CHAPTER XXXII

“Our elaborate schemes for helping people are making us forget,” said

the Doctor one day, “that the one thing human beings want is human

sympathy.”

To this I assented readily.

“In the first place,” she continued, with a thoughtful air, “through all

this machinery of leagues and clubs and organizations we are beginning

to lose our sense of individual responsibility. As soon as we find an

act of charity that ought to be done, we start a society to do it for

us.”

“But when,” I protested, “has a sense of individual responsibility in

regard to the poor been so strong? Social problems have never been so

closely studied as they are to-day. Look at the seriousness of our young

men and women! Think of Barnet House, and the College Settlement!”

“Yes, think of them,” said the Doctor. “The only trouble with the

residents at Barnet House is that they have too great a sense of

responsibility about other people’s lives, and too little about their

own. Society has, I presume, as just a claim to a man’s best work as the

poor have to his interest. Those young men do not belong to society at

all, because they do not share its burdens. ‘Two men I honour, and no

third,’—the man who works with his hands, and the man who works at a

necessary profession. But the man who gives up all regular occupation

just out of sheer benevolence I do not understand.

“And I hope,” the Doctor added grimly, “that these young socialists may

be spared to share the labour of the era they are trying to usher in.

There will be no more of the _dolce-far-niente_ of doing good then, only

pick-axes and spades all round, with maybe an hour off at noon! If

socialism means work by all for all, I fail to see why those who

advocate it should devote themselves to an existence made of a little

study, a little lecturing, and much visiting, for scientific purposes,

of popular amusements.”

“Do you consider that just?” I demanded. “I do not know any men who work

harder than some of those residents at Barnet House. Whether their

effort is mistaken is not for us to decide.”

“No, I was not fair,” said the Doctor, penitently, “but I have been

meditating a long time on the relation of the man with a mission to the

public at large. It seems to me that no one ought to throw the burden of

his support on benevolent societies. You can’t take doing good as a

profession: you have got to do good work. We have no right to palm off

an interest in the lives of others as a substitute for living

ourselves.”

“You have given much criticism, and very telling criticism of our

methods of work,” I remarked in a tone that anger made only the more

polite. “Now won’t you suggest some way in which things ought to be

done?”

“I haven’t finished my criticism yet,” said the Doctor, undaunted. “I am

finding fault with myself too. In a way we all fail, and to go back to

what I said first, it is largely because of a lack of sympathy. We

forget that this is all-important, and keep thrusting our ideals between

us and human beings. Each one of us has an abstract standard to which

mankind must conform. It is equally fatal when the idea is cleanliness

and when it is godliness. I suppose that it will take a thousand years

for us to learn that we are responsible to humanity and not to notions.”

My silence did not indicate that I had nothing to say.

“The trouble with the world is,” the Doctor went on, “that it has

suffered from too much lofty thought. If there had been less of that,

there might have been more lofty action, and closer sympathy between man

and man. We shouldn’t be allowed to try to impress on our fellow-beings

pure, cold abstract notions. The only legitimate way of presenting our

theories to the world is by working them out in our own lives. We

haven’t any right to ideals for other people. I am more and more

convinced that we ought to keep our thoughts to ourselves, and give the

world simply the benefit of our actions.”

“That is the first constructive suggestion that you have given,” I

muttered. “It is good. I like it.”

“We are making our problem too hard.” The Doctor was very much in

earnest as she said this. “It is perfectly simple, after all. We must

take care of people ourselves. No organization should be allowed to

relieve us of our share of responsibility. The distress of those who

suffer must remain with every man a standing personal problem. So long

as the poor are with us, and any one of them needs a cup of cold water,

it is for us to give it, and with our own hands.”

“That idea is very beautiful,” I commented, with hypocritical sweetness.

“Human sympathy is the one thing we all want. If one cultivate it long

enough, it may become so far-reaching as to extend to one’s

fellow-philanthropists, and even to one’s friends!”

This was unkind, but the Doctor deserved it.

An Experiment in Altruism · 第 32 / 43 章