THE STEREOSCOPE AND THE PHOTOGRAPH.

When once the availability of one great primitive agent is worked out,

it is easy to foresee how extensively it will assist in unravelling

other secrets in natural science. The simple principle of the

Stereoscope, for instance, might have been discovered a century ago,

for the reasoning which led to it was independent of all the properties

of light; but it could never have been illustrated, far less multiplied

as it now is, without Photography. A few diagrams, of sufficient

identity and difference to prove the truth of the principle, might

have been constructed by hand, for the gratification of a few sages;

but no artist, it is to be hoped, could have been found possessing

the requisite ability and stupidity to execute the two portraits, or

two groups, or two interiors, or two landscapes, identical in every

minutia of the most elaborate detail, and yet differing in point of

view by the inch between the two human eyes, by which the principle is

brought to the level of any capacity. Here, therefore, the accuracy and

insensibility of a machine could alone avail; and if in the order of

things the cheap popular toy which the stereoscope now represents was

necessary for the use of man, the photograph was first necessary for

the service of the stereoscope.--_Quarterly Review_, No. 202.

Curiosities of Science, Past and Present A Book for Old and Young · 第 124 / 469 题