THE LORETTO CHAPEL
The interest of this section is greatly enhanced by the fact that the
foundations of the Loretto Chapel were discovered last summer in the
place indicated by the script. The work of excavation will not be
completed until next season, but already more than half of the plan of
the chapel has been laid bare, and a full report with illustrations
has been contributed by the author to the Somerset Archæological
Society, and will appear in their Proceedings for 1919, now being
published early in 1920. The report will be accessible to all
archæological students at the principal libraries. The footings of the
chapel show that it was 20 feet wide, as the script indicates, but the
author's interpretation was at fault in assuming this width to be an
internal one, whereas it is the external dimension. The length may be
found to follow suit. The chapel lies about 5 feet within the bank as
stated, and the west wall-footing is the best preserved, thus bearing
out the accuracy of the writings.
[Illustration: PLATE IV. CONEY'S VIEW OF THE ABBEY (1817).
Frontispiece to Part III.]
THE LORETTO CHAPEL
Among the lost features of Glastonbury Abbey recorded by Leland[45] is
a chapel built by Abbot Bere on the north side of the nave. Leland says
of this:
[45] _Itinerary_, vol. iii., p. 103.
"Bere cumming from his Embassadrie out of Italie[46] made a Chapelle
of our Lady de Loretta, joining to the north side of the body of the
Church."
[46] Undertaken in 1503, on the election of Pius III.
But apart from his record, which has preserved the bare memory of
the work and its approximate location, we have no surviving facts,
either historical or descriptive, to guide us in the search for its
vestiges, save one or two trifles which the orthodox archæologist would
probably despise, but on which the imagination might build an airy
and tenuous fabric, a mere gossamer which the rude touch of practical
argument would dispel, and which would find its place more fittingly
in the pages of romance than in the chronicles of the labours of
serious-minded antiquaries.
Here, then, was a chance for the subliminal mind to exercise its
powers, just the opportunity most desirable for an experiment in the
psychology of inductive and deductive processes, and a test of the
possibility of drawing by the thread of slenderest and most imperfect
knowledge, some kindred knowledge from the great reservoir of the
memory of nature. This experiment was made, and the result of it I am
going to give my readers without any sort of reticence or reserve,
making no claim, but asking that they will regard it with an open mind,
and accepting it for analysis as an illustration of the working of the
latent powers of the mind under the same conditions that we in the
onset laid down for our work.
The material from which our sublimated essence was distilled was as
follows:
1. Leland's note, as above.
2. A fragment of walling shown in Coney's view of the Abbey, 1817. This
appears in the sketch just on the spot where the wall of the north
aisle of the nave would have joined that of the transept at its eastern
extremity, but it is diminutive in height--only about a third of the
height proper to the nave wall, as is clearly evident by comparison
with the surrounding features. It is like a little screen-wall, and
such as might have filled at one time an archway at this point opening
from the last or most eastward division of the north aisle wall towards
a chapel just without, in the angle between the aisle and the north
transept. But in Coney's sketch it does not look like a Gothic work,
but is more like a building of the modern times, since it has four
little dumpy windows with round heads and the projecting cills which we
associate with our everyday experience of domestic building. No one
but Coney, so far as I am aware, has indicated any sort of remnant of
building at this point, and there are several older views of the Abbey,
which would be expected to show it if anything had been there. Look,
for example, at Stukeley's panoramic view of the ruins, published in
1723. (See Fig. 10, p. 115.) Nothing visible there--the whole of the
north side of the nave an open field, as it had been for at least half
a century previous (_vide_ Hollar's view).
3. In the Cannon MS., a diary referring to Glastonbury about the time
of George II., is a sketch plan of the Abbey, very crude, in which the
writer shows a mound of rubbish and rough stones with suggestions of a
broken wall on the ground at or near this point, and he makes a note to
the effect that it is the remains of "The Chapter House."
But, of course, the Chapter House was on the south side of the Choir,
and could not have been elsewhere in the case of Glastonbury, as
its site was never in doubt, and it has now been recovered and its
dimensions tested and proved.
4. Marsh, the old gardener at the Abbey for over forty years, used to
say to me that in the grass bank which runs along the north side of the
nave area, under the trees, there was a fine bit of freestone walling,
some of which Mr. Austin, his earlier employer, used up for building. I
dug in, but could find nothing of this at the point he indicated.
Now, at the risk of being a little tedious, I propose to quote a short
paragraph from my _Architectural Handbook_, because it shows what I was
thinking about this matter in 1910, and such evidence is needed for any
useful analysis of the psychology of the whole subsequent matter.
I would add that, so far as I can remember, my friend J.A. had formed
no theory as to the nature of the chapel or its real position other
than my own, and what I here quote represents the utmost that could at
the time be said (_Architectural Handbook of Glastonbury Abbey_, second
edition, pp. 32, 33, 1910):
"Some fragments of building on the north side of the nave were
surviving as recently as 1817, when Coney's drawings were published.
In one of these we see a wall with a row of windows having a rather
unusual detail in their heads (Fig. 10). This would be near the site
of the Loretto Chapel, built by Abbot Bere. Carter, writing some few
years later, tells us that the Loretto Chapel was then standing, and
if he be correct, it must have been a substantial piece of masonry
exterior to the church, and not a light internal structure within it,
as has been conjectured. But he may have been referring to the Chapel
of Saint Thomas the Martyr in the north transept, which has sometimes
been miscalled the 'Loretto Chapel.'
[Illustration: FIG. 10.--VIEW OF THE RUINS IN 1723. (From Stukeley's
Itinerary.)]
[Illustration: FIG. 11.--GLASTONBURY ABBEY IN 1655 _circa_: ENLARGEMENT
OF HOLLAR'S VIEW.]
[Illustration: Fig. 12.--MS. PLAN OF JOHN CANNON, 1740 _circa_.
_A_, Chaple; _B_, quire; _C_, the great arch; _D_, the nave or body;
_E_, the chapter house; _F_, gate to ye kitchen; _G_, St. Joseph's
Chaple.]
"A sketch plan in the Cannon MS. shows a group of ruins in an
apparently similar position, and he records the tradition of a very
magnificent building at this point, which he terms the 'Chapter House.'
However erroneous this designation, we may at least accept his record
as corroborative of the existence of a richly ornamented building of
some special nature (as distinct from the body of the Church at the
junction of the Nave aisle and North Transept)."
It seems, then, that we had formed the impression of a fine building
just outside the nave wall and in the angle of aisle and transept; but
to be strictly accurate, I do not think that Coney's sketch had much
weight as regards the character of the work it might have contained,
and so far as one's normal impressions were concerned, it was dismissed
as "modern."
RECORD OF EXCAVATION IN 1911.
In the early part of June, 1911, the footing trench of the north aisle
wall of the nave was opened up at its eastward end, and the junction
of the same with the west wall of the north transept was found. The
area just outside the angle of the two walls was cleared with the
object of discovering traces of a chapel at this point, but beyond a
few very beautiful sections of window mullions of the style of the
late fifteenth or early sixteenth century--good Tudor work--nothing
material came to light in the way of detail. But about 13 feet west of
the transept wall, and running parallel to it, meeting the line of the
aisle wall at right angles and going north from it, was found another
broad foundation, and this we assumed at the time to be the footing
of the west wall of the Loretto Chapel. The inference was clear that
there must at least have been some building of a permanent nature,
and rather substantial, attached to the west face of the transept
wall just outside its junction with the aisle, and perhaps it was not
unreasonable at the time to suppose that this was the Loretto Chapel.
The architectural detail discovered pointed to a Gothic chapel, and was
entirely inconsistent with such a building as Coney showed. Neither was
it of like character with the work in the Nave. Such was the position
when, on 13th June, 1911, we obtained the following automatic script:
SITTING XLVII. 13th June, 1911.
"I made that building. All that I didde anywhere is fannes. Ne barrel
vault. And under them, three faire windowes of foure lights with
transomes and littel castel-work on the ramps thereof. And if ye digge
in the wall of the navis, there is much fell in. Serche the great
pier of the nave opposite the cutte: yt is full ... but they threw
therein the fragments of my capella, a canopy at the west, and all
the central ones--faire canopy work, and in the midst a littel one
for Our Ladye, sylver guilt and very faire. Somewhat remaineth of ye
outer walls and ye walle by ye crossinge, but they have taken hym
mostly away long syne. Very deepe fannes ... and each fanne had twelve
ribs, and they were ycoloured red and gold, like my chapel of Edgar.
There yet remaineth somewhat of Our Ladye. Yt lieth in front of the
west walle three feet or thereabouts. Seek ye well out the bank to the
Est: something remaineth of ye transept (?) wall whereon we placed the
tabernacles, but most is ygone. Ye doore unto hym is at the west,[47]
nigh unto the pillar of the navis, one doore only, on nave.
[47] This must be a mistake. The south is the Nave side.--F.B.B.
"R. B. scripsit, pro instructionem tuam. Ye roundels of ye volte were
golden, and also ye bosses, and ye hollows were bright redde; likewise
ye tabernacle of Oure Ladye in the est wall golde and redde; and ye
windowes were of glasse yellow in canopies with redde and blewe in ye
little lights thereof. Ye floore was of tileis red, with shields, and
ornaments in yellow likewise, and it was very faire and magnifical,
like unto my chappel of Edgar, but more faire, for I builded hym
later, for I hadde a vowe of mine owne which I performed."
_Q. "What was your vow?"_
_A._ "Know ye not that wee were borne downe by rude men in foreign
parts and the mule which bore me fell, for I was a grete and heavy
man. And being like to fall down a steepe place or be trampled by
ye mule, I called on Oure Lady and shee heard me, soe that my cloke
catching on a thorne I was prevented, and then said I: 'Lo! When I
returne I will build a chapel to Our Lady of the Loretto, and soe
instant was I inn (my vowe) that the brethren were grieved, for yt
was arranged in Chapitre that wee shold build a Chapel to oure Edgare
before I wennt in ye shyppe. Therefore builded I hym first, for it was
a public vowe: but mine owne vowe I fulfilled afterer, and soe all was
well--Yt is given."
_Q. "What was the occasion of your journey?"_
_A._ "Know ye not of my Ambassadrie, when ye Kinge wold know what the
Bis^P of Roume would doe? Even soe journeying fromm Padua whither came
the shippes, we felle among evil menne who would hold us to ransome.
Here fell ye mule, and ye reste ye knowe."
NOTES ON BEERE'S EMBASSY.
Abbot Richard Bere was deputed by Henry VII. to visit Rome in 1503,
in order, it is said, to congratulate the new Pope, Pius III., on
his election. Whether there was any political object intended to be
served by his embassy does not appear, but it is strongly suggested by
subsequent events. The new Pope did not live to establish his policy.
He survived his election only twenty-six days, and was succeeded during
the same year by Julius II., a "political" Pope, who formed the "League
of Cambrai," which was followed by the "Holy League" of powers against
Louis XII. of France, including England, Spain, and Venice in the bond,
which Henry VIII. afterwards joined, until the peace with France in
1514 ended it. As to the story of the journey, the mention of Padua as
his port of call seemed odd, and a little hard to understand. The usual
route to Rome for English travellers of that period was via Antwerp,
Augsbourg, and Venice. From Venice he might have taken boat to the
wharves of Padua, and would thence proceed southward along the Adriatic
side, till near Ancona, and here he would strike Loreto, which would be
the start of an overland journey, the Apennines being crossed possibly
on mule-back.
_Q. "What were the dimensions of the work about which you have been
telling us?"_
_A._ "Yn feete twenty and two, and foure paces in width thereof, and
ye walle of ye nave was strengthened thereby, for ye towre hadde
pressed ye walls through the volt of the navis, and hee was crackt all
ye way to the bottom thereof. Therefore my chapel was high, in height
twenty and three feet, and very strong in the volt, soe that it tied
the wall of ye nave and ye wall of ye crossing where it was weake.
They who builded ye towre should have made arches in ye walle to help
ye higher windowes, carrying them along ye crossing in ye walle to
helpe ye towre at ye angle, but they did not. Therefore helped I yt by
my chappell and by an arche I builded from ye toppe of ye aisle to
the roofe of ye chappell to bond ye whole at ye angle. Also builded I
ye grete arches in ye towre. It wasne ye volte that did caste out, but
ye towre gave inne as against ye volte by reason of its weight,[48]
and soe it even gave away from[49] the crossing in its lowre part and
gave out in its upper.--R. B."
[48] This seems perfectly true. The great piers buckled under the
weight of the tower, and bowed inwards, probably pushing the vault,
and cracking it by compression.--F.B.B.
[49] _Gave in towards_ the crossing would be more expressive of the
fact.--F.B.B.
_Q. "Can you give us an idea of the state of opinion in the religious
establishments of your day--of the views and ideals current?"_
_A._ "Ne helde I wyth superstitions. Ever I was for ye people and ye
better understanding of ye mysteries. It was meet that it be soe, and
notte kept in the hearts of the religious only. More wold ye? What
more I didde as seemed best, for the old tymes were changing and menne
loved the glory of our ceremonial. They were angered at the deceits
which hadde kept their fathers humble and meek. Through the eye the
glory of our services might make them wish for noble things, but I
knew, and hee my friend knew[50] they were no longer to be fooled with
trickery. All was changing in my day and the wars made for greater
knowledge. The Englyshe were (a)sleepe no more, ne ever to be. Dixi."
[50] Bere was the friend of Erasmus.
The dimensions given for this little chapel could be applied to the
foundations discovered only if the longer measure (22 feet) were taken
north and south, and the shorter (four paces) east and west. This would
make the building cover one bay of the transept, and extend to the
outer footing wall exposed by the excavation. But this footing did not
stop at 22 feet, but ran on north, and was found to be co-extensive
with the northerly projection of the transept, so that the chapel
described would only have occupied one-half of the length, and it
looked as if there had been an aisle to the transept such as F.B.B.
showed in his drawing of the reconstructed interior. The description
of the strongly built little chapel in the angle, buttressing up the
weak tower and transept wall, was a plausible one, but the description,
and especially the dimensions, would not throw any light on Coney's
sketch, and left the wall in the bank, spoken of by the gardener, still
unexplained. The dimensions were small--unsatisfying for a special
work of this nature, and one which had merited individual mention by
Leland. And the proportion was so unusual, in that the east and west
measurement was the lesser and would be insufficient for its purpose,
one would think, unless the altar were placed at the north end, which
would not be an English custom. Was this little building, after
all, the real Chapel of the Loretto, or was it only an antechamber,
through which access would be had from the nave to a more important
work farther out? The long aisle-like footing looked like an adit or
approach. It could hardly have been part of the transept because of the
sharp difference in level between the two floors, that of the transept
being 4 feet or so above the nave. But only further digging could bring
light, and this was at the time impossible, so there the matter was
bound to remain until a more favourable opportunity should occur for
further research. So it rested for five years.
In December, 1916, F.B.B. and J.A. found themselves near neighbours,
and it had been mutually agreed, in view of the greatly revived
interest in the subject of spiritual phenomena, that the experiments
in writing should be resumed, but no definite day had been fixed.
Some days before F.B.B. had given J.A. some MS. notes to transcribe,
being extracts he had made some years before from the Cannon MS.
It had been proposed to publish these in the _Proceedings of the
Somerset Archæological Society_, and with them was the sketch of the
ruins already referred to, at which both had casually glanced; but
this had not been the subject of attention. and J.A.'s transcript had
not arrived at that point when the first sitting was held. This was
on 4th December. Glastonbury matters were not to the fore in recent
conversation, which had been given to the subject of the Greek Cabala
and the geometry connected with it. J.A. says his mind was still full
of this on 4th December, to the exclusion of Glastonbury, and that the
reference in the Cannon MS. had not been in his thoughts. F.B.B.'s
experience was similar. He had been busy with letters until the moment
of J.A.'s arrival, and his last envelope having been sealed, he, on
the spur of the moment, proposed a sitting, to which J.A. agreed.
F.B.B. had an idea that if any writing were obtained it might be on the
subject of the war and current events; and J.A. anticipated something
on geometrical symbolism. No suggestion was made as to the subject of
the proposed communication. The following is the record:
SITTING. 4th December, 1916.
The first page of writing is cramped and well-nigh illegible. The
following can be made out:
"Cosmic facts are everywhere, but not easily attained....
"... by assembling yourselves together and obtaining the inspiration
ye seek consciously or unconsciously. The result obtained is the same,
but the word endures....
"... The material world is the screen between--the complex fabric of
the simple weaving. The essential facts are eternal which (? move)
in a circle, and to them that know the circle, somewhat will pass
into all times, only ye see but little at a time. The centre is the
point on which all revolves, and ye, revolving, are conscious of the
influence, but cannot know the radius...."
"Obliviscor. So long we have slept near Capella Loretta under the bank
full thirty paces from the Navis. Ye did not go farre enow beyond the
(bank) they cast up there. It was full five feet in, and buried in
the place where he didd drawe the Chapitre Howse.[51] and the end of
the pilgrimmes (way) is ... through ye porche, thro ye wicket gate in
ye corner, and by ye steppes over against ye lower graveyard. There
shewed wee the relics and ye pilgrimmes passed by this way to the
Chapell of St. Mary, by ye steppes, and to Navis majoure."
[51] This appears to be in allusion to the note in the Cannon MS. which
J.A. says he had not then noticed.
Then in a different hand:
"Abbot Bere ybuilded ye Loretto Chapel faire and large to the north
(side of the) navis. We said that itt ... was not ye Chapitre Howse....
"... The syde of it was distant from ye navis thirty-one feet and a
half, and from ye aisle of ye transept he was fulle tenn feet with
a covered way unto, and four steppes up unto ye aisle aforesaid. Yt
... was ybuilded by Bere most faire and wonderfull in ye newe style
brought from Ytaly when he didd goe there upon ambassadrie.
"Ye have heard of yt. Ye Chapell was full forty feet, and width
between twenty and ... twenty-one feet, and hee had an entrance unto
(hym) from the roade which ledde from St. John his gait unto ye navis,
and thus might ye B^p and the Kinges majestic (enter).
"Bere used to approach by entering into the Claustre, and soe he didde
close it oftentimes."
The foregoing script at first sight seemed impossible to decipher,
and a repetition was asked for. This was clearly written, and by its
aid the sense of the foregoing was mastered, and word by word picked
out, but there are yet some seemingly hopeless blanks. These, however,
may not be material, and will probably refer to the ruinous state
of the Chapter House and its repair, as re-stated in the following
communication:
"We have said he was of the Ytalian style new and very faire, and Bere
ybuilded coming from embassadrie in Ytaly. Hee was not ye Chapitre,
but Bere did use hym so because ye Chaptre House was dammp and ruinous
and was being repaired. We have said so. Hee met ye King and ye B^p
who sojourned (with him). The same was forty feet (long) by twenty
(or) thereabouts and his grylled doore was to the west and a pavement
joyned him to the Road from St. John's gate to ye churche.
"He wasne like anything else (but was of the) newe style. There were
four steppes--nay, six--to the aisle of ye transeppt, and a covered
way vaulted in a rounde vaulte to ye Chappell....--THESIGER."
Q. "By 'steps' do you mean ascending steps, or paces?"
A. "Ten feet, and four or six steppes up to hym."
The signature "THESIGER" is of peculiar interest. At the beginning of
this communication will be seen the words "Obliviscor." "So long we
have slept near Capella Loretta," etc. Only once before, at Sitting
XLII., on the 7th September, 1910, has the same signature been
observed. This was at the close of a communication dealing with the
shrine of St. Dunstan, and was given as follows:
"Sub marmore dormio, quod taedet me--obliviscor.--CAMILLUS THESIGER."
The identity of this person was at the time a matter of speculation,
but F.B.B. concluded that it must be meant for Camel, the Purse-bearer
to Abbot Bere, whose marble tomb with coffered panels is a feature in
St. John's Church. Camel had a house in the upper part of the town, in
the High Street, on the south side, some little way above St. John's
Gate, and to the east.
The architectural details which we here reproduce were then given, some
explanatory notes appended.
THE LORETTO CHAPEL
ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
DESCRIPTION OF PLAN A.
I. _a_, Drawing of a gable with "stepped" coping, probably meant for
the west gable.
I. _b_, Plan of the Chapel, showing four bays in length, with
buttresses having a pointed profile, labelled "Cappella Loretta."
I. _c_, Elevation of a circular-headed recess, with ornament in head,
labelled "Cava."
I. _d_, Plan (enlarged) of the Chapel, showing an entrance ("portus")
apparently in the south-west bay.
DESCRIPTION OF PLAN B.
I. _e_, Plan of the east end of Chapel, showing the convex "Cava
Virginis," and the door ("portus") leading to the church.
I. _f_, Another and clearer plan of the Chapel, confirming the
four-bay division.
I. _g_, Elevation of the east wall of Chapel, as seen internally, the
"Cava Virginis," or semicircular recess, being in the centre and the
door to the transept on the right or south side.
[Illustration: PLAN A.]
[Illustration: PLAN B.]
DESCRIPTION OF PLAN C.
I. _h_, This appears to be another effort to show the east wall, but
the "Cava" is so small that the alternative suggests itself of an
elevation of the west wall, with a central doorway.
I. _j_, _k_, Head of the "Cava," with attempt to represent a shell
ornament filling the hollow of same.
II. _a_, Elevation, probably of exterior of west wall, with
round-headed door, and "Virgo" over--_i.e._, a statue of the Virgin
here. There is a suggestion of undulating parapets, with a sitting
lion at the corner.
II. _b_, _c_, Divisions of the copings, with lions at intervals.
[Illustration: PLAN C.]
DESCRIPTION OF PLAN D.
II. _d_, Another drawing of the east end of the plan, with the
position of the east door, written "portus ad ecclesiam et voltus
quadripartus." Note "portus" for "porta," and "voltus" for" volta,"
always occurring in these writings.
II. _e_, _f_, Repetition of the undulating contours of the parapet,
labelled "parapetus." The lions at intervals as before.
[Illustration: PLAN D.]
DESCRIPTION OF PLAN E.
II. _g_, Undulating outline of a parapet, with foliage ornament
applied, and the word "leo."
II. _h_, Sketch of a small pier or baluster form. This is labelled
"patella and pillar." The word "patella" has the same intention as
the word "patera," well known as an architectural term and implying
a plate or panel, often of rectangular form. This may be let into
the surface of a pilaster. The plan clearly indicates a flat pier or
pilaster; or it may imply an abacus for the support of the lion.
[Illustration: PLAN E.]
DESCRIPTION OF PLAN F.
III. _a_, Two sketches of the lions. They are sitting lions, holding
shields, as we see them in many Tudor buildings, but the ornament is
more customary in domestic work than in ecclesiastical.
III. _b_, More parapets, this time partly of a Florentine pattern.
Whether these are meant for a more detailed study of the undulations
previously shown, or are some in a special position, does not yet
appear. The little "angels" seem to be connected with them.
III. _c_, Probably meant for one of the heads of the side-windows in
the Chapel. There is clearly a semicircle at head, and there appears
some sort of filling like open scroll-work. No English precedent of
this date is known to the writer.
[Illustration: PLAN F.]
DESCRIPTION OF PLAN G.
III. _d_, Another sketch of the "Cava," with the description of the
treatment of its recess: "Golden stars on azure, at the back of the
Virgin's Hollow"; and it proceeds: "Ad orientem, in cava Virginis
Mari(a)e Lorettae quod ... ad ecclesiam ... via claustra ad eccl^m
... ad orientem ... ad ecclesiam" (To the east, a covered way, or
cloister, leading to the church).
III. _e_, Again a plan of the east end of the Chapel, with the door
marked "portus," and a line going east.
III. _f_, The "via claustra" shown from the Chapel to the "ecclesia."
[Illustration: PLAN G.]
DESCRIPTION OF PLAN H.
IV. _a_, "Chapel is forty (in) feet by twenty." Then follows an
elevation of one side showing the round heads of the windows connected
by a string-course, and the writing "forty feet, four parts."
IV. _b_, Sketch of a rounded vault, its groin carved along the whole
length. Described thus: "Volt of fruit and flowers painted very
cunningly. Ye ribs of volts ycarven so."
IV. _c_, Small sketch of one of the sitting lions at the angle of the
Chapel, with one crenelle of the parapet adjoining. Described thus:
"Ye Leones cornerwise, and thre(e) between. The partitions were 10
feet, forty in length and twenty wide," with round vaults: ribs carven
with fruit and many colours.
[Illustration: PLAN H.]
[Illustration: PLAN I.
IV. _d_, Another sketch of a sitting lion.]
REVIEW.
It was with a sense of astonishment that, after so great a lapse of
time, this interesting communication, so voluminous in detail, and,
so apparently explanatory of doubts and difficulties in connection
with the obscure problem of the Loretto Chapel, should have presented
itself unsought, unexpected, and inclusive of strange new elements
which suggested the existence at Glastonbury in Bere's day of an
architectural model which would be unique for the period in these
islands, and probably without parallel in Northern Europe.
Several questions arise in the mind. Could the little windows in
Coney's sketch have stimulated a subconscious dream of an Italian
chapel? But where are we to look for the original model of these
undulating parapets, Lions sejeant with shields, patellæ, fruit and
flower enrichment, the conchoidal "Cava Virginis," and the precision
of the general proportions? Was there, in the subconscious memory of
either of the sitters, some forgotten impression of a building in
Padua or elsewhere in Northern Italy, which in its main features, or
subsidiary detail, might tally with what was here given? That we cannot
say, for nothing of the sort could or can be recalled by the conscious
mind.
Should the day come when the bank of rubble on the north side of the
nave of Glastonbury Abbey can be thoroughly explored, it may be that
beyond some traces of the freestone wall spoken of by the old gardener
there may be found _nothing_; but if, on the other hand, it should
appear that by the same obscure mental process which has already, in
the case of the Edgar Chapel, predicated the existence, with practical
truth in form and detail, of a building whose very memory was lost
(and the evidence for which had been ignored, nay even scouted, by
the most competent antiquaries), another architectural treasure, long
buried and forgotten, might once again be brought to light, and its
wealth of Italian detail verified; then, indeed, would come into sight
new vistas, new possibilities of exploration and research into the
secrets of old time, and we should stand at the threshold of the Gate
of Remembrance.
SITTING. 16th August, 1917 (at Gloucester).
_Note._--The objects sought in this communication were formulated by
F.B.B. in advance. They chiefly concerned the discrepancies between the
two descriptions of Bere's buildings given at previous sittings, 13th
June, 1911, and 4th December, 1916, the first of which referred to some
work unidentified. F.B.B. suggested that the discovery of the footings
of the transept "aisle" immediately before the former of these two
sittings had created a mental bias in favour of a "chapel" there, and
thus confused the script.
"Maestro ... Francesco de Padua qui me instruxit et capella(m)
cognoscit in Italia. Ille etiam scripsit cum me et ille ... (struebat)
in modo Italiano, et mecum in nave navigavit ad Brit(tanniam). Ille
aedificavit et ornavit."
"Deepe, by ye Bank, is ye walle where ye fathers didde sit in their
old age; and they had not the use[52] of the younger brethren, but
were free--and who wished to spend hys dayes in ease and luxury? But
capella wasne in muro in Boreali parte. I have told ye. It was soe,
and in the banke deepe down ye shall find hym full perfect as I do
think. There was a deepe place where they destroyed and they covered
him and made a banke full six feet high, and soe saved the wall at the
west end for all tyme.
[52] _I.e._, did not keep the canonical hours, etc.--F.B.B.
"Ask ye, what was the chapel under the Tower beyond the Porche? He was
for the reliquaries, and ye did enter hym from the garth on the syde
of St. Mary's and uppe four steppes to him, and soe through to the
upper garth and ye road to the John's Gate."
* * * * *
"Wysdom--it was best soe. The Land was ycovered with the houses of
God, and the grass he could not grow, and it was in the providence of
God that the houses were destroyed, for they held no life. Men desired
fuller life in ye world, and to travel far; and the old faith[53] was
no longer needed, for the minds of men were no longer as ye beasts
that perish, but each man was a light unto himself and did need no
father to control him--so it was best, though much loveliness was
destroyed in the undoing. The Spirit liveth still, and what we lived
for, in new guise we give to you. Grow in the Spirit. We are a symbol
of great truths, and ye read the symbol aright. That which we did
dream lives on, and in the Spirit we pass it on to you, from symbol to
symbol--ever higher, ever wider.
[53] _I.e._, the old system.
"As great books were we, and our work was in stone--a language handed
down for you to read, which we had forgotten, and so fell.
"What wold ye?"
At this point there was a pause in the writing. Neither F.B.B. nor J.A.
were aware of anything that had been written. The sheets were replaced
and laid aside as they were filled, and nothing was suggested during
the writing by either sitter. There was a little conversation on other
subjects. At this point it occurred to F.B.B. (though in ignorance of
the question "What wold ye?") to ask the following, and he wrote it
down on the paper.
_Q._ "_Do you confirm all that was told us of the Italian design of
the chapel of the Loretto? Please say what building in Italy was the
model chosen by Abbot Richard Bere for this work._"
_A._ "Francesco de Padua aedificavit. Two would speak of it--he who
made it and I who moved for my fannes and English. We both made
hym--I, and he, my friend."
"Capella di Marco[54] at Padua--hym by the Key.[55]
[54] Not mentioned in Cesare Foligno's _Story of Padua_, but there
is a chapel of St. Mark figured in a mediæval map of the town. The
mention of this saint tends to explain the lions mentioned in the 1916
script, which had hitherto seemed an incongruous feature, if not quite
out of place on a chapel of Our Lady.--F.B.B.
[55] The Chapel of St. Mark occupies, in the map, a place not far from
the river, and near the mediæval bridge of St. Mathio. As the River
Bacchiglione was navigable, it seems quite probable that there would
be quays along its banks within the city.
"Dominic di Vallera Castiglione[56] aedificavit anno 1497--via St.
Ursula."
[56] This name is quite unknown to either of us.--F.B.B.
At this point the sitting was broken off and resumed on the evening
following--17th August, 1917.
_Q. by F.B.B._ "_Please tell us plainly, what was the building 22
feet long and 4 paces wide spoken of on 13th June, 1911? What was
its use and what was its dedication? This is the building with the
fan-vaulting. Tell us exactly where it stood._"
"Vincula ecclesiae disrupta sunt. Claustra aperta sunt.
"Claustra quae vocantur, vento Boreali aperta est (_sic_)[57] in
vestibulo sub turre--English volts--and Capella Lorettae (in) Ytaliano
modo.
[57] Evidently a play upon words, the first "Claustra" apparently
signifying that the barred gates are opened; and the second, "that
which we should describe as 'cloisters' were open at this point to the
North Wind."
"Capella Loretta was on ye lower level, with four or six steppys up to
the pavement. One steppe to hym from the way from John's Gate to the
North Porche.
"Seek my chapple as I told ye in ye Banck. He was entered from ye
West, and had a door into the littel cloister by ye transept of ye
grete Church, and four stepps up to the pavement.
"Ye door was in ye transept wall at ye end thereof.
"Wold ye have many things? The Vineyard was by the Ponds behind the
Priests' Houses that I ybuilded, over against the (road?), and beyond
ye gallery at the Maudlin Gate by the water. On ye side of ye grete
Courte was ye brick yarde--beyond ye fishponds. Seek ye foundations at
ye east of ye great Court where ye pryor's chapel was, and I ybuilded
in front of hym. Digge also near by the Kitchens, which were near
together.
"That which the brethren of old handed down to us, we followed, ever
building on their plann. As we have said, our Abbey was a message
in ye stones. In ye foundations and ye distances be a mystery--the
mystery of our Faith, which ye have forgotten and we also in ye latter
days.
"All ye measures were marked plaine on ye slabbes in Mary's
Chappel,[58] and ye have destroyed them. So it was recorded, as they
who builded and they who came after knew aforehand where they should
build. But these things are overpast and of no value now. The spirit
was lost and with the loss of the spirit the body decayed and was of
no further use to (us).
[58] William of Malmesbury's _Glastonbury_, quoted below.
"There was the Body of Christ, and round him would have been the Four
Ways. Two were ybuilded and no more. In ye floor of ye Mary Chappel
was ye Zodiac, that all might see and understand the mystery. In ye
midst of ye Chapel he was laid; and the Cross of Hym who was our
Example and Exemplar.
"Braineton, he didde much, for he was Geomancer to ye Abbey of old
tyme."
These curious statements appear to have a bearing on certain facts
recorded of the Lady Chapel and upon others which have come to light
as a result of the study of the whole plan of the Abbey Church and
Monastic buildings. The latter were found to be laid out on a series of
commensurate squares of 37 × 2 (or 74) feet, and it has been observed
that there is no divergence from the symmetry of these squares in the
works of the successive centuries right up to the time of the last
Abbot, for the Edgar Chapel falls into line with the rest. Thus the
outer measure of the total length of the Great Church with St. Mary's
Chapel is 592 feet, or eight commensurate and consecutive squares of
74 feet each, and the width of the Nave and Quire are each one such
square. The plan has been already most useful in locating the position
of walls destroyed and lost. There is much yet to be done in order to
complete the plan, but it is, in the main, recovered, and has been
published in the _Proceedings of the Somerset Archæological Society_,
from which it is here reproduced (Fig. 12).
As to the engraved geometric lines on the floor of St. Mary's Chapel,
it may be well to quote William of Malmesbury, whose record of this
dates from the twelfth century. This old chronicler says, speaking of
this chapel, which was on the site of the oldest Christian church:
"This church, then, is certainly the oldest I know in England, and
from this circumstance derives its name (_vetusta ecclesia_)....
In the pavement may be seen on every side stones designedly inlaid
in triangles and squares, and figured with lead, under which, if I
believe some sacred enigma to be contained, I do no injustice to
religion."
[Illustration: FIG. 13.
NOTE.--This plan shows the state of knowledge in 1912. A western aisle
to the north transept is shown on the site of the foundations which had
been discovered. _To fold between pp. 148, 149._]
The plan of the Chapel is itself a perfect instance of the Vesica
Piscis, the proportions of the double equilateral triangle and the most
sacred and cherished mystery of the Christian temple builders (see
_Proceedings of the Somerset Archæological Society_, vol. lxii., 1916,
pp. xxxviii-xl). For the "Four Ways" see such early instances of the
Rood as the example at Lucca Cathedral, where the arms of the Cross are
held in a circle, suggestive of the zodiac, and point to the position
of the four fixed signs Aquarius, Leo, Taurus, and Aquila or Scorpio,
corresponding to SS. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, figured in the
Christian symbology by the Angel, the Lion, the Bull, and the Eagle
respectively. What is implied in the foregoing communication, when it
is stated that of the four ways, they only builded two, is not known to
the writer.
* * * * *
F.B.B., not being yet quite satisfied on the subject of the script of
13th June, 1911, repeated a part of his former question, as follows:
_Q._ "_But where was that building 22 feet long and 4 paces wide, with
three four-light windows and fans. I cannot see how the measure of 22
feet is obtained. Was this an east-and-west measure, or to be taken
north-and-south?_"
_A._ "Ye door into ye transept in ye north, which I, Camel, used; he
was in ye west porche and under the three high windowes.
"What wold ye? The newe Chappell, he was in ye Bank far oute, in
line with ye Transept as I remember yt. He wasne finished or ever.
Chappells a many! Everywhere! Why cumbered they the ground when faith
was dead, and there was no longer any need for hym? The purse[59] was
full, it must be spent, and so, when nor barn nor byre nor pent called
for it, it was yspent. Why should roysterers and evil men have it to
spend? So we builded much.
[59] John Camel was "Purse-bearer" to Abbot Bere.
"Chapels everywhere--ne need of them.
"Small chance it is preserved (_passage doubtful_), but it was well
ycovered, I wot, for them who would pull downe.
[Illustration:
FIG. 14.--GLASTONBURY ABBEY: PLAN OF THE CHAPEL OF OUR LADY, BUILT
A.D. 1184, ON THE SITE OF THE CHURCH OF JOSEPH OF ARIMATHÆA.
The plan lies in a hexagon. Its measures are based upon the standard
British foot of 12 inches. The breadth between the faces of the
central buttresses is 37 feet, in harmony with the general scheme of
measures found in the Abbey. The length of the vesica is approximately
64 feet, and its points touch the outer faces of the end walls.
External to this is another vesica embracing the plinth-course (see
plan). The interior shows a third, marking three-quarters of its
length. Each vesica contains a rhombus of two equilateral triangles.
Their measures are symbolic and explanatory of the sacred geometry of
which the "Gematria" of the Greek scriptures is illustrative. Thus,
the solid rectangular area of this building is 37 by 64, or 2,368
square feet, by Gematria the equivalent of ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ (Jesus
Christ) or Ὁ ἉΓΙΟΣ ΤΩΝ ἉΓΙΩΝ (The Holy One of Holy Ones). The rhombus
contained has the area 1,184 square feet, very possibly designed to
record the date (A.D. 1184) of the erection of the Chapel. It will
be noted that William of Malmesbury alludes to the "sacred enigma"
believed to be concealed in the triangular and other figures on
the floor of the Chapel.]
"Stones carven and yguilded--ne spirit, I wot. How could these things
stand in the day of wrath? Pride! Ostentation! Much glory and much
tinsel; but ne worship, ne humbleness, ne object for us to continue
more.... So passe old tymes away."
_Q._ "_But how was that 22 feet length arrived at?_"
_A._ "A cloyster from ye Nave to ye Lobby, and four steppes unto ye
Transept floor, and from ye lobby, on ye west, ye Chappell.
"Ne Chappell but ye Cloyster in ye corner of ye grete Church. Claustrum
to ye Chappel along ye aisle--then ye lobby and ye Chappel west of hym."
This statement is now sufficiently explicit. It is possible to form a
plan (see Figs. 15 and 16). The little cloister alongside the wall of
the transept forms a western aisle to the same, covering one bay, whose
width is known to have been 22 feet nearly. At this point it merges
into a lobby or vestibule, at or near the foot of a fair-sized turret
which stands at the north-west angle of the transept. This lobby has
doors on all sides--(1) south, from the cloister communicating with the
nave; (2) north, to the upper garth, and the path used by Camel the
Purser, who lived in High Street; (3) east, and up the steps through
the transept wall, into the transept itself; and (4) west, into the
short corridor of 10 feet leading to the Loretto Chapel.
[Illustration: FIG. 15.--THE NORTH TRANSEPT, SHOWING THE "CLAUSTRA"
ALONG THE AISLE, THEN THE LOBBY, WITH ITS FOUR DOORS, AND THE LORETTO
CHAPEL TO THE WEST.]
[Illustration: FIG. 16.--GLASTONBURY ABBEY: COMPLETE PLAN, SHOWING ALL
THE PRINCIPAL FEATURES MENTIONED IN THE SCRIPT.]
A final question was asked, and the result is interesting, as
the question was a mental one, asked by F.B.B., not written nor
communicated to J.A. by any ostensible means. F.B.B. formulated
the question in his mind thus: "What was the surname of the Paduan
architect Francesco?" Answer: "_Vecchi._--_Francesco di Vecchi._"[60]
[60] A name unknown to us in this connection.--F.B.B. A letter received
by F.B.B. from an Englishman living in Venice (dated April 19) gives
the following extract from the "Curiosita Veneziane" (Giuseppe Tassini,
Venezia, 1887):
"_Vecchia_ ... Stefano della Vecchia. Il cui padre Venturino era stato
approvato cittadino originario il 29 Octobre 1629 apparteneva alla
famiglia Della Vecchia, la quali venne dal territorio di Bergamo, ed
era detto da principio, Cornovi.
"... Un Antonio di questa famiglia il cui figlio Zaccaria fu _Vescovo
di Torcello_, comperi in 1565 un nobile palazzo sulla Fundamenta della
Madonna dell'Orto."
This not being quite as clear as was wished, the question was repeated,
and the reply came as follows: "VECCHI _di Torcello in Italia_."
[Illustration: PLATE V.
CONJECTURAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE NORTH TRANSEPT, WITH THE "CLAUSTRUM"
ATTACHED
On the left, under the turret, is the open vestibule, leading to the
Chapel of the Loretto (on extreme left). _To face page 154._]
CONCLUSION
So ends the "Loretto Chapel" script, with a series of precise and
categorical statements, offering no means of escape from the final
alternative of truth or falsehood, fact or fiction. This situation will
be clear to the reader, as it is to the writer of this narrative, who,
for the reasons now about to be given, entertains no misgivings as to
the course he has taken in publishing it.
His motto here would be, "Prove all things, and hold fast that which
is good." These writings, whose value is at present unproven, and in
respect of the detailed statement of names, dates, and places, highly
problematical, are put forward as an illustration of the working of his
method.
They are not to be accepted with credulity, but are subjects for
critical analysis, and must be weighed and examined, with all the
rest, in the light of reason, assisted by every useful means of normal
research and exploration.
If we are resolved to accept nothing which is not first fully endorsed
by reason and common sense, and afterwards fortified by deductions
fairly made from data, however slender, we stand but little risk of
being deceived. Let us, therefore, apply to this case the same rule
which the writer has already successfully applied in the case of the
Edgar Chapel.
Intuition has played her part. From the depths of the subconscious
mind her power has evoked these images. Now let Reason and Logic take
the reins and drive the argument. Let us analyse the facts, such as
they are, which bear upon the case, and in the light of the intuitive
results see whether an argument may be built up which will be capable
of supporting weight.
In this lies the true utility of the method we have chosen. It
claims a double value--(1) in its ability to remember and to review
subconsciously an infinitude of minor things, slightly or casually
impressed upon the mind and unnoticed or unremembered by the working
brain; and (2) the faculty of balancing, assessing, and combining
these in such manner as the brain itself is rarely if ever able to
do, and hence to evolve from slenderest data a scheme in which all
probabilities which can lawfully be inferred from these minutiæ are
welded into a complete whole.
For a moment, let us go farther and assume that some of the statements
made in the script are not merely incapable of proof, but are found
actually inconsistent with facts. Where then do we stand with our
theory?
As I have said, until the statements are accepted, no one is deceived
unless by his own rashness. All that has happened is that two people
having a perfectly honest purpose have attempted to record by
automatic process knowledge arrived at by the trained exercise of the
subconscious mind, and have obtained--let us say--fiction or romance
instead of the fact they sought.
The logical inference from this failure will obviously be that the
particular method employed, whilst it may have the value claimed for it
of supplementing the ordinary reasoning powers, has proved unreliable
where applied for the purpose of procuring statements whose truth does
not (as in the case of the Edgar Chapel) depend upon the deductive or
inductive probabilities, but upon isolated facts unrelated to others,
such as the names of places and people unknown; and that therefore,
as a general conclusion, the method is unsuited for the purpose of
obtaining such information, and we have used it for an end for which it
is not adapted.
Thus may the legitimate bounds of the automatic method be prescribed;
Intuition must bring all her results to the bar of Reason for
provisional acceptance, and when this test is passed then the matter
becomes ripe for further research.
Above all, let us not be superstitious. There is no need to invoke
the action of supernatural agencies of a malevolent sort to explain
the outcome of our own fallibility. If a man or woman sits down and
produces automatically a story which turns out to be fiction, why, I
ask, should that fiction be regarded as anything inherently worse in
origin than the mass of fiction, good, bad, and indifferent, which
writers produce consciously?
Where is the essential difference? The only answer I can find to this
question is that the difference lies in the folly of the credulous, who
are at all times willing to attach greater importance and credit to a
statement made from an unknown source than to one which has a definite
human and personal origin. "Omne ignotum pro magnifico."
For the imaginative function, whether working consciously or
unconsciously, is the same in either case. Give it truth to feed upon
and it will evolve truth. And through the door of truth may enter that
which will guide us to a wider knowledge.
APPENDIX
THE LORETTO CHAPEL
SYNTHETIC OR CONSTRUCTIVE ARGUMENT
BASED ON CONCLUSIONS OFFERED BY THE AUTOMATIC SCRIPT, AND THE WEIGHING
OF ALL AVAILABLE DATA IN THE LIGHT OF SAME.
A.--AS TO THE POSITION OF THE LORETTO CHAPEL.
SCRIPT.
August 16, 1917. "=Deepe, by ye Bank, is ye walle," etc. "But capella
wasne in muro in Boreali parte ... and in ye Banke deepe downe ye shall
find him," etc. There was a deep place where they destroyed, and they
covered him, and made a banke full six feet high, and soe saved the
wall at the west end for all tyme.="
December 4, 1916. "=Abbot Bere ybuilded ye Loretto Chapel faire and
large to the north side of the Navis. Itt was not ye Chapitre House....
Bere's Chapel was distant from ye Navis thirty-one feet and a half, and
from ye aisle of ye transept he was fulle tenn feet.... The same was
forty feet by twenty or thereabouts, and his chief doore was to the
west, and a pavement joyned him to the road from St John's Gate to ye
Churche.="
August 17, 1917. "=Capella Loretta was on ye lower level, with four or
six steppys up to the pavement.="
"=Seek my chapple, as I told ye, in ye Banck.="
"=He was entered from ye west, and had a door into the littel cloister
by ye transept of ye grete Church, and four stepps up to the pavement.="
"=All ye measures were marked plaine on ye slabbes of St. Mary's
Chappel ... so it was recorded, as they who builded and they who came
after knew aforehand where they should build.="
"=The newe chappell he was in ye bank far oute in line with ye transept
as I remember it.="
September 1, 1910. "=On ye north syde of ye grete church, at ye ende,
near to ye newe chappel which Bere (builded).="
EXISTING DATA.
_The Deep Place._--The mention of a "deep place" calls attention for
the first time to a number of facts which group themselves in a manner
suggestive of such a probability. They are as follows:
(_a_) Stukeley's view (1723) (see Fig. 9) seems to indicate a drop on
the north side of the nave and transept, to a lower level.
Coney's view (see Plate IV.) certainly shows the small building on the
north side of the nave with a break in the ground just in front of it,
marking a lower level for the wall.
(_b_) The configuration of the ground is in favour of this. Above and
eastward of the Abbey enclosure is a narrow valley running west, and
filled up in its lower part, over which lies the northern section of
the Abbey enclosure. The High Street runs down the north side of this
valley, and parallel to it, and closely adjoining the Abbey wall is
Silver Street, a name said by some antiquaries to indicate a ford.
(_c_) The drainage of the Abbey church is down the north side, as would
appear by the direction of the drainage channel in the foundations of
the Edgar Chapel, and the larger water-channel whose course was traced
diagonally beneath the floor of the quire.
(_d_) In excavating the north porch, a very deep pit was found right
against the north-west angle of the footings. It went down nearly 10
feet below the floor-level of the church. This may have extended east
and west, and the north porch may in that case be supposed to have been
approached by a paved way over a bridge.
_The Bank._--The foot of the bank, as nearly as may be estimated, lies
about 27 feet north of the position of the nave wall (outer face). This
would bring the 31 and a half feet distance indicated by the script for
the wall of the chapel, about 4 and a half feet within the bank, and
this would seem to accord with the old gardener's recollection.
The bank runs westwards as far as the north porch, or about 108 feet
west of the transept, so that the west end of the chapel as described
would be well covered, being some 40 feet east of the termination of
the bank.
The extreme projection of the transept, beyond the line of the inner
face of the nave wall, would be about 60 feet, and not less than 54.
The thirty-one and a half feet measure from the outside of the nave
wall, if added to the probable thickness of the latter, will give a
total of 39 or 40 feet, and if this measure is assumed to be to the
inner face of the chapel wall (south) the position of its outer face
would accord with the 37 feet general line, following the symmetric
scheme on which the whole abbey is found to be built (see Fig. 12), and
the north side of the chapel will then come very nearly into line with
the transept.
WORKING HYPOTHESIS.
_That the ground on the north side of the Church sloped down formerly
to the bed of the brook coming from the hill behind the town. This
would make a depression about 10 feet deep alongside the Church, at
a distance, roughly, of about 40 feet north of the outer face of the
nave aisle wall, and immediately north of the projection of the north
transept and porch. The bed would have been partly filled when the
Abbey was standing, and there would be a system of drains beneath
the soil, which would have been levelled to form a garth or garden a
few feet below the nave floor, terminated on the west by a path or
pavement from the porch to St. John's Gate (running due north), and
beyond this, again to the west, would be another garth at a still lower
level, to the north of St. Mary's Chapel and the Galilee, following the
general trend of the grounds, which slope to the westward. This part
was the cemetery of the laity._
_It is inferred that Bere's Chapel of the Loretto may have stood on
the upper garth, its floor a few feet below the nave, and at about the
distance mentioned in the script._
_That the present aspect of the ground, which shows a uniform rise to
the north of the Abbey, is thus totally misleading, and the bank and
the higher level beyond on the town side must be altogether artificial,
and nothing but a huge accumulation of débris from the destruction of
the Abbey. The bulk of the ancient work now destroyed was so enormous
that there is no difficulty at all in supposing this, notwithstanding
the fact that a great quantity of the masonry went, as is known, to
make a foundation for the new road to Wells._
_The further inference is made that under this bank will most likely
be hidden a great deal of fragmentary work, and that its removal will
bring to light many things of archæological interest._
_That the Loretto Chapel, if its position be correctly given in the
script as 31 feet 6 inches from nave, would appear nearly in line with
the transept (north end), when viewed from the north, but, if anything,
rather further out_ (see Fig. 14).
B.--AS TO THE WESTERN AISLE TO THE TRANSEPT, AND THE SUGGESTION OF A
CLOISTER OR PASSAGE IN SAME, AND THE CHARACTER OF THE BUILDING.
SCRIPT
June 13, 1911.... "=Somewhat remaineth of ye outer walls, and ye walle
by ye crossinge.... Ye doore unto hym is at the west (see note), nigh
unto the pillar of the Navis; one doore only, on Nave.=
="Yn feete twenty and two, and foure paces in the width thereof, and ye
walle of ye Nave was strengthened thereby," etc.=
December 4, 1916. "=Bere's Chapel was distant from ye Navis thirty-one
feet and a half, and from= _ye aisle of ye transept_ =he was fulle tenn
feet with a covered way unto, and four steppes up unto= _ye aisle_
=aforesaid=.
"=There were four steppes--nay, six--to the= _aisle of ye transeppt_,
=and a covered way vaulted in a round vault to ye chappel=."
August 17, 1917. "=Claustra quae vocantur, vento Boreale aperta est--in
vestibule sub turre--English volts=."
"=Seek my chapple as I told ye in ye Banck. He was entered from ye
west, and had a door into the= _littel cloister by ye transept_ =of ye
grete church, and four stepps up to the pavement. Ye door was in ye
transept wall at ye end thereof.="
"=Ye door into ye transept in ye north, which I, Camel, used, he was in
ye west porche and under the three high windows.=
"_A Cloyster from ye Nave to ye Lobby_, =and four steppes unto ye
Transept floor, and from ye Lobby, on ye west, ye Chappell=.
"_Ne Chappel but ye Cloyster_ =in ye corner of ye grete church=.
_Claustrum to ye Chappel along ye aisle, then ye lobby_ =and ye Chappel
west of hym=."
(Italics mine.--F.B.B.)
EXISTING DATA
(_a_) The wall-footing discovered in 1911 shows a possible breadth of
12 feet or so for this aisle. The thickness of the footing is evidence
of a strong construction. There were some marks of a cross-foundation
at a point over 20 feet out north, and near the face of the bank.
(_b_) The indications were in favour of a lower level for this work.
The drop from the transept level to that of the nave is about 4 feet,
and this aisle or passage would appear to be on the nave level.
(_c_) Benedictine houses did not usually have western aisles to the
transepts, as is the case with cathedral churches. But Glastonbury
followed Wells in some things, and at Wells there are western aisles
to the transepts, and that on the north side has screens on two sides,
within arches to nave and to transept.
(_d_) The detail found on this site was of very fine late perpendicular
window-tracery, showing the existence of windows with heavy central
mullions, and most likely of four lights.
(_e_) Camel's house was in the High Street at a point which would be
readily approached by a path towards this part of the Abbey Church.
WORKING HYPOTHESIS.
_That the foundation discovered in 1911 is not that of a chapel, nor
yet of an aisle to the transept, properly so called, although it might
be thus described since it would have that appearance from without._
_The inference is that this adjunct would have been on the nave level,
and its use connected with the nave. It would have been primarily a
passage-way from the nave to a court or to buildings on the north side,
and it would be properly described as a cloister alley._
_In this position it would, if substantially built, most readily serve
the useful purpose of contributing support to the central tower and
to the walls near the crossing, adding stability to the transept if
affected by the weakness of the tower, and furnishing support for
flying buttresses to the north-west angle of the crossing and tower
itself._
_There would be little object in carrying it out further north than
would be requisite to cover one bay of the transept wall. This would
make it a possible 22 feet in internal measure. There would be normally
a double square on plan, and if fan-vaulted this would give two bays,
and two windows to the west and one to the north--three in all._
C.--AS TO THE ITALIAN STYLE OF THE CHAPEL.
SCRIPT
December 4, 1916. "=Abbot Bere ybuilded ye Loretto Chapel faire
and large, to the north (side of the) Navis.... Yt was ybuilded by Bere
most faire and wonderful in ye newe style brought from Ytaly when he
didd go there....="
"=We have said, he was of the Ytalian style, new and very faire, and
Bere ybuilded coming from embassadrie in Ytaly.... He wasne like
anything else, (but was of the) newe style.="
_Here followed the detailed sketches showing--_
1. =A rectangular chapel of four bays, with a small apse to the east,
as a "Cava Virginis."=
2. =Parapets of undulating outline, and others suggestive of the
fleur-de-lys, with indications of fruit and flower enrichment.=
3. =Sitting lions, bearing shields, over each division of the bays,
mounted on small pillars with "patellae" or plaques, dividing the
parapets.=
4. =Heads of angels or cherubs, probably in the cornices.=
5. =Round-headed windows, and vaults with bands of carved fruit and
flowers on the groin-ribs.=
August 16, 1917. "=Maestro Francesco de Padua qui me instruxit et
capellam cognoscit in Italia ... struebat in modo Italiano.=
"=Francesco de Padua aedificavit. Two would speak of it--he who made
it, and I who moved for my fannes and English. We both made him.="
(_Name of the model for this work_)--
"=Capella di Marco at Padua--hym by the Key.="
"=Domenic di Vallera Castiglione aedificavit anno 1497--via St Ursula.="
(_Name of Bere's architect_)--
"=Vecchi--Francesco De Vecchi.="
"=VECCHI di Torcello in Italia.="
EXISTING DATA
(_a_) The Chapel was built just after Bere's embassage to Italy. He
was a cultivated and learned man with a knowledge of architecture, as
is evident from the quality of his building works. He must have been
supported by capable, if not eminent, master-builders and craftsmen.
(_b_) Bere was impregnated with the new ideas, and was the friend of
Erasmus. A letter of his to Erasmus is extant. His sympathy with new
and more liberal views would be reflected in a wider culture, and the
influence of the Italian Renaissance, already affecting English art in
minor ways, may well have moved him to become a pioneer in introducing
the style which, a half-century later, usurped the place of our native
"Tudor" forms. These he used as a master, and had developed them to
their highest pitch.
(_c_) The duration of his visit to Italy is at present unknown to us,
but the circumstance of the death of Pius III.--if he overstayed that
event--would make for delay and give him time to devote to the study of
Italian architectural models.
(_d_) The circumstances of his vow are also, so far as we know, not a
matter of history; but the vow itself or the intention which clearly
implies it is our reading of Leland's note.
The Chapel is undoubtedly a thank-offering. It is built to the honour
of Our Lady in the particular aspect of an "Italian" saint of local
repute, possessed of the attribute of protection to life and health.
The choice of a style and character for the monument designed by Bere
would very naturally be consonant with that prevailing locally--_i.e._,
Italian.
(_e_) A few fragments of plain moulded work, of Italian character,
have been noted amongst the débris of the Abbey. These were hitherto
supposed to have belonged to some Elizabethan building, now destroyed,
whose remains had somehow found their way into the general mass of
Abbey fragments.
WORKING HYPOTHESIS.
_That a Chapel dedicated to an "Italian" Madonna, erected by an
Abbot of liberal views, impressed by the newer learning and culture,
immediately on his return from a visit to Italy, at a time when the
forms of Italian Renaissance were in process of adaptation to Gothic
buildings, might well have been influenced in its design by Italian
ideas, even to a wholesale extent, and that if an Italian master were
employed, as appears by no means an unreasonable idea, an entirely
Italian model may have been followed._
_That the type that would evoke most readily the Abbot's artistic
sympathies would be a North Italian type, not too far removed from
the principles of architectural form to which he had been habituated.
An entirely Roman model, on purely classic lines, is for this reason
less likely. But the selection of an Italian master for the purpose of
carrying out Bere's scheme almost necessarily follows if the intention
to employ an Italian style be conceded. Bere could not do this unaided,
as an Abbot would not be his own architect._
D.--AS TO THE STYLE OF THE BUILDING AT THE ANGLE OF THE TRANSEPT AND
NORTH AISLE OF NAVE.
SCRIPT
Script, June 13, 1911. "=I made that building. All that I didde
anywhere is fannes. Ne barrel vault. And under them, three faire
windowes of foure lights, with transomes and littel castel-work on
the ramps thereof ... and each fanne had twelve ribs, and they were
ycoloured red and gold, like my chapel of Edgar....=
"=... Ye roundels of ye volte were golden, and also ye bosses, and ye
hollows were bright redde, likewise ye tabernacle of Oure Ladye in the
est wall golde and redde; and ye windowes were of glasse yellow in
canopies with redde and blewe in ye little lights thereof. Ye floore
was of tileis red, with shields and ornaments in yellow likewise."...=
EXISTING DATA
(_a_) As an integral part of the Church the probabilities lie in the
direction of the use of Bere's own master-masons for this work, and the
choice of the customary English style seems to follow. This would be
all the more consistent with probabilities if the work were involved
with the strengthening of the older masonry at the crossing of the
Church--a work known to have been necessary, since Leland records the
fact that Bere strengthened the central tower by the addition of the
"St. Andrew's" arches beneath it (see Plate III).
(_b_) The fragments of window-tracery already referred to as having
been found on the site are English in character.
WORKING HYPOTHESIS.
_That the building in the angle of the nave and transept was formed
with the double object of a support to the weak walls of the crossing,
and as a covered approach to the Chapel of the Loretto, erected by
Abbot Bere on a site adjoining the north side of the nave, but not
attached directly to same, and that this cloister was built in the
later English style in which his own masons were expert._
ENVOI
THE LAMPLIGHTER
One by one, along the crowded street
The footsteps falter, and the stillness grows
Oppressive as the sudden hush that falls
In shaded chambers whence a life has flown.
One by one, the ruddy windows fade
To utter darkness, while behind closed doors
The voices cease, and all the shadowy night
Broods o'er a city of the seeming dead;
Save only that amid the shadows gleam
Dim lights that trace the form of street and square
And guide the wanderer in his mazy quest
Through ways all unfamiliar. He that lit
The starry welcome now is seen no more.
His light extinguished and his duty done,
He peaceful sleeps within his silent home.
We see him not; and yet perchance he hears
In dreams our echoing voices as we pass
Athwart his shuttered windows--hears us bless
The light he lighted, gleaming through the night
A welcome to the lost and weary; wakes perchance
To murmur, "All is well," then sleeps again.
So may he sleep in peace until the Sun
From which his flame was borrowed wakes the East
To crimson glory, and his glimmering lights
Merge in the splendour of the breaking Day.
JOHN ALLEYNE.
INDEX AND SYNOPSIS
A
Abbey Church, plans, Figs. 1, 3, 12, 15
its total length, 12, 62, 65, 68, 69
Abbots (see Bere, Breynton, Whiting, etc.)
House, 10 ref. and Fig. 9
head (carved), 99 (Fig. 8)
Aisle to north transept (a cloister-alley), 125, 126
Ale, Johannes and the vat of, 89
Aller, John de, 66
Almoner, J. Bryan (lived over the King's Gate), 95
Altar, the High, 45, 56
screen, etc., 51, 56, 58, 77;
its back, with ancient image of B. V. M., 57
sepulchre under, 65
Altars, side, 43
Ambrosius the Cellarer, 66
Andrew, St., Chapel of, 51
Guild of, 100
arches (under tower), 122, 167, and Plate III.
Apse, semicircular, on Phelps' and Warner's plans, 11, 51, 52, 74
polygonal, 57, 61, 73, 74; Figs. 5, 6, 7, and 12; also Plate II.
Arch to Edgar Chapel (antechapel), 43
to end of Quire, 59
relieving, to the north-west angle of central tower, 121
Arches, like St. Andrew's Cross, under tower, 122, 167; Plate III.
Architect of Edgar Chapel (Richard de Tantonia), 67
of Loretto Chapel (Francesco Vecchi), 144, 145, 154
of St. Mark's, Padua (Domenico di Vallera Castiglione), 146
Arimathea, Joseph of, 33 ref.
Convent of (near Guest Hall), 68
Arthur, King: tomb of, 45, 56, 65
Automatism, discussion of, 22
Awfwold the Saxon, 63, 68
Azure glass (vitrea azurea): in script, 37, 72
discovered, 62, 72
B
Bailey, the Inner and Outer, 91 ref.
Bank, on site of the Loretto Chapel, north side of nave, 113, 144,
146, 160, 161, 162
Bards, writings, 87
Barrel vault, in south chantry, 57
Bell-tower, over north-east angle of cloister, burnt, repaired, and
pulled down owing to bad foundation, 88
Benedict (for Benignus), St.: Church of, 98, 100;
gargoyle of, 99 (Fig. 8)
Bere or Beere, Abbot Richard, 4, 35, 44, 45, 47, 54, 59, etc.
arms of, 98;
carved head of, 99 (Fig. 8)
embassy, 111;
notes on, 120
built St. Benignus' Church, 100
Edgar Chapel, 53
Loretto Chapel, 111, 120, 125, 126, 145, 146
claustrum in angle of transept, leading to Loretto, 119, 121
his signature in script, 53
his influence on those coming after, 47-48
Body of Christ (in symbolic lines on floor of St. Mary's), 147
Bones, the stirring of the dry, 21
of Abbot Whiting (collected and buried), 65
of St. Dunstan (held by Glastonbury), 91
Braineton, or Breynton, John of, Abbot, 48
geomancer to the Abbey, 147
Bryan, John, Almoner, 95
Bryant, Johannes, monk, curator of Edgar Chapel, sculptor, mason,
37, 38, 40, 41, 45, 47, 57, 59, 66
child of Nature, 85-97 _passim_
C
Camel, or Camillus, Thesiger--_i.e._, treasurer to Abbot Bere, 125,
127, 149, 151, 166
house of, 164
path used by, 154
tomb in St. John's, 127
Cancellarius (see Chancellor)
Cannon, MS. of John, 113, 114, 117 (Fig. 11), 124
Cannon, sketch of ruins by, 117
Canterbury, pilgrims from, to shrine of St. Dunstan, 91
Capella St. Edgar (see Chapel)
St. Maria (see Chapel)
Cardinal Wolsey: friend of the Abbey, 91
made Whiting Abbot at Oxford, 101
Castiglione, Domenico, 146
Cava Virginis (the apse of the Loretto Chapel), 129, _c_, _e_, _g_;
130, _h_, _j_, _k_; 139, _d_; text, 143
Cellarer: Ambrosius, 66
Cellars of Refectory, 66
of Guest Hall, 67
Chalice Hill, 69
chapel on path to, 69
Chamber, the Great, 94
over King's Gate, 95
to the east of Edgar Chapel, 63
Chancellorium, _in_ (as a Chancery: the purpose of Christ Church Hall,
as built by Wolsey), 101
Changing-room for the choristers, 68
Chantry (south of Quire), 51
south side of Edgar Chapel, 27 ref.
57 (script), 63;
plan, 64 (Fig. 6)
Chapel of Dunstan, St.: in the west (built by Edgar, and rebuilt by
Radulphus), 91
plans, Figs. 12 and 15
in the north (the corner chapel in Fig. 14), 68
Chapel of Edgar, 35, 43, 44, 47, 51, 53, 55, 63, 70-77 (table), 119, 120
plans of, 34, 36, 64 (Fig. 6), 148_a_ (Fig. 12), 153 (Fig. 15);
Plate II. (p. 56_a_)
elevation of, 81
length determined, 63
Chapel of Our Lady of Loretto (site lost): built by Bere,
111;
described in script as being in Italian style, its _locus_ indicated,
and details given, 125, 126, 129-142, 146;
plans, 152, 153 (Figs. 14 and 15); Plate V. (154_a_)
used as a Chapter House by Bere, during repairs, 126
Chapel of St. Mary, 35, 41, 47, 58, 125 (see Retro-Chapel,
Lady Chapel, etc.)
the older Lady Chapel, 47, 50, 78
minor, in retro-quire, 43, 51
present, on site of the primitive church, at west end: plans,
148_a_ (Fig. 12), 150, 153 (Figs. 13, 15)
sketches of, Figs. 9, 10, 11
sacred geometry on floor of chapel, 147, 148
geometric principles of the plan, 150, 151, Fig. 13 and ref.
Chapel of St. Michael in the graveyard (burial-place of Johannes), 97
Chapel of St. Thomas of Canterbury, 114, and Fig. 14 (this is the
inner chapel shown in Fig. 14, the outer being St. Dunstan)
Chapter House: Edgar Chapel so called in Elizabethan record, 12
Loretto Chapel, so called in Cannon MS., 114, 125, 126
Loretto Chapel used as, by Bere, during repair of, 126
Christ Church Hall, a Chancellorium, 101
Church, Saxon (on site of Edgar Chapel within a fort), 63
Church of Ina, 56
of Turstin, 107
the Great (_temp._ Jocelyn), 87,88
Clock (horloge) of Peter Lightfoot, 87
Cloister, the Great, 68, 96
Little, 67, 68
to north transept, 126 and Plate V.
of the North Wind, 146, 151; Plate V.
Community of 347 monks (thirteenth century), 88
Company, the, 21, 87, 88 (brotherhood, 94)
Coney, drawing by, Plate IV.; ref. to, 112, 114, 123
Convent of Arimathea (the little convent), 68
Court, the Great, 147
by the graveyard, 94
Covered walk (Abbot's), 96
ways (see Passages)
Cross in the Zodiac, 147
Crypt under stairs of Edgar Chapel, 40, 50, 53
under New Hall, 68
under nave, 41
Curator capellae (J. Bryant), 38
D
Deep Place, the, 144, 166
Distances, Mystery of the, 147
Di Vallera: Domenico, 146
Door (in east wall), 53 (see Portus)
Drain, the Great, 66
Drawings of Edgar Chapel, 67
of Loretto Chapel, 128-142
geometrical, on floor of St. Mary's Chapel, 147
Ducange, dict. of mediæval and low Latin quoted, 33 ref.
Dunstan, St.: bones of, 91
chapel in the west, 91;
chapel in the north, 68;
chapel at Edgarley, 106 ref.
E
Eawulf, or Eanwulf, Saxon Earl of Somerton (Yarl of Edgarley) 29,
105, 108
Edgar, King (Saint), 4, 44
Chapel of, 4, 8, 9, 28, etc., Plate II. (see Chapel)
for "Edmund," 56, 59
Edgarley, 106
Elizabeth, Queen, 4, 12, 66
Enigmas, Sacred, on floor of chapel, 148
Erasmus (friend of Bere), 122
Ell (measure), 43 (In the script still unpublished occurs an
authoritative statement that the builder's ell used by the monks was
just over 2 feet 4 inches. This makes it identical with the "pace" as
indicated in the statement of length on p. 68, where 733 feet = 311
"passus.")
Excavation of Bere's chapel, 53, 54;
completed, 55, 59
of apse, 62
plan, 64
F
Fannes (fan-vaulting) in Edgar Chapel, 38, 43, 57
in claustrum of the Loretto, 119, 145
in Quire, 59
Glo'ster, 38, 58
Fishponds, the Abbey, 147
Flat fan-vault in apse, 57
Fort or enclosure (Saxon), 63
Foundations of apse, 43, Fig. 6
of Bere's Chapel, 51, 59;
also Fig. 6 and Plate II.
mystery in the, 147
Four Ways, the, 147
Francesco de Padua (Vecchi), 145, 154
Freeman, Professor, quoted, 11
G
Galfrith, Frater, 87
Gallery over entrance to Edgar Chapel, 43
Gallery under great west window, 88
under the great east window of Quire, 57
under west window of Refectory, 96
Gargoyle, the, 99
Garth, upper and lower on north side of church, 144
Gate, to Chalice Hill, 63
King's, 95
Maudlin, 146-147
of Remembrance, 144
St. John's, 127-144
Water, 147
Gatehouse keeper's lodging (in dismantled Chapel of Dunstan), 91
Gematria of the Holy Name in the Greek, 151 ref.
Geometry, sacred, 147, 148, 150
Gifts, spiritual, 22-25 and flyleaf
Glastonbury as a centre of spiritual life, 20
Abbey (see Abbey)
Gloucester Cathedral cited, 27 ref.
Glo'ster fannes, in Edgar Chapel, 38
Gold and crimson roof in Edgar Chapel, 53, 77
Grave, a martyr's, 65
Graveyard, monks', 94, 96, 97
chapel in the, 97
Groin (see Vaulting)
Guest Hall, 35, 67, 90, 96
Gulielmus, Monachus, 33 (signature), 34, 38, 45, 58, 86
H
Hærewith the Dane, 94
Hall, the Great, 90, 91, 94, 96
built by Wolsey in Oxford, 101
Handrail, double, 43, 75
Hearne, Thomas (eighteenth-century antiquary), quoted, 12, 62
Herlewin, Abbot, 107 ref.
Hollar (ditto) quoted, 12, 62
View of ruins in 1655,
enlarged, 116 (Fig. 10)
I
Ibericus, journey of, 102
Imperator (Cæsar), 108
Ina (King), Church built by, 56
J
Jocelyn (Trotman), Bishop of Wells, thirteenth century, 67, 88
Johannes (see Bryant)
Joseph of Arimathea (or of Marmore), 33 ref.
K
King's Gate and Way, 66
Kirkyard, 96, 97
Kitchen, Abbot's (the "grete" kitchen), 67, 94
little (between the Refectory and Guest Hall), 67
Kitchen Court, 95
L
Lady Chapel at east end (older), 11
with angular end, 47
Monington's, 50, 51 (see Phelps and Warner)
Lady of Loretto, 119
Lapidator (= stonemason) (J. Bryant), 38
Lay-brothers' House, 96
Lay-Chamber, 96
Lead roof on Edgar Chapel, 55
Leland's _Itinerary_ quoted, 4, 9, 111, 123
Life, Universal (mention in script), 97
Lightfoot, Peter (maker of the clock), 88
Linea bifurcata (Joseph of Arimathea's sepulture), 33 ref.
Lions of Arthur's Tomb, 57
of Loretto Chapel, 131, II. _b_; 133, II. _g_; 137, III. _a_;
141, IV. _c_; 142; text, 143, 146 ref. 1
Lobby to Loretto Chapel (with round vaults), 151
Lobinell Hist. quoted, 35 ref.
Lodge over the Chalice Gate, 63
Loretto, Chapel of, 111, 125
documents, 111-118
script, _re_, 119 _seq._
dimensions (40 × 21 feet), 125
excavation of cloister footings (1911), 118
Lory, John (carver of gargoyle), 100
M
Malmesbury, William of, on sacred symbols, 148
Mark, Chapel of St. (in Padua), 146 ref.
Marmore, Joseph of, 33 ref.
Martyr's grave (Whiting's), 65
Martyri, 35. (Not known to whom this refers, unless to one of the two
Edmunds, both of whom were assassinated. King Edgar died a natural
death.)
Maudlin Gate, 146-147
Measures (sacred), 147, 148, 150, 151 ref.
Melchin, Book of, 33 ref.
Memory, cosmic, 20
universal (in script), 97
Merlins, the British, 87
Michael, Chapel of St. (since discovered), 97
Monington, Abbot: lengthened Quire about 1334, 58
modified retro-quire and chapel, 50
Multipartite vaulting (Whiting's work), 35, 38
N
New Hall, 68
North porch, 125, 146
passage through, 125
O
Organs on screen and in chapels, 88, 89
P
Padstow (Cornwall), 103
Padua, Bere's journey to, 120, 121, 143
Francesco de, 145, 154, 166
Chapel of St. Mark in, 146, 166
Panellae (panels), 43
in east window, 57
in Quire, 59
Parapets of Loretto Chapel, 133, II. _e_, _f_; 135, II. _g_; 137, _b_
Parker, James, quoted, 10
Parlour, Monks', 68
Passages, secret, 53, 63, 66
Passage, timber, to Saxon Church, 56
paved, in inner court, 95
Passus (paces), 68, 69
(_a_) Mediæval, of 1 foot 7·44 inches (or 1·62 feet)
(_b_) Romano-British, of 2 feet 4-1/4 inches _circa_
NOTE.--The Greek and Roman foot, on which the last is founded,
appears in these islands in early monuments such as Stonehenge, as
well as in mediæval work. It varies from about 11·52 to 11·74
inches (see Flinders Petrie's _Inductive Metrology_, p. 109 for
English mediæval units; p. 118, Stonehenge (11·54 inches); p. 138,
Rome and Mediæval England (11·52 to 11·74 inches); also synoptic
table, p. 142_a_; England 11·6, England, Italy, and Roman Colonies,
11·525 to 11·68 inches).
Patellae (plaques), in Loretto Chapel, 135, II. _h_
Phædrus (Phocis), voyage of, 103
Pilgrims' processions, 88, 91 Way, 125
Pillars over buttresses (Loretto Chapel), 135, _h_
Polygonal apse, plan published before discovery, 61
foundations discovered, 62, 64 (Fig. 6)
Ponds of abbey, 146
Portus introitus (door in east wall of Edgar Chapel), 35, 53
(door to Loretto Chapel), 126 (west door); 129, I. _e_, _g_;
133, II. _d_; 139, III. _e_, _f_
Priests' houses, 146
Prior's Chapel, 147
Lodgings, 66, 67
Processional path and doors, 56, 58, 65
R
Radulphus (Ralph), FitzStephen, chancellor, and builder of the Abbey
Church, 91, 106, 108
FitzHamon (Norman knight, _temp._ Turstin, 1089 _circa_), 108
Rebus of Abbot Bere, 100
Refectorium, 67, 68
cellars of, 66
misericorde, 96
Reginaldus (_ob._ 1214), 46, 58
Bishop of Wells (twelfth century), 46
Relics, where kept, 144
Ribs of vault to Loretto, carved with fruit and flowers, 141, _b_; 142
Richard de Tantonia (architect of Edgar Chapel), 67
Robert (_anno_ 1334), 48
Rolf, Monachus, 35, 38
S
Saint Andrew, Chapel of, 51
guild of, 100
Bridget, 46
Benedict (or Benignus), 98
Church of, 100
Edgar (King), 35, 44
John's Gate, 127, 144
Mary, Chapel of (see Chapel), 41, 51, 56, etc.
Michael in the graveyard (burial place of Johannes), 97
Patrick, 46
Thomas of Canterbury (site of his Chapel), 114
Schola, the (the Abbey School), 68
Screen, the great (on which was the Quire Organ), 89
behind altar and reredos, 65
Screens in Guest Hall, 90, 91
Script, notes on, 26
errors in, 26-30, 68, 69
"Latin" in, 31
Scriptorium of Abbey, 68
Somerset, Lord, 66
Somerton, Eanwulf, Earl of, 106
Squares (symbolic) in sacred geometry on floor of Lady Chapel, 148, 150
general system of in plan of monastery, 148_a_ (Fig. 12)
Stables of Abbey (near Guest Hall), 67
Stairway to Edgar Chapel, 43
Steps in marble to Edgar Chapel, 43
four or six from Loretto to the transept aisle, 126
four from St. Mary's Garth to the Relics Chapel, 144
four from aisle up to transept, 146, 151
from "vetusta ecclesia" to Ina's Church, 56
Steps from great cloister in south-east corner, XII. down, and IX. up,
to back parts of monastery, 68
Stillington's Chapel at Wells, 44
Stukeley's panorama of ruins, 115 (Fig. 9), 160
T
Taunton, Abbot's bones secretly brought from, 65
Richard de (architect), 67, 69
Thesiger, Camillus, 126, 127
Tintagella settlement, 103
Towers, western, 46
Tower, central, 41, 87
bell, 87, 88
Triangles (symbolic) in floor of Lady Chapel, 148
double, in plan of Lady Chapel, 148
Turstin, Abbot, 106, 108
church built by, 105, 107
V
Vallera di, Domenico, 146
Vault, sepulchral, under High Altar, 65
under halls, 66, 67, 68
under central tower and nave, 41
under stairs of St. Mary's (Galilee), 41
Vaulting (volt), quadripartite, 35
multipartite, 35, 38
fans (old style) at east end of Quire, 38
panelled, in Edgar Chapel (fans), 43, 57
fans in claustrum north side of nave, 119
with gilt roundels, 120
barrel section (to chantry chapel), 57
cracked, under central tower, 121, 122
Italian pattern, to Loretto Chapel, 126, 141, 146
Vecchi, Francesco (di Torcello), 154
Vesica Piscis (sacred symbol, containing the double equilateral
triangle, found in plan of St. Mary's Chapel), 150 (Fig. 13), 151 ref.
Vestibule (Italian), to Loretto Chapel (the cloister open to the north
wind), 146, 151
Vineyards, the Abbey, 146
Virga (a yard), 36, 37
Virgin, ancient statue of (at back of altar-screen), 57
and Child in canopied niche over High Altar, 65
Virginis, Cava (apse, or recess of circular form in the east wall of
the Loretto Chapel, as indicated by script), 128-140, 143
W
Walls at an angle, 40, 41, 44, 51, 59, 64 (Figs. 5, 6, and Plate II.)
Warner quoted, 7, 11, 74
plan of older Lady Chapel, 51, 52
Watchers, the, 93
Watergate, 146-147
Wattlework (Saxon), 63, 65
Ways, the Four, 147
Well of Abbey, filled, 95
chamber in court, 94
Wells, Bishop of, 46, 87
chapel at, 44
Cathedral cited, 44, 88
Wells Lady Chapel, 73
Whiting (Whyttinge), Abbot, 4, 35, 37, 55 (signature), 57, 65, 70,
72, 101
Wild, plan by, 13, 16, 40
Willis, Professor, quoted, 7-12, 15, 16
plan by, 9 (Fig. 1)
of retro-chapel, 51, 53
Window, great east; 57;
originally straight, 47;
with balcony under, 65;
lengthened and rebuilt, 58
great west, with gallery under, 88
Window, transomed, in Edgar Chapel, 37
six, in Great Hall, 90, 91
Window, marked with cross (old shrine of Edgar), 44
Windows, three, in apse of Edgar Chapel, 57
three, in claustrum chapel, north side nave
Wolsey, Cardinal, 91, 101
Wyrcestre, William, quoted, 14, 69
reviewed, 13, 14
Y
Yseuguilt (Yseult), Princess, 103
Z
Zodiac (in the floor of St. Mary's Chapel), 147
BILLING AND SONS, LTD., PRINTERS, GUILDFORD, ENGLAND
THE GATE OF REMEMBRANCE
A series of Seven Musical Impressions for
the Pianoforte, by the English composer
CARLYON DE LYLE,
based upon episodes in the life of Johannes,
the monk of Glastonbury, as given in the
well-known book of the same name, being
"MAGNUS ALBUM," No. 37
Published by SWAN & CO., 312, REGENT STREET,
LONDON, W.
_May be had of all Music-sellers_
Price 2s. net
_First edition, February, 1918_
_Second edition, July, 1918_
_Third edition, March, 1920_
* * * * *
Transcriber's Notes.
Obvious typographical errors have been silently corrected.
Hyphenation has been standardised, but other variations in spelling,
punctuation and accents remain as in the original
For the sake of clarity, the advert for The (musical) Gate of
Remembrance has been has been moved from the beginning to the end.
The "Table of Veridical Passages" and "Table of Data and Constructive
Argument" are three column double page spreads in the original, linking
Script, Existing Data and Working Hypothesis. These sections are now
sequential to conform with width restrictions.
Footnote 6 refers to a non-existent flyleaf.
Italics are represented thus _italics_ and bold thus =bold=.
End of Project Gutenberg's The Gate of Remembrance, by Frederick Bligh Bond