And, again--

“It was at Ballybay that _the Catholics murdered one Hughes, a

yeoman sergeant, for being a Protestant, as was given in evidence

at the assizes by a Catholic witness_.”

I have read this passage from the _Hibernian Journal_ of the 7th of

this month. I know not whether you can hear, unmoved, a paragraph

which makes my blood boil to read; but I shall only tell you, that the

Attorney-General refused to prosecute this libeller. Gentlemen, there

have been several murders committed in the county of Monaghan, in which

Ballybay lies. The persons killed happened to be Roman Catholics;

their murderers are Orangemen. Several of the persons accused of these

murders are to be tried at the ensuing assizes. The agent applied to me

personally, with this newspaper; he stated that the obvious intention

was to create a prejudice upon the approaching trials favorable to

the murderers, and against the prosecutors. He stated what you--_even

you_--will easily believe, that there never was a falsehood more

flagitiously destitute of truth than the entire paragraph. I advised

him, gentlemen, to wait on the Attorney-General in the most respectful

manner possible; to show him this paragraph, then to request to be

allowed to satisfy him as to the utter falsehood of the assertions

which this paragraph contained, which could be more easily done, as

the judges who went that circuit could prove part of it to be false;

and I directed him to entreat that the Attorney-General, when fully

satisfied of the falsehood, would prosecute the publisher of this,

which, I think, I may call an atrocious libel.

Gentlemen, the Attorney-General was accordingly waited on; he was

respectfully requested to prosecute upon the terms of having the

falsehood of these assertions first proved to him. I need not tell you

he refused. These are not the libellers _he_ prosecutes. Gentlemen,

this not being a libel on any individual, no private individual can

prosecute for it; and the Attorney-General turns his Press loose on

the Catholics of the county of Monaghan, whilst he virulently assails

Mr. Magee for what must be admitted to be comparatively mild and

inoffensive.

No, gentlemen, he does not prosecute this libel. On the contrary, this

paper is paid enormous sums of the public money. There are no less

than five proclamations in the paper containing this libel; and, it

was proved in my presence, in a court of justice, that, besides the

proclamations and public advertisements, the two proprietors of the

paper had each a pension of £400 per annum, for supporting government,

as it was called. Since that period one of those proprietors has got

an office worth, at least, £800 a year; and the son of the other, a

place of upwards of £400 per annum: so that, as it is likely that the

original pensions continue, here may be an annual income of £2000 paid

for this paper, besides the thousands of pounds annually which the

insertion of the proclamations and public advertisements cost. It is

a paper of the very lowest and most paltry scale of talent, and its

circulation is, fortunately, very limited; but it receives several

thousands of pounds of the money of the men whom it foully and falsely

calumniates.

Would I could see the man who pays this proclamation money and these

pensions at the Castle. [Here Mr. O’Connell turned round to where

Mr. Peele[B] sat.] Would I could see the man who, against the fact,

asserted that the proclamations were inserted in all the papers,

save in those whose proprietors were convicted of a libel. I would

ask him whether this be a paper that ought to receive the money of

the Irish people? Whether this be the legitimate use of the public

purse? And when you find this calumniator salaried and rewarded, where

is the impartiality, the justice, or even the decency of prosecuting

Mr. Magee for a libel, merely because he has not praised public men,

and has discussed public affairs in the spirit of freedom and of the

constitution? Contrast the situation of Mr. Magee with the proprietor

of the _Hibernian Journal_: the one is prosecuted with all the weight

and influence of the Crown, the other pensioned by the ministers of

the Crown; the one dragged to your bar for the sober discussion of

political topics, the other hired to disseminate the most horrid

calumnies! Let the Attorney-General now boast of his impartiality; can

you credit him on your oaths? Let him talk of his veneration for the

liberty of the Press; _can you_ believe him in your consciences? Let

him call the Press the protection of the people against the government.

Yes, gentlemen, believe him when he says so. Let the Press be the

protection of the people; he admits that it ought to be so. Will you

find a verdict for him that shall contradict the only assertion upon

which he and I, however, are both agreed?

[B] Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant.

Gentlemen, the Attorney-General is bound by this admission; it is

part of his case, and he is the prosecutor here; it is a part of the

evidence before you, for he is the prosecutor. Then, gentlemen, it is

your duty to act upon that evidence, and to allow the Press to afford

some protection to the people.

Is there amongst you any one friend to freedom? Is there amongst

you one man who esteems equal and impartial justice, who values the

people’s rights as the foundation of private happiness, and who

considers life as no boon without liberty? Is there amongst you one

friend to the constitution--one man who hates oppression? If there

be, Mr. Magee appeals to his kindred mind, and confidently expects an

acquittal.

There are amongst you men of great religious zeal--of much public

piety. Are you sincere? Do you believe what you profess? With all

this zeal--with all this piety, _is_ there any conscience amongst

you? _Is_ there any terror of violating your oaths? Be ye hypocrites,

or does genuine religion inspire ye? If you be sincere--if you have

conscience--if your oaths can control your interests, then Mr. Magee

confidently expects an acquittal.

If amongst you there be cherished one ray of pure religion--if amongst

you there glow a single spark of liberty--if I have alarmed religion,

or roused the spirit of freedom in one breast amongst you, Mr. Magee is

safe, and his country is served; but if there be none--if you be slaves

and hypocrites, he will await your verdict, and despise it.[8]

Representative British Orations Volume 4 (of 4) With Introductions and Explanatory Notes · 第 18 / 48 题