and the rippled silver,
and the tarnished copper
of its neck and beak,
toward the deep black water,
beneath the arches,
the swan floats slowly.
Into the dark of the arch the swan floats,
and the black depths of my sorrow
bears a white rose of flame.
If Mr. Flint had written nothing else but these two poems he would be
immortal for their sake, in spite of his disregard—shared by H. D.—of
the convenient device which begins each line of a poem with a capital
letter, and of the laws of punctuation. They weave a perfect hypnotic
spell in my mind, and they fulfill completely a recent definition of Mr.
E. A. Robinson, that poetry is a language which expresses through an
emotional reaction something which cannot be said in ordinary speech.
Mr. Flint has given us other poems not less beautiful, but with a strain
of greater pathos:
Tired faces,
eyes that have never seen the world,
bodies that have never lived in air,
lips that have never minted speech;
they are the clipped and garbled
blocking the highway.
They swarm and eddy
between the banks of glowing shops
towards the red meat,
the potherbs,
the cheapjacks,
or surge in
before the swift rush of the charging teams;
pitiful, ugly, mean,
encumbering.
Immortal?
In a wood
watching the shadow of a bird,
leap from frond to frond of bracken,
I am immortal,
perhaps.
But these?
Their souls are naphtha lamps,
guttering in an odour of carious teeth,
and I die with them.
Perhaps the last poem in Mr. Flint’s book will give the most complete
exposition of his art and vision:
The Star
Bright Star of Life,
Who shattered creeds at Bethlehem,
And saw
In the irradiance of your vision shining,
Children and maidens, youths and men and women,
Dancing barefoot among the grasses, singing,
Dancing,
Over the waving flowery meadows;
So calmly watched the universe and men,
And yet
So fiery was the heart behind the light;
The creeds have been re-made by men
Who followed as you walked abroad,
And gathered up their shattered shards;
Then with a wax of sticky zeal,
Each little piece unto its fellow joined;
But over the meadows comes the wind
Remembering your voice:
_O my love,_
_O my golden-haired, my golden-hearted,_
_I will sing this song to you of Him,_
_This golden afternoon._
_This song of you;_
_For where love is, is He,_
_Whose name has echoed in the halls of Time,_
_Who caught the wise eternal music, ay,_
_And passed it on—_
_For men to sing it since_
_In false and shifting keys—_
_Who hears it now?_
But the hearts of those who have heard it rightly,
Grew great;
And behind the walls and barriers of the world,
Their voices have gone up in sweetness
Unheeded,
Yet imminent in the wings and flight of change;
Comes there a time when men shall shout it,
And say to Life:
You have the strength of the seas,
And the glory of the vine;
You shall have the wisdom of the hills,
The daring of the eagle’s wings,
The yearning of the swallow’s quest.
And, in the mighty organ of the world,
Great men shall be as pipes and nations stops
To harmonize your Song.
_O my love,_
_Like a cornfield in summer_
_Is your body to me;_
_Golden and bending with the wind,_
_And on the tallest ear a bird is piping_
_The lonely song._
_And scarlet poppies thread the golden ways._
_Out of the purple haze of the sea behind it_
_Appears a white ship sailing,_
_And its passengers are harvesters._
_But who dares sing of love?_
The jackals howl; the vultures gorge dead flesh.
In despite of the last line, which is undoubtedly true, and, under the
present circumstances, certainly necessary to the context of all that
precedes it, yet I feel I cannot share Mr. Flint’s despair of this
world. For as long as there is any poet who can have such visions as
this is, in such a world as ours, the earth cannot be altogether given
over to crime and slaughter. Which one of the Imagists could have given
us with so direct and poignant sincerity—scorning all artifice—such a
vision of beauty? Or, for that matter, which one of the poets of today?
The Reader Critic
What Is Anarchy?
_Alan Adair, London_:
In the March number of THE LITTLE REVIEW, Miss Alice Groff criticises
Anarchy. She criticises it badly and unfairly. She writes as though she
did not understand what anarchy is. Have you room in your paper for me
to tell her?
Anarchy is the name given to those periods in the life of a people
during which the principle of domination is held in abeyance and men are
no longer accountable to any magistracy. It is properly a political
word. It has no philosophical significance. All it means is absence of
material government. It is in that sense that Milton uses it and Swift
uses it. It is in that sense that writers of history books employ it. It
is a term, and the only correct term, for a certain condition of
society. That condition has occurred in the past and will doubtless
occur in the future. It is the result of an equality of strength among
the different elements, or “social-egos” that make up a community. There
is Anarchy only so long as these forces remain equal. Once they cease to
be equal, so soon as one begins to tend towards dominance, so soon does
the Anarchy end. According to the “social-ego” that has triumphed, the
changed commonwealth becomes an oligarchy or a kingdom; a military
republic, an ochlocracy or a federation of communes. But until then,
while there is still absence of supreme coercive power, while there is
still _no dominant “social-ego,”_ so long is the community correctly
termed an Anarchy.
Between this, the Anarchy of fact and of history, and the Anarchy of
theory and modern revolutionists, there is no substantial difference.
The anarchist, in any age, is simply and without qualification, a man
who desires an end put to the political power under which he lives. The
reason _why_ he desires such a thing does not matter. He may think
government to be eternally an evil or only presently an evil. He may be
egoist or communist. What makes him an anarchist is that he hates the
social order around him and would precipitate its destruction by
paralyzing the centers of its administrative and legislative authority.
The theoretical case against government has little part in the mind of
the modern anarchist. Miss Groff altogether overestimates the importance
that he attaches to it. The war against authority _as authority_ is
past. We are beyond that kind of mysticism. Scepticism is a big
ingredient of Anarchy and the anarchist knows only too well that we know
too little of psychology and too little of philosophy to judge the worth
of abstractions like justice or liberty or the principle of domination.
We can only fix temporary, conditional values to such things. Actual,
modern authority is the only sphinx that troubles the contemporary
anarchist. He has no desire to control the destinies of his people and,
as anarchist, he has no theories about the future form of its political
institutions. His business is solely with present facts. His task is
simply destruction. It may be that he does not start from a “basis of
reason.” He has seen and thought too much to trouble greatly about
reason. He knows too many books to have much optimism. He sees sprawled
across the earth a tragic and incoherent civilization and he sees the
most virile of the races of man lose under its influence the spontaneity
of their actions and the region of their instincts. That, possibly more
than the desire to “complete a circuit of reason,” is at the root of his
attitude to society. The question of the moral significance of archist
or an-archist is beyond the answering of Miss Groff or any one else. The
question of whether it is well to endure the present order; to be
dwarfed and poisoned by its ideals; to be devoted by its economy to
contemptible pursuits; to be forced to conjunction with base influences
by every circumstance that past power has created for the control of
present humanity; that is at least an answerable question. Of the value
of the anarchist answer there may be many opinions, but that it is an
intelligible answer is not to be denied. It is simple and coherent.
Society is sick of its many counsellors and rulers. Its sources of
spiritual vitality are dried up. It is full of confusion; bereft of
consistent purpose; continuing only in mechanical existence. To
precipitate its decay is the one wise action possible to mankind. All
things are grown fatigued; without simplicity of soul or rigour of
desire. Religions, institutions and codes of law are no longer animated;
solely the dead weight of the past holds them in position. Of what use
to plan, meditate or invent, to conquer elements or to evoke from the
earth new, fantastic and wonder-working metals, when that which has
custody of all such things, that which alone can give continuity to the
works and achievements of man our mother civilization itself is in
dissolution?
To the mind of the anarchist, there are but two courses open to
humanity. First: there may be a continuance of the present conditions: a
society stratified as now, stupidified as now, completely organized, of
antique institutions, growing perpetually enfeebled in spirit, the
current of its vitality becoming attenuated until lost in the morass of
an enormous racial degeneracy. Or else, secondly, the mechanism of
civilization may break and a period of administrative and moral chaos
not easily distinguishable from barbarism supervene upon dilatory
decadence. It is this second course that commends itself to the
anarchist. Only in a partial cessation of its continuity, only in a
barbaric forgetfulness of its eternal problems and speculations can an
exhausted humanity come once more to a zest for existence and the will
to achievement.
And an Anarchy is commonly an epoch of such confusion and recovery.
Impressions of the Loop
_A Boy Reader, Chicago_:
Is the following good enough for you to print?
As I walk through the streets of the Loop,
Big, fat, double-chinned women fan by;
They reek of Melba perfume:
They might have used some other kind,
But they like Melba: fat women, I mean.
Then there are whining old ladies;
They look disdainfully at the gay styles,
Whining, because they are disgusted—
(Envious disgust).
They are old, you know, and can’t do such things.
And drunken men tumble from the corner saloons;
I envy them, for they are very happy.
Miserable, begging men and women sit in comfort
On every corner.
Some have _an_ arm, some _a_ leg,
But they had _another_ once.
Why don’t the rich people take care of them?
They might lose their arms and legs!
Big limousines glide by;
Painted blonde ladies sit on soft cushions.
They must sit there!
What would the jewelry stores do without them!
Diamonds glitter on their perfumed hands;
They cannot smile, for the paint would crack
And fall from their faces. Besides, they are select.
Ragamuffins weave in and out.
They hop cars, scream, and envy the blossoming windows
Of cheap Delicatessens.
Flip stenographers flit by;
Their ankles are gay with many-colored stilty shoes,
But their stockings are full of holes and Jacob’s ladders
Under it all.
Terrible odors fill the air:
Fish, gasoline, booze, sachet-powder (lots of Melba),
Gas, cheap roses, and peanuts; coffee, smoke,
And other things.
Dirty men, clean men, dudes, street mashers,
Cheap Musicians and Artists....
This is life!
Statement of Ownership, Management,
Circulation, Etc., Required by the Act of
Congress of August 24, 1912
Of THE LITTLE REVIEW, published monthly at
Chicago, Ill., for April 1st, 1916.
State of Illinois, County of Cook—ss:
Before me, a Notary Public in and for the State
and county aforesaid, personally appeared
Margaret C. Anderson, who, having been duly
sworn according to law, deposes and says that
she is the Editor of THE LITTLE REVIEW, and
that the following is, to the best of her
knowledge and belief, a true statement of the
ownership, management (and if a daily paper,
the circulation), etc., of the aforesaid
publication for the date shown in the above
caption, required by the Act of August 24,
1912, embodied in section 443, Postal Laws and
Regulations, printed on the reverse of this
form, to wit:
1. That the names and addresses of the
publisher, editor, managing editor, and
business managers are:
Publisher, Margaret C. Anderson, 834 Fine Arts
Building; Editor, Margaret C. Anderson, 834
Fine Arts Building; Managing editor, Margaret
C. Anderson, 834 Fine Arts Building; Business
manager, Margaret C. Anderson, 834 Fine Arts
Building.
2. That the owners are: (Give names and
addresses of individual owners, or, if a
corporation, give its name and the names and
addresses of stockholders owning or holding 1
per cent or more of the total amount of stock.)
Margaret C. Anderson, 834 Fine Arts Building.
3. That the known bondholders, mortgagees, and
other security holders owning or holding 1 per
cent or more of total amount of bonds,
mortgages, or other securities are: (If there
are none, so state.) None.
4. That the two paragraphs next above, giving
the names of the owners, stockholders, and
security holders, if any, contain not only the
list of stockholders and security holders as
they appear upon the books of the company but
also, in cases where the stockholders or
security holder appears upon the books of the
company as trustee or in any other fiduciary
relation, the name of the person or corporation
for whom such trustee is acting, is given; also
that the said two paragraphs contain statements
embracing affiant’s full knowledge and belief
as to the circumstances and conditions under
which stockholders and security holders who do
not appear upon the books of the company as
trustee, hold stock and securities in a
capacity other than that of a bona fide owner;
and this affiant has no reason to believe that
any other person, association, or corporation
has any interest direct or indirect in the said
stock, bonds, or other securities than as so
stated by him.
MARGARET C. ANDERSON.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 31st day
of March, 1916.
(SEAL)
MITCHELL DAWSON, Notary Public.
(My commission expires December 20, 1917.)
A Vers Libre Prize Contest
Through the generosity of a friend, THE LITTLE REVIEW is enabled to
offer an unusual prize for poetry—possibly the first prize extended to
free verse. The giver is “interested in all experiments, and has
followed the poetry published in THE LITTLE REVIEW with keen
appreciation and a growing admiration for the poetic form known as _vers
libre_.”
The conditions are as follows:
Contributions must be received by August 15th.
They must not be longer than twenty-five lines.
They must be sent anonymously with stamps for return.
The name and address of the author must be fixed to the manuscript in a
sealed envelope.
It should be borne in mind that free verse is wanted—verse having beauty
of rhythm, not merely prose separated into lines.
There will be three judges: William Carlos Williams, Zoë Aikens and
Helen Hoyt.
There will be two prizes of $25 each. They are offered not as a first
and second prize, but for “the two best short poems in free verse form.”
As there will probably be a large number of poems to read, we suggest
that contributors adhere closely to the conditions of the contest.
THE NEW POETRY SERIES
A successful attempt to give the best of contemporary verse a
wide reading in its own generation.
NEW VOLUMES NOW READY
SOME IMAGIST POETS, 1916
A new collection of the work of this interesting group of
poets—Richard Aldington, “H. D.”, John Gould Fletcher, F. S.
Flint, D. H. Lawrence, and Amy Lowell—showing increased scope and
power and confirming their important position in modern poetry.
The volume includes Miss Lowell’s “Patterns” and “Spring Day,”
and Mr. Fletcher’s Arizona poems.
GOBLINS AND PAGODAS
By JOHN GOULD FLETCHER
This volume includes “Ghosts of an Old House” and ten
“Symphonies” interpreting in terms of color the inner life of a
poet. In originality of conception, in sheer tonal beauty, and in
the subtlety with which moods are evoked, these poems mark a
distinct advance in the development of the art of poetry.
ROADS
By GRACE FALLOW NORTON
The author of “The Little Gray Songs from St. Joseph’s” writes in
the old metres but with all the artistic vitality of the newer
school of poets. The poems of this volume represent the best work
she has yet done.
TURNS AND MOVIES
By CONRAD AIKEN
“Most remarkable of all recent free verse.”—Reedy’s St. Louis
Mirror.
A SONG OF THE GUNS
By GILBERT FRANKAU
Wonderfully vivid pictures of modern war written to the roar of
guns on the western front by a son of Frank Danby, the novelist.
These are the war poems the world has been waiting for.
IDOLS
By WALTER CONRAD ARENSBERG
Contains many interesting experiments in new metres and
reflective verse of much beauty as well as novel and effective
renderings of Mallarmé’s “Afternoon of a Faun,” and of Dante’s
Fifth Canto.
Each 75 cents Net, except “A Song of the Guns,” which is 50
cents Net.
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN CO.
At all Bookstores 4 Park Street, Boston
READ THE MISCELLANY
An Illustrated QUARTERLY for
Connoisseurs of the Book-Beautiful
Occasional Book Reviews and Articles on
Prints, Etchings and Fine
Engraving
THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF
THE AMERICAN BOOKPLATE SOCIETY
$1.00 a Year 25 Cents a Copy
Address
EDITOR, THE MISCELLANY
1010 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, Ohio
Are you really opposed to the war and are you anxious to
do anti-military propaganda? Then help spread
ANTI-MILITARY LITERATURE
Preparedness, the Road to Universal Slaughter
By Emma Goldman, 5c each, $2.50 a hundred
Patriotism, a Menace to Liberty
By Emma Goldman, 5c each, $2.50 a hundred
War and Capitalism
By Peter Kropotkin, 5c each
The Last War
By George Barrett, 5c each
For sale by MOTHER EARTH PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION
20 EAST 125th STREET, NEW YORK CITY
“Et j’ai voulu la paix”
POÈMES
Par ANDRÉ SPIRE Author of “Versets,” “Vers les Routes
Absurdes,” &c.
A little book of unpublished poems written just before and during
the war. M. Spire has been in Nancy, within a few kilometres of
the firing-line, since August, 1914.
THE EGOIST, in publishing these poems by as well known an author
as M. Spire, hopes to reach that fairly numerous public in
England which reads French, and hopes also to follow up this book
with other small collections of new French poetry by the younger
poets.
Copies may be obtained from
THE EGOIST, or from RICHARD ALDINGTON, 7 Christchurch Place,
Hampstead, N. W.
Price 6d net. Postage 1d
EDITION LIMITED TO 750 COPIES
A List of Interesting Papers to Appear in Early Issues of
THE QUARTERLY NOTEBOOK
Homage to Watteau*
_By W. G. Blaikie-Murdoch_
Seventeenth Century Type-Making*
_By Dard Hunter_
The Centenary of Charlotte Brontë
_By E. Basil Lupton_
Synge and Borrow: A Contrast in Method
_By Miriam Allen deFord_
Dickens as a Student of Scott
_By E. Basil Lupton_
Ivories
_By N. Tourneur_
*Illustrated
The Little Review
Literature, Drama, Music, Art
MARGARET C. ANDERSON, Editor
The monthly that has been called “the most unique journal
in existence.”
THE LITTLE REVIEW is a magazine that believes in Life for Art’s
sake, in the Individual rather than in Incomplete People, in an
Age of Imagination rather than of Reasonableness; a magazine
interested in Past, Present, and Future, but particularly in the
New Hellenism; a magazine written for Intelligent People who can
Feel, whose philosophy is Applied Anarchism, whose policy is a
Will to Splendour of Life, and whose function is—to express
itself.
One Year, U.S.A., $1.50; Canada, $1.65; Great Britain, 7/-
The Little Review
THE FLAME
A JOURNAL FOR THE NEW AGE
Irwin Granich and Van K. Allison, Editors.
3 Bellingham Place, Boston, Mass.
“The Flame” is to be a monthly journal of revolution, soon to
take life. It is to burn against oppression and authority
everywhere, and is to be as pure and merciless as the flower of
light after which it is named.
We want you to help us make “The Flame.” It is not to be one of
those vehicles for the delivery of the vast thoughts of an
unrecognized “genius,” but a little forum where every
revolutionist of high heart and purpose can speak. We can pay
nothing, of course. Cartoons, poems, stories, sketches, tracts,
philosophies, news reports—all will be welcomed.
No creed or philosophy will be barred from our columns if only
its devotee writes in a beautiful and furious and yes-saying
gesture. The editorials will be flavored by the anarchy of the
publishers.
INVITATION
TO
MEMBERSHIP
SOCIETY OF MODERN ART
Every copy of M. A. C. (Modern Art Collector) is spreading the
new form of art throughout America, is adding the law of
recognition to these hard-working, self-sacrificing, unselfish
artists.
Support of the Collector is a direct and potent method of
manifesting your interest in Modern Art and of aiding its advance
in the betterment of the Modern Artist.
A fee of eighteen dollars will be charged by the publishers of
the Modern Art Collector to those desiring to lend support to the
Modern Art Movement. The payment of the fee will be acknowledged
by an engraved certificate signed by the Society’s officers and
will entitle the contributor to copies of M. A. C., containing
collections of Modern Artists’ work for the period of two years.
Those who have previously subscribed to M. A. C. may procure the
same advantages by paying the difference between the subscription
rate and the membership fee.
EMMA
GOLDMAN
THE NOTED ANARCHIST
Will Lecture in San Francisco, Cal.,
at Fillmore Street Averill Hall
1861 Fillmore St., Bet. Sutter and Bush
SUNDAY, JULY 16th, 8 P. M.
“Anarchism and Human Nature—Do they harmonize?”
TUESDAY, JULY 18th, 8 P. M.
“The Family—Its Enslaving Effect upon Parents and Children”
WEDNESDAY, JULY 19th, 8 P. M.
“Art For Life”
THURSDAY, JULY 20th, 8 P. M.
“Preparedness, The Road to Universal Slaughter”
FRIDAY, JULY 21st, 8 P. M.
“Friedrich Nietzsche and the German Kaiser”
SATURDAY, JULY 22nd, 8 P. M.
“The Educational and Sexual Mutilation of the Child”
(The Gary System Discussed)
SUNDAY, JULY 23rd, 8 P. M.
“The Philosophy of Atheism”
(The Lecture delivered before the Congress of Religious Philosophies
held at San Francisco during the Exposition)
Questions and Discussions at all Lectures
Admission 25 Cents
Transcriber’s Notes
Advertisements were collected at the end of the text.
The table of contents on the title page was adjusted in order to reflect
correctly the headings in this issue of THE LITTLE REVIEW.
The original spelling was mostly preserved. A few obvious typographical
errors were silently corrected. All other changes are shown here
(before/after):
[p. 3]:
... when the First Consul sent home the news of the victory of
Merengo?” ...
... when the First Consul sent home the news of the victory of
Marengo?” ...
[p. 25]:
... in landlady’s pink, a Jessicca (a spirited Cockney girl) in
Turkish costume, ...
... in landlady’s pink, a Jessica (a spirited Cockney girl) in
Turkish costume, ...
[p. 26]:
... if similar technique, should chose to band themselves
together ...
... if similar technique, should choose to band themselves
together ...
[p. 41]:
... And, in the mightly organ of the world, ...
... And, in the mighty organ of the world, ...
[p. 43]:
... now, stupified as now, completely organized, of antique
institutions, growing perpetually ...
... now, stupidified as now, completely organized, of antique
institutions, growing perpetually ...