The land to the north-east of Short’s Gardens seems also to have formed

part of that acquired by William Short in 1590, for certain premises

which can be identified as occupying a site to the rear of the centre of

the frontage to Drury Lane between Short’s Gardens and Broad Street, are

stated to be bounded on the south by ground of Robert Clifton, “which

ground was heretofore the inheritance of William Short, deceased.”[516]

The fact that the property in Crown Court sold by Thomas Short in

1679[517] was also bounded on the south by land “late in the possession

of Robert Clifton” shows that the Short property originally extended

further westwards. It stretched, in fact, as far as the eastern boundary

of Marshland.[518]

The Subsidy Roll for 1646 gives three names between that of the Earl of

Downe, probably representing Lennox House, and Paviors Alley, afterwards

Ashlin Place. The first is that of “Mr. Edw. Smyth,” who was taxed 6s.

8d. for land, and 8s. for goods, and was evidently a person of much more

substance than his two neighbours, who figure each at 2s. for land only.

Mr. Smith had caused much concern by his building. As early as June,

1618, the Privy Council wrote[519] to the justices pointing out that

“there is a faire building now goeing up in Drury Lane, w^{ch} is by

credible information erected upon a new foundacion,” that the “said

building is under his Ma^{ties} eye as he passeth that way, and is

observed as a speciall marke of contempt amongst all the rest,” and

asking for particulars as to the date of the foundation, etc. As a

result it was found that Smith’s new building, which had been assigned

him by William Short,[520] was contrary to the proclamation as going

beyond the old foundations, and converting a stable into a dwelling

house,[521] and order was accordingly given for the demolition of that

part,[522] but Smith seems to have made a successful protest. Eighteen

years elapsed, and Smith was again in trouble. On 20th June, 1636, the

Earl of Dorset reported to the Privy Council that “one Smith hath lately

erected an house in or neare Drury Lane suddenly and for the most part

by stealth in the night, not onely contrary to His Ma^{ties}

proclamation, but after he was commanded by his Lo^{pp} to forbeare to

proceed in the building thereof.” Smith was thereupon committed to

prison until the house should be wholly demolished.[523]

The north-eastern angle of land formed by Drury Lane and Broad Street,

like the land on the opposite side of the way, is one of the very few

sites which can be identified with certainty in the book of grants to

the Hospital of St. Giles. In some unknown year, but apparently in the

reign of Henry III., John de Cruce demised to Hugh, the smith, “all that

his land situate at the angle or corner formed by the meeting of the two

streets, whereof the one comes from St. Giles and is called St. Giles

Street, and the other goes towards the Thames by the forge of the said

Hugh, and is called Aldewych. And which land begins on the east part of

the said corner, and stretches westwards towards the Hospital of St.

Giles; and again beginning at the said corner or forge, and facing the

spring,[524] extends southwards towards the Thames, in a line with the

street called Aldewych, by the garden of Roger, the son of Alan.”[525]

Before Elizabethan times the forge had disappeared, and the site in

question was occupied by _The Bear_ inn, and property connected

therewith.

In 1567 George Harrison purchased[526] from Lord and Lady Mountjoy,

_inter alia_, the messuage called _The Bear_, two messuages lying

between _The Bear_ on the east and the tenement of Godfrey Matthew

(_i.e._, _The Swan_) on the west, and all other houses, etc., lying

between Godfrey Matthew’s tenement on the west and the Queen’s highway

from the Strand to St. Giles on the east. Harrison sold the property in

1568 to John Walgrave who in the following year parted with it to

Johanna Wise, who subsequently married James Briscowe, and in 1582[527]

the property, including brewing vessels and other implements belonging

to the inn and the brewhouse, was acquired by James Mascall, brewer, who

was then actually in occupation of _The Bear_. The property continued in

the Mascall family, and in 1634, according to a deed[528] relating to

the marriage portion of Frances Godman, daughter of Olive Godman (_née_

Mascall) it included (i.) a messuage sometime in the tenure of John

Vavasour and then of Matthew Quire, (ii.) the messuage, inn or tenement

commonly called _The Black Bear_, sometime in the tenure of Richard

Robins and then of Matthew Quire, (iii.) ten messuages in Black Bear

Yard, (iv.) a number of other messuages,[529] and (v.) two gardens to

the rear of Black Bear Yard, one of them formerly in the tenure of John

Vavasour, and the other occupied with the inn. Vavasour’s house, it is

known, occupied the site of Ragged Staff Court,[530] which was situated

about 60 feet northwards from Paviors Alley,[531] and as no mention of

it occurs in the sale to Mascall, it may be taken for granted that it

was built either by the latter within the course of the next three

years,[532] or by John Vavasour, who married Mascall’s widow. The first

building on that spot therefore was erected some time between 1582 and

1608.[533]

To the west of _The Bear_ property was _The Swan_. In 1566 Lord and Lady

Mountjoy sold to Thomas Allen[534] all that messuage or tenement

“sometyme called ... _The Swanne_,” in the tenure of Geoffrey Matthew,

abutting to the east on _The Bear_, west on the tenement of Robert

Bromeley, “sometyme called _The Grayhounde_,” south-west on Matthew’s

stables, south on the Greyhound Close, and north on the Queen’s highway.

It has unfortunately not proved possible to trace the later history of

_The Swan_, but there can be no doubt that the property is identical

with that sold in 1723 by William Gyles to Peniston Lamb and Thos.

Hanson,[535] and which consisted of three houses in the main street with

the alley behind, formerly called Cock alley and then Gyles’ Court, and

is described as having a frontage to the street of 44½ feet and a depth

of 114 feet, and bounded on the south by the brewhouse late Mr.

Theedham’s,[536] on the east partly by messuages and lands in the

occupation of Theedham, and on the west by messuages and lands

“heretofore of one Short” (_i.e._, _The Greyhound_).

A comparison between the names of the occupiers of the three houses as

given in the deed of 1723, and the entries in various issues of the

sewer ratebook, shows that the houses in question corresponded with the

present Nos. 59 to 61 (formerly 56 to 58).

There does not seem any reason to doubt the identity of _The Swan_ of

the time of Elizabeth with _Le Swan on le Hop_,[537] demised by the

Hospital of St. Giles to John de Polton in 1360–61. It was then

described as standing south on land of the said Hospital and north on

the king’s highway. This description certainly does not warrant the

statement of Parton that the inn must “have been situate somewhat

eastward from Drury Lane end, and on the south side of Holborn.”[538]

Immediately to the west of _The Swan_ came _The Greyhound_.

Unfortunately no description of the inn or the property connected with

it has come down from Elizabethan times. In 1679, however, Thomas Short,

son and heir of Dudley Short, sold the whole to John Pery, and the

indenture[539] embodying the transaction gave a description of the

property as it then existed. It included two houses in the main

thoroughfare, both extending southward to Greyhound Court and one of

them being “commonly called ... or knowne by the name or signe of _The

Crowne_.” It would seem therefore that _The Greyhound_ had by now been

renamed _The Crown_, although the court still retained the old name. By

1704 the court had also been renamed Crown Court.[540] Included in the

sale was a quantity of land in the rear, with buildings, garden ground

and other ground, including the house in Greyhound Court where Thomas

Short had himself lived. The details given, though full, are not

sufficient to enable a plan to be drawn of the property. It certainly

included the eastern portion of the site of St. Giles’s Workhouse,[541]

and did not extend as far south as Short’s Gardens, as it is said to be

bounded in that direction by a “peice of ground commonly called the

mulberry garden, late in the possession of Robert Clifton.”

To the west of _The Greyhound_, were a number of houses, which in 1567

were sold[542] by Lord and Lady Mountjoy to Henry Ampthill.[543] They

are described as in eleven occupations, adjoining _The Greyhound_ on the

east, the highway on the north, and a close (probably Greyhound Close)

on the south. The western boundary, unfortunately, is not given. The

property was subsequently split up, about half coming into the hands of

a family named Hawkins,[544] and this in 1726 certainly included

property on either side of Lamb Alley,[545] probably as far as the site

of the present No. 45, Broad Street. How much further the Ampthill

property extended is not known.

In 1631 Ann Barber, widow, and her son Thomas, sold[546] to Henry Lambe

a tenement and two acres of land, the said two acres being garden ground

and adjoining on the west “a parcell of ground called Masslings,” on the

south “a parcell of ground in the occupation of one Master Smith,” on

the east a “parcell of ground in the occupation of Mistris Margarett

Hamlyn,” and on the north certain tenements and garden plots in the

occupation of Robert Johnson and others. In 1654 John Lambe sold the

property to Henry Stratton, who in the following year parted with it to

Thomas Blythe.[547] In the indenture accompanying the latter sale, the

two acres are stated to be “a garden or ground late in the occupation of

Samuel Bennet,” and the remainder of the property is described as 10

messuages late in the tenure of Edmund Lawrence, 4 small messuages also

late in Lawrence’s occupation, a chamber commonly called the Gate House,

a messuage called _The Bowl_, and a messuage called _The Black Lamb_.

The property had formerly belonged to William Barber,[548] Ann’s

husband. There is nothing to show how he became possessed of it, but it

is possible that the property is identical with the “one messuage, one

garden and two acres of land with appurtenances” sold by John Vavasour

in 1590 to Thomas Young.[549]

The eastern limits of the property above described may be fixed within a

little, as it is known that a portion of it was utilised in the 18th

century for the building of the original workhouse, and is described in

a deed quoted by Parton[550] as bounded on the east by the backs of

houses in Crown Court. It may be regarded therefore as including the

site of the central portion of the present workhouse. The “parcel of

ground in the occupation of one Master Smith” described as the southern

boundary, and referred to in a deed of 1680[551] as the garden and

grounds of William Short, is obviously the strip of ground on the north

side of Short’s Gardens, leased by Short to Edward Smith.[552] The

western boundary, “Masslings,” has been strangely misconstrued. Parton

read it as “Noselings,”[553] which he regarded as a corruption of

“Newlands,”[554] and located the ground on the east side of Neal Street.

Blott copied the error and, in a highly imaginative paragraph, connected

it with Noseley, in Leicestershire.[555] As a matter of fact, there is

not the slightest doubt that “Masslings”[556] is “Marshlands,” between

which the form “Marshlins” appearing in a deed of 1615[557] is evidently

a connecting link.

The boundary between Marshland and _The Bowl_ property is shown on Plate

39.

By 1680[558] a considerable portion of _The Bowl_ property had been

built on and Bowl Yard had been formed. In the first instance, the

latter led by a narrow passage into Short’s Gardens, but afterwards the

entrance was widened, and the southern part of the thoroughfare was

named New Belton Street, Belton Street proper being distinguished as Old

Belton Street. About 1846 both were widened on the east side to form

Endell Street, and the still remaining portion of Bowl Yard at the

northern end was swept away. Bowl Yard obviously derived its name from

_The Bowl_ inn, which, together with _The Black Lamb_, is mentioned in

the deed of 1655, above referred to. The sign had no doubt reference to

the custom mentioned by Stow[559] that criminals on their way to

execution at Tyburn were, at St. Giles’s Hospital, presented with a

great bowl of ale “thereof to drinke at theyr pleasure, as to be theyr

last refreshing in this life.” The inn itself probably fronted Broad

Street, and the brewhouse attached to it was situated behind, on the

west side of Bowl Yard.

Plate 38 shows the west front of _The Bowl_ Brewery in 1846, and the

houses at the northern end of Belton Street.

IN THE COUNCIL’S COLLECTION ARE:—

[560] _The Bowl_ Brewery in 1846 (photograph).

Nos. 7 and 9, Broad Street. Exterior (photograph).

LI.—SITE OF MARSHLAND (SEVEN DIALS.)

Included in the property transferred to Henry VIII. in 1537 was “one

close called Marshland.”[561] In 1594, Queen Elizabeth farmed the close

to Thomas Stydolph, his wife, and his son, Francis, for the life of the

longest liver, and in 1598 she farmed it for the sixty years following

the death of the longest lived of the three to Nicholas Morgan and

Thomas Horne. The latter immediately conveyed their interest to James

White, and subsequently it came into the hands of Sir Francis Stydolph,

who thus held a lease for the length of his own life and for sixty years

afterwards. In 1650, while he was still in possession of the close, it

was surveyed by Commissioners appointed by Parliament[562]. In their

report, the close is described as “all y^t peice or parcell of pasture

ground comonly called ... Marsh close _alias_ Marshland ... on the north

side of Longe Acre,[563] and ... betwene a way leadinge from Drury Lane

to St. Martin’s Lane on the north;[564] and a way leadinge from St.

Gyles to Knightsbridge, and a way leadinge from Hogg Lane into St.

Martin’s Lane on the west;[565] and Bennet’s Garden[566] and Sir John

Bromley[567] and Mr. Short on the east.” These boundaries are in accord

with the plan showing the design for laying out (Plate 39), and with

Faithorne’s Map of 1658 (Plate 4). The extension of Marshland to the

east of Neal Street (formerly King Street) has never been noticed, but

the fact is quite clear. One proof will suffice. On 23rd September,

1728, James Joye sold to trustees of the charity schools of St. Giles,

Cripplegate, property specified as “part of the Marshlands in St.

Giles-in-the-Fields,”[568] and situated on the _east_ side of King

Street. Part of the property has since been thrown into the public way,

but part can still be identified as No. 82, Neal Street,[569] on the

_east_ side.

In 1650 the buildings on the Close were:—

(i.) _The Cock and Pye_ inn, a brick building of two storeys and a

garret, standing on ground 117 feet from north to south, with a breadth

of 48 feet at the north end. This is probably the building shown on

Hollar’s Plan of 1658 (Plate 3), at the southern angle of the close.

From it the close was sometimes known as Cock and Pye Fields.

(ii.) A house with wheelwright’s shop and shed attached, covering with

yards, gardens, etc., 3 roods.

(iii.) A shed of timber and Flemish wall, with tiled roof, containing

two small dwelling rooms, occupying, with a garden, half an acre.

(iv.) A piece of ground, half an acre in extent, “late converted into a

garden, beinge very well planted w^{th} rootes.”

(v.) Three tenements of timber and Flemish wall, with thatched roof, on

the north side of what was afterwards Castle Street, occupying, with

gardens, etc., half an acre.

(vi.) “All that conduit scituate and adjoyninge to the aforesaid 3

tenements, and standeth on the southest corner of the aforesaid Marsh

Close, consistinge of one roome heirtofore used to convey water to the

Excheq^r. Office, but of late not used.”

Sir Francis Stydolph died on 12th March, 1655–6, and his successor, Sir

Richard, at once entered on the remaining 60 years’ term and in 1672

obtained an extension of this for 15 years.[570] Morden and Lea’s Map of

1682 shows that by that date a considerable amount of building had taken

place on the close, though the details are not clear.[571] This is

probably to be connected with the lease which James Kendricke obtained

for 31 years as from Michaelmas, 1660.[572] In 1693 Thomas Neale,

“intending to improve the said premisses by building”[573], obtained a

lease of the close until 10th March, 1731–2, undertaking to build within

two years sufficient houses to form ground rents amounting to £1,200,

the ground rents to be calculated at from 5s. to 8s. a foot frontage,

except in the case of houses fronting King Street (now Neal Street),

Monmouth Street (now Shaftesbury Avenue), St. Andrew Street and Earl

Street, where the amount was to be from 8s. to 12s. a foot. Building

operations were apparently started immediately,[574] but do not seem to

have been completed until well into the 18th century.[575]

Neale’s plan was one which excited considerable notice at the time, the

streets all radiating from a common centre. Evelyn records in his Diary

under date of 5th October, 1694: “I went to see the building neere St.

Giles’s, where 7 streets make a star from a Doric pillar plac’d in the

middle of a circular area.” From the fact that on the summit of the

column were dials, each facing one of the streets, the district obtained

the name of Seven Dials. The top part of the pillar, however, has only

six faces, a fact which has worried antiquaries. In explanation Mr. W.

A. Taylor, the Holborn Librarian, has pointed out[576] that the plan

(Plate 39) now at the Holborn Public Library, of the proposed laying out

shows only six streets, Little White Lion Street not being provided

for.[577]

The pillar was taken down in July, 1773, on the supposition that a

considerable sum of money was lodged at the base. “But the search was

ineffectual, and the pillar was removed to Sayes Court, Addlestone, with

a view to its erection in the park. This, however, was not done, and it

lay there neglected until the death of Frederica, Duchess of York, in

1820, when the inhabitants of Weybridge, desiring to commemorate her

thirty years’ residence at Oatlands and her active benevolence to the

poor of the neighbourhood, bethought them of the prostrate column,

purchased it, placed a coronet instead of the dials on the summit, and a

suitable inscription on the base, and erected it, August, 1822, on the

green. The stone on which were the dials, not being required, was

utilised as the horseblock at a neighbouring inn, but has been removed

and now reposes on the edge of the green, opposite the column.”[578]

Plate 40 shows the column as at present.

[Illustration]

Little of architectural interest now remains in the district of Seven

Dials. Plate 41 is a view of Little Earl Street at the present day.

Suspended from No. 56, Castle Street is a wooden key used as a street

sign and trade mark, probably dating from the reign of George III., at

which time the predecessors of the present firm carried on a locksmith’s

business at the premises. The exterior retains an 18th-century

appearance, and a small Georgian coat of arms remains over the doorway.

The interior has been many times reconstructed, and does not now contain

anything of architectural interest.

IN THE COUNCIL’S COLLECTION ARE:—

No. 54, Neal Street. Exterior (photograph).

No. 54, Neal Street. Detail of staircase (measured drawing).

Nos. 54, 56 and 58, Castle Street. Exterior (photograph).

[579]No. 56, Castle Street. Street sign (photograph).

No. 50, Castle Street. Exterior (photograph).

Nos. 1–6, Little White Lion Street. General view (photograph).

No. 10, Lumber Court. Exterior of ground floor (photograph).

[579]Little Earl Street. General view looking east (photograph).

Little Earl Street. General view and No. 15 (photograph).

No. 15, Little Earl Street. Exterior (photograph).

Nos. 12–16, Great White Lion Street. General view of exteriors

(photograph).

LII.—THE CHURCH OF ALL SAINTS, WEST STREET.

[Illustration: Wesley’s Chapel, West S^t., Seven Dials]

GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND DATE OF STRUCTURE.

On 20th February, 1699–1700, John Ardowin obtained a lease of a plot of

Marshland, 73 feet long, by 46 feet deep, abutting south on West Street

and north on Tower Street, “as the same was laid out and designed for a

chapel.”[580] The chapel in question, which was for the use of the

little colony of Huguenots lately settled in the district, was duly

built, and received the title of “La Pyramide de la Tremblade.” The

following inscription, however, which occurs on two chalices in the

possession of the West London Mission, shows that the congregation had

for more than two years had a temporary place of worship on this spot.

“Hi duo Calices dono dati sunt ab Honesto Viro Petro FENOWILLET die

octavo Julii MDCIIIC in usum Congregationis Gallicae quae habetur in via

vulgo dicta West Street de Parochia S. Ægidii. Si vero dissolvitur

Congregatio in usum Pauperum venundabuntur.” In 1742 the congregation

removed elsewhere, and in the following year John Wesley took a seven

years’ lease of the building, holding his first service there on Trinity

Sunday, 1743. His house, which stood immediately to the west of the

chapel, was demolished in 1902. The lease of the chapel was renewed from

time to time until Wesley’s death in 1791, after which the premises were

used for various religious purposes until 1888, when they were purchased

for the use of the Seven Dials Mission.[581]

The exterior is of stock brick with large semi-circular headed windows,

as shown on the previous page.

The interior has three large galleries supported on panelled square wood

pillars. The ceiling and roof are carried by Ionic columns. Over the bay

of the nave next to the chancel is a large square lantern with flat

ceiling; in each side of the lantern are three light windows.

The chancel is the full width of the nave between the galleries. The end

wall had a window, known in Wesley’s time as the “Nicodemus Window.” It

connected with Wesley’s house, and by its means many of his secret

admirers could take part in the service without being observed by the

congregation. It was filled in after Wesley’s death and was not found

again until 1901, when the wall was pulled down and rebuilt. Vestries

with rooms over now occupy the sides of the chancel, but formerly these

were a portion of the church.

[Illustration]

The top part of the pulpit, formerly a “three decker,” occupied by

Wesley, is still in use as the reading desk. The present pulpit, of

18th-century oak, was a gift from the church of St. George, Bloomsbury,

and the white marble font, dated 1810, came from the parish church of

St. Giles.

IN THE COUNCIL’S COLLECTION ARE:—

[582]Church of All Saints, West Street. Exterior in 1901

(photograph).

General view of interior (photograph).

[582]Top part of Wesley’s pulpit (photograph).

LIII.—SITE OF THE HOSPITAL OF ST. GILES.

The Hospital of St. Giles-in-the-Fields was founded by Maud,[583] Henry

I.’s Queen, probably in 1117 or 1118.[584] Stow[585] giving, on unknown

authority, the date as “about the yeare 1117,” and the Cottonian MS.

_Nero_ C.V.[586] placing the event in 1118. The number of lepers to be

maintained in the Hospital was stated, in the course of the suit between

the Abbot of St. Mary Graces and the Master of Burton Lazars in the

fourth year of Henry IV.’s reign, to be fourteen,[587] and this is to a

certain extent confirmed by a petition[588] from the brethren of the

Hospital, dating from the end of Edward I.’s reign, which gives the

number as “xiij,” apparently a clerical error. On the other hand, the

jury who were sworn to give evidence at the above-mentioned suit,

declared that from time immemorial it had not been the custom to

maintain fourteen, but that sometimes there had been only three, four or

five.

Survey of London, Volume 05 (of 14), the parish of St. Giles-in-the-Fields, part 2 · 第 11 / 24 段