P. 61. _Wear not the image of God in a ring._

This in the Protreptics is the 24th Symbol; but instead of _wear_, it is

there _inscribe_. But Iamblichus’ explanation of it is as follows: “This

Symbol conformably to the foregoing conception, employs the following

exhortation: Philosophize, and before every thing consider the Gods as

having an incorporeal subsistence. For this is the most principal root

of the Pythagoric dogmas, from which nearly all of them are suspended,

and by which they are strengthened even to the end. Do not therefore

think that the Gods use such forms as are corporeal, or that they are

received by a material subject, and by body as a material bond, like

other animals. But the engravings in rings exhibit the bond which

subsists through the ring, its corporeal nature and sensible form, and

the view as it were of some partial animal, which becomes apparent

through the engraving; from which especially we should separate the

genus of the Gods, as being eternal and intelligible, and always

subsisting according to the same and in a similar manner, as we have

particularly, most fully, and scientifically shown in our treatise

concerning the Gods.”[97]

P. 61. _Nor is it proper to sacrifice a white cock; for this also is a

suppliant, and is sacred to the moon._

In the Protreptics, the 18th Symbol is partly the same with, and partly

different from this. For it is, “Nourish a cock; but sacrifice it not;

for it is sacred to the sun and the moon.” And Iamblichus explains it as

follows: “This Symbol advises us to nourish and strengthen the body and

not neglect it, dissolving and destroying the mighty tokens of the

union, connexion, sympathy, and consent of the world. So that it exhorts

us to engage in the contemplation and philosophy of the universe. For

though the truth concerning the universe is naturally occult, and

sufficiently difficult of investigation, it must, however, at the same

time, be inquired into and investigated by man, and especially through

philosophy. For it is truly impossible to be discovered through any

other pursuit. But philosophy receiving certain sparks, and as it were

viatica, from nature, excites and expands them into magnitude, rendering

them more conspicuous through the disciplines which it possesses. Hence,

therefore, we should philosophize.”

Iamblichus' Life of Pythagoras, or Pythagoric Life Accompanied by Fragments of the Ethical Writings of certain Pythagoreans in the Doric dialect; and a collection of Pythagoric Sentences from Stobaeus and others, which are omitted by Gale in his Opuscula Mythologica, and have not been noticed by any editor · 第 55 / 67 题