy, but most of them very wretched; all of them being

naked.

The first time I went to Mrs. Snale’s Dorcas gathering Mr. Snale was

reader, on the ground that I was a novice; and I was very glad to resign

the task to him. As the business in hand was week-day and secular, it

was not considered necessary that the selected subjects should be

religious; but as it was distinctly connected with the chapel, it was

also considered that they should have a religious flavour. Consequently

the Bible was excluded, and so were books on topics altogether worldly.

Dorcas meetings were generally, therefore, shut up to the denominational

journal and to magazines. Towards the end of the evening Mr. Snale read

the births, deaths, and marriages in this journal. It would not have

been thought right to read them from any other newspaper, but it was

agreed, with a fineness of tact which was very remarkable, that it was

quite right to read them in one which was “serious.” During the whole

time that the reading was going on conversation was not arrested, but was

conducted in a kind of half whisper; and this was another reason why I

exceedingly disliked to read, for I could never endure to speak if people

did not listen.

At half-past eight the work was put away, and Mrs. Snale went to the

piano and played a hymn tune, the minister having first of all selected

the hymn. Singing over, he offered a short prayer, and the company

separated. Supper was not served, as it was found to be too great an

expense. The husbands of the ladies generally came to escort them home,

but did not come upstairs. Some of the gentlemen waited below in the

dining-room, but most of them preferred the shop, for, although it was

shut, the gas was burning to enable the assistants to put away the goods

which had been got out during the day.

When it first became my turn to read I proposed the _Vicar of Wakefield_;

but although no objection was raised at the time, Mr. Snale took an

opportunity of telling me, after I had got through a chapter or two, that

he thought it would be better if it were discontinued. “Because, you

know, Mr. Rutherford,” he said, with his smirk, “the company is mixed;

there are young leedies present, and perhaps, Mr. Rutherford, a book with

a more requisite tone might be more suitable on such an occasion.” What

he meant I did not know, and how to find a book with a more requisite

tone I did not know.

However, the next time, in my folly, I tried a selection from George

Fox’s Journal. Mr. Snale objected to this too. It was “hardly of a

character adapted for social intercourse,” he thought; and furthermore,

“although Mr. Fox might be a very good man, and was a converted

character, yet he did not, you know, Mr. Rutherford, belong to us.” So I

was reduced to that class of literature which of all others I most

abominated, and which always seemed to me the most profane—religious and

sectarian gossip, religious novels designed to make religion attractive,

and other slip-slop of this kind. I could not endure it, and was

frequently unwell on Dorcas evenings.

The rest of the small congregation was of no particular note. As I have

said before, it had greatly fallen away, and all who remained clung to

the chapel rather by force of habit than from any other reason. The only

exception was an old maiden lady and her sister, who lived in a little

cottage about a mile out of the town. They were pious in the purest

sense of the word, suffering much from ill-health, but perfectly

resigned, and with a kind of tempered cheerfulness always apparent on

their faces, like the cheerfulness of a white sky with a sun veiled by

light and lofty clouds. They were the daughters of a carriage-builder,

who had left them a small annuity.

Their house was one of the sweetest which I ever entered. The moment I

found myself inside it, I became conscious of perfect repose. Everything

was at rest; books, pictures, furniture, all breathed the same peace.

Nothing in the house was new, but everything had been preserved with such

care that nothing looked old. Yet the owners were not what is called

old-maidish; that is to say, they were not superstitious worshippers of

order and neatness.

I remember Mrs. Snale’s children coming in one afternoon when I was

there. They were rough and ill-mannered, and left traces of dirty

footmarks all over the carpet, which the two ladies noticed at once. But

it made no difference to the treatment of the children, who had some cake

and currant wine given to them, and were sent away rejoicing. Directly

they had gone, the elder of my friends asked me if I would excuse her;

she would gather up the dirt before it was trodden about. So she brought

a dust-pan and brush (the little servant was out) and patiently swept the

floor. That was the way with them. Did any mischief befall them or

those whom they knew, without blaming anybody, they immediately and

noiselessly set about repairing it with that silent promptitude of nature

which rebels not against a wound, but the very next instant begins her

work of protection and recovery.

The Misses Arbour (for that was their name) mixed but little in the

society of the town. They explained to me that their health would not

permit it. They read books—a few—but they were not books about which I

knew very much, and they belonged altogether to an age preceding mine.

Of the names which had moved me, and of all the thoughts stirring in the

time, they had heard nothing. They greatly admired Cowper, a poet who

then did not much attract me.

The country near me was rather level, but towards the west it rose into

soft swelling hills, between which were pleasant lanes. At about ten

miles distant eastward was the sea. A small river ran across the High

Street under a stone bridge; for about two miles below us it was locked

up for the sake of the mills, but at the end of the two miles it became

tidal and flowed between deep and muddy banks through marshes to the

ocean. Almost all my walks were by the river-bank down to these marshes,

and as far on as possible till the open water was visible. Not that I

did not like inland scenery: nobody could like it more, but the sea was a

corrective to the littleness all round me. With the ships on it sailing

to the other end of the earth it seemed to connect me with the great

world outside the parochialism of the society in which I lived.

Such was the town of C-, and such the company amidst which I found

myself. After my probation it was arranged that I should begin my new

duties at once, and accordingly I took lodgings—two rooms over the shop

of a tailor who acted as chapel-keeper, pew-opener, and sexton. There

was a small endowment on the chapel of fifty pounds a year, and the rest

of my income was derived from the pew-rents, which at the time I took

charge did not exceed another seventy.

The first Sunday on which I preached after being accepted was a dull day

in November, but there was no dullness in me. The congregation had

increased a good deal during the past four weeks, and I was stimulated by

the prospect of the new life before me. It seemed to be a fit

opportunity to say something generally about Christianity and its special

peculiarities. I began by pointing out that each philosophy and religion

which had arisen in the world was the answer to a question earnestly

asked at the time; it was a remedy proposed to meet some extreme

pressure. Religions and philosophies were not created by idle people who

sat down and said, “Let us build up a system of beliefs upon the

universe; what shall we say about immortality, about sin?” and so on.

Unless there had been antecedent necessity there could have been no

religion; and no problem of life or death could be solved except under

the weight of that necessity. The stoical morality arose out of the

condition of Rome when the scholar and the pious man could do nothing but

simply strengthen his knees and back to bear an inevitable burden. He

was forced to find some counterpoise for the misery of poverty and

persecution, and he found it in the denial of their power to touch him.

So with Christianity.

Jesus was a poor solitary thinker, confronted by two enormous and

overpowering organisations—the Jewish hierarchy and the Roman State. He

taught the doctrine of the kingdom of heaven; He trained Himself to have

faith in the absolute monarchy of the soul, the absolute monarchy of His

own; He tells us that each man should learn to find peace in his own

thoughts, his own visions. It is a most difficult thing to do; most

difficult to believe that my highest happiness consists in my perception

of whatever is beautiful. If I by myself watch the sun rise, or the

stars come out in the evening, or feel the love of man or woman,—I ought

to say to myself, “There is nothing beyond this.” But people will not

rest there; they are not content, and they are for ever chasing a shadow

which flies before them, a something external which never brings what it

promises.

I said that Christianity was essentially the religion of the unknown and

of the lonely; of those who are not a success. It was the religion of

the man who goes through life thinking much, but who makes few friends

and sees nothing come of his thoughts. I said a good deal more upon the

same theme which I have forgotten.

After the service was over I went down into the vestry. Nobody came near

me but my landlord, the chapel-keeper, who said it was raining, and

immediately went away to put out the lights and shut up the building. I

had no umbrella, and there was nothing to be done but to walk out in the

wet. When I got home I found that my supper, consisting of bread and

cheese with a pint of beer, was on the table, but apparently it had been

thought unnecessary to light the fire again at that time of night. I was

overwrought, and paced about for hours in hysterics. All that I had been

preaching seemed the merest vanity when I was brought face to face with

the fact itself; and I reproached myself bitterly that my own creed would

not stand the stress of an hour’s actual trial.

Towards morning I got into bed, but not to sleep; and when the dull

daylight of Monday came, all support had vanished, and I seemed to be

sinking into a bottomless abyss. I became gradually worse week by week,

and my melancholy took a fixed form. I got a notion into my head that my

brain was failing, and this was my first acquaintance with that most

awful malady hypochondria. I did not know then what I know now, although

I only half believe it practically, that this fixity of form is a

frequent symptom of the disease, and that the general weakness manifests

itself in a determinate horror, which gradually fades with returning

health.

For months—many months—this dreadful conviction of coming idiocy or

insanity lay upon me like some poisonous reptile with its fangs driven

into my very marrow, so that I could not shake it off. It went with me

wherever I went, it got up with me in the morning, walked about with me

all day, and lay down with me at night. I managed, somehow or other, to

do my work, but I prayed incessantly for death; and to such a state was I

reduced that I could not even make the commonest appointment for a day

beforehand. The mere knowledge that something had to be done agitated me

and prevented my doing it.

In June next year my holiday came, and I went away home to my father’s

house. Father and mother were going, for the first time in their lives,

to spend a few days by the seaside together, and I went with them to

Ilfracombe. I had been there about a week, when on one memorable

morning, on the top of one of those Devonshire hills, I became aware of a

kind of flush in the brain and a momentary relief such as I had not known

since that November night. I seemed, far away on the horizon, to see

just a rim of olive light low down under the edge of the leaden cloud

that hung over my head, a prophecy of the restoration of the sun, or at

least a witness that somewhere it shone. It was not permanent, and

perhaps the gloom was never more profound, nor the agony more intense,

than it was for long after my Ilfracombe visit. But the light broadened,

and gradually the darkness was mitigated. I have never been thoroughly

restored. Often, with no warning, I am plunged in the Valley of the

Shadow, and no outlet seems possible; but I contrive to traverse it, or

to wait in calmness for access of strength.

When I was at my worst I went to see a doctor. He recommended me

stimulants. I had always been rather abstemious, and he thought I was

suffering from physical weakness. At first wine gave me relief, and such

marked relief that whenever I felt my misery insupportable I turned to

the bottle. At no time in my life was I ever the worse for liquor, but I

soon found the craving for it was getting the better of me. I resolved

never to touch it except at night, and kept my vow; but the consequence

was, that I looked forward to the night, and waited for it with such

eagerness that the day seemed to exist only for the sake of the evening,

when I might hope at least for rest. For the wine as wine I cared

nothing; anything that would have dulled my senses would have done just

as well.

But now a new terror developed itself. I began to be afraid that I was

becoming a slave to alcohol; that the passion for it would grow upon me,

and that I should disgrace myself, and die the most contemptible of all

deaths. To a certain extent my fears were just. The dose which was

necessary to procure temporary forgetfulness of my trouble had to be

increased, and might have increased dangerously.

But one day, feeling more than usual the tyranny of my master, I received

strength to make a sudden resolution to cast him off utterly. Whatever

be the consequence, I said, I will not be the victim of this shame. If I

am to go down to the grave, it shall be as a man, and I will bear what I

have to bear honestly and without resort to the base evasion of

stupefaction. So that night I went to bed having drunk nothing but

water. The struggle was not felt just then. It came later, when the

first enthusiasm of a new purpose had faded away, and I had to fall back

on mere force of will. I don’t think anybody but those who have gone

through such a crisis can comprehend what it is. I never understood the

maniacal craving which is begotten by ardent spirits, but I understood

enough to be convinced that the man who has once rescued himself from the

domination even of half a bottle, or three-parts of a bottle of claret

daily, may assure himself that there is nothing more in life to be done

which he need dread.

Two or three remarks begotten of experience in this matter deserve

record. One is, that the most powerful inducement to abstinence, in my

case, was the interference of wine with liberty, and above all things its

interference with what I really loved best, and the transference of

desire from what was most desirable to what was sensual and base. The

morning, instead of being spent in quiet contemplation and quiet

pleasures, was spent in degrading anticipations. What enabled me to

conquer, was not so much heroism as a susceptibility to nobler joys, and

the difficulty which a man must encounter who is not susceptible to them

must be enormous and almost insuperable. Pity, profound pity, is his

due, and especially if he happen to possess a nervous, emotional

organisation. If we want to make men water-drinkers, we must first of

all awaken in them a capacity for being tempted by delights which

water-drinking intensifies. The mere preaching of self-denial will do

little or no good.

Another observation is, that there is no danger in stopping at once, and

suddenly, the habit of drinking. The prisons and asylums furnish ample

evidence upon that point, but there will be many an hour of exhaustion in

which this danger will be simulated and wine will appear the proper

remedy. No man, or at least very few men, would ever feel any desire for

it soon after sleep. This shows the power of repose, and I would advise

anybody who may be in earnest in this matter to be specially on guard

during moments of physical fatigue, and to try the effect of eating and

rest. Do not persist in a blind, obstinate wrestle. Simply take food,

drink water, go to bed, and so conquer not by brute strength, but by

strategy.

Going back to hypochondria and its countless forms of agony, let it be

borne in mind that the first thing to be aimed at is patience—not to get

excited with fears, not to dread the evil which most probably will never

arrive, but to sit down quietly and _wait_. The simpler and less

stimulating the diet, the more likely it is that the sufferer will be

able to watch through the wakeful hours without delirium, and the less

likely is it that the general health will be impaired. Upon this point

of health too much stress cannot be laid. It is difficult for the victim

to believe that his digestion has anything to do with a disease which

seems so purely spiritual, but frequently the misery will break up and

yield, if it do not altogether disappear, by a little attention to

physiology and by a change of air. As time wears on, too, mere duration

will be a relief; for it familiarises with what at first was strange and

insupportable, it shows the groundlessness of fears, and it enables us to

say with each new paroxysm, that we have surmounted one like it before,

and probably a worse.

The Autobiography of Mark Rutherford, Edited by his friend Reuben Shapcott · 第 3 / 9 章