In America there have been important contributions to educational

theory during the century. There has been a perfect flood of

educational books, pamphlets, and periodicals, whose merit is so great

as to extort even reluctant admiration from foreign critics. While

there has been much unevenness in quality, yet Americans have no reason

to feel ashamed of their contribution to pedagogical literature. The

best work has been done in the discussion of specific questions, rather

than in an elaboration of general ideals. Administration, with its

manifold problems, has appealed strongly to the American genius; and

consequently the greatest names of the century are those of men who

have devoted themselves to some practical work, the ideals and details

of which they have thoroughly mastered, and so have left enduring

monuments of their lives’ work.

[Illustration: DR. THOMAS ARNOLD, OF RUGBY, ENGLAND.

(Courtesy of The School Journal, New York.)]

The great achievement of the century in the United States has been the

establishment of a system of free and public schools. Like most of the

nation’s intellectual impulses, this spirit seems to have come from New

England. There, the democratic ideals of the people led to an early

appreciation of the necessity for universal education. There can be

little doubt that it was from the Puritan settlements in Massachusetts

that the original impulse toward universal education came. Thus, in

1647, the Colonial Assembly required that each town containing one

hundred families should establish a grammar school to prepare youths

for the university. During colonial times more and more schools were

steadily established. But the movement, which was zealously supported

in New England and encouraged in the Middle States, especially by

the Friends, met with opposition in the South, where education was

considered a family duty, and not within the province of the State.

Whatever, therefore, was accomplished in an educational line prior to

the Revolution depended upon the spirit of the individual colonies;

consequently, there was the widest possible divergence in the policies

and methods of different localities.

[Illustration: AN OLD LOG SCHOOLHOUSE.]

But as soon as the Revolution had been accomplished, and independence

had become a fact, a renewed interest in general education was evident.

It is exceedingly interesting to watch the development of the point

of view that free schools were a necessity for the existence of the

republic, and hence must be established by the State. The early

fathers of the nation were not slow to recognize this. In the words of

Franklin, “A Bible and newspaper in every house, a good school in every

district—all studied and appreciated as they merit—are the principal

support of virtue, morality, and civil liberty.” “In proportion

as the structure of a government gives force to public opinion,”

said Washington, “it is necessary that public opinion should be

enlightened.” And Jefferson, with his broad philosophical appreciation

of democracy, started the battle against the ideas of Governor

Berkeley, of Virginia, when, in 1779, he introduced into the General

Assembly of Virginia a bill providing for the establishment of schools

“for the free training of all free children, male and female.”

The half century from 1790 to 1840 is the period of the battle for

free public schools. It was a hard fight, complicated in many States

by local questions and conditions that rendered success almost

hopeless. Some opposed from the old point of view that education was

an individual matter,—each should get for himself just so much as

was possible. Others raised the objection of cost,—if taxation was

proposed, was it right to take money from one group to educate the

children of another? Religious disputes hindered progress,—many of

the denominations had founded sectarian schools, and were unwilling to

see them replaced by public schools, where no creed would be taught.

Especially, in some States, as in Pennsylvania, where Swede, German,

Scotch, Irish, and English lived side by side, did the race problem

enter as a perplexing element. Should any language other than English

be taught? What respect should be given to the traditions and customs

of each race-group? Moreover, when the conservatism began to yield to

progress, it compromised with great reluctance. At first, provision was

made whereby the children of the poor should have their school fees

paid by the State. Then public schools were started exclusively for the

poor, which were branded with the stigma of “pauper schools.” But these

difficulties only served to increase the ardor of the public-school

advocates, and at length their success was complete.

Some episodes of the struggle deserve special mention. Horace Mann

(1796–1859) has been called the St. Paul of education in America.

In 1837, the State Board of Education was created in Massachusetts,

and Horace Mann was appointed its first secretary. For twelve years

he labored with unflagging energy to build up the public interest

in education. By speech and by pen, he awakened in his State an

appreciation of the value of the public school system that has never

since decayed. He established on an enduring basis the business side

of education in the State, by systematizing the school funds. The

personal sacrifice was enormous. He addressed public meetings all

over the country. When he found that no arrangements had been made at

Pittsfield to prepare the schoolhouse for his meeting, Horace Mann and

Governor Briggs themselves swept out the building and set it in order.

One of his first interests was the provision of good teachers. In

order to spur the Assembly to its duty, he begged from his friends the

sum of $10,000, which, with an equal sum appropriated from the state

treasury, was used in the establishment of the Massachusetts normal

schools at Lexington and Barre (1839). Outside of his administrative

work, his fame must rest upon his stanch advocacy of the principle of

“the obligation of a State, on the great principles of natural law and

natural equity, to maintain free schools for the universal education of

its people.”

In Pennsylvania, the hero of the battle for free schools was Thaddeus

Stevens. In 1834, a law was passed by the legislature establishing a

state system, and abolishing the distinction between rich and poor

which had been noticed in the old pauper schools. Two years later,

a determined effort was made by the combined forces of ignorance,

prejudice, and caste, to repeal the act of 1834. Nothing but the

stanchness of Governor Wolf and the power exerted by the eloquence of

the “Old Commoner” saved free schools for the Keystone State, and so

established the system which to-day receives more direct aid from the

state treasury than in any other State of the Union.

West of the Alleghanies, the interest in popular education has always

been deep and thorough. Settled in large measure by the steady sons of

New England, education found there a most fertile soil. Moreover, by

the wise foresight of Congress, provision was made for school funds

in a most satisfactory way. The Ordinance of 1787, which organized

the territory north of the Ohio River, contained a provision that

one section of land in each township should be devoted to public

education. If this grant, which was originally suggested by Jefferson,

had been carefully watched, it would have been sufficient to endow

the public schools of many Western States. The national government

gave to education in the first hundred years of its history nearly

eighty million acres of public lands, but these grants were not always

conserved with sufficient care. In 1896–97 the total revenue of the

school systems in the United States was $188,641,243, of which less

than five per cent was from state school funds or rent of school

lands, while over eighty-six per cent was derived from state and local

taxation.

Some little conception of the immensity of the common-school system in

the United States may be obtained from the following statistics, taken

from the Report of the Commissioner of Education for 1896–97.

COMMON-SCHOOL STATISTICS OF THE UNITED STATES (NOT INCLUDING PRIVATE

SCHOOLS, COLLEGES, OR UNIVERSITIES).

1870–71 1896–97

I.—General Statistics. Approximate

Total population 39,500,500 71,374,142

Number of persons 5 to 18 years of age 12,305,600 21,082,472

Number of different pupils enrolled

on the school registers 7,561,582 14,652,492

Per cent of total population enrolled 19.14 20.53

Average daily attendance 4,545,317 10,089,620

Average length of school term (days) 132.1 140.4

Male teachers 90,293 131,386

Female teachers 129,932 271,947

------------ ------------

Whole number of teachers 220,225 403,333

Per cent of male teachers 41.0 32.6

Average monthly wages of teachers:

Males (averaged from the

statistics of 43 States) $44.62

Females (averaged from the

statistics of 43 States) $38.38

Number of schoolhouses 132,119 246,828

Value of school property $143,818,703 $469,069,086

II.—Financial Statistics.

Receipts:

Income from permanent funds $7,846,648

From state taxes 35,062,533

From local taxes 127,960,761

From all other sources 17,771,301

------------

Total receipts 188,641,243

Expenditures:

For sites, buildings, furniture,

libraries, and apparatus $31,903,245

For salaries of teachers and

superintendents $42,580,853 119,303,542

For all other purposes 36,113,815

------------

Total expenditures $69,107,612 $187,320,602

Expenditure per capita of population. 1.75 2.62

Total expenditure per pupil 15.20 18.57

To these grand totals must be added the million and more in attendance

at private schools throughout the country, and the rapidly increasing

number (now 217,763) of those who receive higher instruction, in

universities and professional and normal schools. This makes for

the United States a grand total of 16,255,093 pupils and students

of all grades in public and private schools. The growth during the

last generation has been most marked. The statistical table gives an

opportunity for comparison with the year 1870–71,—the span of a

generation,—and it has been estimated that within this period the

average total amount of schooling has increased from 2.91 years to 4.28

years. In other words, the amount of education which each one felt able

to afford has increased almost one half. Such is the magnificent result

which has grown out of the isolated village schools of our New England

ancestors, fostered by the democratic desire for intelligence found all

over the country.

[Illustration: SCHOOLHOUSE, SLEEPY HOLLOW, N. Y.

(Courtesy of The School Journal, New York.)]

Equally great has been the change in the spirit of the school. In the

early days the schools were very crude. Population was scattered, and

since the children could not go as far to school as their elders did to

church, the number of schoolhouses was very great. They were usually

put up by the people of the neighborhood with little pretense at

adornment. The average schoolhouse was located either at a fork in the

roads or on an elevation, where it shared, with the church, the honor

of conspicuousness. We give a picture of Old Sleepy Hollow Schoolhouse,

made famous by Washington Irving’s elaborate description of Ichabod

Crane, its ruler in the colonial days. But a structure of this kind is

luxurious compared with the hardships of more sparsely settled regions.

From Wickersham’s “History of Education in Pennsylvania” the following

description is culled: “The pioneer schoolhouse was built of logs,

sixteen by twenty feet, seven feet to the ceiling, daubed with mud

inside and out, a mud and stick chimney in the north end, and in the

west a log was left out, and the opening covered with oiled paper to

admit light; holes were bored in the logs and pins driven in, on which

to nail a long board for a writing-table, and slabs with legs answered

for seats. The early schoolhouses were generally situated near the

roadside or cross-roads, being without playground, shade-trees, or

apparatus.”

Here the master kept his country school for a term of from six to

twelve weeks. In the winter time the pupils were almost frozen, and

there were other dangers which the hardy lad of those days had to

encounter. Nevertheless, rude, uncomfortable, and inadequate as they

were, it was here that our forefathers obtained their scanty schooling.

The three R’s, Readin’, Ritin’, and ‘Rithmetic, formed the basis of

the course of study. Methods were very simple. Much of the early

instruction was religious in its trend, and the child was expected to

use books which would teach moral lessons. Church books, containing

creeds and hymns and catechisms, might be used in the school for

study. Then there were the primers or books to teach the A B C. The

famous “New England Primer” was published in the latter part of the

seventeenth century. Later editions contained rhyming couplets upon

each letter of the alphabet, illustrated with such imagery as the art

would allow. A page from the “Child’s Guide,” published in London in

1762, is shown on page 527. Its verses were easily memorized, and

sometimes gave a basis for a spelling lesson. There were no graded

readers until this century.

Writing in some neighborhoods was taught only to boys, on the general

ground that it was an unnecessary accomplishment for the sex which

never engaged in business. Ink was home-made from bruised nutgalls

placed in a bottle with water and rusty nails. The writing was done

with a quill pen, and one of the foremost duties of the old-fashioned

pedagogue was to make and mend pens.

[Illustration: INTERIOR OF SCHOOLROOM, SLEEPY HOLLOW, N. Y.

(Courtesy of The School Journal, New York.)]

The master set the copies by writing a lesson which was to be imitated

by the pupils. There was no set style, but usually the teacher wrote

a bold, legible hand which in time was acquired with a fair degree of

success. Arithmetic was taught without text-books. Sums were given

out by the master and worked out on paper on the desk. Nothing but the

more rudimentary principles was taught, and the higher branches of

algebra and geometry were unknown in the public schools of this time.

Spelling was one of the favorite studies. It gave free scope for the

memory, and provided an opportunity for one of those public exhibitions

in which Americans have always delighted. “Spelling on the book,” says

Wickersham, “was taught by attempting to lead the pupil to give the

names of syllables and words by naming the letters of which they are

composed. The first lesson consisted of combinations of a word with

one or more consonants, arranged so that a kind of rhyme aided the

pronunciation, as _ab_, _eb_, _ib_, etc.” ... “Spelling off the book”

consisted in naming the letters of words pronounced for that purpose.

But the chief enjoyment of spelling came from the old-fashioned

contests, or “spelling-bees.” Sometimes it was to discover the best

speller of the district; again, one district might be pitted against

another. The spellers would be arranged in two rows. The first word

would be given to the first speller on one side, the next to his rival,

the third to his comrade, and so on. If one missed a word, he at once

took his seat; presently the contest would narrow down to a few, until

at last all would have missed save one, and he or she became the

champion speller.

The teachers of the time formed a group of varied attainments, and

oftentimes with little professional enthusiasm. Teaching has always

suffered from the fact that a great number of young men enter upon

its practice, who use it merely as a stepping-stone to some other and

more attractive pursuit. The number of those who have taught a few

terms, in order to save money for a college, law, or medical course

is legion; and this fact has laid the profession open to the reproach

that only the unambitious and the unalert follow it permanently. In

the early days of our country’s history, this stigma was intensified

by the number of “itinerant schoolmasters,” men who wandered from

place to place, teaching a term in one village and then moving to

the next,—“odd in dress, eccentric in manners, and oftentimes

intemperate.” Their work was simple in its nature; they were to

keep order and to teach the rudiments. Their methods in the latter

have already been referred to; for the former, they relied, almost

universally, upon the unsparing use of the rod.

The wisdom of the practice of flogging has only been questioned in

the latter part of this century. In the early days it was the one

recognized punishment, even for students whose maturity and attainments

would suggest an appeal to reason. With this mode of punishment was

associated a more or less ingenious series of devices, such as the

dunce-block, the fools’ cap, etc., all calculated to bring the offender

into ridicule, but utterly destructive of that good feeling between

teacher and pupil, upon which so much stress is laid to-day.

In the course of the century the old-fashioned school has either passed

away or else has been modified materially. To-day it is to be found in

only sparsely settled districts, while in the cities and in the more

cultured neighborhoods one finds carefully planned systems of education

that show the fruits of the study and direction of some of the keenest

minds that our country has produced. While it is impossible in the

space of a single chapter to refer to _all_ the changes, yet some of

the most important will be considered.

[Illustration:

A.

In _Adam’s_ Fall,

We sinned all.

B.

This _Book_ attend,

Thy Life to mend.

C.

The _Cat_ doth play,

And after slay.

D.

The _Dog_ doth bite

A Thief at Night.

E.

An _Eagle’s_ flight

Is out of sight.

F.

The Idle _Fool_,

Is whipt at School.

G.

As runs the _Glass_,

Man’s Life doth pass.

H.

My Book and _Heart_

Shall never part.

I.

_Jesus_ did dye,

For thee and I.

K.

_King Charles_ the Good,

No man of Blood.

L.

The _Lyon_ bold,

The _Lamb_ doth hold.

M.

The _Moon_ gives Light,

In time of Night.

N.

_Nightingales_ sing,

In time of Spring.

O.

The Royal _Oak_ our King did save,

From fatal stroke of Rebel Slave.

P.

_Peter_ denies

His Lord, and cries.

Q.

_Queen Esther_ came in Royal State,

To save the Jews from dismal fate.

R.

_Rachel_ doth mourn

For her first-born.

S.

_Samuel_ anoints

Whom God appoints.

T.

_Time_ cuts down all,

Both great and small.

U.

_Uriah’s_ beauteous Wife,

Made David seek his Life.

W.

_Whales_ in the Sea

God’s voice obey.

X.

_Xerxes_ the Great did die,

And so must you and I.

Y.

_Youth’s_ forward slips

Death soonest nips.

Z.

_Zaccheus_, he

Did climb the Tree,

His Lord to see.

CHILD’S GUIDE.

(_Courtesy of J. Harold Wickersham._)]

Foremost in real importance come the changes in the course of study—in

the list of subjects which the well-educated young man may be expected

to have mastered. One hundred years ago the average child would have

gone to the village school for the three “R’s” with, maybe, a little

training in geography and parsing. If a college career was open to

him, he would then go to an academy, usually a private institution,

for his introduction to the classics, Latin and Greek, and to algebra.

While instruction was given in other branches, yet these formed the

backbone of the course. The average age of admission to college was

considerably less than it is at present. In the ordinary college there

was a required course of study, in which Latin, Greek, and higher

mathematics played the most conspicuous part. The scientific studies

were counted less educative, and were usually rather poorly taught.

Literature, history, and philosophy were sometimes included in the

college curriculum, and in many ways the course of study was modeled to

suit the preferences and abilities of the different teachers. Nowadays

this is all changed. In the United States a graded school system has

been created, that is, a complete course of study has been worked

out, whereby certain studies are specified as suited for each year of

the school life. This is not the same for all parts of the country,

for the American school system, unlike that in Germany and France, is

not national in its organization. The authority over the schools is

vested in the individual States, and as a consequence each State shows

peculiarities in course of study, in laws, and in methods that make

the whole seem chaotic. There is, however, more similarity than would

appear at first sight, and while what is asserted in general may not be

true of each particular locality, yet certain lines of development may

be clearly seen.

The schools of the country may be divided into three

groups,—elementary, secondary, and higher. The elementary schools

are built in some places upon the kindergarten; they are ordinarily

supposed to occupy the first eight or nine years of the child’s

school-life, and are classified as primary and grammar schools. During

that period the pupil studies a great variety of branches,—language

studies, reading, writing, spelling, and grammar; arithmetic,

geography, United States history, civil government, nature study,

physiology and hygiene, physical culture, vocal music, drawing and

manual training in boys’ schools, or sewing and cooking in girls’

schools. Several of these subjects have been introduced only within the

last few years. The tendency toward enriching the curriculum is quite

manifest to-day; it is based upon the fact that by far the larger part

of the pupils never enter the higher schools, since their education is

ended with the elementary schools, therefore it is thought desirable to

bring some of the higher subjects into the grammar school.

With the completion of this elementary course the pupil passes into the

secondary school. Earlier in the century this was ordinarily a private

academy, either conducted for profit or by a religious society. In

exceptional cases these schools were public; but as the benefits of

higher education were recognized more completely, the popularity of

these schools increased enormously. Public high schools were opened,

and success led to their rapid multiplication, until to-day they form

one of the most useful elements in our system, sending forth year by

year leaders of thought and moulders of opinion. Their course of study

has been the subject of much controversy. The old academy prepared

for the college; the new high school prepares for life; consequently

there ensued a breach between the high school and the college which

only now is being closed. The ordinary high-school course is four

years, and includes languages, Latin, French, German, and sometimes

Greek and Spanish; mathematics, algebra, geometry, trigonometry, and

sometimes analytical geometry and even astronomy; history, literature,

physical geography, physics, chemistry, biology, geology, drawing, and

occasionally political economy, ethics, and civics. It will be noticed

that subjects formerly taught only in the colleges have been brought

into the high-school curriculum. This again is due to the “enriching

process,” and is illustrative of the fact that for so many of its

students the high school is the crown of their education. The stress

laid upon nature study and the physical sciences, and the introduction

of modern languages, are among the most significant changes of the

century, as indicative of the desire to bring the schools in touch with

the conditions of practical life.

From the high school or academy, the student passes to the college or

university. Within the last decade an attempt has been made to give a

definite pedagogical content to each of these terms. A _college_ is an

institution where the liberal arts are studied for purposes of general

culture. A _university_, on the other hand, prepares a man for one

definite line of work, either professional or technical. Both confer

degrees upon those who have successfully completed their courses, but

those of the university (Ph. D., A. M., M. D., etc.) are of a higher

type than those of the college (A. B., Ph. B.). There were twenty-four

colleges in the United States in 1800. The six oldest were: Harvard,

established in 1687; William and Mary, 1693; Yale, 1701; Princeton,

1746; University of Pennsylvania, 1749; Columbia, 1754.

Triumphs and Wonders of the 19th Century: The True Mirror of a Phenomenal Era A volume of original, entertaining and instructive historic and descriptive writings, showing the many and marvellous achievements which distinguish an hundred years of material, intellectual, social and moral progress · 第 55 / 76 段