CHAPTER I

[Illustration: ATHENÆUM PORTRAIT, BY GILBERT STUART]

_George Washington_

BY

WOODROW WILSON

PHD., LITT.D., LL.D.

COPIOUSLY ILLUSTRATED

FROM

OLD PRINTS, PAINTINGS

AND DRAWINGS BY

HOWARD PYLE

[Illustration]

HARPER & BROTHERS PUBLISHERS

NEW YORK AND LONDON

BOOKS BY

WOODROW WILSON

INTERNATIONAL IDEALS

GUARANTEES OF PEACE

IN OUR FIRST YEAR OF WAR

WHY WE ARE AT WAR

A HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

WHEN A MAN COMES TO HIMSELF

ON BEING HUMAN

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

HARPER & BROTHERS, NEW YORK

[ESTABLISHED 1817]

COPYRIGHT, 1896, BY HARPER & BROTHERS

COPYRIGHT, 1924, BY WOODROW WILSON

PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

M.A.

TO

E. A. W.

WITHOUT WHOSE SYMPATHY AND COUNSEL

LITERARY WORK WOULD LACK

INSPIRATION

CONTENTS

CHAP. PAGE

I. IN WASHINGTON’S DAY 3

II. A VIRGINIAN BREEDING 45

III. COLONEL WASHINGTON 69

IV. MOUNT VERNON DAYS 99

V. THE HEAT OF POLITICS 117

VI. PILOTING A REVOLUTION 153

VII. GENERAL WASHINGTON 179

VIII. THE STRESS OF VICTORY 213

IX. FIRST IN PEACE 233

X. THE FIRST PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 265

INDEX 315

ILLUSTRATIONS

ATHENÆUM PORTRAIT, BY GILBERT STUART _Frontispiece_

GEORGE WASHINGTON _Facing p._18

TIDE-WATER, VIRGINIA, 1738 (MAP) “ 22

WILLIAM BYRD “ 26

JAMES BLAIR “ 34

ALEXANDER SPOTSWOOD “ 38

FACSIMILE OF THE ENTRY OF WASHINGTON’S BIRTH _Page_ 41

THOMAS, SIXTH LORD FAIRFAX _Facing p._48

MOUNT VERNON AT THE PRESENT DAY “ 52

LAWRENCE WASHINGTON “ 58

FRENCH AND ENGLISH IN NORTH AMERICA, 1755 (MAP) “ 60

GENERAL EDWARD BRADDOCK “ 82

THE BURIAL OF BRADDOCK “ 90

WASHINGTON AND MARY PHILIPSE “ 92

LEAVING MOUNT VERNON FOR THE CONGRESS OF THE

COLONIES “ 100

“THE WHITE HOUSE,” ON THE PAMUNKEY “ 104

TAZEWELL HALL, THE HOME OF THE RANDOLPHS “ 120

WILLIAM AND MARY COLLEGE, FROM AN OLD PRINT “ 120

PEYTON RANDOLPH “ 132

GEORGE MASON “ 136

IN THE OLD RALEIGH TAVERN “ 146

WASHINGTON, FROM A PORTRAIT BY REMBRANDT PEALE “ 158

CARPENTER’S HALL, PHILADELPHIA “ 166

WASHINGTON’S HEADQUARTERS AT VALLEY FORGE “ 198

THE ESCAPE OF ARNOLD “ 208

THE BUST OF ECKSTEIN “ 218

FRAUNCE’S TAVERN, NEW YORK “ 226

WASHINGTON BRINGING HIS MOTHER INTO THE BALL-ROOM,

FREDERICKSBURG “ 240

THOMSON, THE CLERK OF CONGRESS, ANNOUNCING TO

WASHINGTON, AT MOUNT VERNON, HIS ELECTION TO

THE PRESIDENCY “ 266

THE FIRST PRESIDENTIAL MANSION, NEW YORK “ 272

WASHINGTON MANSION, PHILADELPHIA “ 272

WASHINGTON, AFTER A PAINTING BY SAVAGE “ 276

CONGRESS HALL, 1790-1800 “ 282

ELEANOR PARKE CUSTIS “ 286

WASHINGTON AND NELLY CUSTIS “ 300

DEATH OF WASHINGTON “ 304

HANOVER COURT-HOUSE “ 310

THE OLD TOMB, MOUNT VERNON “ 310

IN WASHINGTON’S DAY

GEORGE WASHINGTON

CHAPTER I

George Washington was bred a gentleman and a man of honor in the free

school of Virginian society, with the generation that first learned what

it meant to maintain English communities in America in safety and a

self-respecting independence. He was born in a season of quiet peace,

when the plot of colonial history was thickening noiselessly and almost

without observation. He came to his first manhood upon the first stir of

revolutionary events; caught in their movement, he served a rough

apprenticeship in arms at the thick of the French and Indian war; the

Revolution found him a leader and veteran in affairs at forty-four;

every turn of fortune confirmed him in his executive habit of foresight

and mastery; death spared him, stalwart and commanding, until, his

rising career rounded and complete, no man doubted him the first

character of his age. “Virginia gave us this imperial man,” and with him

a companion race of statesmen and masters in affairs. It was her natural

gift, the times and her character being what they were; and Washington’s

life showed the whole process of breeding by which she conceived so

great a generosity in manliness and public spirit.

The English colonies in America lay very tranquil in 1732, the year in

which Washington was born. It fell in a season betweentimes, when

affairs lingered, as if awaiting a change. The difficulties and

anxieties of first settlement were long ago past and done with in all

the principal colonies. They had been hardening to their “wilderness

work,” some of them, these hundred years and more. England could now

reckon quite six hundred thousand subjects upon the long Atlantic

seaboard of the great continent which had lain remote and undiscovered

through so many busy ages, until daring sailors hit upon it at last

amidst the stir of the adventurous fifteenth century; and there was no

longer any thought that her colonists would draw back or falter in what

they had undertaken. They had grown sedate even and self-poised, with

somewhat of the air of old communities, as they extended their

settlements upon the coasts and rivers and elaborated their means of

self-government amidst the still forests, and each had already a bearing

and character of its own. ’Twas easy to distinguish the New-Englander

from the man of the southern colonies; and the busy middle provinces

that stretched back from the great bay at New York and from the waters

of the spreading Delaware had also a breed of their own, like neither

the men of the south nor the men of the northeast. Each region had bred

for itself its characteristic communities, holding their own distinctive

standards, knowing their own special purposes, living their own lives

with a certain separateness and independence.

Virginia, the oldest of the colonies, was least to be distinguished by

any private character of her own from the rural communities of England

herself. Her population had come to her almost without selection

throughout every stage of quick change and troubled fortune that England

had seen during the fateful days since James Stuart became king; and

Englishmen in Virginia were in no way radically distinguishable from

Englishmen in England, except that they were provincials and

frontiersmen. They had their own tasks and ways of life, indeed, living,

as they did, within the old forests of a virgin continent, upon the

confines of the world. But their tastes and temperament, spite of change

and seclusion, they had in common with Englishmen at home. They gave

leave to their opinions, too, with a like downright confidence and

hardihood of belief, never doubting they knew how practical affairs

should go. They had even kept the English character as they had received

it, against the touch of time and social revolution, until Virginians

seemed like elder Englishmen. England changed, but Virginia did not.

There landed estates spread themselves with an ample acreage along the

margins of the streams that everywhere threaded the virgin woodland;

and the planter drew about him a body of dependants who knew no other

master; to whom came, in their seclusion, none of that quick air of

change that had so stirred in England throughout all her century of

revolution. Some were his slaves, bound to him in perpetual subjection.

Others were his tenants, and looked upon him as a sort of patron. In

Maryland, where similar broad estates lay upon every shore, the law

dubbed a great property here and there a “manor,” and suffered it to

boast its separate court baron and private jurisdiction. Virginian

gentlemen enjoyed independence and authority without need of formal

title.

There was but one centre of social life in Virginia: at Williamsburg,

the village capital, where the Governor had his “palace,” where stood

the colonial college, where there were taverns and the town houses of

sun-dry planters of the vicinage, and where there was much gay company

and not a little formal ceremonial in the season. For the rest, the Old

Dominion made shift to do without towns. There was no great mart to

which all the trade of the colony was drawn. Ships came and went upon

each broad river as upon a highway, taking and discharging freight at

the private wharves of the several plantations. For every planter was

his own merchant, shipping his tobacco to England, and importing thence

in return his clothes, his tools, his household fittings, his knowledge

of the London fashions and of the game of politics at home. His

mechanics he found among his own slaves and dependants. Their “quarters”

and the offices of his simple establishment showed almost like a village

of themselves where they stood in irregular groups about his own square,

broad-gabled house, with its airy hall and homelike living-rooms. He

might have good plate upon his sideboard and on his table, palatable old

wine in his cellar, and on the walls about him portraits of the stately

men and dames from whom he took his blood and breeding. But there was

little luxury in his life. Plain comfort and a homely abundance sufficed

him. He was a gentleman, owned all he saw around him, exercised

authority, and enjoyed consideration throughout the colony; but he was

no prince. He lived always in the style of a provincial and a gentleman

commoner, as his neighbors and friends did.

Slaves, dependants, and planters, however, did not by any means make up

the tale of Virginia’s population. She had been peopled out of the

common stock of Englishmen, and contained her own variety. Most of the

good land that lay upon the lower courses of the James, the York, the

Rappahannock, and the Potomac rivers, and upon the bay on either hand,

had been absorbed into the estates of the wealthier planters, who began

to conceive themselves a sort of aristocracy; but not a few plain men

owned their own smaller tracts within the broad stretches of country

that lay back from the rivers or above their navigable depth. Upon the

western front of the colony lived sturdy frontiersmen; and no man was so

poor that he might not hope by thrift to hold his own with the best in

the country. Few could own slaves in any number, for the negroes counted

less than a third in a reckoning of the whole population. There were

hired servants besides, and servants bound for a term of years by

indenture; even criminals who could be had of the colony for private

service; but most men must needs work their own plots of ground and

devise a domestic economy without servants. A wholesome democratic

spirit pervaded the colony, which made even the greater planters

hesitate to give themselves airs. A few families that had thriven best

and longest, and had built up great properties for themselves, did

indeed lay claim, as royal governors found to their great displeasure,

to a right to be heard before all others in the management of the

government. But they could of course show no title but that of pride and

long practice. ’Twas only their social weight in the parish vestries, in

the Council, and in the House of Burgesses that gave them ascendency.

It was the same in church as in state. Virginia prided herself upon

having maintained the Establishment without schism or sour dissent; but

she had maintained it in a way all her own, with a democratic

constitution and practice hardly to be found in the canons. Nominally

the Governor had the right of presentation to all livings; but the

vestries took care he should seldom exercise it, and, after they had had

their own way for a century, claimed he had lost it by prescription.

They chose and dismissed and ruled their ministers as they would. And

the chief planters were nowhere greater figures than in the vestries of

their own parishes, where so many neighborhood interests were passed

upon--the care of the poor, the survey of estates, the correction of

disorders, the tithe rates, and the maintenance of the church and

minister. Sometimes the church building was itself the gift of the chief

land-owner of the parish; and the planters were always the chief

rate-payers. Their leadership was natural and unchallenged. They enjoyed

in their own neighborhood a sort of feudal pre-eminence, and the men

about them easily returned in thought and estimation to that elder

order of English life in which the chief proprietor of the country-side

claimed as of course the homage of his neighbors. There were parishes,

not a few, indeed, in which there was no such great planter to command

consideration by a sort of social primacy. It was, after all, only here

and there, and in the older parts of the colony, that affairs awaited

the wish of privileged individuals. But it was the ascendency of the

greater planters which most struck the imagination, and which gave to

Virginia something of the same air and tone and turn of opinion that

existed in England, with its veritable aristocracy, its lordly country

gentlemen, its ancient distinctions of class and manners.

Those who took counsel in England concerning colonial affairs had

constant occasion to mark the sharp contrast between the easy-going

Virginians, who were no harder to govern than Englishmen everywhere, and

the men of the northeastern colonies, with their dry reserve and their

steadfast resolution not to be governed at all. These seemed unlike

Englishmen elsewhere; a whit stiffer, shrewder, more self-contained and

circumspect. They were, in fact, a peculiar people. Into New England had

come a selected class, picked out of the general mass of Englishmen at

home by test of creed. “God sifted the whole nation,” one of their own

preachers had told them, at election-time, in the far year 1668, “that

he might send choice grain out into this wilderness.” But the variety of

the old life in England had been lost in the sifting. The Puritan, for

all he was so strong and great a figure in his day, was but one man

among a score in the quick and various English life. His single standard

and manner of living, out of the many that strove for mastery in the

old seats where the race was bred, had been transferred to New England;

and he had had separate and undisputed ascendency there to build new

commonwealths as he would. The Puritan Commonwealth in England had been

the government of a minority. Cromwell had done his work of chastening

with a might and fervor which he found, not in the nation, but in

himself and in the stout men-at-arms and hardy reformers who stood with

him while he purified England and brought upon all her foes a day of

reckoning. The people had stood cowed and uneasy while he lived, and had

broken into wild excess of joy at their release when he died. But in New

England an entire community consented to the Puritan code and mastery

with a hearty acquiescence. It was for this liberty they had come over

sea.

And the thoughtful, strong-willed men who were their leaders had built,

as they wished, a polity that should last. Time wrought its deep changes

in New England, as elsewhere, but the stamp set upon these Puritan

settlements by the generation that founded them was not effaced. Trade

made its characteristic mark upon them. Their merchants had presently

their own fleets and markets. Their hardy people took more and more to

the sea, lived the rough life of the ocean ways with a relish, beat in

their small craft up and down the whole coast of the continent, drove

bargains everywhere, and everywhere added a touch to their reputation as

doughty sea-dogs and shrewd traders. The population that after a while

came to New England did not stay to be sifted before attempting the

voyage out of the Old World, and the quaint sedateness of the

settlements began to be broken by a novel variety. New men beset the

old order; a rough democracy began to make itself felt; and new

elements waxed bold amidst the new conditions that time had wrought. The

authority of the crown at last made a place of command for itself,

despite every stubborn protest and astute evasion. It became necessary

to be a trifle less observant of sect and creed, to cultivate, as far as

might be, a temper of tolerance and moderation. But it was a slow change

at best. The old order might be modified, but it could not so soon be

broken. New England, through all her jurisdictions, remained a body of

churches, as well as a body of towns, submissive to the doctrine and

discipline of her learned clergy, keeping the old traditions distinct,

indubitable, alike in her schools and her meeting-houses. Even in Rhode

Island, where there had from the first been such diversity of creed and

license of individual belief, there was little variety of type among the

people, for all they counted themselves so free to be what they would.

There was here a singular assortment, no doubt, of the units of the

stock, but it was of the Puritan stuff, none the less, through all its

variety.

New England, indeed, easily kept her character, for she lived apart. Her

people mustered a full hundred thousand strong before the seventeenth

century was out; her towns numbered many score, both upon the margins of

the sea and within the forests; but she still lay within a very near

frontier, pushed back only a short journey from the coast. Except where

the towns of Connecticut ran in broken line close to the westward strait

of Long Island Sound, a broad wilderness of untouched woodland, of

thicketed hills and valleys that no white man yet had seen, stretched

between them and Hudson’s river, where New York’s settlements lay upon

the edge of a vast domain, reaching all the way to the great lakes and

the western rivers. Not till 1725 did adventurous settlers dare go so

far as the Berkshire Hills. “Our country,” exclaimed Colonel Byrd, of

Virginia, who had seen its wild interior, “has now been inhabited more

than a hundred and thirty years, and still we hardly know anything of

the Appalachian Mountains, which are nowhere above two hundred and fifty

miles from the sea.” A full century after the coming of the Pilgrims,

New England, like Virginia, was still a frontier region, shut close

about on every hand by thick forests beset by prowling bands of savages.

She had as yet no intimate contact with the other colonies whose

fortunes she was to share. Her simple life, quickened by adventure, but

lacking the full pulse of old communities, kept, spite of slow change,

to a single standard of conduct, made her one community from end to end,

her people one people. She stood apart and compact, still soberly

cultivating, as of old, a life and character all her own. Colonel Byrd

noted how “New England improved much faster than Virginia,” and was fain

to think that “though these people may be ridiculed for some Pharisaical

particularities in their worship and behavior, yet they were very useful

subjects, as being frugal and industrious, giving no scandal or bad

example.” Public men in England, who had to face these “particularities

in behavior,” would hardly have agreed that the men of New England were

good subjects, though they must have admitted their excellent example in

thrift, and Virginia’s need to imitate it.

This contrast between the northern and southern set tlements was as old

as their establishment, for Virginia had from the first been resorted to

by those who had no other purpose than to better their fortunes, while

New England had been founded to be the home of a creed and discipline;

but it was not until the Commonwealth was set up in England that the

difference began to be marked, and to give promise of becoming

permanent. The English in Virginia, like the bulk of their countrymen at

home, had stood aghast at a king’s death upon the scaffold, and had

spoken very hotly, in their loyalty, of the men who had dared do the

impious deed of treason; but when the _Guinea_, frigate, brought the

Commonwealth’s commission into the river to demand their submission,

even Sir William Berkeley, the redoubtable Cavalier Governor, who had

meant stubbornly to keep his province for the second Charles, saw he

must yield; perceived there was too nice a balance of parties in the

colony to permit an execution of his plans of resistance; heard too many

plain men in his Council, and out of it, declare themselves very much of

a mind with the Puritans for the nonce in politics--very willing to set

up a democracy in Virginia which should call itself a part of the

Puritan state in England. But a great change had been wrought in

Virginia while the Commonwealth lasted. When the Commonwealth’s frigate

came in at the capes she counted scarcely fifteen thousand settlers upon

her plantations, but the next twenty years saw her transformed. By 1670

quite twenty-five thousand people were added to the reckoning; and of

the new-comers a great multitude had left England as much because they

hated the Puritans as because they desired Virginia. They were drawn out

of that great majority at home to whom Cromwell had not dared resort to

get a new parliament in the stead of the one he had “purged.” Many of

them were of the hottest blood of the Cavaliers.

It was in these years Virginia got her character and received her

leading gentry for the time to come--the years while the Commonwealth

stood and royalists despaired, and the years immediately following the

Restoration, when royalists took heart again and Englishmen turned with

a new ardor to colonization as the times changed. Among the rest in the

great migration came two brothers, John and Lawrence Washington, of a

stock whose loyalty was as old as the Conquest. They came of a Norman

family, the men of whose elder branch had for two hundred years helped

the stout Bishops of Durham keep the border against the Scots; and in

every branch of which men had sprung up to serve the king, the state,

and the church with steadfastness and honor: dashing soldiers ready for

the field at home or abroad, stout polemical priors, lawyers who knew

the learning of their day and made their way to high posts in

chancery, thrifty burghers, gallant courtiers, prosperous

merchants--public-spirited gentlemen all. It was Colonel Henry

Washington, cousin to the Virginian refugees, who had been with Rupert

when he stormed Bristol, and who, with a handful of men, had made good

an entrance into the town when all others were beaten back and baffled.

It was he who had held Worcester for his master even after he knew

Charles to be a prisoner in the hands of the parliamentary forces.

“Procure his Majesty’s commands for the disposal of this garrison,” was

all he would answer when Fairfax summoned him to surrender; “till then I

shall make good the trust reposed in me. The worst I know and fear not;

if I had, the profession of a soldier had not been begun.” But it was an

ill time to revive the traditions of the knights of Durham; loyalty only

brought ruin. The Reverend Lawrence Washington, uncle to the gallant

colonel who was the King’s Governor at Worcester, had been cast out of

his living at Purleigh in 1643 by order of Parliament, upon the false

charge that he was a public tippler, oft drunk, and loud to rail against

the Parliament and its armies; but really because, with all his race, he

was a royalist, and his living one of the best in Essex. It was his sons

who left off hoping to see things mend in England and betook themselves

to Virginia. His ruin had come upon him while they were yet lads. He had

been a brilliant university scholar, fellow and lector of Brasenose, and

rector of Oxford; but he could give his sons neither a university career

nor hope of fortune in the humble parish pitying friends had found for

him in an obscure village of Essex; and when he was dead they saw no

reason why they should stay longer in England, where Cromwell was

master.

John Washington, the oldest son of the unfortunate rector, reached

Virginia in 1656, having made his way to the colony as “second man” to

Edward Prescott, merchant and ship-owner, in whose company he had come;

and his brother Lawrence, after passing to and fro between England and

the colony several times upon errands of business, presently joined him

in permanent residence upon the “northern neck” of rich land that lay

between the Rappahannock and the Potomac rivers. It was a region where

every settlement as yet was new. A few families had fixed themselves

upon it when Maryland drove Captain Clayborne and his Virginian

partisans forth from Kent Island in the years 1637 and 1638; and they

had mustered numbers enough within a few years to send a representative

to the House of Burgesses at Jamestown. But it was not till 1648 that

the Assembly gave their lands a regular constitution as the County of

Northumberland; for it was to this region the Indians had been driven by

the encroachment of the settlements on the James and York, and for a

while the Assembly had covenanted with the red men to keep it free from

settlers. When once the ban was removed, however, in 1648, colonization

set in apace--from the older counties of Virginia, from Maryland across

the river and England over sea, from New England even, as if by a common

impulse. In 1651 the Assembly found it necessary to create the two

additional counties of Gloucester and Lancaster, and in 1653 still

another, the County of Westmoreland, for the region’s proper government,

so quickly did it fill in; for the tide out of England already began to

show its volume. The region was a natural seat of commerce, and

merchants out of the trading ports of England particularly affected it.

Rich land was abundant, and the Potomac ran strong and ample there, to

carry the commerce alike of Virginia and Maryland to the bay, upon whose

tributaries and inlets lay all the older settlements of both colonies.

Lawrence Washington, though he still described himself, upon occasion,

as “of Luton, County Bedford, merchant,” found his chief profit where he

made his home, with his brother John, in the new County of Westmoreland

in Virginia. About them lived young men and old, come, like themselves,

out of England, or drawn from the older settlements by the attractions

of the goodly region, looking out, as it did, on either hand to a broad

river and an easy trade. They felt it scarcely an expatriation to live

there, so constantly did ships come and go between their wharves and the

home ports at Bristol and London. It soon grew to be nothing singular to

see well-to-do men go every year to England upon some errand of profit

or pleasure.

It was with such a region and such stirring neighbors that the young

Washingtons identified themselves while they were yet youths in their

twenties; and there they prospered shrewdly with the rest. Prudent men

and men of character readily accumulated estates in the untouched glades

and forests of Westmoreland. The season of their coming, moreover, sadly

as things seemed to go in 1656, turned out propitious. The Restoration

opened a new era in the settlement of the country. Englishmen bestirred

themselves to take actual possession of all the great coast-line they

had so long claimed without occupying. “The Dutch had enjoyed New

Netherland during the distractions of the reign of Charles I. without

any other interruption” than the seizure of their post upon the

Connecticut by the New-Englanders, and the aggressions alike of Swedes

and English upon the Delaware; but the ministers of Charles II., though

“for some time perplexed in what light to view them, whether as subjects

or as aliens, determined at length that New Netherland ought in justice

to be resumed,” and the thing was presently accomplished in true

sovereign fashion by force of arms. To the ducal province of New York,

Penn presently added the thrifty Quaker colony which so promptly created

a busy town and mart of trade at Philadelphia, and which pushed its

rural settlements back so speedily into the fertile lands that lay

towards the west. Then, while the new colonizing impulse still ran

strong, New Jersey, too, was added, with her limits at one end upon the

Hudson and the great bay at New York, where she depended upon one rival

for a port of entry, and at the other upon the Delaware, where another

rival presided over the trade of her southern highway to the sea. To the

southward straggling settlements upon Albemarle Sound grew slowly into

the colony of North Carolina; and still other settlements, upon the

rivers that lay towards Florida, throve so bravely that Charleston

presently boasted itself a substantial town, and South Carolina had

risen to be a considerable colony, prosperous, well ordered, and showing

a quick life and individuality of her own.

A new migration had come out of England to the colonies, and Englishmen

looked with fresh confidence to see their countrymen build an empire in

America. And yet perhaps not an empire of pure English blood. New York

was for long scarcely the less a Dutch province, for all she had changed

owners, and saw Englishmen crowd in to control her trade. There were

Swedes still upon the Delaware; and Pennsylvania mustered among her

colonists, besides a strange mixture out of many nations--Germans,

French, Dutch, Finns, and English. Even in Virginia, which so steadily

kept its English character, there were to be found groups of French

Huguenots and Germans who had been given an ungrudging welcome; and

South Carolina, though strongly English too, had taken some of her best

blood out of France when Louis so generously gave the world fifty

thousand families of the finest breed of his kingdom by the revocation

of the Edict of Nantes (1685).

[Illustration: GEORGE WASHINGTON

(From a portrait painted in 1772 by C. V. Peale, now owned by General

George Washington Custis Lee, of Lexington, Virginia)]

The second quarter of the eighteenth century saw Scots-Irish enter

Virginia and the middle colonies in hosts that for a time numbered ten

thousand by the year. Pennsylvania alone, in the single year 1729, could

reckon five thousand of these sturdy people who had come to multiply and

strengthen her settlements.

It was to the middle colonies that most foreigners came, and their

coming gave to the towns and farms of that region a variety of tongues

and customs, of manners and trades and ways of life and worship, to be

found nowhere else. Boston, with all its trade and seafaring, had no

touch of that cosmopolitan character which New York had taken on quite

inevitably in the course of her varying fortunes, and which Philadelphia

had assumed by choice; and rural Virginia scarcely felt amidst her

scattered plantations the presence of the few families who lived by

standards that were not English. The common feature of the new time,

with its novel enterprises and its general immigration, was that the

colonies everywhere, whether young or old, felt a keen stimulation and a

new interest in affairs beyond their borders. A partial exchange of

population began, a noticeable intercolonial migration. Whole

congregations came out of New England to found towns in New Jersey, and

individuals out of every colony ventured more freely than before to

exchange one region for another, in order to coax health or fortune.

Population was thus not a little compacted, while the colonies were

drawn by insensible degrees to feel a certain community of interest and

cultivate a certain community of opinion.

An expanding life, widened fields of enterprise and adventure, quickened

hopes, and the fair prospects of a growing empire everywhere heartened

strong men in the colonies to steady endeavor when the new century

opened--the scheming, calculating eighteenth century, so unimpassioned

and conventional at first, so tempestuous at last. The men of the

colonies were not so new as their continent in the ways of civilization.

They were Old World men put upon fresh coasts and a forest frontier, to

make the most of them, create markets, build a new trade, become masters

of vast resources as yet untouched and incalculable; and they did their

work for the most part with unmatched spirit and energy, notwithstanding

they were checked and hampered by the statutes of the realm. The

Navigation Acts forbade the use of any but English ships in trade;

forbade all trade, besides, which did not run direct to and from the

ports of England. The colonies must not pass England by even in their

trade with one another. What they could not produce themselves they must

bring straight from England; what they had to dispose of they must send

straight to England. If they would exchange among themselves they must

make England by the way, so that English merchants should be their

middlemen and factors; or else, if they must needs carry direct from

port to port of their own coasts, they must pay such duties as they

would have paid in English ports had they actually gone the intermediate

voyage to England preferred by the statutes. ’Twas the “usage of other

nations” besides England “to keep their plantation trade to themselves”

in that day, as the Parliament itself said and no man could deny, and

’twas the purpose of such restrictions to maintain “a greater

correspondence and kindness between” England and her subjects in

America, “keeping them in a firmer dependence,” and at the same time

“rendering them yet more beneficial and advantageous” to English seamen,

merchants, wool-growers, and manufacturers; but it cost the colonists

pride and convenience and profit to obey.

Some, who felt the harness of such law too smartly, consoled themselves

by inventing means to escape it. The coast was long; was opened by many

an unused harbor, great and small; could not everywhere and always be

watched by king’s officers; was frequented by a tolerant people, who had

no very nice conscience about withholding taxes from a sovereign whose

messages and commands came quickly over sea only when the wind held fair

for weeks together; and cargoes could be got both out and in at small

expense of secrecy and no expense at all in duties. In short, smuggling

was easy. ’Twas a time of frequent wars, moreover, and privateering

commissions were to be had for the asking; so that French ships could be

brought in with their lading, condemned, and handsomely sold, without

the trouble of paying French prices or English port dues. Privateering,

too, was cousin-german to something still better; ’twas but a sort of

formal apprenticeship to piracy; and the quiet, unused harbors of the

coast showed many a place where the regular profession might be set up.

Veritable pirates took the sea, hunted down what commerce they

would--English no less than French and Dutch and Spanish--rendezvoused

in lonely sounds, inlets, and rivers where king’s officers never came,

and kept very respectable company when they came at last to dispose of

their plunder at New York or Charleston, being men very learned in

subterfuges and very quick-fingered at bribing. And then there was “the

Red Sea trade,” whose merchants sent fleets to Madagascar in the season

to exchange cargoes with rough men out of the Eastern seas, of whom

they courteously asked no questions. The larger ports were full of

sailors who waited to be engaged, not at regular wages, but “on the

grand account”; and it took many weary years of hangman’s labor to bring

enough pirates to the gallows to scotch the ugly business. In 1717 it

was reported in the colonies that there were quite fifteen hundred

pirates on the coast, full one-half of whom made their headquarters,

very brazenly, at New Providence in the Bahamas; and there were

merchants and mariners by the score who had pangs of keen regret to see

the breezy trade go down, as the century drew on a decade or two,

because of the steady vigilance and stern endeavor of Governors who had

been straitly commanded to suppress it.

The Navigation Acts bred an irritation in the colonies which grew with

their growth and strengthened with their consciousness of strength and

capacity. Not because such restrictions were uncommon, but because the

colonies were forward and exacting. There was, indeed, much to commend

the legislation they resented. It attracted the capital of English

merchants to the American trade, it went far towards securing English

supremacy on the seas, and it was strictly within the powers of

Parliament, as no man could deny. Parliament had an undoubted right to

regulate imperial interests, of this or any other kind, even though it

regulated them unreasonably. But colonies that reckoned their English

population by the hundred thousand and lived by trade and adventure

would not long have brooked such a policy of restraint had they had the

leisure to fret over it. They did not as yet have the leisure. The

French stood menacingly at their western gates, through which the great

[Illustration: TIDE-WATER VIRGINIA, 1738

(From Sir William Keith’s _History of the British Plantation in

America_)]

fur trade made its way; where the long rivers ran which threaded the

central valleys of the continent; where the Mississippi stretched itself

from north to south like a great body of dividing waters, flanking all

the coast and its settlements--where alone a true mastery of the

continent and its resources could be held. It would be time enough to

reckon with Parliament touching the carrying trade when they had made

good their title to what they were to trade withal.

The French had been a long time about their work, for they had done it

like subjects, at the bidding of an ambitious king, rather than like

free men striving as they pleased for themselves. But what they had done

they had done systematically and with a fixed policy that did not vary,

though ministers and even dynasties might come and go. The English had

crowded to the coasts of the continent as they pleased, and had mustered

their tens of thousands before the French reckoned more than a few

hundreds. But the French had hit upon the mighty river St. Lawrence,

whose waters came out of the great lakes and the heart of the continent;

their posts were garrisons; what men they had they put forward, at each

step of discovery, at some point of vantage upon lake or river, whence

they were not easily dislodged. Their shrewd fur-traders and dauntless

priests struck everywhere into the heart of the forests, leading forward

both trade and conquest, until at last, through the country of the

Illinois and out of far Lake Michigan, the streams had been found which

ran down into the west to the flooding Mississippi. Colonists were sent

to the mouth of the vast river, posts presently dotted its banks here

and there throughout its length, trade passed up and down its spreading

stream, and the English, their eyes at last caught by the stealthy

movement, looked in a short space to see French settlements “running all

along from our lakes by the back of Virginia and Carolina to the Bay of

Mexico.”

This was a business that touched the colonies to the quick. New York had

her western frontiers upon the nearer lakes. Thence, time out of mind,

had come the best furs to the markets at Albany, brought from tribe to

tribe out of the farthest regions of the northwest. New England, with

the French at her very doors, had to look constantly to her northern

borders to keep them against the unquiet savage tribes the French every

year stirred up against her. Virginia felt the French power among her

savage neighbors too, the moment her people ventured across the Blue

Ridge into the valley where many an ancient war-path ran; and beyond the

Alleghanies she perceived she must stand in the very presence almost of

the French themselves. English frontiersmen and traders, though they had

no advancing military posts behind them, were none the less quick to go

themselves deep into the shadowed wilderness, there to meet the French

face to face in their own haunts. The Carolinas were hardly settled

before their more adventurous spirits went straight into the far valley

of the Tennessee, and made trade for themselves there against the coming

of the French. Out of Virginia, too, and out of Pennsylvania, as well as

out of New York, traders pressed towards the West, and fixed their

lonely huts here and there along the wild banks of the Ohio. ’Twas

diamond cut diamond when they met their French rivals in the wigwams of

the Indian villages, and their canoes knew the waterways of the

wilderness as well as any man’s. ’Twas they who learned at first hand

what the French were doing. They were like scouts sent out to view the

ground to be fought for.

This hazardous meeting of rival nations at the heart of the continent

meant many a deep change in the fortunes of the colonies. European

politics straightway entered their counsels. Here was an end of their

separateness and independence of England. Charles and James and William

all showed that they meant to be veritable sovereigns, and had no

thought but that the colonists in America, like all other Englishmen,

should be their subjects; and here was their opportunity to be masters

upon an imperial scale and with an imperial excuse. In Europe, England

beheld France her most formidable foe; she must look to it that Louis

and his ministers take no advantage in America. The colonies, no less

than the Channel itself, were become the frontiers of an empire--and

there must be no trespass upon English soil by the French. The colonists

must be rallied to the common work, and, if used, they must be ruled and

consolidated.

As it turned out, the thing was quite impossible. The colonies had too

long been separate; their characters, their tempers, their interests,

were too diverse and distinct; they were unused to co-operate, and

unwilling; they were too slow to learn submission in anything. The plan

of grouping several of them under a single governor was attempted, but

they remained as separate under that arrangement as under any other.

Massachusetts would interest herself in nothing beyond her own

jurisdiction that did not immediately touch her safety or advantage; New

York cared little what the French did, if only the Iroquois could be

kept quiet and she could get her furs in the season, and find a market

for them abroad or among the French themselves; Virginia had no eye for

any movement upon the frontiers that did not menace her own fair valleys

within the mountains with hostile occupation; the Carolinas were as yet

too young to be serviceable, and New Jersey too remote from points of

danger. Nowhere could either men or supplies be had for use against the

French except by the vote of a colonial assembly. The law of the empire

might be what it would in the mouths of English judges at home; it did

not alter the practice of the colonies. The courts in England might say

with what emphasis they liked that Virginia, “being a conquered country,

their law is what the King pleases”; it was none the less necessary for

the King’s Governor to keep on terms with the people’s representatives.

“Our government is so happily constituted,” writes Colonel Byrd to his

friend in the Barbadoes, “that a governor must first outwit us before he

can oppress us. And if ever he squeeze money out of us, he must first

take care to deserve it.” Every colony held stoutly to a like practice,

with a like stubborn temper, which it was mere folly to ignore. One and

all they were even then “too proud to submit, too strong to be forced,

too enlightened not to see all the consequences which must arise” should

they tamely consent to be ruled by royal command or parliamentary

enactment. Their obedience must be had on their own terms, or else not

had at all. Governors saw this plainly enough, though the ministers at

home could not. Many a governor had his temper sadly soured by the

contentious obstinacy of the colonial assembly he was set to deal with.

One or two died of sheer exasperation. But the situation was not altered

a whit.

[Illustration: WILLIAM BYRD]

When there is friction there must, sooner or later, be adjustment, if

affairs are to go forward at all, and this contest between imperial

system and colonial independence at last brought some things that had

been vague to a very clear definition. ’Twas plain the colonies would

not of themselves combine to meet and oust the French. They would supply

neither men nor money, moreover. England must send her own armies to

America, fight France there as she would have fought her in Europe, and

pay the reckoning herself out of her own treasury, getting from the

colonies, the while, only such wayward and niggardly aid as they chose

to give. The colonies, meanwhile, might gather some of the fruits of

experience; might learn how safe it was to be selfish, and how unsafe,

if they hoped to prosper and be free; might perceive where their common

interests lay, and their common power; might in some degree steady their

lives and define their policy against the coming of more peaceful times.

Two wars came and went which brought France and England to arms against

each other in America, as in Europe, but they passed away without

decisive incident in the New World, and there followed upon them thirty

years of uneventful peace, during which affairs hung at a nice balance,

and the colonies took counsel, each for itself, how they should prosper.

Virginia, meanwhile, had got the charter she was to keep. From the

Potomac to the uncertain border of the Carolinas she had seen her

counties fill with the men who were to decide her destiny. Her people,

close upon a hundred thousand strong, had fallen into the order of life

they were to maintain. They were no longer colonists merely, but

citizens of a commonwealth of which they began to be very proud, not

least because they saw a noble breed of public men spring out of their

own loins to lead them. Though they were scattered, they were not

divided. There was, after all, no real isolation for any man in

Virginia, for all that he lived so much apart and was a sort of lord

within his rustic barony. In that sunny land men were constantly abroad,

looking to their tobacco and the labor of all kinds that must go

forward, but would not unless they looked to it, or else for the sheer

pleasure of bestriding a good horse, being quit of the house, and

breathing free in the genial air. Bridle-paths everywhere threaded the

forests; it was no great matter to ride from house to house among one’s

neighbors; there were county-court days, moreover, to draw the

country-side together, whether there was much business or little to be

seen to. Men did not thrive thereabouts by staying within doors, but by

being much about, knowing their neighbors, observing what ships came and

went upon the rivers, and what prices were got for the cargoes they

carried away; learning what the news was from Williamsburg and London,

what horses and cattle were to be had, and what dogs, of what breeds. It

was a country in which news and opinions and friendships passed freely

current; where men knew each other with a rare leisurely intimacy, and

enjoyed their easy, unforced intercourse with a keen and lasting relish.

It was a country in which men kept their individuality very handsomely

withal. If there was no town life, there were no town manners either, no

village conventionalities to make all men of one carriage and pattern

and manner of living. Every head of a family was head also of an

establishment, and could live with a self-respect and freedom which

were subject to no man’s private scrutiny. He had leave, in his

independence, to be himself quite naturally, and did not need to justify

his liberty by excuses. And yet he had responsibilities too, and a

position which steadied and righted him almost in spite of himself. It

required executive capacity to make his estate pay, and an upright way

of life to maintain his standing. If he was sometimes loud and

hectoring, or over-careless what he said or did, ’twas commonly because

he was young or but half come into his senses; for his very business, of

getting good crops of tobacco and keeping on dealing terms with his

neighbors, demanded prudence and a conduct touched with consideration.

He had to build his character very carefully by the plumb to keep it at

an equilibrium, though he might decorate it, if it were but upright, as

freely, as whimsically even, as he chose, with chance traits and

self-pleasing tastes, with the full consent and tolerance of the

neighborhood. He was his own man, might have his own opinions if he held

them but courteously enough, might live his own life if he but lived it

cleanly and without offence. ’Twas by their living rather than by their

creed or their livelihood that men were assessed and esteemed.

It was not a life that bred students, though it was a life that begot

thoughtfulness and leadership in affairs. Those who fell in the way of

getting them had not a few books upon their shelves, because they

thought every gentleman should have such means of knowing what the world

had said and done before his day. But they read only upon occasion, when

the weather darkened, or long evenings dragged because there were no

guests in the house. Not much systematic education was possible where

the population was so dispersed and separate. A few country schools

undertook what was absolutely necessary, and gave instruction in such

practical branches as every man must know something of who was to take

part in the management of private and public business. For the rest,

those who chose could get the languages from private tutors, when they

were to be had, and then go over sea to read at the universities, or to

Williamsburg when at last the colony had its own college of William and

Mary. More youths went from the Northern Neck to England for their

education, no doubt, than from any other part of Virginia. The counties

there were somewhat closer than the rest to the sea, bred more merchants

and travellers, kept up a more intimate correspondence both by travel

and by letter with Bristol and London and all the old English homes. And

even those who stayed in Virginia had most of them the tradition of

refinement, spoke the mother tongue purely and with a proper relish, and

maintained themselves somehow, with perhaps an added touch of simplicity

that was their own, in the practices of a cultivated race.

No one in Virginia thought that “becoming a mere scholar” was “a

desirable education for a gentleman.” He ought to “become acquainted

with men and things rather than books.” Books must serve only to deepen

and widen the knowledge he should get by observation and a free

intercourse with those about him. When Virginians wrote, therefore, you

might look to find them using, not studied phrases, but a style that

smacked fresh of all the free elements of good talk--not like scholars

or professed students, but like gentlemen of leisure and cultivated men

of affairs--with a subtle, not unpleasing flavor of egotism, and the

racy directness of speech, withal, that men may use who are sure of

their position. Such was the writing of Robert Beverley, whose _History

and Present State of Virginia_, published in London in 1705, spoke at

first hand and authoritatively of affairs of which the world had heard

hitherto only by uncertain report. He did not write the manly book

because he had a pricking ambition to be an author, but because he loved

Virginia, and wished to give such an account of her affairs as would

justify his pride in her. He came of an ancient English family, whose

ample means were scarcely more considerable in Virginia than they had

been in Beverley, in Yorkshire. He had himself been carefully educated

in England, and had learned to feel very much at home there; but the

attractions of the old home did not wean him from his love of the new,

where he had been born--that quiet land where men dealt with one another

so frankly, where Nature was so genial in all her moods, and men so

without pretence. Official occupations gave him occasion while yet a

very young man to handle familiarly the records of the colony, the

intimate letters of its daily life, and he took a proud man’s pleasure

in extracting from them, and from the traditions of those who still

carried much of the simple history in their own recollections of a

stirring life, a frank and genial story of what had been done and seen

in Virginia. And so his book became “the living testimony of a proud and

generous Virginian”--too proud to conceal his opinions or withhold

censure where it was merited, too generous not to set down very

handsomely whatever was admirable and of good report in the life of his

people. His own manly character, speaking out everywhere, as it does,

in lively phrase and candid meaning, is itself evidence of the wholesome

native air he so praises in Virginia.

He thought himself justified in loving a country where “plantations,

orchards, and gardens constantly afford fragrant and delightful walks.

In their woods and fields they have an unknown variety of vegetables and

other rarities of nature to discover and observe. They have hunting,

fishing, and fowling, with which they entertain themselves in a thousand

ways. Here is the most good nature and hospitality practised in the

world, both towards friends and strangers; but the worst of it is this

generosity is attended now and then with a little too much intemperance.

The neighborhood is at much the same distance as in the country in

England, but with this advantage, that all the better sort of people

have been abroad and seen the world, by which means they are free from

that stiffness and formality which discover more civility than kindness.

And besides, the goodness of the roads and the fairness of the weather

bring people oftener together.”

Of a like quality of genuineness and good breeding is the writing of

Colonel William Byrd, the accomplished master of Westover, who was of

the same generation. He may well have been the liveliest man in

Virginia, so piquant and irrepressible is the humor that runs through

almost every sentence he ever wrote. It must be he wrote for pastime. He

never took the pains to publish anything. His manuscripts lay buried a

hundred years or more in the decent sepulture of private possession ere

they were printed, but were even then as quick as when they were

written. Beverley had often a grave smile for what he recorded, or a

quiet sarcasm of tone in the telling of it. “The militia are the only

standing forces in Virginia,” he says, very demurely, and “they are

happy in the enjoyment of an everlasting peace.” But Colonel Byrd is

very merry, like a man of sense, not contriving the jest, but only

letting it slip, revealing it; looks very shrewdly into things, and very

wisely, too, but with an easy eye, a disengaged conscience, keeping

tally of the score like one who attends but is not too deeply concerned.

He was, in fact, very deeply engaged in all affairs of importance--no

man more deeply or earnestly; but when he wrote ’twas not his chief

business to speak of that. He was too much of a gentleman and too much

of a wit to make grave boast of what he was doing.

No man born in Virginia had a greater property than he, a house more

luxuriously appointed, or a part to play more princely; and no man knew

the value of position and wealth and social consideration more

appreciatively. His breeding had greatly quickened his perception of

such things. He had had a long training abroad, had kept very noble

company alike in England and on the Continent, had been called to the

bar in the Middle Temple and chosen a Fellow of the Royal Society, and

so had won his freedom of the world of letters and of affairs. Yet he

had returned to Virginia, as all her sons did, with only an added zest

to serve and enjoy her. Many designs for her development throve because

of his interest and encouragement; he sought her advantage jealously in

her Council, as her agent in England, as owner of great tracts of her

fertile lands. ’Twas he who brought to her shores some of her best

settlers, gave her promise of veritable towns at Richmond and

Petersburg, fought arbitrary power wherever it showed itself in her

government, and proved himself in every way “a true and worthy inheritor

of the feelings and opinions of the old cavaliers of Virginia.” But

through all his busy life he carried himself like the handsome,

fortunate man he was, with a touch of gayety, a gallant spirit of

comradeship, a zest for good books, spirited men, and comely

women--heartily, like a man who, along with honor, sought the right

pleasures of the world.

Nothing daunted the spirits of this manly gentleman, not even rough work

at the depths of the forest, upon the public business of determining the

southern boundary-line of the colony, or upon the private business of

seeing to his own distant properties in North Carolina. It gave him only

the better chance to see the world; and he was never at a loss for

something to do. There were stray books to be found even in the cabins

of the remotest settlers; or, if not, there was the piquant literary

gossip of those laughing times of Queen Anne, but just gone by, to

rehearse and comment upon. Colonel Byrd was not at a loss to find

interesting ways in which even a busy man might make shift to enjoy “the

Carolina felicity of having nothing to do.” A rough people lived upon

that frontier in his day, who showed themselves very anxious to be put

upon the southern side of the line; for, if taken into Virginia, “they

must have submitted to some sort of order and government; whereas in

North Carolina every one does what seems best in his own eyes.” “They

pay no tribute,” he laughs, “either to God or to Cæsar.” It would not be

amiss, he thinks, were the clergy in Virginia, once in two or three

years--not to make the thing burdensome--to “take a turn among these

gentiles.” “’Twould

[Illustration: JAMES BLAIR]

look a little apostolical,” he argues, with the characteristic twinkle

in his eye, “and they might hope to be requited for it hereafter, if

that be not thought too long to tarry for their reward.” A stray parson

was to be found once and again even at the depths of the forest--on the

Virginian side--though to find his humble quarters you must needs thread

“a path as narrow as that which leads to heaven, but much more dirty”;

but a stray parson was no great evangel. Colonel Byrd was too sound a

gentleman not to be a good churchman; but he accounted it no sin to see

where the humor lurks even in church. “Mr. Betty, the parson of the

parish, entertained us with a good, honest sermon,” he chronicles upon

occasion; “but whether he bought it, or borrowed it, would have been

uncivil in us to inquire. Be that as it will, he is a decent man, with a

double chin that fits gracefully over his band.... When church was done

we refreshed our teacher with a glass of wine, and then, receiving his

blessing, took horse.” ’Tis likely Colonel Byrd would have found small

amusement in narrating the regular course of his life, his great errands

and permanent concerns of weighty business. That he could as well leave

to his biographer, should he chance to have one. For himself, he chose

to tell the unusual things he had seen and heard and taken part in, and

to make merry as well as he might by the way.

The Virginian writers were not all country gentlemen. There were austere

and stately scholars, too, like the Reverend William Stith, who had held

modest livings in more than one parish, had served the House of

Burgesses as chaplain, and the college, first as instructor and then as

president, until at length, having won “perfect leisure and retirement,”

he set himself in his last days to straighten into order the confusion

of early Virginian history. “Such a work,” he reflected, “will be a

noble and elegant entertainment for my vacant hours, which it is not in

my power to employ more to my own satisfaction, or the use and benefit

of my country.” What with his scholarly love of documents set forth at

length, however, his painstaking recital of details, and his roundabout,

pedantic style, his story of the first seventeen years of the colony

lingered through a whole volume; and his friends’ laggard subscriptions

to that single prolix volume discouraged him from undertaking another.

There was neither art nor quick movement enough in such work, much as

scholars have prized it since, to take the taste of a generation that

lived its life on horseback and spiced it with rough sport and direct

speech. They could read with more patience the plain, business-like

sentences of the Reverend Hugh Jones’s _Present State of Virginia_, and

with more zest the downright, telling words in which the Reverend James

Blair, “commissary” to the Bishop of London, spoke of their affairs.

James Blair, though born and bred in Scotland, educated at Edinburgh,

and engaged as a minister at home till he was close upon thirty years of

age, was as much a Virginian in his life and deeds as any man born in

the Old Dominion. ’Twas he who had been the chief founder of the College

of William and Mary, and who had served it as president through every

vicissitude of fortune for fifty years. For fifty years he was a member,

too, of the King’s Council in the colony, and for fifty-eight the chief

adviser of the mother Church in England concerning ecclesiastical

affairs in Virginia. “Probably no other man in the colonial time did so

much for the intellectual life of Virginia” as did this “sturdy and

faithful” Scotsman. To the colonists, oftentimes, he seemed overbearing,

dictatorial even, and, for all their “gentlemanly conformity to the

Church of England,” they did not mean to suffer any man to be set over

them as bishop in Virginia; while to the royal governors he seemed

sometimes a headstrong agitator and demagogue, so stoutly did he stand

up for the liberties of the people among whom he had cast his lot. He

was in all things a doughty Scot. He made very straight for the ends he

deemed desirable; dealt frankly, honestly, fearlessly with all men

alike; confident of being in the right even when he was in the wrong;

dealing with all as he thought he ought to deal, “whether they liked it

or not”; incapable of discouragement, as he was also incapable of

dishonor; a stalwart, formidable master of all work in church and

college, piling up every day to his credit a great debt of gratitude

from the colony, which honored him without quite liking him.

It was very noteworthy that masterful men of many kinds took an

irresistible liking to Virginia, though they were but sent upon an

errand to it. There was Alexander Spotswood, for example, who, after he

had been twelve years Lieutenant-Governor in the stead of his lordship

the Earl of Orkney, spent eighteen more good years, all he had left,

upon the forty-odd thousand acres of land he had acquired in the fair

colony, as a country gentleman, very busy developing the manufacture of

iron, and as busy as there was any need to be as Postmaster-General of

the colonies. He came of a sturdy race of gentlemen, had seen service

along with Marlborough and my uncle Toby “with the army in Flanders,”

had gone much about the world upon many errands and seen all manner of

people, and then had found himself at last in Virginia when he was past

forty. For all its rough life, he liked the Old Dominion well enough to

adopt it as his home. There was there, he said, “less swearing, less

profaneness, less drunkenness and debauchery, less uncharitable feuds

and animosities, and less knavery and villany than in any part of the

world” where his lot had been. Not all of his neighbors were gentlemen;

not very many could afford to send their sons to England to be educated.

Men of all sorts had crowded into Virginia: merchants and gentlemen not

a few, but also commoner men a great many--mariners, artisans, tailors,

and men without settled trades or handicrafts of any kind. Spotswood had

found it no easy matter when he was Governor to deal patiently with a

House of Burgesses to which so many men of “mean understandings” had

been sent, and had allowed himself to wax very sarcastic when he found

how ignorant some of them were. “I observe,” he said, tartly, “that the

grand ruling party in your House has not furnished chairmen of two of

your standing committees who can spell English or write common-sense, as

the grievances under their own handwriting will manifest.”

’Twas not a country, either, where one could travel much at ease, for

one must ford the streams for lack of bridges, and keep an eye sharply

about him as he travelled the rude forest roads when the wind was high

lest a rotten tree should fall upon him. Nature was so bountiful,

yielded so easy a largess of food, that few men took pains to be

thrifty, and some parts of the colony were little more advanced in the

arts of life than North Carolina, where, Colonel Byrd said, nothing was

dear “but law, physic, and strong drink.” No doubt the

[Illustration: ALEXANDER SPOTSWOOD]

average colonist in Virginia, when not sobered by important cares, was

apt to be a fellow of coarse fibre, whose

“addiction was to courses vain;

His companies unlettered, rude, and shallow;

His hours fill’d up with riots, banquets, sports;

And never noted in him any study,

Any retirement, any sequestration

From open haunts and popularity.”

But to many a scapegrace had come “reformation in a flood, with such a

heady current, scouring faults,” as to make a notable man of him. There

were at least the traditions of culture in the colony, and enough men of

education and refinement to leaven the mass. Life ran generously, even

if roughly, upon the scattered plantations, and strong, thinking,

high-bred men had somehow a mastery and leadership in it all which made

them feel Virginia their home and field of honor.

Change of time and of affairs, the stir of growing life in Virginia as

she ceased from being a mere colony and became a sturdy commonwealth,

boasting her own breed of gentlemen, merchants, scholars, and statesmen,

laid upon the Washingtons, as upon other men, a touch of transformation.

Seventy-six years had gone by since John Washington came out of

Bedfordshire and took up lands on Bridges’ Creek in Westmoreland in

Virginia, and still his children were to be found in the old seats he

had chosen at the first. They had become thorough Virginians with the

rest, woven into the close fibre of the new life. Westmoreland and all

the counties that lay about it on the Northern Neck were strictly of a

piece with the rest of Virginia, for all they had waited long to be

settled. There the Washingtons had become country gentlemen of

comfortable estate upon the accepted model. John had begotten Lawrence,

and Lawrence had begotten Augustine. John had thriftily taken care to

see his offspring put in a way to prosper at the very first. He had

acquired a substantial property of his own where the land lay very

fertile upon the banks of the Potomac, and he had, besides, by three

marriages, made good a very close connection with several families that

had thriven thereabouts before him. He had become a notable figure,

indeed, among his neighbors ere he had been many years in the colony--a

colonel in their militia, and their representative in the House of

Burgesses; and they had not waited for his death to call the parish in

which he lived Washington Parish. His sons and grandsons, though they

slackened a little the pace he had set them in his energy at the outset,

throve none the less substantially upon the estates he had left them,

abated nothing of the dignity and worth they had inherited, lived

simply, and kept their place of respect in the parish and state. Wars

came and went without disturbing incident for them, as the French moved

upon the borders by impulse of politics from over sea; and then long

peace set in, equally without incident, to stay a whole generation,

while good farming went quietly forward, and politicians at home and in

the colonies planned another move in their game. It was in the

mid-season of this time of poise, preparation, and expectancy that

George Washington was born, on the 22d of February, in the year 1732,

“about ten in the morning,” William Gooch, gentlest of Marlborough’s

captains, being Governor in Virginia. He came into the world at the

plain but spacious homestead on Bridges’ Creek, fourth son, fifth child,

of Augustine Washington, and of the third generation from John

Washington, son of the one-time rector of Purleigh. The homestead stood

upon a green and gentle slope that fell away, at but a little distance,

to the waters of the Potomac, and from it could be seen the broad

reaches of the stream stretching wide to the Maryland shore beyond, and

flooding with slow, full tide to the great bay below. The spot gave

token of the quiet youth of the boy, of the years of grateful peace in

which he was to learn the first lessons of life, ere war and the

changing fortunes of his country hurried him to the field and to the

council.

[Illustration: FAC-SIMILE OF THE ENTRY OF WASHINGTON’S BIRTH IN HIS

MOTHER’S BIBLE]

A VIRGINIAN BREEDING

George Washington(#79698) · 第 1 / 11 章