VISITING TEACHER, PUBLIC EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, NEW YORK CITY

Walter preferred to play ball under the kindly protection of the

Queensborough Bridge to attending school where he had no chance to show

his ability as a leader. He had successfully evaded all the visits of

the truant officer, and when his teacher asked me, a visiting teacher,

to try my luck, I wondered what I should find. I called first upon his

mother at her place of business and found her in thorough sympathy with

the school, but apparently powerless to make her son attend. Walter took

advantage of the fact that she left the house before he did, and as they

alone comprised the family, he could disobey her and go to school or not

as he saw fit. There was no one but himself to report to her in the

evening just how he had spent his day.

I chose supper time for my first visit, and found him, as I hoped, at

home, a little tired from his day’s play and hungry, of course. His

mother was there too. She was surprised when I told her that her son had

not attended school that day, nor indeed for many days previously. We

talked of many things, and just before leaving, I ventured to ask Walter

what he wanted to be when he was a man. He was then twelve years old. He

did not hesitate an instant. He wanted, he said, to be an architect. And

then his mother showed me a little calendar he had painted which adorned

the closet door. We struck a bargain. If he went to school regularly, I

was to arrange with his teacher to give him a palette and brushes so

that he could paint. It was possible to do this as he was in a special

class in which the course of study is more easily adapted to the child’s

needs.

The next morning, when I opened the classroom door, two pairs of smiling

eyes greeted me—the teacher’s and Walter’s. At once the teacher and I

planned our campaign. Walter was to learn that at school he could get a

chance at leadership too, for could he not play games there? At first,

perhaps, they seemed tame compared with those under the bridge, for the

classroom or the school-yard, even when given over to ball or bean-bag,

does not easily associate itself in the child’s mind with scenes of

adventure. However, the chance of some time being captain of the team

had charms even for him. The proof is to be found in the fact that he

attended school regularly, earning, in so doing, his palette and brushes

and at the end of the term promotion to a regular class.

The work of the visiting teacher has passed the experimental stage. The

position was created to bridge a gap in the existing school machinery.

The visiting teacher’s province lies outside that of the regular

teacher, the attendance officer and the school nurse, though like the

attendance officer and the school nurse, she goes into the child’s home.

To her is assigned the group called the “difficult” children, and it is

her aim to discover, if possible, the cause of the difficulty which

manifests itself in poor scholarship, annoying conduct, irregular

attendance, or the need of or desire for advice on some important phase

of life. It is too much to expect the regular teacher, handicapped as

she is by her large class, to cope with such situations. Nor is it to be

expected that those qualified to act as attendance officer or school

nurse, were they not already overburdened, should do the work of the

visiting teacher. In her is united the training that makes a teacher and

a social service worker, and it is because of this combination that she

is able to widen the regular teacher’s reach and help her interpret and

solve the problems as they present themselves.

From the school she learns that the child is apparently making little

effort; that his work is “C” or worse; that he is perpetually making

trouble in the class room and is never attentive: that he seems

lifeless, unable to keep pace with the class; that he attends so

irregularly that it is impossible to teach him anything, or that he has

no time to study and the situation at home is such that he must leave

school and go to work. With these facts as clues she sets to work; it is

impossible to define her methods, for they vary with her tact and

resourcefulness and with the specific character of the problem before

her. Briefly, they are the methods that spring from a friendly interest,

an intimate personal relation.

Between the home and the school the visiting teacher vibrates, carrying

to the former the school’s picture of the child and returning to the

school to reinforce that impression or to shed new light upon the

problem. There is no fixed number of times that she is expected to

travel this path, as there is no fixed hour of the day for her visits.

The urgency and complexity of a situation alone determine her movements.

Nor is there any regular routine of action that she follows. Whatever in

her judgment seems imperative, she endeavors to effect, using to this

end everything the ingenuity of man has devised to make smooth the rough

places of life.

It is a focussing of interests that she demands. The child is the

pivotal point on which she hopes to bring all her knowledge and

experience to bear. Sometimes it is the expert teacher’s training that

she invokes; sometimes the psychologist or the physician, general or

special, that she consults; or again it is the social worker to whom she

appeals. Before these she lays the facts, the reasons why her services

have been sought and from them she asks co-operation. To the adult, she

is the visiting teacher; to the child, she is simply the “lady cop.”

The results achieved do not always show a complete cure. In some cases

there has been a marked improvement in scholarship, conduct or

attendance,—at least a good start in the right direction has been made.

In other cases the child has been transferred to a different class,

regular, special or ungraded, or to a trade school, where his chances at

succeeding in making a place for himself are increased. Again, the

information the visiting teacher shares with the regular teacher has

resulted in a change of attitude toward the child, in an expansion or

contraction of the course of study, or in her giving the child extra

instruction in study periods or out of school hours. Finally, he has

been helped to promotion, even to graduation.

Last year 1,157 cases were handled by the seven visiting teachers

maintained in New York by the Public Education Association. The majority

of these came directly through the school, but in a few instances the

visiting teacher was called in by the child’s mother, a neighbor, or the

child himself, all of whom, looking to her for help, show not only an

appreciation of the fact that something is wrong, but also an

understanding of what the visiting teacher is trying to accomplish.

Their appeal emphasizes the necessity for just such a connection as she

makes. Other cases came through settlements, charity organizations,

churches, or the visiting teacher herself, whose attention had been

attracted to some child on her rounds through the classrooms. In every

instance, however, before the child technically becomes a case, the

principal and teacher are conferred with. His school record must show

him to be below standard in either scholarship, conduct or attendance,

or in need of such advice or information as will, if followed, enhance

his general well being.

Five hundred and five of the children visited were below standard in

scholarship. This deficiency might be due to any one of a number of

causes directly traceable to “home conditions,” such as congested or

unsanitary living quarters, child labor, “overburdened childhood,” and

ignorance of or indifference to the school’s claims. Or it might be that

some school adjustment was necessary; for example, de-moting the child

that is mentally and physically unequal to the grade’s requirements; or

drawing him out in recitations, should he be nervous or timid; or

helping him in the preparation of the studies that trouble him.

Three hundred and thirteen children were below standard in conduct; that

is, they were either out of sympathy with the school environment or they

were guilty of some offence, such as stealing, lying, cheating, or

sexual irregularity.

Four hundred and sixty-five children were irregular in attendance. Since

the same child is sometimes below standard in scholarship and irregular

in attendance, or in need of advice and information, the groups here

mentioned often overlap and the numbers total more than 1,157.

Six hundred and seventy-five needed advice or information. In all of

these cases the child needed someone to plead his cause either at home

or at school, that he might be the more thoroughly understood and that

his special need, whether it be recreational, physical, or vocational,

might be satisfied.

The task of the visiting teacher is plain. She must get at the facts.

This she does by studying closely the child’s environment, realizing

that he is the product of varied associations and influences. There are

circles within circles—the home, the school, the immediate neighborhood,

and what at times seems almost “beyond his ken,” the great wide world

itself. No analysis of the forces that in their play and interplay tend

to shape this young life would be complete that did not include the

shifting, kaleidoscopic scenes amid which so often his plastic years are

spent; nor would the picture be lifelike did it not show upon its face

the changes that are wrought through that remoter contact with men and

things.

The action followed depends naturally upon what the investigation

reveals. Should the home be at fault, then an effort is made to remove

the “trouble maker,” and, should this be impossible, then effort is made

at least to effect some compromise, the benefit of which the child will

reap both in the home and in the school.

Margaret had many times struck a discordant note in the classroom. At

home she had always had her own way. Small wonder, then, that she played

the prank she did in the assembly. In the midst of the gathering of some

five hundred children when the morning exercises were being held, she

spoke loud enough to be disturbing, and when reprimanded and told to

leave the hall, she walked its full length on her heels, thus creating a

greater disturbance and openly defying the principal’s authority. She

was sent home and the matter was explained to her parents. The child

felt that she had been insulted because ordered from the room, and the

mother, unfortunately, took her side. At first she could not be made to

see that if her child saw fit to leave the hall as she chose, the other

499 might use their wits to the same end and pandemonium result. Only

after repeated interviews with the visiting teacher and after the child

had lost fully a month of school did the mother allow her to return.

Sometimes it happens that the child has neither time nor place to study.

“The noise, it gets me all mixed up,” is her pathetic comment. The

neighborhood is scoured till a quiet room is found, either in a

settlement, a sisterhood, or a public library, and then the mother’s

co-operation is enlisted and many times secured when she understands

that noise, interruptions and general disorder are not conducive to the

formation of good habits of study.

Should it happen that the child’s work is seriously impaired because his

sleep is interfered with, either because the mother’s work is carried

late into the night and goes on in the child’s so-called bedroom, or

because he is allowed to partake too freely of tea and coffee, the

injurious effects of this way of living are demonstrated and the family

is, in the one case, urged to move to better rooms, and in the other,

plead with until milk and cocoa are substituted for tea and coffee. If

then, the longed-for change sets in, showing itself in the child’s

ability to make normal responses at school, word is carried to the home

and thereby is strengthened the bond that makes these two centers one in

their desire to promote the child’s well being.

But there are times when the cause is not so obvious and does not lend

itself so easily to a simple solution. It happens often that what to the

school appears a lack of co-operation on the part of the home means only

that the parents have tried and failed. Again and again the visiting

teacher is besought “Use your influence,” “Come and advise us,” “Robert”

or “Alice,” “pays attention to you,”—all of which reduced to its lowest

terms means that somewhere there is failure to understand. “It is

because we are treated as we are at home that we run the streets,” is

the way one girl of fourteen sums up the situation.

On the other hand it may happen that the source of the difficulty is to

be found in the school itself, in the conditions that surround the child

there, which, in the light of the information gathered in the home,

expose to view some serious maladjustment. Perhaps it is a case of

simple misunderstanding between teacher and pupil, the former holding

the latter to a sort of rule-of-thumb scale of measurement when,

mentally and physically, the child is incapable of following.

Handicapped by nature, perhaps one of a long line similarly affected, is

it to be expected that his reactions will be what in age and grade they

should be? For such as he the hope lies in a curriculum so elastic that

at some point the spark of interest cannot fail to be struck.

In the class room Lillian, a frail girl of thirteen, had apparently made

only the impression of being a slow, sleepy, listless child. The first

interviews showed her ill at ease. She studied hard every evening, she

insisted; but when she was questioned in the class all the carefully

memorized facts flew to the winds, she was so afraid. History was her

Waterloo. Try as she would, she could not conquer. The outlook was not

promising. The visit to the home revealed that she loved to draw. Tony,

the black and white spaniel, and Nellie, his fox-terrier companion, had

up to that time been her only models. In her leisure moments she

sketched them lying before the kitchen stove, or curled up, asleep,

under the table.

When her teacher was told how she was found occupying her time at home,

her reply was prompt: “Yes, I remember now, she does seem fond of

drawing.” A conference was arranged with the principal and a way was

found of giving Lillian a chance to develop further this gift, her one

excellency. Her fifth grade work was so re-arranged as to allow her to

take drawing with the seventh grade, where she found greater variety and

a teacher eager to let her express herself. At the same time she was

introduced to a volunteer worker, a woman to whom history was an

unending joy and with her she spent evening after evening making friends

with facts, people, and dates that up to that moment had been total

strangers to her. Later she was transferred to a trade school in which

she was given an opportunity to specialize in designing.

In some pupils what appears as indifference or inattention may in truth

be only a temperamental peculiarity which, if individual attention were

possible, would in time be modified. The relation of pupil and teacher

is at bottom one of sympathetic understanding. This is why sometimes,

where one fails, the other succeeds, and herein lies the advantage of

having several teachers to a grade. It makes possible a shifting about

and increases the child’s chances of being understood. The desirability

of this cannot be overestimated.

Another way in which the need of unusual children is met is the

so-called “rapid progress class,” into which are put those children who

are capable of making more than two grades in a year. Strange as it may

on the surface appear, some of the children entrusted to the charge of

the visiting teacher prove in the end to be just this type. For one

reason or another, the routine of the regular class does not hold the

child’s interest, and, as we all know, in such instances energy like

that will not remain pent up. It is in its determination to find an

outlet that it comes into conflict with established order.

Sometimes it is best to give the child a training wholly different from

that offered by the school he is attending. Not all minds respond alike

to the same stimuli. It often seems an utter waste to insist upon

children plodding doggedly at subjects which make no appeal to them.

Here lies the opportunity for vocational training. More than one case of

apathy on the part of a child has been dispelled when a chance was given

him to express himself in some sort of manual or industrial activity.

Occasionally it is found that at neither the door of the home nor at

that of the school can the whole blame for the child’s failure to live

up to his best moments be laid. There are times when he is under the

kindly influence, if such it be, of neither one nor the other. It is at

such times that his energies should be given a chance at wholesome

expression, so that they may not be tempted to seek the baser kinds, in

which the streets of a large city abound. It is interesting to note how

a beneficient “wider view” reacts upon the school and home environment,

making of what was once a listless, joyless, or obstinate, untractable,

child one that gives out in “measure brimful and overflowing” the

happiness that was but his birthright.

The question that naturally suggests itself is What is the result of the

action taken? What outcome can be expected from having secured active

co-operation in 568 homes; from having changed the class of 92 children,

the school of 56, and made other school adjustments for 125; from having

called into play 288 outside agencies in the shape of clubs, classes,

and excursions and 604 agencies such as hospitals, relief societies, day

nurseries, scholarship funds, reformatories, settlements, public

libraries, etc., and from having sent 208 children to the country on

extended visits?

A statistical reply is not always feasible. Certain stages in the

child’s school career are marked: certain data about it definite enough;

but whether in the final summing up these shall be given precedence over

the subtler, more elusive changes that have come about, that is the real

question. Just as in the matter of method employed, so in the matter of

result achieved, it must be remembered that the numerical reckoning does

not tell the whole story.

To the casual observer it might appear that the test to be applied to

the visiting teacher’s work is embraced in the single word “promotion.”

The greater the number of promotions, therefore, the greater her measure

of success. In a measure this is true and the work stands it. But this

is not all. Our object is to find for each child his suitable niche, and

if to achieve this means a de-motion instead of a promotion, it must not

on that account be reckoned as a failure. To the child it may mean a new

birth. In his changed surroundings he may gain self-confidence and no

longer be a laggard and a drag upon his class. To his teacher and his

classmates little by little he will present a different front. The magic

door has been opened. Into what lies beyond he can enter and with the

rest can follow, and because of this there springs up between him and

them a new relation, one that satisfies his human craving for friendship

and sympathy. In which column, the debit or the credit, of our yearly

ledger, are such items to be placed?

With final judgments tempered by such considerations, the following

possibilities may be offered:

Promoted, including graduates, 568.

Left back, 237.

Graduated, 39.

The Survey, Volume 30, Number 5, May 3, 1913 · 第 34 / 71 题