FOOD OF THE ARCTIC REGIONS--FRANKLIN'S EXPEDITION.

A certain class of reasoners have argued themselves into the belief

that, setting all other considerations aside, Sir John Franklin and

his companions must have necessarily perished ere now from _lack of

food_. When the four years, or so, of provisions he took out with him

for the large crews of the vessels were all consumed, how, say they,

would it be possible for so great a number of men to obtain food

sufficient to support life in those awfully desolate regions? Let us

examine the question a little.

Men in very cold climates certainly require a much larger amount of

gross animal food than in southern latitudes--varying, of course, with

their particular physical constitutions. Now, let us grant--though we

do not positively admit it--that, however the provisions taken from

England may have been economised, they have, nevertheless, all been

consumed a couple of years ago, with the exception of a small quantity

of preserved meats, vegetables, lemon-juice, &c. kept in reserve for

the sick, or as a resource in the last extremity. As to spirits, we

have the testimony of all arctic explorers, that their regular

supply and use, so far from being beneficial, is directly the

reverse--weakening the constitution, and predisposing it to scurvy and

other diseases; and that, consequently, spirits should not be given at

all, except on extraordinary occasions, or as a medicine. Sir John

Ross, in his search of the North-West Passage in 1829, and following

years, early stopped the issue of spirits to his men, and with a most

beneficial result. Therefore, the entire consumption of the stock of

spirits on board Sir John Franklin's ships must not be regarded as a

deficiency of any serious moment.

We shall then presume, that for upwards of two years the adventurers

have been wholly dependent on wild animals, birds, and fish for their

support. Here it becomes an essential element of consideration to form

some approximate idea of the particular locality in which the missing

expedition is probably frozen. Captain Penny tracked it up Wellington

Strait and thence into Victoria Channel--a newly-discovered lake or

sea of unknown extent, which reaches, for anything that can be

demonstrated to the contrary, to the pole. It has long been noticed,

that the mere latitude in the arctic regions is far from being a

certain indication of the degree of cold which might naturally be

expected from a nearer approach to the pole. For instance, cold is

more intense in some parts of latitude 60 degrees than in 70 or 77

degrees; but this varies very much in different districts of the

coast, and in different seasons; and we may remark in passing, that

whenever there is a particularly mild winter in Britain, it is the

reverse in the arctic regions; and so _vice versâ_. The astonishment

of Captain Penny on discovering the new polar sea in question was

heightened by the fact, that it possessed a much warmer climate than

more southern latitudes, and that it swarmed with fish, while its

shores were enlivened with animals and flocks of birds. Moreover,

_trees_ were actually floating about: how they got there, and whence

they came, is a mysterious and deeply-interesting problem. Somewhere

in this sea Sir John Franklin's ships are undoubtedly at this moment.

We say the ships are; for we do not for one moment believe that they

have been sunk or annihilated. It is not very likely that any icebergs

of great magnitude would be tossing about this inland sea in the

summer season--in winter its waters would be frozen--and in navigating

it, the ships would, under their experienced and judicious commander,

pursue their unknown way with extreme caution and prudence. It is more

probable that they were at length fast frozen up in some inlet, or

that small floating fields of ice have conglomerated around them, and

bound them in icy fetters to the mainland. Or it may be that Franklin

sailed slowly along this mystic polar sea, until he reached its

extremity and could get no farther; and that extremity would actually

seem to be towards the Siberian coasts. One thing is quite

certain--namely, that so far as Captain Penny's people were able to

penetrate the channel--several hundred miles--there was no indication

whatever that up to that point Franklin had met with any serious

calamity, or that he had suffered from a fatal deficiency of the

necessaries of life.

Wherever his exact position may be, there is every reason to suppose

that the country around him produces a supply of food at least equal

to any other part of the arctic regions; and probably much more than

equal, owing to the greater mildness of the climate. But we will only

base our opinion on the fair average supply of food obtainable in the

arctic regions generally; and now let us see what result we shall

fairly arrive at.

The first consideration that strikes us, is the fact that all over

these icy regions isolated tribes of natives are to be met with; and

they do not exist in a starved and almost famished condition, like the

miserable dwellers in Terra del Fuego, but in absolute abundance--such

as it is. When Sir John Ross's ship was frozen up during the

remarkably severe winter of 1829-30, in latitude 69 degrees 58

minutes, and longitude 90 degrees, he made the following remarks

concerning a tribe of Esquimaux in his vicinity, which we quote as

being peculiarly applicable to our view of the subject:--'It was for

philosophers to interest themselves in speculating on a horde so

small and so secluded, occupying so apparently hopeless a country--so

barren, so wild, and so repulsive, and yet enjoying the most perfect

vigour, the most _well-fed health_, and all else that here constitutes

not merely wealth, but the opulence of luxury, since they were as

amply furnished with provisions as with every other thing that could

be here necessary to their wants.'

'Yes,' exclaims our friend the reasoner, 'but the constitution of an

Esquimaux is peculiarly adapted to the climate and food: what he

enjoys would poison a European; and he also possesses skill to capture

wild animals and fish, which the civilised man cannot exercise.' Is

this true? We answer to the first objection: only partially true; and

the second, we utterly deny. The constitution of vigorous men--and all

Franklin's crew were fine, picked young fellows--has a marvellous

adaptability. It is incredible how soon a man becomes reconciled to,

and healthful under, a totally different diet from that to which he

has been all his life accustomed, so long as that change is suitable

to his new home. We ourselves have personally experienced this to some

extent, and were quite amazed at the rapid and easy way in which

nature enabled us to enjoy and thrive on food at which our stomach

would have revolted in England or any southern land. In every country

in the world, 'from Indus to the pole,' the food eaten by the natives

is that which is incomparably best suited to the climate. In the

frozen regions, and every cold country, the best of all nourishment is

that which contains a large proportion of fat and oil. In Britain, we

read with disgust of the Greenlander eagerly swallowing whale-oil and

blubber; but in his country, it is precisely what is best adapted to

sustain vital energy. Europeans in the position of Franklin's crew

would become acclimatised, and gradually accustomed to the food of the

natives, even before their own provisions were exhausted; and after

that, we may be very sure their appetites would lose all delicacy, and

they would necessarily and easily conform to the usages, as regards

food, of the natives around them. We may strengthen our opinion by the

direct and decisive testimony of Sir John Boss himself, who says: 'I

have little doubt, indeed, that many of the unhappy men who have

perished from wintering in these climates, and whose histories are

well known, might have been saved had they conformed, as is so

generally prudent, to the usages and the experience of the natives.'

Undoubtedly they might!

Secondly, as to the Europeans being unable to capture the beasts,

birds, and fishes so dexterously as the natives, we have reason to

know that the reverse is the case. It is true that the latter know the

habits and haunts of wild creatures by long experience, and also know

the best way to capture some of them; but a very little communication

with natives enables the European to learn the secret; and he soon far

excels his simple instructors in the art, being aided by vastly

superior reasoning faculties, and also by incomparably better

appliances for the chase. Firearms for shooting beasts and birds, and

seines for catching fish, render the Esquimaux spears, and arrows, and

traps mere children's toys in comparison. Moreover, a ship is never

frozen up many weeks, before some wandering tribe is sure to visit it;

and all navigators have found the natives a mild, friendly, grateful

people, with fewer vices than almost any other savages in the World.

They will thankfully barter as many salmon as will feed a ship's crew

one day for a file or two, or needles, or a tin-canister, or piece of

old iron-hoop, or any trifling article of hardware; and so long as the

vessel remains, they and other tribes of their kindred will frequently

visit it, and bring animals and fish to barter for what is literally

almost valueless to European adventurers.

An important consideration, is the _variety_ of food obtainable in the

arctic regions. We need not particularly classify the creatures found

in the two seasons of summer and winter, but may enumerate the

principal together. Of animals fit for food are musk-oxen, bears,

reindeer, hares, foxes, &c. Of fish, there is considerable variety,

salmon and trout being the chief and never-failing supply. Of birds,

there are ducks, geese, cranes, ptarmigan, grouse, plovers,

partridges, sand-larks, shear-waters, gannets, gulls, mollemokes,

dovekies, and a score of other species. We personally know that the

flesh of bears, reindeer, and some of the other animals, is most

excellent: we have partaken of them with hearty relish. As to foxes,

Ross informs us that, although his men did not like them at first,

they eventually preferred fox-flesh to any other meat! And as to such

birds as gannets and shear-waters, which are generally condemned as

unpalatable, on account of their fishy taste, we would observe that

the rancid flavour exists only in the fat. Separate it, and, as we

ourselves can testify, the flesh of these birds is little inferior to

that of the domestic pigeon, when either boiled or roasted. The

majority of the creatures named may be captured in considerable

numbers, in their several seasons, with only ordinary skill. But

necessity sharpens the faculties of men to an inconceivable degree;

and when the life of a crew depends on their success in the chase,

they will speedily become expert hunters. It is true that the wild

animals habitually existing in a small tract of country may soon be

thinned, if not altogether exterminated; but bears, foxes, &c.

continue to visit it with little average diminution in numbers. The

fish never fail. The quantity of salmon is said to be immense, and

they can be preserved in stock a very long period by being simply

buried in snow-pits. The birds also regularly make their periodical

appearance. Besides, parties of hunters would be despatched to scour

the country at considerable distances, and their skill and success

would improve with each coming season. In regard to fuel, the

Esquimaux plan of burning the oil and blubber of seals, the fat of

bears, &c. would be quite effective. In the brief but fervid summer

season, every inch of ground is covered with intensely green verdure,

and even with flowers; and there is a great variety of wild plants,

including abundance of Angelica, sorrel, and scurvy-grass, also

lichens and mosses, all of antiscorbutic qualities. We have ourselves

seen the Laplanders eat great quantities of the sorrel-grass; and the

Nordlanders told us that they boiled it in lieu of greens at table.

These vegetables might be gathered each summer, and preserved for

winter use.

We repeat, that since the poor, ignorant natives live in rude

abundance, and lack nothing for mere animal enjoyment of life, it is

impossible to doubt that Europeans, who in intelligence and resources

are a superior race of beings, can fail to participate equally in all

things which the Creator has provided for the support of man in this

extremity of the habitable globe; also let it be borne in mind, that

half-a-dozen Esquimaux devour almost as much food every day as will

suffice for a ship's crew. Sir John Ross declares, that if they only

ate moderately, any given district would support 'double their number,

and with scarcely the hazard of want.' He says that an Esquimaux eats

twenty pounds of flesh and oil a day, and, in fact, never ceases from

devouring until compelled to desist from sheer repletion. Speaking

of one meal taken in their company, we have this edifying

observation:--'While we found that one salmon and half of another were

more than enough for all us English, these voracious animals (the

Esquimaux) had devoured two each. At this rate of feeding, it is not

wonderful that their whole time is occupied in procuring food: each

man had eaten fourteen pounds of this raw salmon, and it was probably

but a luncheon after all, of a superfluous meal for the sake of our

society!.... The glutton bear--scandalised as it may be by its

name--might even be deemed a creature of moderate appetite in

comparison: with their human reason in addition, these people, could

they always command the means, would doubtless outrival a glutton and

a boa-constrictor together.'

Finally, we expressly deny that the Esquimaux can or do bear extreme

cold and privations better than Englishmen who have been a season or

two in their country. Arctic explorers testify that the natives always

appeared to suffer from cold quite as much as Europeans; and what

little we have ourselves seen of northern countries, induces us to

give ample credence to this.

The conclusion, then, at which we arrive is this: that under such

experienced and energetic leaders as Sir John Franklin and his chief

officers, the gallant crews of the missing expedition have _not_

perished for lack of food, and will be enabled, if God so wills, to

support life for years to come. Great, indeed, their sufferings must

be; for civilised men do not merely eat to sleep, and sleep to eat,

like the Esquimaux; but they will be upheld under every suffering by a

firm conviction that their countrymen are making almost superhuman

exertions to rescue them from their fearful isolation. What the final

issue will be, is known only to Him who tempers the wind to the shorn

lamb, and can, if He deems meet, provide a way of deliverance when

hope itself has died in every breast. Our individual opinion is, that

it is not improbable the lost crews will, sooner or later, achieve

their own deliverance by arriving at some coast whence they may be

taken off, even as Ross was, after sojourning during four years of

unparalleled severity. But it is the bounden duty of our country never

to relax its efforts to save Franklin, until there is an absolute

certainty that all further human exertions are in vain.

[We give the above as a paper on the food of the arctic regions, and

can only hope that our correspondent's cheering views as to the fate

of the missing expedition may prove to be correct.--ED.]

Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 423 Volume 17, New Series, February 7, 1852 · 第 10 / 15 题