CHAP. XXIV.

Since, however, nutriment greatly contributes to the best discipline,

when it is properly used, and in an orderly manner, let us consider what

Pythagoras also instituted as a law about this. Universally, therefore,

he rejected all such food as is flatulent, and the cause of

perturbation, but he approved of the nutriment contrary to this, and

ordered it to be used, viz. such food as composes and compresses the

habit of the body. Hence, likewise, he thought that millet was a plant

adapted to nutrition. But he altogether rejected such food as is foreign

to the Gods; because it withdraws us from familiarity with the Gods.

Again, according to another mode also, he ordered his disciples to

abstain from such food as is reckoned sacred, as being worthy of honor,

and not to be appropriated to common and human utility. He likewise

exhorted them to abstain from such things as are an impediment to

prophesy, or to the purity and chastity of the soul, or to the habit of

temperance, or of virtue. And lastly, he rejected all such things as are

adverse to sanctity, and which obscure and disturb the other purities of

the soul, and the phantasms which occur in sleep. These things therefore

he instituted as laws in common about nutriment.

Separately, however, he forbade the most contemplative of philosophers,

and who have arrived at the summit of philosophic attainments, the use

of superfluous and unjust food, and ordered them never to eat any thing

animated, nor in short, to drink wine, nor to sacrifice animals to the

Gods, nor by any means to injure animals, but to preserve most

solicitously justice towards them. And he himself lived after this

manner, abstaining from animal food, and adoring altars undefiled with

blood. He was likewise careful in preventing others from destroying

animals that are of a kindred nature with us, and rather corrected and

instructed savage animals through words and deeds, than injured them

through punishment. And farther still, he also injoined those

politicians that were legislators to abstain from animals. For as they

wished to act in the highest degree justly, it is certainly necessary

that they should not injure any kindred animal. Since, how could they

persuade others to act justly, if they themselves were detected in

indulging an insatiable avidity by partaking of animals that are allied

to us? For through the communion of life and the same elements, and the

mixture subsisting from these, they are as it were conjoined to us by a

fraternal alliance. He permitted, however, others whose life was not

entirely purified, sacred and philosophic, to eat of certain animals;

and for these he appointed a definite time of abstinence. These

therefore, he ordered not to eat the heart, nor the brain; and from the

eating of these he entirely prohibited all the Pythagoreans. For these

parts are of a ruling nature, and are as it were certain ladders and

seats of wisdom and life. But other[25] things were considered by him as

sacred on account of the nature of a divine reason. Thus he exhorted his

disciples to abstain from mallows, because this plant is the first

messenger and signal of the sympathy of celestial with terrestrial

natures. Thus, too, he ordered them to abstain from the fish melanurus;

for it is sacred to the terrestrial Gods. And also not to receive the

fish erythinus, through other such like causes. He likewise exhorted

them to abstain from beans, on account of many sacred and physical

causes, and also such causes as pertain to the soul. And he established

as laws other precepts similar to these, beginning through nutriment to

lead men to virtue.

Iamblichus' Life of Pythagoras, or Pythagoric Life Accompanied by Fragments of the Ethical Writings of certain Pythagoreans in the Doric dialect; and a collection of Pythagoric Sentences from Stobaeus and others, which are omitted by Gale in his Opuscula Mythologica, and have not been noticed by any editor · 第 28 / 67 题