THE THEORY OF THE BED.

It was about seven o'clock in the evening. They were seated upon the

academic armchairs, which made a semi-circle round a huge hearth, on

which a coal fire was burning fitfully--symbol of the burning subject

of their important deliberations. It was easy to guess, on seeing the

grave but earnest faces of all the members of this assembly, that they

were called upon to pronounce sentence upon the life, the fortunes and

the happiness of people like themselves. They had no commission

excepting that of their conscience, and they gathered there as the

assessors of an ancient and mysterious tribunal; but they represented

interests much more important than those of kings or of peoples; they

spoke in the name of the passions and on behalf of the happiness of

the numberless generations which should succeed them.

The grandson of the celebrated Boulle was seated before a round table

on which were placed the criminal exhibits which had been collected

with remarkable intelligence. I, the insignificant secretary of the

meeting, occupied a place at this desk, where it was my office to take

down a report of the meeting.

"Gentlemen," said an old man, "the first question upon which we have

to deliberate is found clearly stated in the following passage of a

letter. The letter was written to the Princess of Wales, Caroline of

Anspach, by the widow of the Duke of Orleans, brother of Louis XIV,

mother of the Regent: 'The Queen of Spain has a method of making her

husband say exactly what she wishes. The king is a religious man; he

believes that he will be damned if he touched any woman but his wife,

and still this excellent prince is of a very amorous temperament. Thus

the queen obtains her every wish. She has placed castors on her

husband's bed. If he refuses her anything, she pushes the bed away. If

he grants her request, the beds stand side by side, and she admits him

into hers. And so the king is highly delighted, since he likes -----'

I will not go any further, gentlemen, for the virtuous frankness of

the German princess might in this assembly be charged with

immorality."

Should wise husbands adopt these beds on castors? This is the problem

which we have to solve.

The unanimity of the vote left no doubt about the opinion of the

assembly. I was ordered to inscribe in the records, that if two

married people slept on two separate beds in the same room the beds

ought not to be set on castors.

"With this proviso," put in one of the members, "that the present

decision should have no bearing on any subsequent ruling upon the best

arrangement of the beds of married people."

The president passed to me a choicely bound volume, in which was

contained the original edition, published in 1788, of the letters of

Charlotte Elizabeth de Baviere, widow of the Duke of Orleans, the only

brother of Louis XIV, and, while I was transcribing the passage

already quoted, he said:

"But, gentlemen, you must all have received at your houses the

notification in which the second question is stated."

"I rise to make an observation," exclaimed the youngest of the jealous

husbands there assembled.

The president took his seat with a gesture of assent.

"Gentlemen," said the young husband, "are we quite prepared to

deliberate upon so grave a question as that which is presented by the

universally bad arrangement of the beds? Is there not here a much

wider question than that of mere cabinet-making to decide? For my own

part I see in it a question which concerns that of universal human

intellect. The mysteries of conception, gentlemen, are still enveloped

in a darkness which modern science has but partially dissipated. We do

not know how far external circumstances influence the microscopic

beings whose discovery is due to the unwearied patience of Hill,

Baker, Joblot, Eichorn, Gleichen, Spallanzani, and especially of

Muller, and last of all of M. Bory de Saint Vincent. The imperfections

of the bed opens up a musical question of the highest importance, and

for my part I declare I shall write to Italy to obtain clear

information as to the manner in which beds are generally arranged. We

do not know whether there are in the Italian bed numerous curtain

rods, screws and castors, or whether the construction of beds is in

this country more faulty than everywhere else, or whether the dryness

of timber in Italy, due to the influence of the sun, does not _ab ovo_

produce the harmony, the sense of which is to so large an extent

innate in Italians. For these reasons I move that we adjourn."

"What!" cried a gentleman from the West, impatiently rising to his

feet, "are we here to dilate upon the advancement of music? What we

have to consider first of all is manners, and the moral question is

paramount in this discussion."

"Nevertheless," remarked one of the most influential members of the

council, "the suggestion of the former speaker is not in my opinion to

be passed by. In the last century, gentlemen, Sterne, one of the

writers most philosophically delightful and most delightfully

philosophic, complained of the carelessness with which human beings

were procreated; 'Shame!' he cried 'that he who copies the divine

physiognomy of man receives crowns and applause, but he who achieves

the masterpiece, the prototype of mimic art, feels that like virtue he

must be his own reward.'

"Ought we not to feel more interest in the improvement of the human

race than in that of horses? Gentlemen, I passed through a little town

of Orleanais where the whole population consisted of hunchbacks, of

glum and gloomy people, veritable children of sorrow, and the remark

of the former speaker caused me to recollect that all the beds were in

a very bad condition and the bedchambers presented nothing to the eyes

of the married couple but what was hideous and revolting. Ah!

gentlemen, how is it possible that our minds should be in an ideal

state, when instead of the music of angels flying here and there in

the bosom of that heaven to which we have attained, our ears are

assailed by the most detestable, the most angry, the most piercing of

human cries and lamentations? We are perhaps indebted for the fine

geniuses who have honored humanity to beds which are solidly

constructed; and the turbulent population which caused the French

Revolution were conceived perhaps upon a multitude of tottering

couches, with twisted and unstable legs; while the Orientals, who are

such a beautiful race, have a unique method of making their beds. I

vote for the adjournment."

And the gentleman sat down.

A man belonging to the sect of Methodists arose. "Why should we change

the subject of debate? We are not dealing here with the improvement of

the race nor with the perfecting of the work. We must not lose sight

of the interests of the jealous husband and the principles on which

moral soundness is based. Don't you know that the noise of which you

complain seems more terrible to the wife uncertain of her crime, than

the trumpet of the Last Judgment? Can you forget that a suit for

infidelity could never be won by a husband excepting through this

conjugal noise? I will undertake, gentlemen, to refer to the divorces

of Lord Abergavenny, of Viscount Bolingbroke, of the late Queen

Caroline, of Eliza Draper, of Madame Harris, in fact, of all those who

are mentioned in the twenty volumes published by--." (The secretary

did not distinctly hear the name of the English publisher.)

The motion to adjourn was carried. The youngest member proposed to

make up a purse for the author producing the best dissertation

addressed to the society upon a subject which Sterne considered of

such importance; but at the end of the seance eighteen shillings was

the total sum found in the hat of the president.

The above debate of the society, which had recently been formed in

London for the improvement of manners and of marriage and which Lord

Byron scoffed at, was transmitted to us by the kindness of W. Hawkins,

Esq., cousin-german of the famous Captain Clutterbuck. The extract may

serve to solve any difficulties which may occur in the theory of bed

construction.

But the author of the book considers that the English society has

given too much importance to this preliminary question. There exists

in fact quite as many reasons for being a _Rossinist_ as for being a

_Solidist_ in the matter of beds, and the author acknowledges that it

is either beneath or above him to solve this difficulty. He thinks

with Laurence Sterne that it is a disgrace to European civilization

that there exist so few physiological observations on callipedy, and

he refuses to state the results of his Meditations on this subject,

because it would be difficult to formulate them in terms of prudery,

and they would be but little understood, and misinterpreted. Such

reserve produces an hiatus in this part of the book; but the author

has the pleasant satisfaction of leaving a fourth work to be

accomplished by the next century, to which he bequeaths the legacy of

all that he has not accomplished, a negative munificence which may

well be followed by all those who may be troubled by an overplus of

ideas.

The theory of the bed presents questions much more important than

those put forth by our neighbors with regard to castors and the

murmurs of criminal conversation.

We know only three ways in which a bed (in the general sense of this

term) may be arranged among civilized nations, and particularly among

the privileged classes to whom this book is addressed. These three

ways are as follows:

1. TWIN BEDS.

2. SEPARATE ROOMS.

3. ONE BED FOR BOTH.

Before applying ourselves to the examination of these three methods of

living together, which must necessarily have different influences upon

the happiness of husbands and wives, we must take a rapid survey of

the practical object served by the bed and the part it plays in the

political economy of human existence.

The most incontrovertible principle which can be laid down in this

matter is, _that the bed was made to sleep upon_.

It would be easy to prove that the practice of sleeping together was

established between married people but recently, in comparison with

the antiquity of marriage.

By what reasonings has man arrived at that point in which he brought

in vogue a practice so fatal to happiness, to health, even to

_amour-propre_? Here we have a subject which it would be curious to

investigate.

If you knew one of your rivals who had discovered a method of placing

you in a position of extreme absurdity before the eyes of those who

were dearest to you--for instance, while you had your mouth crooked

like that of a theatrical mask, or while your eloquent lips, like the

copper faucet of a scanty fountain, dripped pure water--you would

probably stab him. This rival is sleep. Is there a man in the world

who knows how he appears to others, and what he does when he is

asleep?

In sleep we are living corpses, we are the prey of an unknown power

which seizes us in spite of ourselves, and shows itself in the oddest

shapes; some have a sleep which is intellectual, while the sleep of

others is mere stupor.

There are some people who slumber with their mouths open in the

silliest fashion.

There are others who snore loud enough to make the timbers shake.

Most people look like the impish devils that Michael Angelo

sculptured, putting out their tongues in silent mockery of the

passers-by.

The only person I know of in the world who sleeps with a noble air is

Agamemnon, whom Guerin has represented lying on his bed at the moment

when Clytemnestra, urged by Egisthus, advances to slay him. Moreover,

I have always had an ambition to hold myself on my pillow as the king

of kings Agamemnon holds himself, from the day that I was seized with

dread of being seen during sleep by any other eyes than those of

Providence. In the same way, too, from the day I heard my old nurse

snorting in her sleep "like a whale," to use a slang expression, I

have added a petition to the special litany which I address to

Saint-Honore, my patron saint, to the effect that he would save me

from indulging in this sort of eloquence.

When a man wakes up in the morning, his drowsy face grotesquely

surmounted by the folds of a silk handkerchief which falls over his

left temple like a police cap, he is certainly a laughable object, and

it is difficult to recognize in him the glorious spouse, celebrated in

the strophes of Rousseau; but, nevertheless, there is a certain gleam

of life to illume the stupidity of a countenance half dead--and if you

artists wish to make fine sketches, you should travel on the

stage-coach and, when the postilion wakes up the postmaster, just

examine the physiognomies of the departmental clerks! But, were you a

hundred times as pleasant to look upon as are these bureaucratic

physiognomies, at least, while you have your mouth shut, your eyes are

open, and you have some expression in your countenance. Do you know

how you looked an hour before you awoke, or during the first hour of

your sleep, when you were neither a man nor an animal, but merely a

thing, subject to the dominion of those dreams which issue from the

gate of horn? But this is a secret between your wife and God.

Is it for the purpose of insinuating the imbecility of slumber that

the Romans decorated the heads of their beds with the head of an ass?

We leave to the gentlemen who form the academy of inscriptions the

elucidation of this point.

Assuredly, the first man who took it into his head, at the inspiration

of the devil, not to leave his wife, even while she was asleep, should

know how to sleep in the very best style; but do not forget to reckon

among the sciences necessary to a man on setting up an establishment,

the art of sleeping with elegance. Moreover, we will place here as a

corollary to Axiom XXV of our Marriage Catechism the two following

aphorisms:

A husband should sleep as lightly as a watch-dog, so as never to

be caught with his eyes shut.

A man should accustom himself from childhood to go to bed

bareheaded.

Certain poets discern in modesty, in the alleged mysteries of love,

some reason why the married couple should share the same bed; but the

fact must be recognized that if primitive men sought the shade of

caverns, the mossy couch of deep ravines, the flinty roof of grottoes

to protect his pleasure, it was because the delight of love left him

without defence against his enemies. No, it is not more natural to lay

two heads upon the same pillow, than it is reasonable to tie a strip

of muslin round the neck. Civilization is come. It has shut up a

million of men within an area of four square leagues; it has stalled

them in streets, houses, apartments, rooms, and chambers eight feet

square; after a time it will make them shut up one upon another like

the tubes of a telescope.

From this cause and from many others, such as thrift, fear, and

ill-concealed jealousy, has sprung the custom of the sleeping together

of the married couple; and this custom has given rise to punctuality

and simultaneity in rising and retiring.

And here you find the most capricious thing in the world, the feeling

most pre-eminently fickle, the thing which is worthless without its

own spontaneous inspiration, which takes all its charm from the

suddenness of its desires, which owes its attractions to the

genuineness of its outbursts--this thing we call love, subjugated to a

monastic rule, to that law of geometry which belongs to the Board of

Longitude!

If I were a father I should hate the child, who, punctual as the

clock, had every morning and evening an explosion of tenderness and

wished me good-day and good-evening, because he was ordered to do so.

It is in this way that all that is generous and spontaneous in human

sentiment becomes strangled at its birth. You may judge from this what

love means when it is bound to a fixed hour!

Only the Author of everything can make the sun rise and set, morn and

eve, with a pomp invariably brilliant and always new, and no one here

below, if we may be permitted to use the hyperbole of Jean-Baptiste

Rousseau, can play the role of the sun.

From these preliminary observations, we conclude that it is not

natural for two to lie under the canopy in the same bed;

That a man is almost always ridiculous when he is asleep;

And that this constant living together threatens the husband with

inevitable dangers.

We are going to try, therefore, to find out a method which will bring

our customs in harmony with the laws of nature, and to combine custom

and nature in a way that will enable a husband to find in the mahogany

of his bed a useful ally, and an aid in defending himself.

The Physiology of Marriage, Part 2 · 第 22 / 40 题