OUR NATIONAL GUESTS.

My wife attributes our success (so far) in the entertainment of Belgian

Refugees solely to the fact that we have not, and never have had, a

vestige of a committee. We all work along in the jolliest possible way,

and we have no meetings, or agenda, or minutes, or co-opting of

additional members, or remitting to executives or anything of that kind.

We just bring along anything that we think will be useful. Some of us

bring clothes and others butter or umbrellas, or French books, or

razor-strops or cigarettes. Hepburn, the dairy farmer, keeps sending

cart-loads of cabbages; old Miss Mackintosh at the Brae Foot sends

threepence a week. And when we are short of anything we just stick up a

notice to that effect in the village shop. I issued a call for jam

yesterday and ever since it has rained pots and pots. We have three

large families of Belgians and we have already got to the stage where

the men are at work and the children at school--though no one really has

the least idea what they do there.

But although I admit that it is magnificent to be without a

committee--we escaped from that by the simple plan of getting the

Belgians first and trusting to the goodwill of the Parish to take care

of them afterwards--there are other important factors in our success.

There is our extraordinary foresight--of course it was a pure fluke

really--in obtaining among them a real Belgian policeman. You can have

no idea what a fine sense of security that gives us in case anything

goes wrong. We have already enjoyed his assistance in a variety of ways,

and we have something still in reserve in the very unlikely event of his

being professionally called in--his uniform. When we put him into his

uniform the effect will be tremendous.

Then again we have the advantage of being Scotch. I simply don't know

how English country people are going to get on at all. Here we find that

by talking with great emphasis in the very broadest Scotch--by simply

calling soap _sape_ and a church a _kirk_ you can quite frequently bring

it off and make yourself understood. I had a most exhilarating hour of

mutual lucidity with the one that makes furniture in the carpenter's

shop. It seemed to me that he called a saw a _zog_, which was surely

quite good enough; and when he referred to a hammer as a _hamer_ it

might surely be said to be equivalent to calling a spade a spade.

Still the language difficulty remains, and the worst of it is that it

gives an altogether unfair advantage--where all are so anxious to

help--to the few select people in our neighbourhood who happen to be

able, fortuitously, to talk French. They are--(1) Dr. Anderson, whose

French is very good; (2) my wife, who is amazingly fluent in a crisis,

though her constructions simply don't bear thinking of; (3) the

school-master, who is weak; (4) the joiner, who is bad; (5) myself, who

am awful. Several of our Refugees talk French.

Of course we all have pocket-dictionaries, but even they don't always

help us out. I found my wife once engaged in a desperate hand-to-hand

encounter with the one who does the cooking about some household

necessity that was sadly lacking. She was completely baffled. It was

pure stalemate, a deadlock. I pulled out my dictionary and suggested to

the cook (by illuminative signs) that she should look it up and point to

the English word. There was some rejoicing at this, and she at once

called upon the collective wisdom of her whole family. At last they got

it with much nodding of heads and exhibited the book, buttressed with an

eager finger at the place. And we looked and read "A young gold-finch;"

so you will see that that didn't help us much. It was only by the almost

miraculous emergence of the word _Fat_ in the course of their own

private conversation shortly afterwards that light came to us.

That they are quite at a loss to understand the meaning of honey in the

comb did not greatly surprise us--though it was rather queer--but the

Parish is deeply distressed at their total ignorance of oatmeal. They

are quite at sea there, and so far have only employed it for baiting a

bird-trap: and that touches us closely, for the very foundation of our

being in these parts is oatmeal. Even their beautiful devotion to

vegetables of all sorts cannot, we feel, compensate for their attitude

of negation towards this very staple of existence. There is a strong

party among us bent on their conversion. We hope with all our hearts

that they will be comfortable and contented among us till the day comes

when they can return to their own country; and we feel that their exile

will not have been entirely wasted if they have learned to appreciate

the purpose fulfilled by porridge in the Divine Order of things.

* * * * *

Illustration: WORD PERFECT.

_Sentry_ (_on duty for first time_). "'ALT! WHO GOES THERE? ADVANCE TO

WITHIN FIVE PACES, AND GIVE THE COUNTERSIGN 'WATERLOO.'"

* * * * *

Punch or the London Charivari, Vol. 147, November 11, 1914 · 第 38 / 39 题