Geissler followed Faraday with an improved system of tubes for

containing rarefied gases for experimentation. He partially exhausted

his tubes of air, introduced into them permanent and sealed platinum

electrodes, and produced those wonderful effects by the discharge

obtained by connecting the electrodes with the terminals of an electric

machine or induction coil, which from their novelty and beauty became

known as Geissler effects, just as his tubes became known as Geissler

tubes. In the attenuated atmosphere of the Geissler tube, the current

does not pass directly from one platinum point or electrode to the

other, but, instead, illuminates the entire atmospheric space. When

other gases are introduced in rarefied form, they are similarly

illuminated, but in colors corresponding to their composition. In his

further experiments, Geissler noted that the gases in the tube behaved

differently at the anode, or positive terminal, and the cathode, or

negative terminal. A beautiful bluish light appeared at the cathode,

while the anode assumed the same color as the illuminated space in the

tube. It was also noted that after the electric discharge within the

tube, there remained upon the inner surface of the glass a fluorescent

or phosphorescent glow, which was attributed to the effect of the

cathode.

[Illustration: GEISSLER’S TUBES.]

This brought the study of the _cathode_ rays into prominence, and

through the investigations of Professor William Crookes, in 1879 and

afterwards, a conclusion was reached that a “Fourth State of Matter”

really existed. He perfected tubes of very high vacuum, by means of

which he showed that molecules of gas projected from the cathode moved

freely and with great velocity among one another, and so bombarded the

inner walls of the tube as to render it fluorescent.

Subsequently, Hertz showed that the cathodic rays would penetrate thin

sheets of metal placed within the tube or bulb; and soon after, Paul

Lenard (1894) demonstrated that the cathodic ray could be investigated

as well outside of the tube or bulb as within it. He set an aluminum

plate in the glass wall of the bulb opposite the cathode. Though

ordinary light could not penetrate the aluminum plate, it was readily

pierced by the cathodic rays, to a distance of three inches beyond its

outside surface. With these rays, thus freed from their inclosure, he

produced the same fluorescent effects as had been noted within the

bulb, and even secured some photographic effects. These cathodic rays

produced no effect on the eye, which proved their dissimilarity to

light. Lenard showed further that the cathodic rays outside of the tube

could be deflected from their straight course by a magnet, that they

might pass through substances opaque to light, and that in so passing

they might cast a shadow of objects less opaque, which shadow could be

photographed. Now Professor Roentgen came upon the scene. He had been

conducting his experiments in Germany, along the same lines as Lenard,

and had reached practically the same results as to the penetrative,

fluorescent, and photographic effects of the cathodic rays. But he

had gone still further, and, in 1896, fairly set the scientific world

aflame with the announcement that all the effects produced by Lenard

in the limited space of a few inches could also be produced at long

distances from the tube, and with sufficient intensity to depict solid

substances within or behind other substances sufficiently solid to

be impermeable by light. Professor Roentgen claims that his X ray is

different from the cathodic ray of Lenard and others, because it cannot

be deflected by a magnet. This claim has given rise to much controversy

respecting the real nature of the X ray, a controversy not likely to

end soon, yet one full of inspiration to further investigation.

[Illustration: SCIAGRAPH OR SHADOW PICTURE.

By X Ray process.]

The essential features of the best approved apparatus designed to

produce the X ray and to secure a photograph of an invisible object,

are: (1.) A battery or light dynamo as a generator of the electric

current, accompanied, of course, by the necessary induction coil,

which should be so wound as to give a spark of at least two inches in

length in the tube where a picture of a simple object, as a coin in

a purse, is desired; a spark of four inches in length where pictures

of the bones of the hands, feet, or arms are desired; and a spark of

from eight to ten inches in length where inside views of the chest,

thighs, or abdomen are desired. (2.) The second essential is the glass

tube. The one in common use is the Crookes tube, usually pear-shaped,

and resting upon a stand. Into it is inserted two aluminum electrodes

or disks, the one through the smaller end of the tube being used as

the cathode, and the one from below and near the large end being used

as the anode. (3.) A fluoroscope with which to observe the conditions

inside the tube necessary to the production of the X ray, to decide

upon its proper intensity, and to establish the proper degree of

fluorescence. The favorite fluoroscope for this purpose is the one

invented by Edison. It is in the form of a stereopticon, in which

is a dark chamber after the manner of a camera. In front are two

openings, admitting of a view within of both eyes. At the opposite,

and greatly enlarged, end is a screen which is rendered fluorescent

by means of a new substance (tungstate of calcium) discovered by Mr.

Edison after some eighteen hundred experiments. Such is the power of

this fluoroscope that it may be used as an independent instrument in

cases of minor surgery to locate bullets or other objects buried in the

flesh, even before a photograph has been taken. (4.) The photographic

plate, which is prepared with a sensitized film and mounted in a

frame as in ordinary photography. Upon this film the object to be

photographed is laid, say, for instance, the human hand, care being

taken to have the film or plate at a proper distance from the Crookes

tube. Current is now turned into the tube, the X ray is developed, the

film is exposed to its effects, and the result is a negative showing

the interior structure of the hand,—the bones or any foreign object

therein. This negative is developed as in ordinary photography.

The discovery and application of the X ray has proved of immense value

in medicine and surgery. By its means the physician is enabled to

carry on far-reaching diagnoses, and to ascertain with certainty the

whole internal structure of the human body. Fractures, dislocations,

deformities, and diseases of the bones may be located and their

character and treatment decided upon. In dentistry, the teeth may

be photographed by means of the X ray, even before they come to the

surface, and broken fangs and hidden fillings may be located. Foreign

objects in the body, as bullets, needles, calculi in the bladder,

etc., may be localized, and the surgery necessary for their safe

removal greatly simplified. The beating of the heart, movement of the

ribs in respiration, and outline of the liver may be exhibited to the

eye. It has been boldly suggested that in the X ray will be found an

agent capable of destroying the various bacilli which infest the human

system, and become germs of such destructive diseases as cholera,

yellow fever, typhoid fever, diphtheria, and consumption. Even if this

be speculative as yet, there is still room for marvel at the actual

results of the discovery of the X ray, and its future study opens a

field full of the grandest possibilities.

IX. OTHER ELECTRICAL WONDERS.

The novel idea of keeping time by means of electricity originated

quite early in the century, and culminated in two kinds of electric

clocks, one moved directly by the electric current, the other moved

by weights or springs, but regulated by electricity. The former have

the advantage of running a very long time without attention, but as

it is impossible to keep up an unvarying electric current, they are

not so accurate as the latter in keeping time. Though the latter are

popularly called electric clocks, they are really only clocks regulated

by electricity, and in such regulation the electric current comes to

be a most important agent, as is proved at all centres of astronomical

and other observations, as at Greenwich and Washington. At such centres

the astronomical time-keeper is set up so as to run as infallibly as

possible. This central time-keeper, say at Washington, is electrically

connected with other clocks, at observatories, signal-service stations,

railway stations, clock-stores, city halls, etc., throughout the

country. Should any of these clocks lose or gain the minutest fraction

of time as compared with that of the central time-keeper, the electric

current corrects such loss or gain, and so keeps all the clocks at a

time uniform with one another and with the central one. Electrical

devices are also often attached to individual clocks, as those upon

city hall towers and in exposed places, for the purpose of meeting

and correcting inequalities of time occasioned by weather exposure,

expansion and contraction by heat and cold, etc.

The fatherhood of the very useful and elegant arts of electrotyping

and electroplating is in dispute. Daniell, while perfecting his

battery, noticed that a current of electricity would cause a deposit

of copper. In 1831, Jacobi, of St. Petersburg, called attention to the

fact that the copper deposited on his plates of copper by galvanic

action could be removed in a perfect sheet, which presented in relief,

and most accurately, every accidental indentation on the original

plates. Following this up, he employed for his battery an engraved

copper plate, caused the deposit to be formed upon it, removed the

deposit, and found that the engraving was impressed on it in relief,

and with sufficient firmness and sharpness to enable him to print from

it. Jacobi called his discovery galvanoplasty in the publication of

his observations in 1839. It was but a step from this discovery to

the application of the electrotyping process to the art of printing.

A mould of wax, plaster, or other suitable substance is made of an

engraving or of a page of type. This mould is covered with powdered

graphite (black lead) so as to make it a conductor of electricity.

It is then inserted in a bath containing a solution of sulphate of

copper. An electric current is passed through the bath, and the copper

is deposited on the mould in sufficient quantity to give it a hard

surface capable of offering greater resistance in printing than the

types themselves, and also of producing a clearer impression. In

electroplating, practically the same principle is employed. The bath is

made to contain a solution of water, cyanide of potassium, and whatever

metal—gold, silver, platinum, etc.—it is designed to precipitate on

the article to be electroplated. The current is then passed through the

bath, and the article—spoon, knife, fork, etc.—to be electroplated

receives its coating of gold, silver, German silver, platinum, or

whatever has been made the third agent in the bath.

The various modern submarine devices for the destruction of ships,

known as torpedoes, submarine mines, etc., depend upon electricity for

their efficiency. It is the lighting or firing agent, and is carried to

the torpedo or mine by means of stout wires or cables from some safe

shore-point of observation.

In railroading, electricity has become an indispensable agent for

the operation of signal systems, opening and closing of switches,

and limitation of safety sections. It moves the drill in the mine,

sets off the blast, and supplies the light. It enables the dentist

to manipulate his most delicate tools and do his cleanest and least

painful work. In medicine it is a healing, soothing agent, boundless

in variety of application and wondrous in results. It is a stimulus

to the growth of certain plants, and has given rise to a new science

called Electro-horticulture. It may be made a prolific source of heat

for warming cars, and even for the welding of iron and steel. The

electric fan cools our parlors and offices in summer, and the electric

bell simplifies household service. In fact, it would appear that, in

contrasting the electrical beginnings with the electrical endings of

the nineteenth century, the space of a thousand rather than a hundred

years had intervened, and that in measuring the agents which conduce to

human comfort and convenience, electricity is easily the most potential.

X. ELECTRICAL LANGUAGE.

Out of the various discoveries and applications of electricity almost

a new language has sprung. This is especially so of terms expressive

of the measurements of electric energy, and of the laws governing the

application of electric power. For a time, various nations measured and

applied by means of terms chosen by themselves. This led to a jargon

very confusing to writers and investigators. It became needful to have

a language more in common, as in pharmacy, so that all nations could

understand one another, could compute alike, and especially impart

their meaning to those whose duty it became to apply discovered laws

and actual calculations to practical electric operations. This was a

difficult undertaking, owing to the tenacity with which nations clung

to their own nomenclatures and terminologies. But the drift, though

slow, finally ended at the Electrical Congress in Paris in 1881, in the

adoption of a uniform system of measurements of electric force, and an

agreement upon terms for laws and their application, which all could

understand.

Three fundamental units of measurement were first agreed upon,—the

_Centimetre_ (.394 in.) as a unit of length; the _Gramme_ (15.43

troy grains) as a unit of mass; the _Second_ (1/60 of a minute) as a

unit of time. These three units became, when referred to together

by their initial letters, the basis of the C. G. S. system of units.

Now by these units of measurement something must be measured, as, for

instance, the electric force; and when so measured, an absolute unit of

force must be the result.

DYNE:—This is but a contraction of _dynam_, force. It was adopted

as the name of the “Absolute Unit of Force,” or the C. G. S. unit of

force, and is that force which, if it act for a second on one gramme of

matter, gives to it a velocity of one centimetre per second.

AMPERE:—Electrical force produces electrical current. Current must

be measured and an absolute unit of current strength agreed upon. The

“Absolute Unit of Current” was settled as one of such strength as that

when one centimetre length of its circuit is bent into an arc of one

centimetre radius, the current in it exerts a force of one dyne on a

unit magnet-pole placed at the centre. But the absolute unit of current

as thus obtained was decided to be ten times too great for practical

purposes. So a practical unit of current was fixed upon, which is just

one tenth part of the above absolute unit of current. This practical

unit of current was called the ampere, in honor of the celebrated

French electrician, Ampère. It may be ascertained in other ways,

as when a current is of sufficient strength to deposit in a copper

electrolytic cell 1.174 grammes (18.116 grains) of copper in an hour,

such current is said to be of one ampere strength; or a current of one

ampere strength is such a one as would be given by an electro-motive

force of one volt through a wire offering one ohm of resistance.

VOLT:—This was named from Volta, the celebrated Italian electrician,

and was agreed upon as the unit of electro-motive force. It is that

electro-motive force which would be generated by a conductor cutting

across 100,000,000 C. G. S. lines in a field of force per second; or it

is that electro-motive force which would carry one ampere of current

against one ohm of resistance.

OHM:—So called from Ohm, a German electrician. It is the unit of

resistance offered by a conductor to the passage of an electrical

current. As an absolute unit of resistance, it is equal to

1,000,000,000 C. G. S. units of resistance. As a practical unit, and

as agreed upon at the International Congress of Electricians (Chicago,

1893), it represents the resistance offered to an electric current at

the temperature of melting ice by a column of mercury 14.451 grammes

in mass, of a constant cross-sectional area, and 106.3 centimetres in

length. This is called the international ohm. The resistance offered by

400 feet of ordinary telegraph wire is about an ohm.

These three units—ampere, volt, and ohm—are the factors in

Ohm’s famous law that the current is directly proportional to the

electro-motive force exerted in a circuit, and inversely proportional

to the resistance of the circuit; that is,—

Current = Electro-motive force / Resistance

or,

Electro-motive force = Current × Resistance

or

Resistance = Electro-motive force / Current.

ERG:—From the Greek _ergon_, work, is the unit of work required to

move a force of one dyne one centimetre. One foot-pound equals 13,560

ergs.

CALORIE:—Latin _calor_, heat, is the unit of heat; being the amount

of heat required to raise the temperature of one kilogram of water one

degree centigrade.

COULOMB:—In honor of C. A. de Coulomb, of France. It is the practical

unit of quantity in measuring electricity, and is the amount conveyed

by one ampere in one second.

FARAD:—From FARADAY, the physicist. It is the unit of electric

capacity, and is the capacity of a condenser that retains one coulomb

of charge with one volt difference of potential.

GAUSS:—From Carl F. Gauss (1785–1855). The C. G. S. unit of

flux-density, or the unit by which the intensity of magnetic fields are

measured. It equals one weber per normal square centimetre.

GILBERT:—The unit for measuring magneto-motive force, being produced

by .7958 ampere-turn approximately.

HENRY:—From Joseph Henry, of the Smithsonian Institution, Washington,

D. C. The practical unit for measuring the induction in a circuit when

the electro-motive force induced is one international volt, while the

inducing current varies at the rate of one ampere per second.

JOULE:—The C. G. S. unit of practical energy, being equivalent to the

work done in keeping up for one second a current of one ampere against

a resistance of one ohm. Named from J. P. Joule, of England.

OERSTED:—From Oersted, the electrician. It is the practical unit for

measuring electrical reluctance.

WATT:—The practical electrical unit of the rate of working in a

circuit, when the electro-motive force is one volt, and the intensity

of current is one ampere. It is equal to 107 ergs per second, or .00134

horse-power per second. Named from James Watt, of Scotland.

WEBER:—The practical unit for measuring magnetic flux. Named from W.

Weber, of Germany.

THE CENTURY’S NAVAL PROGRESS

BY REAR ADMIRAL GEORGE WALLACE MELVILLE, U. S. N.

I. INFLUENCE OF SEA POWER.

The share of navies in the great movements which have moulded human

destiny and shaped the world’s progress, although long obscure and

undervalued, has met in our time full recognition. Within a decade the

influence of sea power upon history has become the frequent theme of

historians and essayists who, in clear and striking form, have shown

the cardinal importance, both in war and commerce, of the fleet—the

nation’s right arm on the sea. It is fitting, therefore, that in the

retrospect of a hundred years navies should have their place; that, in

looking backward with history’s unclouded vision, we should mark, not

only their growth and change, but, as well, their achievement in some

of the most memorable conflicts of our race.

The century had but begun when, at Copenhagen, Nelson, with one titanic

blow, shattered the naval strength of Denmark and the coalition of the

Northern powers. His signal there, ever for “closer battle,” told in

few words the life story of the Great Admiral, and foreshadowed his

end. Four years later, at Trafalgar, the desire of his eager heart

was satisfied, when he met in frank fight the fleets of France and

Spain. Amid the thundering cannonade of that last victory his life-tide

ebbed, bearing with it the power of France upon the seas and the broken

fortunes of Napoleon. In the war of 1812, our disasters upon the land

met compensation in victory afloat. The United States was then among

the feeblest of maritime powers; and yet Macdonough and Perry on the

lakes and our few frigates on the ocean opposed, with success, the

swarming squadrons of a nation whose naval glory, as Hallam says, can

be traced onward “in a continuous track of light” from the days of the

Commonwealth. The oppression of the Sultan was ended for a time when,

in 1827, the Turkish and Egyptian fleets were annihilated, in sudden

fury, by the allied squadrons in that brief engagement which Wellington

termed the “untoward event” of Navarino.

A generation later, the command of the sea enabled England and France

to despatch, in unarmed transports, 63,000 men and 128 guns to the

Crimea, and to land them, without opposition, for the red carnage of

the Alma, Balaklava, Inkerman, and Sebastopol. Following closely upon

the disease and death, the fatuity and the glory, of the Crimea, came

the great war of modern times, in which the gun afloat played such a

gallant part, as the blockade, with its constricting coils, slowly

starved and strangled the Confederacy to death, and Farragut, on inland

waters, split it in twain. Passing over the sea-fights of Lissa,—in

which imperial Venice was the stake,—of South America and the Yalu, we

note, lastly, the swift and fateful actions off Santiago and in Manila

Bay, which destroyed once again the sea power of Spain, won distant

territory for the United States, and opened up for us a noble pathway

of commercial expansion to the uttermost island of the broad Pacific

and the vast Asian littoral beyond. Who will say, in the retrospect of

the century, that the fleets of the world have not had their full share

in the making of its history?

II. THE CENTURY’S GROWTH IN NAVAL STRENGTH.

The United States fleet, in the year 1800, comprised 35 vessels, 10 of

which were frigates mounting 32 guns or more. In 1812, America entered

the lists against a navy of a thousand sail, with a fleet of but 20

ships, the largest of which was a 44-gun frigate. The operations of

the Civil War were begun with but 82 vessels, 48 of which were sailing

craft. Before the close of that gigantic struggle there were added,

by construction or purchase, 674 steamers. In 1898, during the war

with Spain, there were borne on the Naval Register, as building or

in service, 13 battleships and 176 other vessels, including torpedo

craft, with 123 converted merchantmen. The total naval force during

hostilities was 22,832 men and 2382 officers, excluding the Marine

Corps.

[Illustration: AN AUGUST MORNING WITH FARRAGUT.

(Battle of Mobile Bay.)]

At London, in 1653, there was printed “A List of the Commonwealth

of England’s Navy at Sea, in their expedition in May, 1653, under

the command of the Right Honorable Colonel Richard Deane and Colonel

George Monk, Esquires, Generals, and Admirals.” This quaint record of

that early time gives the force afloat as 105 ships, 3840 guns, and

16,269 men. In Britain’s strife for that ocean empire, which is world

empire, that fleet had grown, by the year 1800, to 757 vessels, built

or building, with an aggregate tonnage of 629,211, and carrying 26,552

guns, 3653 officers, and 110,000 men. The stately three-decker, with

its snowy canvas and maze of rigging, has vanished with the past; but,

despite time and change, that mighty fleet still dominates the seas.

Its strength, on February 1, 1898, was 615 vessels—61 of which were

battleships,—carrying a total force of 110,050 officers and men.

[Illustration: BRITISH BATTLESHIP MAJESTIC.]

[Illustration: FRENCH BATTLESHIP MAGENTA.]

Colbert, when the Grand Monarch was at the zenith of his power, found

France with a few old and rotten vessels, and left her with a noble

fleet of 40 ships of the line and 60 frigates, which, under D’Estrée,

Jean Bart, Tourville, and Duquesne, carried her flag to every sea.

A state paper of the time gives the force at the beginning of this

century as 61 ships of the line, 42 corvettes, and a numerous, although

unimportant, flotilla of small craft. With Aboukir and Trafalgar, the

maritime power of France wasted away; and, by the year 1839, there

were afloat but three effective sail of the line. In 1840, however,

the revival began, and during the modern era the French fleet has,

at times, been a formidable rival of that of England. It comprised,

in 1898, 446 vessels, including torpedo craft, 26 of the total being

battleships. The force afloat numbered 70,925, of all ranks and ratings.

[Illustration: GERMAN BATTLESHIP WOERTH.]

Triumphs and Wonders of the 19th Century: The True Mirror of a Phenomenal Era A volume of original, entertaining and instructive historic and descriptive writings, showing the many and marvellous achievements which distinguish an hundred years of material, intellectual, social and moral progress · 第 6 / 76 段