CATHEDRAL AND CASTLE]

It was again visited, seven years later, by fire, from which it had

hardly recovered when a third conflagration occurred and left traces of

devastation for ages. In 1141, Robert Earl of Gloucester was placed in

the Castle. He was the chief general and counsellor of Matilda, and had

been captured prisoner at Winchester after having effected the Queen's

escape. He was eventually exchanged for King Stephen. In 1215 the barons

seized and held the Castle against King John, who gained it. Henry III.

repaired the Castle.

The Castle was again, in 1254, successfully defended for the King by

Edward Earl Warren, against Simon de Montford and the barons. In the

reign of Richard II. the insurrectionists under Wat Tyler released one

of their comrades imprisoned in the Castle.

Rochester has been at different times visited by reigning princes. Henry

VIII., with Emperor Charles V., came there in 1521, whilst in 1573 Queen

Elizabeth honoured it with her presence. Charles II., on his

restoration, passed through the city _en route_ from the Continent to

London. In fact Rochester, being also a port, was a convenient place for

James II. to embark secretly on board of a trading-vessel lying in the

Medway, by which he was conveyed to France.

This Norman castle, which has played such an important part in the

history of the city, deserves some notice. Its extensive remains,

situated on a commanding site, overlook the right bank of the river. The

Castle is supposed to have been built by Gundulph, when Bishop of

Rochester, in the latter part of the eleventh century. It preceded by a

few years the building of the Cathedral by the same prelate. The

architecture of this castle is a striking example of the simplicity of

plans generally employed by the Normans. By preference the castle was a

rectangular keep in form. The sides varied from twenty-five to a hundred

feet in length, and equally so in height. At the corners the walls

advanced so as to form square towers, the faces of which were usually

relieved by flat pilaster-like buttresses. The walls at the base measure

sometimes as much as thirty feet in thickness, and diminish to as much

as ten feet at the summit.

The internal arrangements consisted of a store-room, from which a narrow

staircase, made into the thickness of the walls, gave access to the

rooms of the garrison and those of the owners above, wood being employed

for the floor and roof. A well was always dug. The entire building was

surrounded by a deep moat filled, if possible, with water. The entrance

was small, and was defended by a draw-bridge and portcullis. It was on

the thickness of their walls and the moat that the Normans chiefly

relied for their impregnability. They seldom departed from this simple

form of architecture. Their defence was rarely constructed on a series

of fortifications. Local advantages and a lofty site were invariably the

Norman idea of a safe stronghold.

Great interest is attached to the Cathedral of Rochester. Its see is the

smallest in the kingdom and the most ancient after Canterbury. The two

were established, as we have seen, within a few years of each other,

under the auspices of St. Augustine and King Ethelbert of Kent.

The present cathedral dates from the commencement of the twelfth

century, when it was built by Gundulph. If what we are told about this

structure be correct, its importance cannot be too greatly enhanced, for

it is claimed that its architecture, though much altered and repaired

since, is in the main a copy of Canterbury Cathedral at that time. Thus,

in describing the plan of the one in Rochester, a general idea can be

gained about the other at Canterbury.

Gundulph's contribution is a spacious and venerable building in the form

of a cross, with a central tower surmounted by a spire. The Norman style

forms the basis of the architecture, to which the Later English style

was added chiefly in the many windows of the nave and other parts of the

church. The west front was entirely restored between 1888 and 1889, the

Norman style being strictly adhered to. The doorway is a most decorative

bit of Norman workmanship. Let into the clustered columns on either side

there is, on the right, an effigy of Queen Maud, and on the left another

of Henry I. The door is covered with a rich mass of geometrical design

in metal.

The crypt, invariably a great feature in a cathedral, is partly the work

of Gundulph; that is, the western portion is. The eastern part consists

of cylindrical and octagonal shafts with a light vaulting springing

from them, and belongs to the same period as the superstructure of the

thirteenth century.

There are several chapels, a finely groined roof, and ancient tombs,

which all lend interest to this fine cathedral.

The red-veined marble statue of Walter de Merton cannot fail to attract

attention. He was the founder of the great scholastic college at Oxford

called Merton College. Though small in size, the _entree_ to it demands

high classical attainments.

With regard to commerce, Rochester has a favourable position on the

river Medway, in the creeks and branches of which are the oyster

fisheries. The Corporation, assisted by a jury of free dredgers, hold a

Court of Admiralty, in which they make regulations for the opening,

stocking, and closing of the oyster beds.

In conclusion, we cannot help saying that Kent should be a proud county,

possessing, as it does, the two most ancient sees in the kingdom, the

dioceses of which are separated only by the Medway.

Cathedral Cities of England · 第 94 / 141 题