THE CELEBRATION OF THE PRINCESS ROYAL'S WEDDING IN DUDLEY.

On Monday last, John Beddard, Esq., the Mayor of this town,

issued bills stating that he should be very happy to meet,

at Smith's Hotel, in the Market Place, that evening at seven

o'clock, any of the inhabitants disposed to support some public

demonstration on the marriage day of the Princess Royal.

At the time appointed for the meeting to take place, our

reporter attended and found only the Mayor present. During

the next half-hour or so a few gentlemen looked into the room

to see what sort of a meeting there was, and having satisfied

their curiosity withdrew. About half-past seven o'clock,

however, the Mayor remarked that business had better be

proceeded with. The number of loyal subjects present then was

very few, and during the entire meeting did not exceed a score.

We have no difficulty in subjoining a complete list of their

names. They were the Mayor, the High Bailiff (Elliot Hollier,

Esq.), Mr. W. H. Brooke, Mr. S. Rudge, Mr. R. Houghton, Mr.

W. Wigginton, Mr. Waring, Mr. G. B. Lowe, Mr. Masefield, Mr.

Walker, Mr. William Haden, jun., Mr. Minty, Mr. Laskey, Mr.

Wainwright, Mr. E. Sanders, Mr. Denison, Mr. J. Cartwright, Mr.

Clark, Mr. J. Renaud.

Mr. JOHN RENAUD moved that the Mayor should take the chair.

(Hear).

The MAYOR in doing so, said he was very glad to tell the

gentlemen present that Mr. Smith, at the Priory, would be very

happy "to fall in with whatever was done there." In proceeding

to open the business of the evening, the chairman said they

were met to take steps towards getting up a treat of some kind

or other so that the inhabitants of this town may remember the

day on which the Princess Royal was married. He thought they

ought to do something on this occasion, so that the event might

be signalized and remembered by their children for some time to

come. (Cheers). So far as regarded the poor in the Workhouse,

he should have very great pleasure in affording them a treat

himself. (Hear, hear). Mr. Clark had been suggesting that the

children belonging to the various Sunday Schools should also

have a treat. He should like to hear what he had to say upon

the subject.

Mr. C. F. G. CLARK, chemist, of High street, thought it only

right that the young people and the inhabitants of Dudley

generally should have an opportunity of participating in some

kind of rejoicing on the occasion of the marriage of the

Princess Royal. His Worship the Mayor had been kind enough to

promise--as the highest recognized authority in this place--a

treat to the poor in the Workhouse; and he (Mr. Clark) was of

opinion that they could not do less than give a treat also to

the Sunday School children of the parish. He would, therefore,

at once propose that they should enter into a subscription that

night, and communicate as soon as possible with the trustees

and ministers of the schools to solicit their co-operation in

giving the children a treat, and that they should award to each

establishment a certain sum out of the funds (to be regulated

by the number of scholars they had) for that purpose.

The proposition met with several objections. It was stated, in

answer to questions, that a tea might be had for the children

at fivepence per head, and that the total number of Sunday

Scholars in Dudley was about two thousand. This being so, it

was hinted that the subscription might not be large enough to

pay these schools fivepence per scholar for a treat, and to

meet this it was suggested that fivepence should be given,

and any deficiency which might arise should be made up by the

congregations at each place of worship.

A Gentleman in the meeting asked if the people of Netherton

were to be included in the arrangements? He believed it was the

general opinion that Netherton participated in anything of this

sort with the people of Dudley.

The MAYOR did not think that they could do anything with the

Nethertonians. "Dudley proper," he thought, was enough for them

to deal with.

Mr. CLARK said so far as own feelings were concerned in this

matter, he should very much like to have seen an ox or two

roasted and distributed amongst the poor in the neighbourhood,

after a good old English fashion.

Mr. RENAUD recommended the appointment of a deputation to

confer with the school authorities as to the best mode of

giving a treat to the children. He had no doubt that the

people belonging to the several places of worship would see to

treating their own children, and that each would meet their own

expenses in the event of a deficiency in the amount awarded

them out of the public subscription.

Mr. CLARK said if they were to give a treat at all, let them

do it as it ought to be done. For his own part, he did not

like the idea of proposing a treat and then calling upon other

people to pay for it. He disapproved of the shabby generosity

which wanted to give a tea to children, and, doubting whether

they could do it or not, called upon the congregation to make

up any deficiency. In such a case he (Mr. Clark) very much

questioned whether the parties belonging to the churches and

chapels would comply with, such a request. Some might: others

might not. At any rate, they could do as they liked, and it

would be left to each of them to act independently in the

matter.

Mr. RENAUD remarked that it was just that spirit of

independence amongst the people which he wished to acknowledge.

Mr. CLARK: Well, don't let us do the thing in a spirit of

niggardliness. If such a proposal is carried out, I think it

will be very much like a sectarian treat.

Mr. RENAUD: I wish to abolish that word "sectarian" in this

matter. I don't want us to have a sectarian, but a general

treat.

The MAYOR: Well, I think somebody had better move the

appointment of a deputation to wait upon the ministers of the

churches and chapels in the town upon the subject.

Mr. W. H. BROOKE: I would suggest, Mr. Mayor, that, as a matter

of order, you should first decide whether a committee of that

sort is to be appointed. (Hear, hear.)

The MAYOR: Just so. Will any gentleman move a resolution to

that effect?

Mr. W. H. BROOKE: I will move, if you please, then, "That the

gentlemen present form themselves into a committee for the

purpose of carrying out any arrangements that may be considered

advisable for celebrating the marriage of the Princess Royal in

Dudley."

Mr. HOUGHTON: And I second that motion.

The MAYOR put the proposition to the vote, and it was carried.

Mr. RENAUD: I will next move then, "That the said committee

wait upon the ministers of each chapel and church in the town,

to ascertain if they are willing to co-operate in giving a

treat to the Sunday School children on Monday next, the 25th

instant, in honour of the Princess Royal's wedding, and to use

the best means of carrying this into effect."

Mr. E. HOLLIER: I will second that motion.

The Mayor put the proposition to the vote, and it was carried

unanimously.

Mr. MINTY inquired if the Castle guns were to be fired?

Mr. RENAUD replied that the guns in the Castle yard were

spiked, and could not be used. They did not want to have

another earthquake. (Laughter.)

Mr. CLARK moved that a public subscription should be entered

into.

Mr. W. WIGGINGTON suggested that the committee should report

to a meeting to be held the next night. This proposition was

received.

The MAYOR said he should propose that there be a dinner at

Smith's Hotel, on Monday, precisely at half-past three o'clock.

Mr. WARING, on behalf of the Garrick Club, one of whose

performances is to take place next Monday evening, requested

that the dinner should not interfere with that entertainment.

The MAYOR promised that it should not.

Several gentlemen inquired what sort a dinner they should have.

Mr. CLARK proposed they should have a half guinea dinner, and

the suggestion was received.

Mr. RENAUD reminded the meeting that they ought to do something

for the poor in the neighbourhood. It was well to treat the

inmates of the workhouse, but at the same time he could not

lose sight of the fact that there were many, very many, poor

people who were as badly, if not worse off than the poor in the

workhouse, who ought to be treated also. (Hear, hear).

Mr. G. B. LOWE quite coincided with every word which had fallen

from the lips of his friend Mr. Renaud. There were many very

poor workpeople in the neighbourhood for whom a treat of some

sort ought to be provided, and he should be very sorry indeed

if they were remiss or neglectful in this part of their duty.

Many of the labouring classes were out of work, and must have

something to eat. If they could not get anything fairly they

might depend upon it they would get it other ways. The people

hereabout had behaved themselves very well lately during the

great depression of trade, and they ought to have a treat by

way of encouragement. For his (Mr. Lowe's) own part, he had no

idea of feasting himself up whilst other people were wanting,

and would readily forego his half guinea dinner to provide

something for people in poorer circumstances. (Cheers.)

The MAYOR: I am sorry to say that I cannot agree to such a

proposal. You see we are treating the workhouse people, and I

think that will be as much as we can do.

Mr. RENAUD said there were hundreds of people about the

town who were quite as deserving of a treat as those in the

workhouse.

The MAYOR: There are hundreds walking about with their hands in

their pockets. We pay enough, I think, in poor rates. I say it

without ill nature, I have not much sympathy with the working

classes in this neighbourhood, for it is very often the case

that when they have work to do they won't do it.

Mr. W. H. BROOKE: I say that it would be a disgrace to the

town if something is not done for the poor. That is my decided

opinion.

Mr. LOWE: We shall lay ourselves open to public censure.

Mr. RENAUD: The Dudley Workhouse is only calculated to contain

103 people.

The MAYOR: Well, we pay poor rates enough. The subscription you

see might not be so large as to enable us to do this.

Mr. LOWE: Well, I for one would rather pay my 10s. 6d. for a

treat to the poor than for a dinner at the hotel for myself,

and be aware at the same time that many of our poorer fellow

creatures were suffering from poverty.

Mr. CLARK: Oh! but I expect the Mayor is going to treat us with

the dinner at the hotel?

The MAYOR: I never promised anything of the sort.

Mr. CLARK: Well, I fully expected you were going to pay for it,

Mr. Mayor? (Roars of laughter.)

The MAYOR: Oh, no, I never said that I should.

Considerable merriment ensued. Order having been restored,

Mr. RENAUD renewed his proposal for a treat to the necessitous

poor in the neighbourhood.

The MAYOR again expressed his opinion that the funds would not

permit of anything of the sort.

Mr. WARING, on behalf of the Garrick Club, very generously

stepped forward and guaranteed a donation of £10 in aid of the

object from that body.

Mr. RENAUD said he would guarantee another £10 for the same

purpose.

The Mayor intimated that the further consideration of the

subject of giving a treat to the out-door poor had better be

adjourned until the next meeting. This was agreed to.

The MAYOR then resumed the discussion as to the providing of

a dinner at the hotel, and it was agreed that a dinner should

take place in Smith's hotel, at three o'clock next Monday, to

celebrate the marriage of the Princess Royal, and that the

tickets for the same might be had at the bar of the hotel,

price 10s. 6d.

The several gentlemen on the committee for waiting upon the

ministers and managers of the different Sunday schools then had

their duties apportioned to them, and the meeting was adjourned

until seven o'clock on Tuesday evening, to be held either at

the Hotel or at the Old Town Hall, when the report of the same

was to be received.

The Curiosities of Dudley and the Black Country, From 1800 to 1860 Also an Account of the Trials and Sufferings of Dud Dudley, with His Mettallum Martis: Etc. · 第 310 / 517 题