CONCLUSION

The Workshop was valuable because it brought together partisans from

various groups and provided an occasion to compare goals and methods.

The more committed partisans frequently communicate with others in their

groups, but less often across group boundaries. The Workshop was also

valuable to attendees--including those involved with American Memory--who

came less committed to particular approaches or concepts. These

attendees learned a great deal, and plan to select and employ elements of

imaging, text-coding, and networked distribution that suit their

respective projects and purposes.

Still, reality rears its ugly head: no breakthrough has been achieved.

On the imaging side, one confronts a proliferation of competing

data-interchange standards and a lack of consensus on the role of digital

facsimiles in preservation. In the realm of machine-readable texts, one

encounters a reasonably mature standard but methodological difficulties

and high costs. These latter problems, of course, represent a special

impediment to the desire, as it is sometimes expressed in the popular

press, "to put the [contents of the] Library of Congress on line." In

the words of one participant, there was "no solution to the economic

problems--the projects that are out there are surviving, but it is going

to be a lot of work to transform the information industry, and so far the

investment to do that is not forthcoming" (LESK, per litteras).

*** *** *** ****** *** *** ***

Workshop on Electronic Texts: Proceedings, 9-10 June 1992 · 第 21 / 71 题