This cannot be the meaning, because--

Death is not attended by the events narrated in 1 Thessalonians 4:16,

17. Indeed the second coming is here set forth as the opposite of

death for "the dead in Christ shall rise" from the dead when Christ

comes again. According to John 14:3, Christ comes for us, and

not we go to Him: "I will come again, and receive you unto myself."

John 21:21-23--"Peter seeing him (John) saith to Jesus, Lord, and

what shall this man do? Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he

tarry till I come, what is that to thee? Follow thou me. Then went

this saying abroad among the brethren, that that disciple should

not die; yet Jesus said not unto him, He shall not die; but, if I

will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee?"

1 Corinthians 15:50-57 declares that at the second coming of Christ

we overcome, not succumb to, death. See John 8:51; Matt. 16:28.

The foolishness of such interpretation is seen if we substitute the

word "death" for the second coming of Christ in such places where

this coming is mentioned, e.g., Phil. 3:20; Matt. 16:28--"Verily

I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste

of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom."

b) That the Second Coming Means the Coming of the Holy Spirit.

There is no doubt but that the coming of the Holy Spirit is a coming

(John 14:21-23), but it is by no means _the_ second coming,

and for the following reasons:

Many of the testimonies and promises of the second coming were

given _after_ Pentecost, e.g., Phil. 3:21; 2 Tim. 4:8; 1 Thess.

4:16, 17; 1 Cor. 15:51, 52.

Christ does not receive us unto Himself, but comes to us, at

Pentecost. In the second coming He takes us, not comes to us.

The events of 1 Thessalonians 4:16, 17 did not occur on the day of

Pentecost, nor do they occur when the believer receives the Holy

Spirit.

c) That the Second Coming refers to the Destruction of Jerusalem.

Reply: The events of 1 Thessalonians 4:16, 17 did not take place

then.

John 21:21-23, and Rev. 22:20 were written _after_ the

destruction of Jerusalem.

From all that has been said then, it seems clear that the second

coming of Christ is an event still in the future.

3. THE NEED OF RECOGNIZING THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN CHRIST'S COMING

FOR HIS SAINTS AND WITH HIS SAINTS.

There is a distinction between the _presence_ and the

_appearing_ of Christ: the former referring to His coming

_for,_ and the latter _with_ His saints. We should

remember, further, that the second coming covers a period of time,

and is not the event of a single moment. Even the first coming

covered over thirty years, and included the events of Christ's

birth, circumcision, baptism, ministry, crucifixion, resurrection,

etc. The second coming will also include a number of events such as

the rapture, the great tribulation, the millenium, the resurrection,

the judgments, etc.

The Great Doctrines of the Bible · 第 397 / 463 题