CHAPTER IV.

What is the "Silver Trout"?--Evidence in Favour of a New

Species--Difference in Appearance from the Rainbow--A

Jumper--Native of Kamloops and Shuswap Lakes--A Bag of

Twenty-four--The Dolly Varden--Origin of the Name--Not a Free

Riser--Grayling--Chub and Squaw Fish--Great Lake Trout--The Silver

Fish at Spence's Bridge--Salmon or Steel-head?--Cut-throat

Trout--Possible Fishing Tour in British Columbia.

It still remains a question, which has never yet been decided, whether

there are not two distinct species of trout in these waters. There is no

question that locally such is universally thought to be the case. Every

local fisherman speaks of having caught a red side or a silver trout,

and firmly believes that they are distinct species. Should this be

really the case, it is a matter of no little interest, as a new and very

beautiful species would be added to those already known and described. A

brief account of the evidence, for and against, may not be out of place,

and might result in some final conclusion being arrived at. For several

years two Americans came every season to Savona's Ferry to fish, and,

becoming impressed with the beauty of the so-called silver trout, they

sent a specimen to Professor Starr Jordan, of the Leland Stanford

University of San Francisco. The first specimen did not arrive in good

condition, and another specimen was sent, in the preparation of which I

personally assisted. It was a fish of about 1-1/2lb. in weight, a very

beautiful specimen and a most typical example of the silver trout.

Professor Jordan described this fish as a new species, under the name of

_Salmo kamloopsii_, and he so describes it in a monograph on the salmon

and trout of the Pacific Coast, published by the State Board of

Fisheries for the State of California. In this account he gives expert

reasons, founded on the number of rays in the anal fin and tail, the

position of the opercula, and the size of the body scales, suggesting,

moreover, that the fish might turn out to be a connecting link between

the true salmonidae and the genus oncorhynchus or Pacific Coast salmon.

He suggested that a further specimen should be sent, in order that the

intestinal tract might be examined; but this suggestion was

unfortunately not complied with. I am not prepared to say whether

Professor Jordan still adheres to this opinion, or whether the silver

trout has been fully recognised among ichthyologists as a distinct

species. In a recent letter to me, however, he states that he considers

the Kamloops trout to be "only a slight variation of the steel-head,"

which statement shows that its exact identity is not established, for

the steel-head is absolutely unknown in these upper waters, and the

silver trout never goes down to the sea. To the best of my belief it is

a fact that no further specimens have been examined by any naturalist of

note, and the question is therefore still _in statu quo_. It is a

matter, I would humbly suggest, that is well worthy of solution. So far

as I am aware, Professor Jordan is the only expert who has examined this

fish. The only other evidence as to its existence as a distinct species

is the widespread local opinion, which is also held by the half-breeds

and Indians, who undoubtedly believe that there are two kinds of trout

in the Thompson River. Such evidence or belief is not scientific proof,

but is certainly of considerable weight, until it is proved to be

mistaken.

I have always been firmly convinced that the two fish are perfectly

distinct, and this opinion is fully shared by all the local anglers. If

two well-marked specimens are seen side by side the difference in

appearance is most remarkable. The silver trout is less heavily built,

the head is smaller and sharper, the scales are smaller in size, and

the stripe on the side is violet instead of pink. There is only one

alternative opinion, namely, that for an unknown reason some rainbows

acquire this peculiar silvery appearance. Whatever may be the final

decision, the fact still remains that a fish of a different type from

the ordinary rainbow is common in these waters, and is well deserving of

a description. The back is green, with the usual black spots, the sides

and belly of a bright silver, like a fresh-run salmon, but instead of

the pink or crimson stripe of the rainbow there is a similar band of a

delicate violet or purple hue. If two well-marked specimens are laid

side by side the difference is most marked, though difficult to describe

exactly. The silver trout is a cleaner-cut fish, and looks exactly as if

it had come straight from salt water; one would hardly feel surprised to

see the sea lice sticking to its sides.

From a fisherman's point of view it is gamer, and is always out of the

water when hooked, appearing also to be more addicted to taking

silver-bodied flies, being more of a small fry than a fly feeder. It is

usually caught at the mouths of streams running into the large lakes,

and at the outflow of the Thompson at Savona's, where it can be seen

chasing the small fry on the surface. It must, however, be admitted

that some local anglers consider it to be merely the rainbow when in the

pink of condition, with the colour simply modified by the clear waters

of the lakes, and there is, moreover, no doubt that the poorer the

condition of the rainbow the deeper is the red of its stripe, though, on

the other hand, I have seen splendid fish in which the stripe was very

deep crimson. Spent fish, however, have always a deep red stripe.

This silvery fish seems to be chiefly native to the Kamloops and Shuswap

lakes, whence it spreads into the Thompson. It appears to be much less

common in the river than in the lake waters, except just at the outflow

near Savona's, which is a favourite resort, where in warm evenings in

July and August it may be seen chasing the minnows in the first pool. A

few years ago I made a bag of twenty-four fish, weighing 48lb., in two

evenings between the hours of seven and eight; four of these fish

weighed 4lb. apiece. The fishing here must be done from a boat, as the

eddy where they move is beyond the reach of the bank. It is a most

exciting kind of fishing, as it is almost useless to cast except over a

moving fish; the pool is still for some minutes, and then, in a moment,

a dozen or more fish will be at the surface rushing among the small fry,

who leap out of the water to escape them. If a silver-bodied fly be

thrown over one of these fish he is certain to take it, and if two flies

are used the second fly is certain to be seized as well, while, owing to

the strong water, a desperate fight is the result, and the strongest

single-gut is often broken. But it is by no means on every evening that

this sport can be enjoyed, and in some seasons the fish are much more

plentiful in this pool than others. It must also be in hot, still

weather, as a wind always puts them down. The fishing obviously depends

on the presence of the shoals of small fish, probably young salmon. The

silver trout lie in wait for them here, and when a shoal is entangled in

the strong eddy they rush upon them. This is the same form of sport

which can be enjoyed at the mouth of the streams which run into the

Shuswap Lake, the Eagle River at Sicamous, and Scotch and Adams Creeks.

In connection with this fish it is worthy of note that the rainbow is a

species which shows little tendency to vary from the type. I have caught

them in a great number of the streams and lakes of this district, and

they never seem to vary in the least. A specimen from one lake could not

be distinguished from any other; they are always typical rainbows with

the red stripe, and no silvery fish are ever seen, unless the lake is

directly connected with the Thompson River. Thus the silver form is

found in Shuswap, Kamloops, and Nicola lakes, but in the large mountain

lakes which have no open communication with the river only the ordinary

rainbow is found. There is only one exception, the Long Lake near

Vernon, which contains a beautiful silvery fish, to be alluded to later.

This lake is, I believe, indirectly connected with the Shuswap.

There are other interesting fish found in the Thompson and the Kamloops

and Shuswap lakes, but they are not of much use to the fisherman, though

occasionally caught. The Dolly Varden trout, a species of char, has been

alluded to, and is the only one which affords much sport to the

fisherman; it runs to a large size, as has been stated, but does not

often take the fly. Its curious name is said to be derived indirectly

from Dickens and the time of his tours in the United States, which

produced a Dolly Varden craze in hats and some kinds of calico patterns,

of which one with pink spots was supposed to be the correct Dolly Varden

pattern. On seeing this fish for the first time, some young lady is

supposed to have exclaimed that it was a "Dolly Varden trout," and the

name appears to have been generally adopted. However this may be, there

is no other name for the fish except its scientific one, and it is known

all through the West as the Dolly Varden trout.

It is strong and game, but not so lively as a trout. It takes the fly

very seldom, and then generally only when about a pound or less in

weight. On the other hand, in May it takes the minnow and spoon quite

readily. Later on, in July and after, it is rarely that one is caught. I

once caught two of 4lb. and 5lb. on a fly in July, the only ones so

caught during that month, and have landed many on minnow and spoon. That

it reaches a large size is proved by the capture of the fish alluded to

above, which weighed 15lb. The man who caught it informed me that it was

got on the fly, and I was never able to find out the true history of its

capture, but strongly suspect it was lured to its doom by a piece of raw

beef. The Dolly Varden is a greyish-coloured fish with light

salmon-coloured spots of rather a large size.

An occasional grayling is caught on the fly, but they are not plentiful.

I have never seen one over 2lb. A small fish, like a grayling, but

without any adipose fin, sometimes takes the fly; it has a bright orange

tinge on its side, and has white flesh, which is firm and very good

eating. The chub is very common, and will take the fly, but is regarded

as vermin, being very poor eating; it runs up to 4lb. and over. The

squaw fish, also, will take the fly sometimes, but more often the minnow

or grasshopper; its flesh is white and tasteless. It is a large-mouthed

fish greatly resembling the chub and attaining about the same size. Both

chub and squaw fish are great devourers of fry. In the Shuswap Lake, by

trolling in deep water with a lead attached, a large grey char with pink

spots can be caught, running up to perhaps 20lb., and being usually

known as the lake trout or great lake trout; it takes a spoon, but is

very sluggish, and does not give any real sport. The Indians catch these

fish. I have never heard of their being caught in Kamloops Lake. With

reference to the run of Pacific salmon, it is interesting to note that

large silvery fish have been caught by minnow and spoon in the Shuswap

Lake, notably in the narrow strait mentioned above. Mr. Inskip has

within the last year or two written some letters to the _Field_

describing the capture of a number of silver fish up to 10lb. weight

near Spence's Bridge, at the mouth of the Nicola river, where it joins

the Thompson. He believes these fish to be salmon, and it is possible

that his view may be correct. But it is also possible that they may be

silver trout or steel-head trout; the evidence is not yet complete. No

salmon have ever been taken in this way with spoon or minnow above this

point, in spite of the number of years that fishing has been carried on

in these waters. The Indians never catch salmon by trolling with the

spoon, though they troll persistently for trout, the line being fastened

to the paddle of their canoe.

Mr. Inskip states that these fish never take the fly, and he has only

caught them in October. There is, of course, no doubt of the truth of

his statement, and a possible explanation might be that the steel-heads

run up as far as this point, and go up to the Nicola River. It has never

been thought that the steel-head runs as far as Kamloops Lake, and I

have never heard of anyone who claimed to have caught one; it is,

however, quite within the bounds of possibility that some of these fish

may come up with the salmon. The problem can be easily solved by

counting the rays in the anal fin; in the true trout these rays only

amount to about nine, in the salmon there are fourteen to sixteen

well-developed rays.

The cut-throat trout is unknown to me. I have never caught it in British

Columbian waters, unless some fish mentioned later in the account of the

Nicola River belonged to this species. It may occur in some of the

southern British Columbian coast rivers, and is common further south in

the neighbouring States of the Union. Prof. Jordan states that it is

always found in the country of the Sioux Indians, and hazards a

suggestion that they may have taken their tribal mark from it. This mark

consists of a couple of lines of red paint under the jaw on each side of

the neck, and is very similar to that which gives this fish its curious

name. The rainbow and the so-called silver trout are the only kinds

which are met with in the central plateau of British Columbia.

The next subject for consideration will be the fishing in the mountain

lakes; but before proceeding to it it may be as well to consider the

fishing as a whole in the waters already described, for the question

which most naturally suggests itself to an Englishman is whether the

sport to be obtained is worth coming so far for. Anyone with the

necessary money and time at his disposal might prefer Norway or

Scotland. It would certainly not be worth anybody's while to come such a

distance to enjoy the two or three weeks at Savona's, which represent,

at the outside, the time of the best fishing on the Lower Thompson. It

would be necessary for the fisherman to have plenty of time at his

disposal, so as to visit the different places at the time when the

fishing was respectively at its best. Thus June could be spent in

trying the sport on the Shuswap Lake, with Sicamous as headquarters,

while a visit could be paid from there to the Okanagan Lakes, which can

be easily reached in three hours by rail. In July the Lower Thompson can

be fished from Savona's as a headquarters, while from there several

lakes can be tried during July and August, the trip being concluded by a

visit to the salmon rivers of the coast during late August and early

September. After that time big game or duck shooting might be tried. The

time mentioned would also allow for a visit to the fishing on the

Kootenay River near Nelson. There is hardly any need to say that all

fishing in British Columbia is free to everyone, and, although there is

a little more fishing done than a few years ago, no one need be afraid

of over-fishing. There is plenty of room, and there will continue to be

so for a very long time yet, except in a neighbourhood close to any very

large town. The fishing in waters hitherto described may be compared, in

my opinion, to very good sea-trout fishing, which it closely resembles.

As stated before, sport depends, as in every country, on certain states

of water and weather. A great bag cannot be an everyday occurrence, but

if the right places are visited at the right time there is great sport

to be obtained.

Fishing in British Columbia With a Chapter on Tuna Fishing at Santa Catalina · 第 4 / 10 章