Howard BESSER Networking Multimedia Databases

What do we have to consider in building and distributing databases of

visual materials in a multi-user environment? This presentation examines

a variety of concerns that need to be addressed before a multimedia

database can be set up in a networked environment.

In the past it has not been feasible to implement databases of visual

materials in shared-user environments because of technological barriers.

Each of the two basic models for multi-user multimedia databases has

posed its own problem. The analog multimedia storage model (represented

by Project Athena's parallel analog and digital networks) has required an

incredibly complex (and expensive) infrastructure. The economies of

scale that make multi-user setups cheaper per user served do not operate

in an environment that requires a computer workstation, videodisc player,

and two display devices for each user.

The digital multimedia storage model has required vast amounts of storage

space (as much as one gigabyte per thirty still images). In the past the

cost of such a large amount of storage space made this model a

prohibitive choice as well. But plunging storage costs are finally

making this second alternative viable.

If storage no longer poses such an impediment, what do we need to

consider in building digitally stored multi-user databases of visual

materials? This presentation will examine the networking and

telecommunication constraints that must be overcome before such databases

can become commonplace and useful to a large number of people.

The key problem is the vast size of multimedia documents, and how this

affects not only storage but telecommunications transmission time.

Anything slower than T-1 speed is impractical for files of 1 megabyte or

larger (which is likely to be small for a multimedia document). For

instance, even on a 56 Kb line it would take three minutes to transfer a

1-megabyte file. And these figures assume ideal circumstances, and do

not take into consideration other users contending for network bandwidth,

disk access time, or the time needed for remote display. Current common

telephone transmission rates would be completely impractical; few users

would be willing to wait the hour necessary to transmit a single image at

2400 baud.

This necessitates compression, which itself raises a number of other

issues. In order to decrease file sizes significantly, we must employ

lossy compression algorithms. But how much quality can we afford to

lose? To date there has been only one significant study done of

image-quality needs for a particular user group, and this study did not

look at loss resulting from compression. Only after identifying

image-quality needs can we begin to address storage and network bandwidth

needs.

Experience with X-Windows-based applications (such as Imagequery, the

University of California at Berkeley image database) demonstrates the

utility of a client-server topology, but also points to the limitation of

current software for a distributed environment. For example,

applications like Imagequery can incorporate compression, but current X

implementations do not permit decompression at the end user's

workstation. Such decompression at the host computer alleviates storage

capacity problems while doing nothing to address problems of

telecommunications bandwidth.

We need to examine the effects on network through-put of moving

multimedia documents around on a network. We need to examine various

topologies that will help us avoid bottlenecks around servers and

gateways. Experience with applications such as these raise still broader

questions. How closely is the multimedia document tied to the software

for viewing it? Can it be accessed and viewed from other applications?

Experience with the MARC format (and more recently with the Z39.50

protocols) shows how useful it can be to store documents in a form in

which they can be accessed by a variety of application software.

Finally, from an intellectual-access standpoint, we need to address the

issue of providing access to these multimedia documents in

interdisciplinary environments. We need to examine terminology and

indexing strategies that will allow us to provide access to this material

in a cross-disciplinary way.

Ronald LARSEN Directions in High-Performance Networking for

Libraries

The pace at which computing technology has advanced over the past forty

years shows no sign of abating. Roughly speaking, each five-year period

has yielded an order-of-magnitude improvement in price and performance of

computing equipment. No fundamental hurdles are likely to prevent this

pace from continuing for at least the next decade. It is only in the

past five years, though, that computing has become ubiquitous in

libraries, affecting all staff and patrons, directly or indirectly.

During these same five years, communications rates on the Internet, the

principal academic computing network, have grown from 56 kbps to 1.5

Mbps, and the NSFNet backbone is now running 45 Mbps. Over the next five

years, communication rates on the backbone are expected to exceed 1 Gbps.

Growth in both the population of network users and the volume of network

traffic has continued to grow geometrically, at rates approaching 15

percent per month. This flood of capacity and use, likened by some to

"drinking from a firehose," creates immense opportunities and challenges

for libraries. Libraries must anticipate the future implications of this

technology, participate in its development, and deploy it to ensure

access to the world's information resources.

The infrastructure for the information age is being put in place.

Libraries face strategic decisions about their role in the development,

deployment, and use of this infrastructure. The emerging infrastructure

is much more than computers and communication lines. It is more than the

ability to compute at a remote site, send electronic mail to a peer

across the country, or move a file from one library to another. The next

five years will witness substantial development of the information

infrastructure of the network.

In order to provide appropriate leadership, library professionals must

have a fundamental understanding of and appreciation for computer

networking, from local area networks to the National Research and

Education Network (NREN). This presentation addresses these

fundamentals, and how they relate to libraries today and in the near

future.

Workshop on Electronic Texts: Proceedings, 9-10 June 1992 · 第 52 / 71 题