THE PRESS

America is a land of newspapers, and the newspapers are very largely

the same. To a certain extent many of them are exactly the same, for

the vastness of the country makes it possible to syndicalise various

features, so that you find Walt Mason's sagacious and merry and punctual

verse, printed to look like prose but never disappointing the ear, in

one of the journals that you buy wherever you are, in San Francisco,

Salt Lake City, Chicago or New York; and Mr. Montagu's topical rhymes

in another; and the daily adventures of Mutt and Jeff, who are national

heroes, in a third. Every day, for ever, do those and other regular

features occur in certain of the papers: which is partly why no American

ever seems to confine himself, as is our custom, to only one.

Another and admirable feature of certain American papers is a column

edited by a man of letters, whose business it is to fill it every

day, either with the blossoms of his own intelligence or of outside

contributors, or a little of each: such a column as Don Marquis edits

for _The Sun_, called "The Sundial," and Franklin R. Adams for _The

Tribune_, called "The Conning Tower," and Christopher Morley for the New

York _Evening Post_, called "The Bowling Green." Perhaps the unsigned

"Way of the World" in our _Morning Post_ is the nearest London

correlative.

These columns are managed with skill and catholicity, and they impart

an element of graciousness and fancy into what might otherwise be

too materialistic a budget. A journalist, like myself, is naturally

delighted to find editors and a vast public so true to their writing

friends. Very few English editors allow their subscribers the

opportunity of establishing such steady personal relations; and in

England, in consequence, the signed daily contribution from one literary

hand is very rare--to an American observer probably mysteriously so. The

daily cartoon is common with us; but in London, for example, I cannot

think of any similar literary feature that is signed in full. We have

C.E.B.'s regular verse in the _Evening News_ and "The Londoner's" daily

essay in the same paper, and various initials elsewhere; but, with us,

only the artists are allowed their names. Now, in America every name,

everywhere, is blazoned forth.

Whatever bushel measures may be used for in the United States the

concealing of light is no part of their programme.

Another feature of American daily journals comparatively unknown in

England is the so-called comic pictorial sequence. All the big papers

have from one to half a dozen of these sequences, each by a different

artist. Bud Fisher with "Mutt and Jeff" comes first in popularity, I

believe, and then there are his rivals and his imitators. Nothing more

inane than some of these series could be invented; and yet they persist

and could not, I am told, be dropped by any editor who thought first of

circulation.

After the individual contributions have been subtracted, all the

newspapers are curiously alike. The same reporters might be on every

one; the same sub-editors; the same composers of head-lines. If we think

of Americans as too capable of cynical levity it is largely because of

these head-lines, which are always as epigrammatic as possible, always

light-hearted, often facetious, and often cruel. An unfortunate woman's

failure at suicide after killing her husband was thus touched off in one

of the journals while I was in New York:

Roving East and Roving West · 第 63 / 78 题